|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 2, 2007 0:20:06 GMT -5
I was figuring the Day was still on until Mal ended it...
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jun 2, 2007 0:20:45 GMT -5
Kyrie, either I'm misunderstanding you or you're misunderstanding me or we're both misunderstanding each other.
Here is a breakdown of how I saw the exchange and what I was asking, put as simply as I can.
I voted for you, citing a few reasons, mostly because of your actions on day one, and mostly for your posting style (which has been not a lot, and when you do you don't seem to say or offer much). Thrown into this, I noticed you stuck up for zuma...You named him specifically. Not just randomly, but very specifically when you stuck up for him in the post that I caught. This was, as far as I could tell in this game so far, unlike you, as you've never said one thing either or about anyone (save for some suspicions of me and who you voted for in day one)..and certainly never STICKING up for someone. I just found it odd.
So anyway, to make a long story short and simple, you say THEN say to me, when I pointed the oddness out, this:
Bolding mine.
So I asked..
Which is pretty much taken as is. WHY are you suspicious of Zuma?
You then make a long post where you try to figure out what I was "why"ing about (which also puzzled me because I had asked why to your quote "I remain slightly suspcious of zuma myself" which I thought explained right away what I was "why"ing) and eventually did get it, here:
To which I replied, finally, with:
You NOT doing so (and continuing to not do so), makes me suspicious. You say you're suspicious of everyone, yet you saw fit to mention him specifically..and not even under a suspicion guise then but actually in his defense a bit. It all just reeks of inconsistance and avoidance. I asked you, straight forward, "Why are you suspicious of him since you mentioned him specifically before" (or, by the same token, "why did you see fit to stick up for him bit specifically" if you don't like the first question).
And this, finally, by me:
was just a continuance of what I seemingly see happening since we started this whole exchange,...that you're not giving any steadfast or actual reasons for your suspicious or defenses of other people. That strikes me as cowardly some, if you're crew, and extremely eleusive if you're scum.
|
|
|
Post by zuma on Jun 2, 2007 0:27:28 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure the day's over now.
Just got off work, and looks like a lot went down. FWIW mHaye was the person who threw FCOD into the tie at the last minute, so I guess I'm still good with my mhaye vote.
|
|
|
Post by autolycus on Jun 2, 2007 0:42:04 GMT -5
Yarrr, I be back! I was out playin' cards with me mates all day. Did we learn anything from the tie, or did I get sum barnacles on tha brain? Is it too late for voting?
Anyway, who'll tip some grog wit' me tonight? Anchors away.
|
|
|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 2, 2007 0:43:00 GMT -5
Uh...seriously, Auto? Seriously?!?
|
|
|
Post by Malacandra on Jun 2, 2007 1:40:04 GMT -5
And once again the argufying aboard the doomed ship rages on until the moon is high above the topmast, and FlyingCowOfDoom is indeed looking doomed until there is a haughty claim of officership both on his behalf and the accused's by ArizonaTeach. This swings the weight of suspicion to MHaye, but sick at heart after hanging an innocent man the previous night, the ship's company point out a little island barely half a mile away and toss the condemned man over the side with an empty keg to float himself ashore. He has time for a cheery wave before a triangular fin cuts the water...
And another...
And another...
MHaye (Crew) has been fed to the sharks. Day Two is over. Night people, get your PMs to me please.
|
|