Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Jul 5, 2010 12:34:03 GMT -5
Is it just me, or does 'defense against soul stainers' sure sounds like 'doc'? Which would leave NAF with some 'splainin' to do. I don't follow. Who said "defense against soul stainers" besides you?
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Jul 5, 2010 14:45:52 GMT -5
<font style="font-size: 12px;"> <font style="font-size: 12px;">
Is it just me, or does 'defense against soul stainers' sure sounds like 'doc'? Which would leave NAF with some 'splainin' to do.I don't follow. Who said "defense against soul stainers" besides you? Blockey said it in the start of day post.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jul 5, 2010 20:48:14 GMT -5
Okay I have a theory.
We know there are Soul Stainers. We know that colors are very important to the game. Perhaps Total Lost and Bill showing up as "white" means that their souls aren't stained? They're still pure or whatever. I dunno. It's a thought.
As for not voting, I just completely forgot about when the Day ended. That was my bad.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Jul 6, 2010 1:27:40 GMT -5
Howdy all, I missed the deadline to vote. I was out yesterday and toDay with the family.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jul 6, 2010 5:21:23 GMT -5
I'm sorry - I had to ask the mod some questions before I could post toDay. I'm allowed to talk about it. This morning I was informed that I have to have all text in white. I was not told why.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Jul 6, 2010 9:11:20 GMT -5
Okay I have a theory. We know there are Soul Stainers. We know that colors are very important to the game. Perhaps Total Lost and Bill showing up as "white" means that their souls aren't stained? They're still pure or whatever. I dunno. It's a thought. As for not voting, I just completely forgot about when the Day ended. That was my bad. Still pure? hmm...dunno about Total LOL!
|
|
|
Post by Archangel on Jul 6, 2010 9:12:51 GMT -5
Hi guys, I'm sorry I missed the voting yesterDay, in all honesty I forgot. Bill, was the blank post an accident or a clue of some sort? Highlight his entire post. He's speaking in white. Also, why didn't you vote yesterDay? Thanks, redskeezix, I didn't see there was any text there at all. As noted in my post that you quoted, I forgot to vote. That sucks and I'm sorry and I'll be around much more this week.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jul 6, 2010 20:50:06 GMT -5
Okay I have a theory. We know there are Soul Stainers. We know that colors are very important to the game. Perhaps Total Lost and Bill showing up as "white" means that their souls aren't stained? They're still pure or whatever. I dunno. It's a thought. Well, I can post normally, and my soul isn't stained (as far as I know). Seems like an odd snuggle, here.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jul 6, 2010 23:23:36 GMT -5
Well, I can post normally, and my soul isn't stained (as far as I know). Seems like an odd snuggle, here. It wasn't really a snuggle, more of an observation. As far as I know my soul isn't stained either. But if somebody has the power to say, highlight two players each round and show if they're soul is stained, then I'd guess Bill and Total showed up as "clean." Unless of course white means they're actually stained. But I'd normally consider white to be unstained. Of course, this is a Blockey game...so....whatever. I was just putting out a theory.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jul 7, 2010 0:09:20 GMT -5
It wasn't really a snuggle, more of an observation. As far as I know my soul isn't stained either. But if somebody has the power to say, highlight two players each round and show if they're soul is stained, then I'd guess Bill and Total showed up as "clean." Unless of course white means they're actually stained. But I'd normally consider white to be unstained. Of course, this is a Blockey game...so....whatever. I was just putting out a theory. Doesn't make sense. we already lost our 'stain investigator' last night.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jul 7, 2010 8:38:44 GMT -5
Still pure? hmm...dunno about Total LOL! Hey! I'm pure evil, pure delight and pure Ullz
Anyway - have you been informed why this happened and if it's just toDay?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 7, 2010 11:37:59 GMT -5
Hi guys, sorry I have been absent toDay, but life is getting in my way right now. Stupid life.
Anyway. Nothing that's happened so far toDay has given me a better lead than the one I played yesterday. On top of that Red voted to lynch a townie. Now I know, town votes to lynch town all the time, so it isn't like my case against him is awesome, but with very little else going on he is the only place I can think of to put my vote.
vote Red
Also, can we get a vote count up in here?[/b][/i][u/]
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jul 7, 2010 13:06:16 GMT -5
vote Red Also, can we get a vote count up in here?[/b][/i][u/][/quote] Ok.......... Vote Count: Redskeezix (1): NAF
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Jul 7, 2010 15:30:47 GMT -5
Still pure? hmm...dunno about Total LOL! Hey! I'm pure evil, pure delight and pure Ullz Anyway - have you been informed why this happened and if it's just toDay? I was told I had a post restriction and have to post in white for toDay
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 7, 2010 16:04:08 GMT -5
vote Red Also, can we get a vote count up in here?[/b][/i][u/][/quote] Ok.......... Vote Count: Redskeezix (1): NAF[/quote] That's what I thought. No one else wants to vote?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 7, 2010 16:05:58 GMT -5
On second thought. No one else vote. I want to see a person get lynched by a single vote. I think it will be a first.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Jul 7, 2010 16:34:04 GMT -5
Heh, while I disagree with your vote, NAF. You might as well stick with the same vote day in and day out, right? Even if you have no reason at all.
I was hoping for something more interesting to talk about but weak ass votes is gonna be it i guess. So in the interest of spurring on discussion and because the most scummy actions are coming from the a claimed doctor (this might be a mild form of lynch the only other person in the room who is really saying anything).
On to archangel:
The phrase "In all honesty" that you have used to describe your reasons for not voting, is often time a verbal cue that you are lying or you have been lying.
Did you not vote because you were not around, or did you not vote because it was so quiet in here yesterday that you were unable to determine who you could vote for blamelessly?
It's probably the weakest vote I've ever cast in my entire life, but heyzeus kristos we need to do something this game or there is no point in even playing. vote archangel
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 7, 2010 17:07:43 GMT -5
Well, I don't question that my vote is weak, but weak votes are really all we have until more people start putting themselves out. Note your own vote and the commentary you placed on it. Saying that I have no reason at all is a flat out lie though. You might not like my reasoning, but I have clearly stated reasons from yesterday. I also have your vote on FCoD yesterday. I can see how you might not think that is much, so I will expand on why I think that vote adds to the case against you.
My feeling is that scum probably all voted. I can see how maybe they might not, but I find it unlikely. You did vote yesterday, so that puts you in the pool of people I find most likely to be scum. I also feel like at least one scum voted for FCoD. You voted for FCoD. Again, other people did too, but hey I figure it ups your odds. Couple that with my case against you yesterday and you saying things like I am voting for you "for no reason at all" and I still think you look better as scum than anyone else so far.
But keep talking and you might change my mind. Hell I would love it if you changed my mind. I fine that the best scum hunting happens by process of elimination. So have at it.
I don't know that the vote for archangel will help you though.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jul 7, 2010 21:47:41 GMT -5
Doesn't make sense. we already lost our 'stain investigator' last night. 1) If it was the work of the stain investigator, his action may have still gone through. 2) There may be more than one stain investigator, as shown by two people having a color-coded day. 3) There may be multiple types of stain investigators. The dead one may have done the public stuff, or maybe his investigations were delivered personally to him. We don't know.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jul 7, 2010 22:07:10 GMT -5
So the scummiest player to me at this point remains... NAF. And he's a claimed doctor, so I can't vote him. But I don't like the idea of lynching Red. He's playing, vocal, and desperate to make a case somewhere. So I'll toss a vote to reduce his chance at elimination, although, really, if someone wants to start a bandwagon on a lurker, I'd be happy to switch.
vote: archangel
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Jul 7, 2010 22:42:49 GMT -5
I have to say this game has been oddly quiet... This is making it very hard to play the game...
I do think it is interesting that there are 2 people that have been told to post in white. I personally think that they are unstained / pure souls... so neither of them are on my list to vote...
I too think that scum was on the board last night with a vote.... So based upon the fact the other people who voted for FCOD yesterday are dead.....
VOTE RED
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Jul 8, 2010 4:42:12 GMT -5
Thanks, redskeezix, I didn't see there was any text there at all. As noted in my post that you quoted, I forgot to vote. That sucks and I'm sorry and I'll be around much more this week. You didn't see in text from me...but you thought Total had been subbed our based on her being in white? selective whiteness?
Vote: Archangel
And I agree with Boozy, I find NAF scummy - as always.
NAF - with "Necromancer" and "Chromomancer" why just "the doctor"? seems out of colo(u)r
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jul 8, 2010 5:42:52 GMT -5
Well, I don't question that my vote is weak, but weak votes are really all we have until more people start putting themselves out. Note your own vote and the commentary you placed on it. Saying that I have no reason at all is a flat out lie though. You might not like my reasoning, but I have clearly stated reasons from yesterday. I also have your vote on FCoD yesterday. I can see how you might not think that is much, so I will expand on why I think that vote adds to the case against you. My feeling is that scum probably all voted. I can see how maybe they might not, but I find it unlikely. You did vote yesterday, so that puts you in the pool of people I find most likely to be scum. I also feel like at least one scum voted for FCoD. You voted for FCoD. Again, other people did too, but hey I figure it ups your odds. Couple that with my case against you yesterday and you saying things like I am voting for you "for no reason at all" and I still think you look better as scum than anyone else so far. But keep talking and you might change my mind. Hell I would love it if you changed my mind. I fine that the best scum hunting happens by process of elimination. So have at it. I don't know that the vote for archangel will help you though. I have to disagree. In one resent game we had Zuma, Peeker and Sister Coyote all scum and none of them with a vote Day 1. So - even with it bringing myself into the lynch-pool I'd rather lynch someone not putting down votes.
Oh, but I have to say, I do (very much) like the remark "I fine that the best scum hunting happens by process of elimination".
Anyway I'm going to jump the bandwagon against Archangle. She has been here. She's not a absent-lurker. Yet I feel her posts are easy quick post with very little in-game content.
Also I like the fact that Red is a vocal player. That doesn't eliminate him as Scum (peeker comes to mind here) but I hate the last couple of games where we've been lynching vocal-players and then the game goes quiet after Day 3 and all just wait to see who scum NKs.
That's why I'll VOTE ARCHANGLE
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on Jul 8, 2010 5:45:15 GMT -5
Thanks, redskeezix, I didn't see there was any text there at all. As noted in my post that you quoted, I forgot to vote. That sucks and I'm sorry and I'll be around much more this week. You didn't see in text from me...but you thought Total had been subbed our based on her being in white? selective whiteness?
Vote: Archangel
And I agree with Boozy, I find NAF scummy - as always.
NAF - with "Necromancer" and "Chromomancer" why just "the doctor"? seems out of colo(u)r In all fairness - I think the reason she thought I'd been subbed was the fact that I was "not" listed on the list of players in the Days first post. I myself noticed it and was very surprised until I saw I was in all white....
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 8, 2010 12:36:45 GMT -5
Thanks, redskeezix, I didn't see there was any text there at all. As noted in my post that you quoted, I forgot to vote. That sucks and I'm sorry and I'll be around much more this week. You didn't see in text from me...but you thought Total had been subbed our based on her being in white? selective whiteness?
Vote: Archangel
And I agree with Boozy, I find NAF scummy - as always.
NAF - with "Necromancer" and "Chromomancer" why just "the doctor"? seems out of colo(u)r Take it up with Blockey. So I now have Boozy, Bill and Red calling me scummy. I know why Red thinks I am scummy, and his reasoning is deeply flawed. Why do y'all think I am scummy?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jul 8, 2010 12:39:01 GMT -5
You didn't see in text from me...but you thought Total had been subbed our based on her being in white? selective whiteness?
Vote: Archangel
And I agree with Boozy, I find NAF scummy - as always.
NAF - with "Necromancer" and "Chromomancer" why just "the doctor"? seems out of colo(u)r Take it up with Blockey. So I now have Boozy, Bill and Red calling me scummy. I know why Red thinks I am scummy, and his reasoning is deeply flawed. Why do y'all think I am scummy? Hmm, part of the reason you might find me scummy is my continued inability to post complete thoughts to the game thread. Sorry, I shouldn't play distracted, but it's the only way I live right now. I don't know why I am just the doctor, but I am very explicitly "the doctor" according to my role PM. Why I didn't get a neat color coded role, I don't know. You'll have to ask Blockey.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Jul 8, 2010 15:52:05 GMT -5
I have to say this game has been oddly quiet... This is making it very hard to play the game... I do think it is interesting that there are 2 people that have been told to post in white. I personally think that they are unstained / pure souls... so neither of them are on my list to vote... I too think that scum was on the board last night with a vote.... So based upon the fact the other people who voted for FCOD yesterday are dead..... So Cap'n Pinkies, you are voting me because I voted FCOD and am still alive, how did you make a decision between myself and pedescribe (who also fits that criteria), since you were unclear in your post? Or was that just a me too vote?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Jul 8, 2010 16:43:19 GMT -5
So Cap'n Pinkies, you are voting me because I voted FCOD and am still alive, how did you make a decision between myself and pedescribe (who also fits that criteria), since you were unclear in your post? Or was that just a me too vote? I choose you for my vote over PED because PED voted for FCOD. You jump off NAF because he claimed doc directly to FCOD because a post he wrote was "too strongly worded". I just kinda feel like you picked the next player with a vote and put yours there.
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Merestil Haye on Jul 8, 2010 17:22:44 GMT -5
Thanks, redskeezix, I didn't see there was any text there at all. As noted in my post that you quoted, I forgot to vote. That sucks and I'm sorry and I'll be around much more this week. You didn't see in text from me...but you thought Total had been subbed our based on her being in white? selective whiteness?
Vote: Archangel
And I agree with Boozy, I find NAF scummy - as always.
NAF - with "Necromancer" and "Chromomancer" why just "the doctor"? seems out of colo(u)r We've already got one example in this game of a Town-aligned power role who's ability was not labelled as something to do with colour magic, and that is FCoD's. I don't think we can challenge NAF's claim just on his claiming to be Doctor.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Jul 8, 2010 17:29:55 GMT -5
Ok, Pinkies, to further clarify:
You are voting me because:
1. You think scum would have voted FCoD yesterday. 2. I am still alive and I voted yesterday. 3. You are making an assumption that white posting = not scum, why you are making this assumption is beyond me, I've seen nothing in the rules or description to indicate what white text might mean. 4. I switched my vote after a power role claim, with only a few hours left in the Day, to a player who already had a vote.
I did give a reason, which I will explain further: coming on too strongly is often scummy, and I have used it as reasoning to lynch scum in the past (cite: Cecil Pond, KellyCriterion). It stems from the fact that scum knows who is scum and who is not scum, and sometimes they are unable to gauge effectively their tone when they are manufacturing cases. They come off as overagressive or overdefensive because they are trying to make their cases seem genuine, and substituing agressiveness for honesty since it is lacking.
Sometimes they are overaggressive town, and sometimes they are scum. You pays your money and you takes your chances. Out of all of the cases that I saw that could have been made yesterday, the one against FCoD was my next choice after NAF, it had the greatest likelihood, IMO of producing a scum lynch.
Just a question, since you didn't bother to answer it when I extended it to all.
Why didn't you vote yesterday? And in your special case, why did you only post fluff yesterDay? Did you really have nothing at all of substance to contribute?
|
|