|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 15:19:54 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Nov 13, 2009 15:19:54 GMT -5
Night had arrived and the survivors were even more gloomy with their decision yesterday. Yet another passenger had been placed into stasis and the numbers had dropped again.
That morning the ship was rocked by a small explosion waking everyone from what restless sleep they had managed to snatch while awaiting the cold Dawn approaching.
As everyone rushed out, they noticed the blast had come from BillMc's cabin. Looking inside, it could be seen that his upper torso had been messily blown apart and he was quite obviously no longer part of this world. Well, perhaps several parts.
Then counting around, they realised more of their number were missing.
A grim search revealed pedescribe had been impaled on a spike. The handprints down the shaft showing he had not died easily as he had tried to pull himself clear, but to no avail.
Still searching another body was found. Natlaw had been strangled with a length of wire. Eyes bulging and tongue lolling as the garotte had cut in with hands grasping desperately trying to release the pressure.
It had been a deadly Night, who knows what today might bring.
BillMc has been killed in an explosion pedescribe was impaled Natlaw was garotted
A brief pinging from the Central Computer gave some brief, but not good news.
Sister Coyote had been registered as a Passenger and famous Xenobiologist Guy Incognito was not a Passenger or part of the Infiltration Team but a Serving Droid.
Day 3 begins now. It will end on Wednesday 18th November at 20:00 GMT
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 15:24:40 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Nov 13, 2009 15:24:40 GMT -5
Ouch!
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 15:28:43 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Nov 13, 2009 15:28:43 GMT -5
That hurt .
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 15:39:31 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 15:39:31 GMT -5
On the plus side: we do get role reveals, if belated ones.
On the minus side: knowing Pedescribe's and to a lesser extent Bill's and Natlaw's alignments would be REALLY HELPFUL right about now.
I'm resuming my case against Merestil Haye.
vote: Merestil Haye[/color]
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 16:24:49 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Nov 13, 2009 16:24:49 GMT -5
Wow, that is alot of people dead. Hopefully atleast one of them are a good choice for whom ever did a kill and atleast one is scum in there. That is what I am hoping for anyways.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 16:42:01 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 16:42:01 GMT -5
"Wow, that is a lot of people dead" ... more precisely, it's three. Given the speculation yesterday about a possibly missing kill, that shouldn't be all that surprising. Your comment as a whole reads false to me, Shaggy.
I think I need to go back over your posts.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 16:42:56 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 16:42:56 GMT -5
NETA: By "false" I mean it reads as composed, not as a true reaction.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 16:52:44 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Nov 13, 2009 16:52:44 GMT -5
Yikes. Well, here's hoping that someone was lying in there.
For toDay, I'll pick up with vote nphase...
But there's still a lot of talking to be done. We really don't know much more than we did yesterDay, so hopefully someone has an interesting new idea or two.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 17:33:23 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Nov 13, 2009 17:33:23 GMT -5
<snip> Well, here's hoping that someone was lying in there. With the delayed reveal the way it appears to be, where we get information on lynches right away and night kills after the following night. It draws into my mind that 1 of 3 things is probably true: 1. Natlaw had a completely useless role, since he would receive role information about the same time that we did. (Possible, but doesn't make sense to me). 2. Natlaw was lying about his role, which implies scum or pfk and took a big risk to determine what kind of investigator ped was. (I say it was a big risk because he wouldn't know what info would be coming up today, and if he were still alive I'd be hella suspicious of him right now). 3. The scum have some kind of janitor role. (If Natlaw comes up as truthful after toNight, I think this will be the case).
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 17:50:35 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 17:50:35 GMT -5
I don't know if I follow you on #3.
I would so love to speculate on who killed whom last night, but I don't know if it will be productive. I'm hopeful the reveal a Day from now will prove useful.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 17:57:07 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Nov 13, 2009 17:57:07 GMT -5
Well crudrudder. Pestilence. Zooby do wop, chowders!
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 18:29:38 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Nov 13, 2009 18:29:38 GMT -5
I don't know if I follow you on #3. I would so love to speculate on who killed whom last night, but I don't know if it will be productive. I'm hopeful the reveal a Day from now will prove useful. Eh, it jumped into my head so I thought I would share. Since he's already dead it probably doesn't matter, but I'm looking back at people who interacted with him. Seeing if there is any accusations or conversations that seem to exist to attract focus. WRT #3, it's just another possible answer to the question "if he actually had a coroner role, why did that role exist given the timing of the information release?"
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 18:38:42 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 18:38:42 GMT -5
The second part wasn't a response to you; it was a separate thought.
I see what you're saying now.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:08:21 GMT -5
Post by special on Nov 13, 2009 19:08:21 GMT -5
I am not an investigator.
However, one of our investigators seems to be able to feed his results to someone else.
I received information that Dirx is a member of the Infiltration Team.
More time to post when I'm not tipsy
oh, and
Vote: Dirx
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:16:37 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Nov 13, 2009 19:16:37 GMT -5
ok, ed i'll bite.
so you are something that leads you to believe what you said tipsy or not.
i'm inlcined to vote along with you becuase this does seem a tad out of character.
but i'll wait and see what happens for a bit.
i also, agree with skeeyzix. don't know what use a "coroner" is if they get their results at the same time town does.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:30:22 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Nov 13, 2009 19:30:22 GMT -5
Ed -
On a Scale of 1 to 10, how confident are you that your source is an actual Town investigator, and not Scum yanking your chain?
Do you know the identity of your Night messenger? PLEASE don't share it if you do, but the yes or no of it is potentially critical.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:31:29 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Nov 13, 2009 19:31:29 GMT -5
WRT #3, it's just another possible answer to the question "if he actually had a coroner role, why did that role exist given the timing of the information release?" That's... actually a really, really good question.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:35:07 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Nov 13, 2009 19:35:07 GMT -5
Ed - On a Scale of 1 to 10, how confident are you that your source is an actual Town investigator, and not Scum yanking your chain? Do you know the identity of your Night messenger? PLEASE don't share it if you do, but the yes or no of it is potentially critical. and ed you and i never agree so listen to story. for fucks sake don't say where you got your information from. unless you go all peeksy and say it was via pm.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 19:54:29 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 19:54:29 GMT -5
I'll wait for answers to Story's questions, but we *do* get a flip on lynches. If this is a frame by Ed or someone else, we'll know.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:04:20 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Nov 13, 2009 20:04:20 GMT -5
I'll wait for answers to Story's questions, but we *do* get a flip on lynches. If this is a frame by Ed or someone else, we'll know. Well, that's the problem, isn't it? If Ed doesn't have a name for his mysterious visitor, and we lynch dirx and he's Town, who do we lynch in retribution? Ed? Well, he's just passing on information he received... or he's straight-up lying. Who knows? Can't tell. Even if he does have a name, though, if dirx comes up Town then whoever he names will almost certainly deny having told Ed anything at all. Then we have to choose between Ed and his visitor - not a great situation, because we basically risk two mislynches for the prices of finally tagging one Scum (which may come too late). This whole set-up has the feel of a Trojan Horse to me, but let's see what Ed says.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:09:48 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Nov 13, 2009 20:09:48 GMT -5
And yeah, I'm sitting around on a Friday night, thinking about this game. Interventions are welcome.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:14:24 GMT -5
Post by special on Nov 13, 2009 20:14:24 GMT -5
Ed - On a Scale of 1 to 10, how confident are you that your source is an actual Town investigator, and not Scum yanking your chain? Do you know the identity of your Night messenger? PLEASE don't share it if you do, but the yes or no of it is potentially critical. I am about a 9 on the confidence-o-meter. It would be pretty gastard for my information to be false.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:15:49 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 20:15:49 GMT -5
I need one too obviously.
What you said occurred to me also five minutes later. We still almost have to lynch Dirx, though. It's just what happens if he does flip Town that becomes problematic.
Anyway. Waiting for Ed to be less tipsy. And Dirx to turn up.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:20:12 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Nov 13, 2009 20:20:12 GMT -5
why don't we just wait and see if ed has a name?
i'll come intervene if you make that damn sounding delicious dish that you talked about when blam and i were playing opposing killers.
but i do like going up and down bunny holes in supposing stuff. sorry, it's just stream of consciousness for me.
ok, ed enough black coffee for you.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:24:41 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 20:24:41 GMT -5
Do you have a name, Ed? Yes, no, no comment?
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:27:41 GMT -5
Post by special on Nov 13, 2009 20:27:41 GMT -5
Do you have a name, Ed? Yes, no, no comment? what name is everyone wanting? The name of Dirx? my name? the name of the investigator?
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:37:37 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Nov 13, 2009 20:37:37 GMT -5
Hey everyone,
So we have had a tracker, we have had a coroner and now aparently a Amnesiac Cop. A cop that sends the results to someone else. On one hand i am inclined to be ok and go along with it, on the other hand I wonder...is there others that have recieved info? I mean I assume it was not always you Ed that got it. So unless they are all dead, would not someone else be in the same boat? Could step forward and not out themselves or anything but atleast be able to back up this claim. Unless we can speculate and say "oh I supose Bill may get results or Pollux or whom ever." And they really are all dead.
I think this is interesting and I for one am going to read the last days specifically pouring over the 2 people in question's posts. Also am wanting to wait till both are here and sober to get a better and more informed idea. get the whole picture as much as possible before making any kind of judgement call.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 20:46:27 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Nov 13, 2009 20:46:27 GMT -5
@ Ed on refresh -- the name of the investigator.
You know, I'm not actually sure a name matters to the credibility of this. Ed's implying he got a PM that specifically called out Dirx as a member of the infiltration team. If he's telling the truth, it would be pretty gastard for the info itself to be false. Even a hypothetical Scum ability to trade identities with another player, interacting in a bad way with the ability Ed describes -- Dirx would not be my first guess as the target of an ability like that, given he attracted a single vote yet. Too many coincidences required for it to be likely to be false in that way.
vote: Dirx[/color]
@ Shaggy -- it's entirely possible the previous results have been of the form "X is a passenger", in which case the recipients might conceivably have chosen not to share that information. I'm not sure, though. Someone stepping forward to say they got something like this previously (if not what) might be useful, maybe. Hard to think these things through.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 21:51:45 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Nov 13, 2009 21:51:45 GMT -5
Do you have a name, Ed? Yes, no, no comment? what name is everyone wanting? The name of Dirx? my name? the name of the investigator? ed don't be obtuse. noone would even be remotely considering suggesting you provide a name on where the info is coming from, at least not me and not others do i think.
|
|
|
Day 3
Nov 13, 2009 22:50:06 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Nov 13, 2009 22:50:06 GMT -5
ok, since apparently i am the only one not drinking, at least in that way. and because this has gotten kind of interesting and then just died.
story how come only supposotions about if dirx comes up town.
how 'bout ed is right and dirx is scum?
i mean someone upthread (normal?) even mentioned that sometimes simplest is best.
|
|