|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:05:19 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 18:05:19 GMT -5
neta: and let's play this straight up mafia. what is the motivation for ed suggesting that pms come to him for "verification".
sounds pretty copacetic, right? who the crap made ed the damn judge, jury and there's a third i swear just can't remember it right now.
so you think that is "town", or is that "scum"?
shit, you know what it smells to me is a third party trying to get some leverage. but isn't that we are all trying to do, aren't you?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:07:01 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 18:07:01 GMT -5
Yeah, being annoyed by Ed trying to use his power in the best way possible is definitely a new one. so you believe ed?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:09:53 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 18:09:53 GMT -5
shit, you know what it smells to me is a third party trying to get some leverage. but isn't that we are all trying to do, aren't you? So, you suggest that no one cooperate with me? I can potentially find a Chain or the Master. I can't really do too much else. Is there a specific reason you don't want me to?
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 18:57:06 GMT -5
Post by Zeriel on Jun 2, 2010 18:57:06 GMT -5
The win condition in the PM I received from the Authors describing my role at the start of this game of mafia was phrased exactly and only as quoted: "Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out." For the record, I'm done with these games. Even if Ed's power is highly useful in this context for finding a MotD or HoC members, he has quite enough with two statements from each of us. Which is really my entire problem with it--how many things do you really need to fish out of us, Ed? Really. vote Special Ed I have no reason to believe you're not using this scheme to your own advantage--a member of the HoC or the MotD could easily have a truthsayer power AND use it to avoid being suspected/detected himself. As I'm not involved at all in the apparent off-board rumor mill, I have nothing to say about the rest of this day, and frankly don't give a rip until or unless someone elects to bring me into the loop. Which would probably be a good idea for them, just sayin'.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:15:37 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:15:37 GMT -5
jeebus, zeriel. don't bring the crowd down.
you're supposed to show up and say you heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend.... lather rinse repeat.
and then come up with something kind of plausible.
shit, dude, get with the program or else we will ignore you until such future time necessitates your involvement.
back to the clam shell. i banish you to making pearls.
or what the heck ever. maybe shuffleboard or darts would be a little more civilized.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:15:45 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Jun 2, 2010 19:15:45 GMT -5
For as long as Ed is alive (and assuming he's telling the truth) it would be absolutely logical for new statements to be requested. My understanding of the game has evolved quite a bit since I got my PM, and I assume Ed is experiencing a somewhat similar evolution. We may even look back at the endgame at how functionally pointless one of the statements he's already requested (or might request in the future) ended up being.
My point being, is there a reason you are trying to limit Ed to statements only made during the naive and early days of the game when no one knew what the hell was going on, Zeriel? Ah, that's right. You say you're not participating in back-room conversations.
If that is true and you are not talking to anyone in private, which is also the word on the street, then you may also be at risk of lasting a short time in this game. Being resistant to clanning-up is allegedly what got Idle killed. But if my theory is correct, the Day killer is probably thinking about targets quite differently than he was Yesterday, so who knows.
And fwiw, I am not the source of any of this information, just the messenger.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:22:28 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:22:28 GMT -5
i have decided to put ed to the test which i don't believe he will survive unless he is a true honest to goodness truthteller.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:23:47 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:23:47 GMT -5
pat roberstons is more motivated by money than by a belief in "christianity"?
'cause it ain't my christianity.
ok, maybe not fair.
let's go again.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:26:55 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:26:55 GMT -5
the bp oil fiasco in the gulf was motivated by right wing nut cases trying to make a quick buck.
the bp oil biasco in the gulf was motivated by left wing nut cases trying to make a quick buck.
by the way, the truth of the aforementioned statements are not mutually exclusionary.
both could be true or both could be false.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:27:56 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:27:56 GMT -5
obama is not a natural born american.
kind of want to figure whether i give the birthers legs or just kind of add fuel to the fire.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:28:17 GMT -5
Post by Mahaloth on Jun 2, 2010 19:28:17 GMT -5
I find Bill greatly suspicious for several reasons, and were it not for the fact that the news about Mahaloth was posted to the thread, I'd be voting for him right now--just to get it out there. There is no "news" out there about me.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:29:23 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:29:23 GMT -5
mexican food in central texas is the only way to eat tex-mex.
the answer to that bad boy will kind of prove whether he is full of crud or not on the rest of the statement truisms/falsisms.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:31:02 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:31:02 GMT -5
manned space exploration makes sense from an economic viewpoint.
just want to know whether i should invest more heavily in that moon drilling stock i have.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:33:47 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:33:47 GMT -5
if she truly sells seashells by the seashore does she get enough cash for an ice cream cone.
it is chocolate.
it is vanilla.
it is a sorbet.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:35:07 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:35:07 GMT -5
cookies is full of shit.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:35:46 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:35:46 GMT -5
the new small coke cans are an improvement.
i kind of like the fact they don't get as warm as quick.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:38:50 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:38:50 GMT -5
hurricane strenght is dependent on the contingent size of martians currently on the earth.
we've really been haggling over this puppy and i kind of would like a cite.
near as i can tell they were all like at home for katrina and wilma and stuff. last year they really populated n.o. heavily - hence no hurricanes. it's just a theory at this point.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:42:49 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:42:49 GMT -5
the production of food items in your garden is inversely proportional to the amount you desire them.
i've got squash out the ear. maters coming in. an overabundance of chives.
i am sick of squash. maters give be me heartburn. i don't like chives.
how come the parsley and rosemary aren't doing better?
the last was just rhetorical sense there is no either true or false to that puppy.
but the original question stands.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:49:11 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Jun 2, 2010 19:49:11 GMT -5
the new small coke cans are an improvement. i kind of like the fact they don't get as warm as quick. Actually they get warm faster, less mass, mC pdT/dt with a bit of variability associated with the smaller surface area exposed to the convective environment. You just don't notice because you drink them faster. Glugg, glugg. vote Mahaloth
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:51:30 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Jun 2, 2010 19:51:30 GMT -5
Yeah, being annoyed by Ed trying to use his power in the best way possible is definitely a new one. so you believe ed? Until given reason to do otherwise, yes.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:52:46 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Jun 2, 2010 19:52:46 GMT -5
the new small coke cans are an improvement. i kind of like the fact they don't get as warm as quick. Actually they get warm faster, less mass, mC pdT/dt with a bit of variability associated with the smaller surface area exposed to the convective environment. You just don't notice because you drink them faster. Glugg, glugg. I should modkill you for bringing up bad thermodynamics memories from college.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 19:55:49 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jun 2, 2010 19:55:49 GMT -5
the new small coke cans are an improvement. i kind of like the fact they don't get as warm as quick. Actually they get warm faster, less mass, mC pdT/dt with a bit of variability associated with the smaller surface area exposed to the convective environment. You just don't notice because you drink them faster. Glugg, glugg. vote Mahaloththat kind of makes sense. it just seems that i can slam the little ones back in two or three massive chugs as opposed to the others where after a couple i need to take a break and then you have like 4 - 5 ozs that are just kind of room temperaturing.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 20:02:00 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Jun 2, 2010 20:02:00 GMT -5
hurricane strenght is dependent on the contingent size of martians currently on the earth. And the number of pirates is directly proportional to global warming. We need more pirates; Pirates vs GW
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 20:22:41 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Jun 2, 2010 20:22:41 GMT -5
I should modkill you for bringing up bad thermodynamics memories from college. Hahahahaha, I have no worries of something as silly as a modkill. I know how to duck and cover*. If a simple newspaper will save me from a nuclear blast surely it will save me from an irate mod. The real reason kids did drugs in the 60's. D&R
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 20:47:43 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 20:47:43 GMT -5
The win condition in the PM I received from the Authors describing my role at the start of this game of mafia was phrased exactly and only as quoted: "Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out." For the record, I'm done with these games. Even if Ed's power is highly useful in this context for finding a MotD or HoC members, he has quite enough with two statements from each of us. Which is really my entire problem with it--how many things do you really need to fish out of us, Ed? Really. vote Special Ed I have no reason to believe you're not using this scheme to your own advantage--a member of the HoC or the MotD could easily have a truthsayer power AND use it to avoid being suspected/detected himself. As I'm not involved at all in the apparent off-board rumor mill, I have nothing to say about the rest of this day, and frankly don't give a rip until or unless someone elects to bring me into the loop. Which would probably be a good idea for them, just sayin'. I need a new statement each Day. I cannot investigate a Day 1 statement on day 2. So, yes, each Day I'll need something.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 20:52:04 GMT -5
Post by special on Jun 2, 2010 20:52:04 GMT -5
i have decided to put ed to the test which i don't believe he will survive unless he is a true honest to goodness truthteller. While all of your statements are interesting. I can only investigate 1 statement per Day. And the deadline has passed anyway. I have discovered a person whose win condition matches the standard one as first stated by Pleonast on Day 1, and as my role PM indicates. No, as for your threat goes, feel free to redirect Mahaloth on to me. As there are Day Kills, there are also Day protectors.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 21:10:07 GMT -5
Post by Zeriel on Jun 2, 2010 21:10:07 GMT -5
My point being, is there a reason you are trying to limit Ed to statements only made during the naive and early days of the game when no one knew what the hell was going on, Zeriel? My reasoning is simple--I am under the impression, as peeker said best, that none of you are really my friends except my clanmates. I don't want to get into a situation where Mister Ed comes up with a request for truthiness that involves information it would not profit me personally to share, and I'm saying that up front now so that my refusal to cooperate if he hits something I don't think acceptable (such as things like powers) isn't taken as an implicit lie. Well, I am talking to several people in private, and in point of fact am in one or more clans. I am just not initiating many conversations right now, given that I'm relatively content with my volume of back-channel communication at this stage of the game. I simply haven't heard any of the back-alley conversation that is filtering among certain members of the game as alluded to during this Day, which is pretty much what I've said.
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 22:58:48 GMT -5
Post by Captain Pinkies on Jun 2, 2010 22:58:48 GMT -5
Interesting events.... Clearly I am failing at this back channel rumor mill, as I am unclear why peeps are voting for Mahaloth. Other than someone thinks he could be a day killer... I mean rumor has it that I have the same body parts as lady gaga.... But that is a whole different topic...
|
|
|
Day Two
Jun 2, 2010 23:28:48 GMT -5
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 2, 2010 23:28:48 GMT -5
Interesting events.... Clearly I am failing at this back channel rumor mill, as I am unclear why peeps are voting for Mahaloth. Other than someone thinks he could be a day killer... I mean rumor has it that I have the same body parts as lady gaga.... But that is a whole different topic... I've gotten some of the same rumors others have been speaking of, but I was loath to act on them, because I had little else. The evidence I've seen put out in the thread was fairly shaky as well. HOWEVER the fact that Mahaloth has had no defence beyond an OMGUS vote is what makes me think that there really is something going on here, behind just being a day killer. It makes me think he's someone the majority of us have to have gone in order to win. Therefore I'm going to go with the crowd. Vote Mahaloth
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jun 3, 2010 1:46:49 GMT -5
My PM says: Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out. Total, can you please be more specific? Your PM may very well say this, but does it indicate that it is your win condition? Sure My wincon is Win Condition: You win when the Master of the Deck is dead, all members of the House of Chains have been eliminated, and your Primary Clan cannot be prevented from killing all other players before all Primary Members of the clan itself is wiped out.
|
|