|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Feb 15, 2010 16:21:50 GMT -5
As this is Bastard, I want to allow for the possibility that just because we can't trust you, Mr. Skeezix, doesn't necessarily mean that you are an enemy. If, for example, you were required to say trustworthy things but were otherwise pure and innocent of intent...though that would indeed be a bastardly role to be given.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 16:23:04 GMT -5
Before anyone else answers. I bet there will be a large amount of players who recieved the following as part of their Role PM:
Oh, and one other thing: Don't trust redskeezix.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 16:23:53 GMT -5
As this is Bastard, I want to allow for the possibility that just because we can't trust you, Mr. Skeezix, doesn't necessarily mean that you are an enemy. If, for example, you were required to say trustworthy things but were otherwise pure and innocent of intent...though that would indeed be a bastardly role to be given. Have you ever seen the movie, 12 monkeys?
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Feb 15, 2010 16:26:23 GMT -5
Bah. That should have said, "If, for example, you were required to say UNtrustworthy things but were otherwise pure and innocent of intent..."
Yes, I have seen 12 Monkeys.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 16:28:54 GMT -5
And while I'm making predictions. How's this one?
Sim salabim sala doooo sala dim.
The next person to post in this thread after me, has either the exact role or variation of Vanilla Town.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Feb 15, 2010 16:52:24 GMT -5
How could you know that? Edit because I can: Wow, you are good! How did you do that?!!?
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 17:01:16 GMT -5
Either the rabbit was in the hat the whole time, or I can make you vanilla. Which do you think is more likely?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Feb 15, 2010 17:06:57 GMT -5
Holy crap, you have the ability to make me vanilla? Did you intercept Sister's PM? Did you do it to everyone?
That's a good trick.
Edit because I can:
There seem to be several jokes going on in my posts that just aren't funny any more. I will stop.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 15, 2010 17:15:47 GMT -5
i don't think you are supposed to quote your pm.
and wtf are you talking about. i trust you completely red.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 15, 2010 17:19:25 GMT -5
gonna test this whole vote thing on whether it's true or not.
vote methos
seems like the new kid on the block so wtf i'll bully him around and check out the girth of his sack.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 15, 2010 17:22:32 GMT -5
uh, fuck.
don't even know if methos be penis possesor or penis envyor.
so if you are of the envyor type the girth should be of the fallopian tubes.
whatever.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 17:25:02 GMT -5
gonna test this whole vote thing on whether it's true or not. vote methosseems like the new kid on the block so wtf i'll bully him around and check out the girth of his sack. You know that might have been bad for you right? I mean, how can you go around voting people when you don't know what your win condition is yet?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Feb 15, 2010 17:38:48 GMT -5
Why are you being so helpful, oh untrustworthy one?
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 17:52:36 GMT -5
I may have a bad reputation, but that doesn't mean that I'm not benevolent.
Oh yeah, I've forgotten about the 12 monkeys that I asked Cookies about. That's one of my favorite movies, love the dystopian future scenes and the doctors are hilarious. But my favorite part is that bit of irony that occurs with the lead actress. Absolutely brilliant, if I must say, and I must.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Feb 15, 2010 17:56:54 GMT -5
Sadly it's been too long since I have seen 12 monkeys for me to follow that particular handshake. I have seen La Jetee recently though. Brilliant short flick. Check it out if you haven't.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 15, 2010 18:11:45 GMT -5
gonna test this whole vote thing on whether it's true or not. vote methosseems like the new kid on the block so wtf i'll bully him around and check out the girth of his sack. You know that might have been bad for you right? I mean, how can you go around voting people when you don't know what your win condition is yet? so you know yours? seriously, i thought that the wincons were hidden. hmmm. not yet skeezyboy, but real damn close.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 15, 2010 18:27:30 GMT -5
I believe peek, that I have thoroughly alluded to the fact that I know everyone's win-con. Even yours.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Feb 15, 2010 18:28:13 GMT -5
/in for the win
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Feb 15, 2010 18:32:56 GMT -5
And while I'm making predictions. How's this one? Sim salabim sala doooo sala dim. The next person to post in this thread after me, has either the exact role or variation of Vanilla Town. You left out a bamba up there kiddo. Have you got the key?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 15, 2010 18:54:09 GMT -5
I believe peek, that I have thoroughly alluded to the fact that I know everyone's win-con. Even yours. care to share? i am flying blind.
|
|
|
Post by Methos on Feb 16, 2010 0:30:46 GMT -5
Let me get this straight. Assuming I'm male, one of you wants to hold my sac to check for firmness while another wishes to measure the girth of my penis!?! Boys on the internet typically fall all over themselves when a woman is on the site, yet you boys seem more interested in other boys. Lol!
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 16, 2010 0:48:43 GMT -5
<font style="font-size: 12px;"> <font style="font-size: 12px;">Let me get this straight. Assuming I'm male, one of you wants to hold my sac to check for firmness while another wishes to measure the girth of my penis!?! Boys on the internet typically fall all over themselves when a woman is on the site, yet you boys seem more interested in other boys. Lol! Let me be the first to welcome you to the internet of the socially adjusted, sort-of. Round here we just try to hang each other from anything tall enough for our toes not to touch.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Feb 16, 2010 11:05:22 GMT -5
Hi gang.
Reminder of the Rules:
1. Anything does NOT go.
2. Voting is in Blue. Unvoting is in Red. Votes not on a new line will not be counted. "No Lynch" is a valid vote.
2a. Votes at Night will result in a penalty Vote for said player in the morning.
3. There are otherwise no restrictions on Nights -- fluff if you'd like, strategize if you'd like, post random Wikipedia articles if that's what floats your boat.
4. All Wincons are hidden.
5. Other rules subject to change as I see fit.
6. No Quoting of Role PMs.
NEW RULE: No more editing. Editing will earn you a penalty vote.
Speaking of which:
Vote count as of the first post of Day One:
1 Vote Peekercpa (penalty)
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Feb 16, 2010 11:14:14 GMT -5
NEW RULE: No more editing. Editing will earn you a penalty vote. Well, you're no fun.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Feb 16, 2010 11:58:45 GMT -5
Eh. I thought about making it "editing allowed for typos and such" but realized I had no way to regulate that, sorry. Besides, I refer you to Rule #1.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 16, 2010 12:36:03 GMT -5
Ok so it's cards on the table time for me. There's somethings I can say and somethings I cannot say. There is also the possibility that Sister C has been lying to me exclusively. That's something that I cannot control, but should be accounted for.
1. I know all the win conditions in the game. 2. If you lynch me, everyone including me loses. 3. If we lynch anyone, they will be revealed as town. 4. There will be no player initiated night kills this game. 5. No lynch is an asshole and we should get him/her out of the game as quickly as possible.
Vote: no lynch
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 16, 2010 12:59:06 GMT -5
well apparently she was serious about the Night voting thing. it probably wouldn't be prudent to test too many of the other rules. although other brave souls can go for it if for nothing else than entertainment value.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 16, 2010 13:03:37 GMT -5
Ok so it's cards on the table time for me. There's somethings I can say and somethings I cannot say. There is also the possibility that Sister C has been lying to me exclusively. That's something that I cannot control, but should be accounted for. 1. I know all the win conditions in the game. 2. If you lynch me, everyone including me loses. 3. If we lynch anyone, they will be revealed as town. 4. There will be no player initiated night kills this game. 5. No lynch is an asshole and we should get him/her out of the game as quickly as possible. [colorblue] Vote: no lynch [/color][/quote] so if we don't lynch during the Day and there are no player initiated Night kills doesn't this seem to play out over an extended period of time? or can we only lynch no lynch once?
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Feb 16, 2010 13:05:46 GMT -5
Before anyone else answers. I bet there will be a large amount of players who recieved the following as part of their Role PM: Oh, and one other thing: Don't trust redskeezix. Now, if anyone does have that in their PM, aren't you in violation of rules 6 for quoting a PM?
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 16, 2010 13:09:38 GMT -5
No player-initiated night kills, huh? Mod-initiated?
|
|