|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:24:49 GMT -5
Post by julie on Aug 4, 2009 13:24:49 GMT -5
I've been thinking about the differences in what Stan and HM claimed, and while this is all assuming Archangel has told the truth, it's what I think is going on there. Stan was targeted during the Day, which is probably why it was announced in the opening Day color, basically so we wouldn't attack him for not posting/voting/etc. HM was targeted at Night, where there is no strategical talking going on, thus no needed to be mentioned in public, but she was blocked. Maybe if she was a Mason or Scum, she wouldn't be able to talk on their respective boards, but I'd assume that'd be posted on that board, and not here. So, it's my theory that Archangel's role works in such a way that if targeted during the Day, said player is removed from the game, but protected from a lynch, and if targeted at Night, it works as a block, and just prevents them from using whatever role they may have. Yeah, that makes sense to me. Of course, it making sense to me is a Bad Sign. How about the color? Any thoughts on that?
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:30:21 GMT -5
Post by hockeyguy8435 on Aug 4, 2009 13:30:21 GMT -5
The differences in color could be based on HM being targeted at Night vs Day for Stan. Or one could be lying about what the color said. I really don't know why the colors would be different unless either Hawk decided to be (more?) creative with HMs color, or the fact that they were targeted at different times (Day vs Night). Or maybe (assuming I'm right on how I think Arch's role works) HM's color was generated from being blocked, and Stan's from just being removed for a Day.
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:33:23 GMT -5
Post by hockeyguy8435 on Aug 4, 2009 13:33:23 GMT -5
None of this explains why Arch would be able to target Stan at Night, be told no, then able to pick him for the Day. That one alone is why I'm still very skeptical of her claim, as that just doesn't add up. Unless she's not telling us something, but what? And is it to important to share now?
I'm still very interested in if Ed will actually submit his action toNight, and if he Watches Archangel at all.
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:35:30 GMT -5
Post by julie on Aug 4, 2009 13:35:30 GMT -5
My other thoughts on color were that it was different between power roles and non- (which goes back to the block or not), or that it will get progressively more colorful as the game goes possibly including clues of some sort.
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:38:17 GMT -5
Post by julie on Aug 4, 2009 13:38:17 GMT -5
None of this explains why Arch would be able to target Stan at Night, be told no, then able to pick him for the Day. That one alone is why I'm still very skeptical of her claim, as that just doesn't add up. Unless she's not telling us something, but what? And is it to important to share now? That part really does seem unlikely to me, too. In Princess Bride on Giraffe the Dread Pirate Roberts power allowed you to have multiple stabs at it in case the person you tapped was ineligible, but that was quite a bit different than a jailing power.
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 13:39:53 GMT -5
Post by hockeyguy8435 on Aug 4, 2009 13:39:53 GMT -5
My other thoughts on color were that it was different between power roles and non- (which goes back to the block or not), or that it will get progressively more colorful as the game goes possibly including clues of some sort. It just occurred to me that the color may be different depending on the target's alignment too. But that could be very telling, and probably too revealing. Just a thought though.
|
|
|
Day 3
Aug 4, 2009 14:53:01 GMT -5
Post by Captain Pinkies on Aug 4, 2009 14:53:01 GMT -5
Vote: Special Ed
For forgetting to submitting his action to himself. This seems really dubious to me...
|
|