|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:10:47 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Jun 2, 2010 10:10:47 GMT -5
I find Bill greatly suspicious for several reasons, and were it not for the fact that the news about Mahaloth was posted to the thread, I'd be voting for him right now--just to get it out there.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:18:53 GMT -5
Post by Mahaloth on Jun 2, 2010 10:18:53 GMT -5
I'm going to vote Cookies, as that is who started this bandwagon on me. OMGUS much? I'm not following this bandwagon, but that doesn't help to allay my suspicions. Uh, I'm not OMGUSing. I'm saying that perhaps Cookies intentionally started this bandwagon with a lie.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:20:09 GMT -5
Post by The Authors on Jun 2, 2010 10:20:09 GMT -5
Vote Count
storyteller (2): SisC 58, BillMc 61 Mahaloth (4): Cookies 93, Total 99, Moley 106, Drain 112 Cookies (1): Mahaloth 115 Not Voting (15): Pinkies, fisheroo, Guiri, blockey, mitchy, nphase, Oredigger, peeker, Pleo, sinjin, Ed, story, timmy, Zeriel, zuma
The Authors are not prepared to discuss what powers exist or when they resolve. Sorry.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:26:27 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Jun 2, 2010 10:26:27 GMT -5
I find Bill greatly suspicious for several reasons, and were it not for the fact that the news about Mahaloth was posted to the thread, I'd be voting for him right now--just to get it out there. Well well what a surprise. Try a new tune.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:27:39 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Jun 2, 2010 10:27:39 GMT -5
Indeed, I'm equally suspicious of folk who feel they need to defend Story Makes me wonder if you are clanned up with him, or are indeed HoC
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 10:51:53 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Jun 2, 2010 10:51:53 GMT -5
Actually, your odd logic regarding story is the least of my concerns.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:02:50 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 11:02:50 GMT -5
ok, i have been cogitating for a while - the warning signs should scream danger/danger when i do that.
if the pms i have been receiving are at all based in any type of truth then i believe there to be a mixture of Day and Night powers. the positioning of these powers to be kind of random amongst the players, i assume. and i come back to what i said earlier: while it is apparant that we all have a kind of universal wincon there is another wincon that everyone seems to want to downplay. in a normal game if i were "town" i would have 5 of 25 (just for ease of math) that want to see my rear dead. in this game i've got at least 21 and maybe as many as 24 that want me dead under the same circumstances.
and in a normal game i would typically assume that a faction (scum) would have a NK. but with this game if there are no "scum" and kills other than lynches were not factored into play this game could last a very LONG time (anyone remember polluxo/dogmom/gastard/beast from hell). so i think the presence/absence of certain roles predicating or determining alignment is kind of disingenious (sp?). or maybe that's the "scum" tell for this game.
there are folks in this game, at least based on pms, that know of certain "non town" alignments.
shit, i even got one from someone who was convinced that skeez was chains. shit, skeez even communicated with me that he was the NK of choice.
and crud i really do have to go clean out the litter box. volunteer cat #4 just crapped on my side of the bed.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:25:56 GMT -5
Post by Pleonast on Jun 2, 2010 11:25:56 GMT -5
My win condition is "You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out." No!!!! I'm not the Day Killer and you have all been deceived! I really want to stay in this game super badly! Please! Whomever is telling you this stuff must be aligned with the House of Chains or Master of the Deck. I think they have simply chosen me to blame because they saw I had limited internet yesterday and were hoping I'd not be back to defend myself. Give us some reason to believe you... vote Mahaloth
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:33:18 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Jun 2, 2010 11:33:18 GMT -5
Interesting.... did you do nothing by choice or because you have nothing to do? I'm assuming that who ever blocked you might have got a message saying that the block had been successful... now they no that they didn't stop anything.... I'm just curious as to why you have made this information IE you not making any action last Night ... public knowledge? Curiosity killed the cat. That's fair enough young man... Anyone want to say where these rumours about MAHALOTH are coming from. PEEKERCPA you say people were saying about the possibilty of skeez being HOC... that I can buy. What I'm not too sure about is why you say Skeez was the NK of choice? He didn't appear to be under any sort of pressure on "main board" to me. I guess anyone who has made an investigation is going to be very quite about it and the try to clan up with the result of the investigation if they turn out to be ascendant or spread gossip if they are chains of MODD. I still agree with PEEKERCPA that unlike normal Mafia... I need everyone dead apart from members of my primary clan. My vote is going to the same place as before VOTE CAPTAIN PINKIESI still feel that he was too quick on removing and changing his vote yesterDay and in my experience he is normally a little more vocal in his reasoning rather than just going "oh sorry I was wrong I'll move my vote" it just seems out of character.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:35:52 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Jun 2, 2010 11:35:52 GMT -5
PLEONAST Is there any reason why you chose to put your wincon in quotation marks?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:40:31 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 11:40:31 GMT -5
Curiosity killed the cat. That's fair enough young man... Anyone want to say where these rumours about MAHALOTH are coming from. PEEKERCPA you say people were saying about the possibilty of skeez being HOC... that I can buy. What I'm not too sure about is why you say Skeez was the NK of choice? He didn't appear to be under any sort of pressure on "main board" to me. I guess anyone who has made an investigation is going to be very quite about it and the try to clan up with the result of the investigation if they turn out to be ascendant or spread gossip if they are chains of MODD. I still agree with PEEKERCPA that unlike normal Mafia... I need everyone dead apart from members of my primary clan. My vote is going to the same place as before VOTE CAPTAIN PINKIESI still feel that he was too quick on removing and changing his vote yesterDay and in my experience he is normally a little more vocal in his reasoning rather than just going "oh sorry I was wrong I'll move my vote" it just seems out of character. mods can i quote from a private message board?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:43:45 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 11:43:45 GMT -5
mods can i quote from a private message board? this is rule 6 6) Although you are allowed to quote from off-board communications as much as you like, you may not give any player not party to the communication a link to the communication. For example, if NAF tells Hoopy that he is a Serial Killer on QuickTopic, Hoopy is free to tell anybody of this either in the main thread or in off-board communication(Hoopy is also free to lie and say that NAF said he was a Roleblocker). However, Hoopy may not post the QuickTopic link to prove that he's telling the truth about what NAF said.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 11:55:12 GMT -5
Post by Pleonast on Jun 2, 2010 11:55:12 GMT -5
PLEONAST Is there any reason why you chose to put your wincon in quotation marks? To make it a grammatical statement, and presumably testable as true or false.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 12:02:09 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 12:02:09 GMT -5
fuck it i waited the requisite 15 minutes so silence means consent, or at least a walk, woot woot. <snipped>Anyone want to say where these rumours about MAHALOTH are coming from. PEEKERCPA you say people were saying about the possibilty of skeez being HOC... that I can buy. What I'm not too sure about is why you say Skeez was the NK of choice? He didn't appear to be under any sort of pressure on "main board" to me. <snipped>I still agree with PEEKERCPA that unlike normal Mafia... I need everyone dead apart from members of my primary clan. rumors can be started by anyone against anyone. and in this game that belief, i posit, will be short sighted. this is what skeez posted. ezix Cacti Thorn
member is offline
Joined: May 2010 Gender: Male Posts: 19 Karma: 0 [ Exalt | Smite ] Re: Day One « Reply #61 on May 28, 2010, 10:49am »
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's okay peek, I've already been informed that I'm dead tonight. You guys should reform the clan w/o me tomorrow morning.
so i was in a clan with skeez, meh. i think the chain gangers kind of semi knew who was who and they went out and decided to infiltrate as many folks as they could. just my supposition. what i can't figure out is who would want all of the chainers dead other than the rest of us? why would skeez suss up to something, if public knowledge, leads to his death? unless he was mislead? i mean i have a couple of theories but would like to hear from others.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 12:48:14 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jun 2, 2010 12:48:14 GMT -5
OMGUS much? I'm not following this bandwagon, but that doesn't help to allay my suspicions. Uh, I'm not OMGUSing. I'm saying that perhaps Cookies intentionally started this bandwagon with a lie. My informations did not come from Cookie and as far as I can tell has nothing to do with her.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 13:04:12 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 2, 2010 13:04:12 GMT -5
Like a few others, I have heard (and, in fact, contributed to) the ongoing off-board buzz suggesting that Mahaloth may be a Day Killer. For my part, I have heard and seen exclusively circumstantial evidence of this possibility - reasonably compelling circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial nonetheless.
More from me in a bit, as I catch up as best I can.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 13:54:02 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Jun 2, 2010 13:54:02 GMT -5
What exactly has Cookies to do with the Mahaloth situation? That's information that I haven't heard before.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 14:12:08 GMT -5
Post by oredigger77 on Jun 2, 2010 14:12:08 GMT -5
Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out.
I guess I might as well post this out in the open to remove any doubt that it's out there.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 14:32:19 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Jun 2, 2010 14:32:19 GMT -5
Like a few others, I have heard (and, in fact, contributed to) the ongoing off-board buzz suggesting that Mahaloth may be a Day Killer. For my part, I have heard and seen exclusively circumstantial evidence of this possibility - reasonably compelling circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial nonetheless. More from me in a bit, as I catch up as best I can. I've been trying to work out why having a Day killer is so bad and then it dawned on me...... Ok it's possible that Mahaloth is a Day killer that has a compulsory kill to carry out each Day ... obviously Day one can sometimes be a crap shoot in any game so it could be possible that they didn't chose their target wisely or were maybe given some misleading information off board. This could be forgiven in a normal game but again this is no normal game. So Mahaloth is a threat to us because of the following. 1- They can Daykill and they are not in our Clan. 2- They can Daykill and they are not in our Clan. And they are either HOC or MODD. Like I say this reasoning took a while for me to get my head around but as general opinion is all the same I'm going to... UNVOTE CAPTAIN PINKIESVOTE MAHALOTHI ned everyone whom I'm not associated with dead... and if they turn out to be a Daykiller to boot then that could be a bonus.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 14:55:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 14:55:25 GMT -5
so anyone who can kill through other than a lynch is a threat?
at least that is what i am hearing, right?
or do NKs get a pass?
now let's play this like normal mafia. who would be the most scared of a Day or Night kill (not withstanding me being a town aligned vig). either deck fucker of chain gangers. but there are too many votes to hang it there.
so what else contributes to the mob.
cookies know as well as does story.
woot fucking woot.
couple of you others as well. i mean i am the town babbler so take it as you will.
weird thing about babblers. they hear more than they say.
vote mahaloth
let's see what the fuck happens.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 15:01:19 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Jun 2, 2010 15:01:19 GMT -5
Ok it's possible that Mahaloth is a Day killer that has a compulsory kill to carry out each Day ... obviously Day one can sometimes be a crap shoot in any game so it could be possible that they didn't chose their target wisely or were maybe given some misleading information off board. This could be forgiven in a normal game but again this is no normal game. So Mahaloth is a threat to us because of the following. 1- They can Daykill and they are not in our Clan. 2- They can Daykill and they are not in our Clan. And they are either HOC or MODD. Well the same would be true of a night killer in this setup. But since no one else is seeing what i think I see with red's comments from yesterday, I'll go bark up a different tree Unvote: Story Vote: Mahaloth
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 16:01:50 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 16:01:50 GMT -5
Hey, everybody, it's Ed again. How about a couple of different things you can say for me toDay, everyone. We can go with the tried and true statement from yesterday OR and this is where it gets interesting. You can PM me something like the following: make sure to CC author when you send me that PM. So you want us to trust you on your statement of truthfulness of something sent to you in private? I could just as easily lie about something sent publicly. My operating theory was, on the off-chance the Chain win condition is not-exclusive or that the chains have a way of becoming 'unchained' they might feel comfortable sharing that with me via PM. Alas, I got nothing in PM that wasn't identical to the prevailing win condition.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 16:05:39 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 16:05:39 GMT -5
My PM says: Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out. Total, can you please be more specific? Your PM may very well say this, but does it indicate that it is your win condition?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 16:45:24 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 16:45:24 GMT -5
Copy/pasted for verification: Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out. I can't really investigate this, since it seems quite likely that you did copy and past that, it would come back as true. Can you please state this as your win condition?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 17:21:10 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 17:21:10 GMT -5
Copy/pasted for verification: Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out. I can't really investigate this, since it seems quite likely that you did copy and past that, it would come back as true. Can you please state this as your win condition? hey, ed you are approaching this as a normal "mafia" game. as such it is becoming i trite little annoying, imho of course. can everyone please post to the thread whether they have gotten sick on a fruit flavored dring at some point in their lives? see the way i see it is that bad folks will have never been on a cruise or an island. it's a little more subtle this way, ed. wink wink nod nod
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 17:29:19 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 17:29:19 GMT -5
i was going to use the sex with goat question but i kind of figured that it would be a null tell when it came to ed and ulla so i kind of came up with the most other exclusionary question i could figure out.
but for a BILLION dollars have you ever drank a fruit drink and decided to have sex with a goat. course the other way plays, did you have ever have sex with a goat and decided you needed a fruit drink.
chicken and egg, of course.
just kind of fucking curious.
mine goes to 11.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 17:39:08 GMT -5
Post by Pleonast on Jun 2, 2010 17:39:08 GMT -5
I can't really investigate this, since it seems quite likely that you did copy and past that, it would come back as true. Can you please state this as your win condition? hey, ed you are approaching this as a normal "mafia" game. as such it is becoming i trite little annoying, imho of course. can everyone please post to the thread whether they have gotten sick on a fruit flavored dring at some point in their lives? see the way i see it is that bad folks will have never been on a cruise or an island. it's a little more subtle this way, ed. wink wink nod nod You're a little annoyed by how Ed is using his power to try to find players with different win conditions? That seems off.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 17:57:24 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 17:57:24 GMT -5
hey, ed you are approaching this as a normal "mafia" game. as such it is becoming i trite little annoying, imho of course. can everyone please post to the thread whether they have gotten sick on a fruit flavored dring at some point in their lives? see the way i see it is that bad folks will have never been on a cruise or an island. it's a little more subtle this way, ed. wink wink nod nod You're a little annoyed by how Ed is using his power to try to find players with different win conditions? That seems off. no what i think is "off" is people being all holier than thou looking for "scum" when unless they are truly are "scum" then they are lying pieces of shit. because as i have said twice before, pleo i really know i need to kill "scum" but i also know that there are others that need to go bye bye as well. and the mods have already made it pretty clear that this is not a them v us kind of engagement. anyone who tries to cache it in that manner is either one of "them" or someone i need to be very careful around.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:00:20 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Jun 2, 2010 18:00:20 GMT -5
Yeah, being annoyed by Ed trying to use his power in the best way possible is definitely a new one.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:01:09 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 18:01:09 GMT -5
You're a little annoyed by how Ed is using his power to try to find players with different win conditions? That seems off. no what i think is "off" is people being all holier than thou looking for "scum" when unless they are truly are "scum" then they are lying pieces of shit. because as i have said twice before, pleo i really know i need to kill "scum" but i also know that there are others that need to go bye bye as well. and the mods have already made it pretty clear that this is not a them v us kind of engagement. anyone who tries to cache it in that manner is either one of "them" or someone i need to be very careful around. you have something better you would have me do with my power? At least I stand a chance of finding people who will never be on my team. That's something, I think.
|
|