|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 8:35:48 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 8:35:48 GMT -5
You've got to be kidding me... ;D The night thread should be entertaining. We'll discuss our next target over the weekend.. No real preference right now.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 8:43:36 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 24, 2010 8:43:36 GMT -5
unbelievable. not only does he hurt town but he leaves open soft claims for every other game in the future.
i really thought he and NAF were masons. but what up with story(?) talking about a one person masonry?
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 9:12:30 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 9:12:30 GMT -5
Idle, I notice our post counts (visible to everyone) are increasing when we post here. Can anything be done about that? I'd hate to get caught that way. Maybe I'm just being paranoid, but still. Or maybe move to another board?
Pleo does seem as if he's setting himself up for future soft claims, but story's idea of policy-lynching him day 1 from now on isn't bad. I have a feeling people are going to be pretty pissed about this (as they should be). I figured he was a vanilla trying some gambit, and he knew he'd get lynched regardless of whether he claimed or not.
I voted for Pleo yesterday, but I don't think I'll get any blowback for it, due to his nonsensical refusal to claim.
With masons the worst we have to worry about (and we can effortlessly kill them at night now should they turn up), maybe we should just go after one of the stronger players tonight? Story comes to mind for me, but I only recently started playing again, so I'm unfamiliar with a lot of these people.
I know you mentioned NAF, but I'm hoping he'll resume going after shaggy tomorrow. I dunno.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 10:52:19 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 10:52:19 GMT -5
This is a potential problem for us to consider:
DAY ONE - 13 players Sister Coyote - 3 (Pleonast, Total Lost, Fisheroo) Pleonast - 2 (luv, shaggy) Story - 1 (special ed) Cookies - 1 (Story) Total Lost - 1 (NAF) zuma - 1 (Cookies) No Vote - 4 (Sister Coyote, ducduc, zuma, peekercpa)
The question may come up why a third vote was not put on Pleo day 1. Me, you and ducduc could have a problem being absent.
If anyone raises this argument, and it gains any traction, one of us should argue that if they are going to go that route, that ducduc is the obvious lynch since he/she is currently not participating, and maybe luv or shaggy would look even worse for being actual pleo voters.
So, thinking out loud, tonight we should not kill:
ducduc fisheroo (fish possibly busses sister coyote, and if fish is confirmed town, the question of where scum were in this vote will become more important. Actually now that I think about it some more, it's in our interest to keep fish alive at least a couple days. I wouldn't vote for her in the day or encourage questions regarding her) luv, shaggy (scum trying to save sister coyote by voting pleo)
Of course we should not bring any of this up ourselves, only have some responses ready should we receive votes based on this.
Plus, can you truly believe that NO scum voted on day 1? that's insane!
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 12:17:08 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 12:17:08 GMT -5
Day 2 votes:
pleo: luv. cookies, zuma, story, NAF shaggy: fisheroo NAF: special ed fisheroo: peeker, shaggy luv: pleo no vote: ducduc
story and NAF came in after pleo ran off the rails. I think maybe we should add luv and cookies to our no-kill (based on voting record only of course).
Shaggy threw a vote on fisheroo after pleo was in trouble. This could work to his disadvantage, especially if NAF returns to his shaggy attention.
let me know what you think. I've only been considering who not to kill based on voting records so far, so it's kind of a limited way to look at things so far.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 12:34:51 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 12:34:51 GMT -5
I think luv and shaggy could be very vulnerable tomorrow. luv voted for pleo both days and voted early. NAF was lately focused on special ed but may return to shaggy. special ed also voted for NAF, so there is some tension there too.
very quick and early thoughts on a kill are NAF, story, or special ed.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 12:48:50 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 12:48:50 GMT -5
One reason to keep story alive is because he was the toughtest on pleo yesterday.
but he also will make a good case that he only came around to voting pleo because pleo refused to claim when any normal townie would have done so.
but he is one of the best scum-hunters i've found. plus story had a vote on NAF at one point, based on his belief that possibly NAF might be scum because NAF "knew" pleo was telling the truth.
Plus killing story would bring attention to NAF, who might then drag special ed and shaggy into the mix.
And killing the biggest pleo-basher would generate a lot of town discussion and hopefully let us fade into the background.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 24, 2010 13:07:26 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 24, 2010 13:07:26 GMT -5
and Idle please don't end night until both peek and I both confirm our kill, or normal night ends.
If you hear from neither of us by the time night ends, kill story
if you get an official kill request ("kill xxx") from both of us, kill them whenever you want If you get an official kill request from just one of us, kill them only when night ends
I think I covered necessary bases.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 25, 2010 14:19:30 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 25, 2010 14:19:30 GMT -5
i think NAF might blow up on shaggy, but that's also so obvious that scum would never do that so maybe we should do that.
no problem with story since he is the one who brought up the one person mason thingy.
so yeh, i'll second what z says. kill story. but let's wait till the last second.
and i'll go ltl tomorrow. soryy ducduc. unless someone comes up with some nice juicy faux pas.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 25, 2010 14:21:55 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 25, 2010 14:21:55 GMT -5
and i actually think our non vote of pleo helps us.
i mean shit if either of us or sis had been around then why not throw it to random or whatever.
plus it was no bs in my case. i had to leave for a couple of days unexpectedly. if anyone gives me shit about rl i'll crap down their throat. as much grief as i get for posting too much anyways.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 25, 2010 15:15:31 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 25, 2010 15:15:31 GMT -5
yah.. no bs in my case either. I skimmed a couple times and thankfully got back in time to kill total. OK, we'll go with story then unless either of us has a reason to change.
Idle, it's story until further notice. let the night play out til the end of night.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 25, 2010 21:30:06 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 25, 2010 21:30:06 GMT -5
well regardless, you get a star in scum hell for the total whack.
hee hee.
now let's go get the rest of the sheep.
i think shaggy makes an interesting target. i will go lurker. policy don't you know. policy is always good. sheesh ask pleo.
hee hee x2.
and can we get a particularly gruesome death for story. he kind of deserves something really absolutely x rated. i mean i like him and stuff so it would be kind of cool if he like exploded internally spraying everyone with bits of his guts and shit. and then little pieces of his remains kind of like gobbled up the big chunks while flying off into a bug zapper and getting zitzified.
yaknow something like that.
but yeh, kill story.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 25, 2010 23:34:17 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Apr 25, 2010 23:34:17 GMT -5
Story, eh?
But yeah, you got till the end of tomorrow night.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 26, 2010 5:41:33 GMT -5
Post by zuma on Apr 26, 2010 5:41:33 GMT -5
I don't want a gruesome death. I just want typical "story is dead" I think.
The one-person mason thing was indeed weird. not sure what to make of it.
Idle, if anything this has been one of the more atypical games so far (in a good way). scum cop and doc for the first 3 deaths? haha
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 26, 2010 9:31:01 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 26, 2010 9:31:01 GMT -5
yeh, probably don't make it to gruesome. that would certainly leave tracks.
"story is dead" works. however, "story is dead and he was a mason" works a whole lot better.
wrap it up when you want to idle.
i'm read to rock and rolla.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 26, 2010 10:49:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 26, 2010 10:49:25 GMT -5
and z and the rest i never look at voting records as any kind of tell. crap look at ragnorak when all scum voted the town vig. no one picked up on it.
i vote for the most scummy (not me, of course) and just let the dust settles where it does. i think the rest of it is a lot of scum paranoia. matter of fact, that is where scum can get in trouble. the whole pseudo random shit that blam used to talk about. manufactured randomness is apparant. thought out randomness, not so much. that was the real strength in his observations. if you vote just to appear within the normal standard deviations then that shows up. if you vote the strength of you convictions regardless of whether they fall within or outside the norm you at least have justification. that is unidentifiable.
woot woot let's lynch NAF.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 26, 2010 10:53:15 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 26, 2010 10:53:15 GMT -5
and by that i mean, let's see if we can get NAF lynched.
kill story kill story kill story kill story kill story
lather, rinse, repeat.
woot woot.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 26, 2010 15:39:45 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 26, 2010 15:39:45 GMT -5
and if anyone gives a fuck.
what i think is interesting is the fact that multiple games can be running on mulitple boards at the same time.
i mean i am town over on giraffe and will play that the way i know. but i will also try to bleed that over to here. kind of an interesting dynamic.
wonder how j sex addresses scum team on one board while being oppositely aligned on a separate board at the same time. now that is fucking awesome. no wonder i like playing poker with these folks.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 28, 2010 9:45:27 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 28, 2010 9:45:27 GMT -5
another thought for future scum teams. NAF and i just cross posted approximately the same thing. no way would scum be working that closely, right? youbetcha. crap i can hardly wait to be scum again and pull that shit off.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 28, 2010 12:20:01 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 28, 2010 12:20:01 GMT -5
don't say a flapping word at this point.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 28, 2010 14:31:01 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 28, 2010 14:31:01 GMT -5
i know i said no talkie but i just couldn't wait to follow up to a fellow scum and see what da crud occurs. kind of hop on but not totally. and with enough of a delay to look maybe kind of but not totally coordinated.
woot woot, now it gets interesting.
shoot , i love this shit.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 29, 2010 14:09:41 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2010 14:09:41 GMT -5
do we claim a two person masonry?
it would kind of be yuckles and chuckles at this point?
i mean, of course after we lynch a stinking townie and kill another toNight. cause i can bail you out if needed and likewise. of course if one of starts to pull a runaway then bus or one off is the call.
ah, it's all kind of academic at this point. but it is still fun.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 29, 2010 17:42:31 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2010 17:42:31 GMT -5
now if we can get one more vote on NAF, not mine or yours we kill ed or cookie and fat lady sings. either way this has been a good Day.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 29, 2010 17:56:35 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2010 17:56:35 GMT -5
fucking hilarious. now NAF cross posts me. crud if ed or cookies doesn't pick up on it it i will boggle.
|
|
|
Night 2
Apr 29, 2010 18:14:57 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2010 18:14:57 GMT -5
we are so going to kill ed or cookies now that fishy is fishandchips.
we'll let NAF take care of shaggy tomorrow.
start thinking about it.
|
|