|
Day 2.
Apr 6, 2010 20:49:54 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 6, 2010 20:49:54 GMT -5
Peekercpa, AKA "THE HEARTBREAK KID" SHAWN MICHAELS, A Mason, is dead.
It is now Day 2.
Day two will end on Friday at 4pm (AZ time).
Have fun everyone.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 6, 2010 20:57:53 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 6, 2010 20:57:53 GMT -5
Ugh. Not awesome.
So, at first blush on a light re-read Peeker clashed with Pleo a fair amount, NAF a little less and Cookies a little less than that. Headed to a baseball game so I'll read more later.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 6, 2010 21:00:36 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 6, 2010 21:00:36 GMT -5
NETA: Going to WATCH a baseball game. I need to proofread more and post in a hurry less.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 6, 2010 21:07:20 GMT -5
Post by special on Apr 6, 2010 21:07:20 GMT -5
This is what happens when we don't lynch Peeker on Day 1?
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 1:26:56 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 1:26:56 GMT -5
hope there were more than 2 masons, or the remaining one isn't so much better than vanilla
|
|
Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 1:33:56 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Apr 7, 2010 1:33:56 GMT -5
So that would make the masons D-Generation X. Probably a 2 man masonry (Michaels and HHH) as those two have been essentially constant as being with the group. More might be possible though.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 3:55:55 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 3:55:55 GMT -5
I'm going to try floating this one again. Dorian is called out by Pleo for insta responding to the mob, at the same time as having no substantive game mods, suggestive of lurking. That may have been a little harsh but no matter. If you want me to talk more substantively then maybe bring up something of substance worth talking about. Clearly I'm around and reading. I do not post because i've already addressed lynching liars and such. bolding mine. And it is fair enough as a response. It interested me, because previously I had thought I had caught Darth in a slip, and I had noticed Dorian log on without commenting on my gaffe. And I really would have expected some kind of response When I used this I got this response. Are you serious? You want me to justify my logging in habits? I'm online constantly and keep windows open and do a little thing called "refresh all tabs" fairly often. I saw your post, I disagreed with it and thought it over before responding. Then Ed covered pretty much exactly what I thought about. jesus christ, if i have to check in just because i'm online, seriously, sub me. Would you like to know when I go to sleep? I'm watching a few movies tomorrow with my lady, want to know what they are? Stalking someone's log-ins passes as scum hunting here? I hadn't asked a thing about justifying logging in habits, I had provided some refutaion to Dorian's defense to Pleo's lurking accusation. The above response was waaaaaay defensive and over reacting. I think the lurking accusation stands vote Dorian
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 3:57:49 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 3:57:49 GMT -5
These colour tags will bethe end of me. I highlight the phrase, I click on the colour drop down and it chucks the damn things at the end of instead of around the string. vote Dorian
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 4:18:09 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 7, 2010 4:18:09 GMT -5
Well, as I've responded to that already I don't know what you expect. As for the overreacting part, clearly you've never played in a game with me.
You say you didn't ask me to justify my log but how else would you categorize "i saw you log in and expected a response"?
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 4:25:01 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 7, 2010 4:25:01 GMT -5
In fact LUV, from the time you posted your "Slip" (1:18AM) and ED corrected you (4:14AM) a shade under 3 hours had passed. So essentially you're voting for me for not reading, processing and responding before ED did simply because the forums had shown me as logged in while you were here? Or are you voting for me because I didn't chime in after ED and say "What he said"?
It's such a weak vote.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 4:26:31 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 7, 2010 4:26:31 GMT -5
So, your "refutation" of Pleo's lurking statement is a 3 hour window in which I said nothing? That's just dumb.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 6:34:27 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 6:34:27 GMT -5
What really pinged me was your really over the top over defesnive response. It really does read very very defensive.
I make no mention of your logging habits, I was calling you on not responding to something "of substance" in the thread, when you had just made a defence that your lack of posting was due to a lack of substance. You seem to be sidestepping the accustaion, which is one of lurking - raised by Pleo, and which I am attempting to substantiate.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 7:54:49 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 7, 2010 7:54:49 GMT -5
well, crudinisky.
can't tell whether scum are scared of me or if i am just annoying.
anyways, go town.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 12:02:18 GMT -5
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Apr 7, 2010 12:02:18 GMT -5
This is what happens when we don't lynch Peeker on Day 1? This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass, Larry.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 12:53:01 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Apr 7, 2010 12:53:01 GMT -5
Luv: I'm going to go out on the same limb that Dorian is apparently on and say that the exchange with Darth that you seem to think is so compelling and full of substance, was not anything that struck me as compelling or full of substance. Why? Because I don't follow wrestling, I had nothing to contribute to the discussion about the face/heel histories of a bunch of wrestlers that I'm not familiar with.
Maybe I have a blind spot because the color is meaningless to me, but I don't think Idle would allow people who have volunteered that they are not aware of the world of WWE to play the game if such a blindspot was going to overly handicap them.
I'm fairly sure Dorian and I aren't the only ones who didn't comment about your exchange with Darth. So your case against him seems to boil down not to the general behavior that Dorian and I both happen to share, but a specific metagame expectation of how you expect Dorian to behave.
For all I know you could end up being right about Dorian, but your case against him right now is parsing as metagame and personal which is probably not going to sway anyone to share your views, and I can understand why he'd bristle about it.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:11:38 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 13:11:38 GMT -5
There are 2 kinds of people in this game. people who know wrestling and people who dont. The ine camp would be pointing out my mistake, the other discussing it, or so I would think.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:11:55 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on Apr 7, 2010 13:11:55 GMT -5
Hey, new Day is up.
Sorry to see you go Peek.
So, straight off, like always I would like to state my suggestion that if there are only two masons left at this point that they claim. It's foolish to let another one of you die without us getting some confirmed townies. Listen to me, don't listen to me, whatever.
Also, Luv (can I just call you OAOW? I can never remember how to spell your name over here) has voted for Dorien. Neat. I don't follow the argument though. I blame me being a touch over tired this mornign. Luv/OAOW can you break it down for me please? Dorien was lurking, and...
In other news, I am going to pick up where I left off yesterDay and
Vote: fisheroo
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:14:58 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on Apr 7, 2010 13:14:58 GMT -5
Dorian not Dorien
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:19:23 GMT -5
Post by special on Apr 7, 2010 13:19:23 GMT -5
For the record: I am a Mason.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:25:36 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 13:25:36 GMT -5
Hey, new Day is up. Sorry to see you go Peek. So, straight off, like always I would like to state my suggestion that if there are only two masons left at this point that they claim. It's foolish to let another one of you die without us getting some confirmed townies. Listen to me, don't listen to me, whatever. Also, Luv (can I just call you OAOW? I can never remember how to spell your name over here) has voted for Dorien. Neat. I don't follow the argument though. I blame me being a touch over tired this mornign. Luv/OAOW can you break it down for me please? Dorien was lurking, and... In other news, I am going to pick up where I left off yesterDay and Vote: fisheroo [/color] [/quote] full chronology 1. I make the mistake where I think I have uncovered a Darth slip 2. Because I am in the UK no bugger is on cos its too early and I wait and wait for feedback. Whilst checking for feedback I notice Dorian is logged on 3 Still no feedback 4. Ed corrects me 5 Mod makes a comment/asks a question or something 6 insta-response from several low volume posters (includign Dorian) 7 Ed calls the insta responders for obv keeping tabs on the thread but not posting - definitive lurking 8 Dorian claims posting would have occurred if there was anything to talk about 9 Aha! says I i saw you on after I had made my posgt and yet no comments 10 I see this as proof of lurking, and post accordingly 11 incrediby defensive over reacting post from Dorian 12 here we are
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:55:24 GMT -5
Post by special on Apr 7, 2010 13:55:24 GMT -5
7 Ed calls the insta responders for obv keeping tabs on the thread but not posting - definitive lurking huh?
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 13:56:35 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Apr 7, 2010 13:56:35 GMT -5
That would have been peeker
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 14:01:20 GMT -5
Post by Sister Coyote on Apr 7, 2010 14:01:20 GMT -5
Relying on who's online can give a lot of false positives. For example, I occasionally read the threads from my iPhone and forget to go back to the home page in Safari when I'm done. Which means I could show up as online for hours when I'm actually nowhere near the boards.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 14:32:37 GMT -5
Post by Pleonast on Apr 7, 2010 14:32:37 GMT -5
I'll continue my vote from YesterDay. vote Sister Coyote unvote Sister Coyote vote DorianPhoenix For not participating for 3 days and 50+ posts and then quickly replying to the moderator instead of any player. That indicates to me that they were following the game but were choosing not to engage other players.
This game does not allow multiple votes (I wish more games did, it makes it much easier to reach a consensus), so I will settle on Dorian for now, since they have already have another vote.
I also found Cookies' quick response to the moderator suspicious, but not as much, since they had more previous participation.
Are we going to get a final official vote count for Day One?
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 14:39:04 GMT -5
Post by fisheroo on Apr 7, 2010 14:39:04 GMT -5
In other news, I am going to pick up where I left off yesterDay and Vote: fisheroo [/color] [/quote] which I don't like at all. It seems like she is placing a vote because someone who she thinks is likely town is voting that way and she doesn't want to vote for clockwork either. This is a bad reason for a vote if only because it shows an inability to come up with her own reason for voting, which I have always believed to be a reliable scum tell.[/quote] This is where you were last time I looked. And I am surprised at you, NAF. and your mischaracterization of my actions because this isn't what I did at all. Especially seeing that I DID give reasons for my voting. What I did was vote who I thought was scummy. Clockwork didn't seem like scum-just new, and I said as much. Pleo's claim seemed short sighted, and not necessarily good for town, but not particularly scummy. I wasn't comfortable with voting for either of those two, and I didn't feel the need to join a bandwagon. Coyote seemed like a viable candidate, for the reasons I have already outlined.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 14:40:38 GMT -5
Post by fisheroo on Apr 7, 2010 14:40:38 GMT -5
Sorry for the bad coding. And I surprised we're already on Day, it seemed like night went fast.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 14:55:32 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Apr 7, 2010 14:55:32 GMT -5
I have to say that I'm baffled at being suspected because of a quick response to the moderator, and I have no idea what it means about Dorian, but it doesn't say jack about me, my participation level, my motivations, my strategy or a damn thing about the actual mafia part of this game.
It is net that is at best 50% wrong, in a game in which participation from EVERYONE is low. I had something to say to Idle at the time, and no observations to make, questions to ask, or opinions to share about the game. So I posted to communicate with the mod. Next time I'll keep my conversations about board functionality to PM, and apparently everyone else should do that to else you be perceived as lurking scum.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 15:32:57 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Apr 7, 2010 15:32:57 GMT -5
7 Ed calls the insta responders for obv keeping tabs on the thread but not posting - definitive lurking huh? Sorry, that was Pleo
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 15:33:55 GMT -5
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 7, 2010 15:33:55 GMT -5
Luv's lurking accusation comes down to a 3 hour window. And pleo's accusation implies that he can't read. I'd addressed what was being talked about, I just did it early and not again because I felt no need to repeat myself. Those 3+ days consisted of topics I'd already addressed.
Now I remember why I stopped playing here.
|
|
|
Day 2.
Apr 7, 2010 15:41:35 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on Apr 7, 2010 15:41:35 GMT -5
Coyote seemed like a viable candidate, for the reasons I have already outlined. You know that it's the reasons "that I had already outlined" that eluded me on my last reading of Day 1, right? That's why I voted for you. It looked like you were hitching your wagon to Pleo. So help me out, why is Sister scum?
|
|