|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:00:01 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 14:00:01 GMT -5
capybara and storyteller make good points about pirates defending crew. These points further remove my suspicion of capybara while deepening my suspicion of hockeymonkey. My primary reason for suspecting hockeymonkey is her voting record of quick, bandwagon votes, one of which contributed to killing a crewmate, and another that was for someone I happen to know is a crewmate (me). Add this to her defense of capybara (a player that I suspected, but was not widely considered scummy), Gadarene, and BM and it seems very scummy to me.
Storyteller, you make similar, excellent points regarding zuma. I think we may both be on to something here, and I encourage everyone to research our points.
--FCOD
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:11:19 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 14:11:19 GMT -5
I've compiled a list of hockeymonkey's Day posts. If anyone feels I've poorly represented the spirit of any of her posts, please correct me. Day One Posts: Nothing relevant.Votes for Idle Thoughts because she feels he's too agreeable.Explains the reasoning behind her vote for Idle Thoughts: he has posts that are all over the place.Says she's starting to think Idle Thoughts is more of a "confused deckhand" than a pirate because his posts are all over the place.Says she doesn't think capybara is a pirate, agrees with MtS about auntbeast and votes for her.Says she thinks Autolycus should be subbed out rather than lynched.When asked why she thinks auntbeast is a pirate instead of inexperienced town, she says "Because her posts don't read as crew to me. Her posts seem more like an inexperienced player with a scum role."In response to storyteller's KatiRoo vote, she jumps right on the bandwagon, agreeing completely with him.Says she played last game stupidly, and she's trying to post enough to avoid being "under the radar".Nothing relevant.Day Two Posts: Acknowledges her reasoning is thin, and says that she can't argue with Lakai's vote for her based on her posting record."Gad, I'm confused on how last night's kill pointed at capybara. In a good way? In a bad way? Could you please elaborate?"Worries about wasting too much time figuring out who killed whom, wants to avoid a speed lynch. Also thanks Gad for answering her question. Says capybara talks too much to be a pirate.Says that she thinks the exchange between me and cowgirl has a contrived, piratey vibe.Agrees with NAF's reasoning for voting for me and votes for me.Says she missed reading some pages, but will leave her vote where it is for the time being.Thanks Gadarene for the analysis. Unvotes me, but says I'm still scummy. Says mhaye's slipup sounds like bona fide pirate. Says she thinks capybara, Gadarene, and Blaster Master all give her a crew vibe. Says she doesn't like the idea of directing Deadeye.---------- Here what I see: Day One. She votes for Idle Thoughts on thin reasoning. That's fine, I did the same thing. Then, she unvotes him, citing the same reason she based her vote on. She defends capybara. Votes for auntbeast based upon MtS's conclusions. When storyteller makes a good case for KatiRoo, she jumps on that bandwagon. Day Two. Defends capybara again. When NAF makes a reasonable argument to suspect me, she agrees and votes for me. She says she missed some pages, but leaves her vote on me. Then, she defends capybara again, along with Gadarene and BM. Here's my opinion: she's and capybara are both pirates. Why would she keep defending her? She's also very quick to vote for crewmates that are falling under suspicion. I mean that she was quick to vote for KatiRoo (confirmed crew) and me (I know I'm crew.) Maybe I'm wrong, but there's certainly enough suspicious behavior here for me to Vote hockeymonkey. --FCOD Thanks for pulling up my posting record! I wish I had gotten this far when I responded to NAF. ;D If I were a pirate, I would definitely not go out of my way to defend another pirate. That would be insane because when the defending pirate is killed, the crew could go back and say "Hey, she was a pirate and defended such and such, so such and such must be a pirate too! If I were a pirate, I might defend someone that I knew to be crew so that when I was killed, that person would immediately fall under suspicion. That said, I'm not a pirate. I don't know if capy is crew or pirate, but her posts are pro-crew to me. That's all I'm saying.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:14:06 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on May 30, 2007 14:14:06 GMT -5
[quote author=hockeymonkey board=general thread=1180304936 post=1180551472 <Kyle's mom>What what what? </KM>
I'm trying to post as much as I can, and believe it or not, I am trying to do some analysis. Now that we are into day 2, there is a lot more to work with. An exaggeration? I'll say! I've voted where I thought my vote should go at the time, and I really put a lot of thought into it. I won't argue that I used other people's analysis to help me make those decisions. I'll lay it out for you...
Day One -Voted for Idle Thoughts for agreeing with me then voting for me because of the same reasoning he was agreeing with. Thought that one up all by myself. -Unvoted IT, Voted Auntbeast because I thought MtS gave a good arguement and I agreed. -Unvoted Auntbeast, Voted Katiroo based on storyteller's arguement. Katiroo was lynched. 3 votes on Day One...not too unusual. There were others who voted and unvoted lots more.
Day Two -Well into day two, I voted for FCOD. I had previously stated that he was twigging my radar, then you, NAF, laid out a good analysis. After reading some more posts, I unvoted him.
That brings us to now. 3 votes day one and 1 vote today. I don't think that is 6 times, and certainly not 17! Shame on you for such a blatant mischaracterization/misrepresentation! Get your facts straight before you accuse me.
FTR, you are wrong about my scumminess. I'm just a very busy crewman. You don't think the decks swab themselves do you? [/quote]
I suppose it is possible I am wrong, but I don't think I am.
I admitted in my own initial post that I exaggerated and couldn't quite remember how many times you had voted. I think the difference between 4 and (which I said was an approximate) is negligible when your overall post count is so low. You seem to vote for whoever the breeze is blowing toward HM. And you unvote just as readily and with little reason.
Couple that with the low content posting, and low posting in general...just smacks of scum to me.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:18:27 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 14:18:27 GMT -5
If I were a pirate, I would definitely not go out of my way to defend another pirate. That would be insane because when the defending pirate is killed, the crew could go back and say "Hey, she was a pirate and defended such and such, so such and such must be a pirate too! If I were a pirate, I might defend someone that I knew to be crew so that when I was killed, that person would immediately fall under suspicion. That said, I'm not a pirate. I don't know if capy is crew or pirate, but her posts are pro-crew to me. That's all I'm saying. I've already realized that a pirate would not be likely to defend another pirate. It doesn't change my reasoning for suspecting you. In fact, if I change my mind and begin to think that capybara is crew it makes me suspect you even more. I think it's a scummy to defend other people in the first place, but when you do it repeatedly for people that are generally not suspected of piracy it doesn't look good for you. --FCOD
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:18:49 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on May 30, 2007 14:18:49 GMT -5
So this getting married while trying to play thing has not worked out so well. To top off being largely MIA since Friday, now that I'm home, I'm staying home sick. I think the best thing for me to do at this point is to ask for a sub. It would take me a good chunk of the day to read and digest what has transpired, and I should be horizontal and resting. If I wait untill I'm feeling better, it just increases the amount of digestion and analysis that I'd have to do.
Sorry y'all. It looks to be a very fun game.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:19:06 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 14:19:06 GMT -5
Also, MALACANDRA CAN WE GET A VOTE COUNT?
TIA.
--FCOD
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:20:36 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 14:20:36 GMT -5
[quote author=hockeymonkey board=general thread=1180304936 post=1180551472 <Kyle's mom>What what what? </KM> I'm trying to post as much as I can, and believe it or not, I am trying to do some analysis. Now that we are into day 2, there is a lot more to work with. An exaggeration? I'll say! I've voted where I thought my vote should go at the time, and I really put a lot of thought into it. I won't argue that I used other people's analysis to help me make those decisions. I'll lay it out for you... Day One -Voted for Idle Thoughts for agreeing with me then voting for me because of the same reasoning he was agreeing with. Thought that one up all by myself. -Unvoted IT, Voted Auntbeast because I thought MtS gave a good arguement and I agreed. -Unvoted Auntbeast, Voted Katiroo based on storyteller's arguement. Katiroo was lynched. 3 votes on Day One...not too unusual. There were others who voted and unvoted lots more. Day Two -Well into day two, I voted for FCOD. I had previously stated that he was twigging my radar, then you, NAF, laid out a good analysis. After reading some more posts, I unvoted him. That brings us to now. 3 votes day one and 1 vote today. I don't think that is 6 times, and certainly not 17! Shame on you for such a blatant mischaracterization/misrepresentation! Get your facts straight before you accuse me. FTR, you are wrong about my scumminess. I'm just a very busy crewman. You don't think the decks swab themselves do you? I suppose it is possible I am wrong, but I don't think I am. I admitted in my own initial post that I exaggerated and couldn't quite remember how many times you had voted. I think the difference between 4 and (which I said was an approximate) is negligible when your overall post count is so low. You seem to vote for whoever the breeze is blowing toward HM. And you unvote just as readily and with little reason. Couple that with the low content posting, and low posting in general...just smacks of scum to me.[/quote] Well, our strategies are different. You are poking people with sticks and turning up the heat voting and unvoting lots of different people. That seems scummier to me that what I'm doing. You are starting up the breezes to see which one catches sails.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:22:53 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 14:22:53 GMT -5
If I were a pirate, I would definitely not go out of my way to defend another pirate. That would be insane because when the defending pirate is killed, the crew could go back and say "Hey, she was a pirate and defended such and such, so such and such must be a pirate too! If I were a pirate, I might defend someone that I knew to be crew so that when I was killed, that person would immediately fall under suspicion. That said, I'm not a pirate. I don't know if capy is crew or pirate, but her posts are pro-crew to me. That's all I'm saying. I've already realized that a pirate would not be likely to defend another pirate. It doesn't change my reasoning for suspecting you. In fact, if I change my mind and begin to think that capybara is crew it makes me suspect you even more. I think it's a scummy to defend other people in the first place, but when you do it repeatedly for people that are generally not suspected of piracy it doesn't look good for you. --FCOD Oy, see what happens when I come out of my shell and start posting? I don't mind if I get lynched, I can still win with my crewmates.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:28:32 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on May 30, 2007 14:28:32 GMT -5
Well, our strategies are different. You are poking people with sticks and turning up the heat voting and unvoting lots of different people. Well I suppose I deserve that in a way (s'what I get for following my belief that we should be playing transparently), but it isn't actually a fair characterization of what I have been doing and it is a bit of a straw man. You are not convincing me that you aren't scum here.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:37:13 GMT -5
Post by Gadarene on May 30, 2007 14:37:13 GMT -5
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies:
Awww! I hope you feel better! (And congratulations again on the nuptials!) Sorry to hear you won't be able to continue. To make sure he sees this: Malacandra, can we get a sub for Cookies?
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:40:13 GMT -5
Post by auntbeast on May 30, 2007 14:40:13 GMT -5
Well, our strategies are different. You are poking people with sticks and turning up the heat voting and unvoting lots of different people. Well I suppose I deserve that in a way (s'what I get for following my belief that we should be playing transparently), but it isn't actually a fair characterization of what I have been doing and it is a bit of a straw man. You are not convincing me that you aren't scum here. I will say that your negative statements regarding players far outnumber anyone elses on this Day so far. I do find it interesting that while you have called out more people than anyone else, very, very few have called you out, which seems far different than what happened on Day One. I haven't a clue if you are pirate or crew, but I do find the differences in the days reactions to people being "named." is quite significant. Heck, yesterDay, it seemed if you mentioned someone in passing that you were virtually guaranteed to be held over the fire. *shrug*
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 14:49:53 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 14:49:53 GMT -5
So this getting married while trying to play thing has not worked out so well. To top off being largely MIA since Friday, now that I'm home, I'm staying home sick. I think the best thing for me to do at this point is to ask for a sub. It would take me a good chunk of the day to read and digest what has transpired, and I should be horizontal and resting. If I wait untill I'm feeling better, it just increases the amount of digestion and analysis that I'd have to do. Sorry y'all. It looks to be a very fun game. I hope you feel better! Thanks for being fair about the game, it's appreciated. --FCOD
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:08:54 GMT -5
Post by Malacandra on May 30, 2007 15:08:54 GMT -5
ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies:Awww! I hope you feel better! (And congratulations again on the nuptials!) Sorry to hear you won't be able to continue. To make sure he sees this: Malacandra, can we get a sub for Cookies? I've notified Kat, who was first reserve. If she doesn't show up, I'll post a more general request.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:33:28 GMT -5
Post by Malacandra on May 30, 2007 15:33:28 GMT -5
I make this the current vote count: hockeymonkey 2 (Lakai, NAF1138) ArizonaTeach 1 (zuma) auntbeast 1 (Mad The Swine) Cookies 1 (Pleonast) FCoD 1 (hockeymonkey) MHaye 1(Blaster Master) zuma 1 (storyteller0910)
tirial is subbing in to replace ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:35:49 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 15:35:49 GMT -5
I make this the current vote count: hockeymonkey 2 (Lakai, NAF1138) ArizonaTeach 1 (zuma) auntbeast 1 (Mad The Swine) Cookies 1 (Pleonast) FCoD 1 (hockeymonkey) MHaye 1(Blaster Master) zuma 1 (storyteller0910)psst...I also voted for hockeymonkey. --FCOD
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:41:10 GMT -5
Post by Merestil Haye on May 30, 2007 15:41:10 GMT -5
MalacandraOne question about Dick Deadeye's role has just become material to my thought. Reasonable assumption, but it's just meant as flavour text. I certainly never meant that a Dick kill should be distinguishable from anyone else's. Nor, although Ben stands to be a crazed paranoid killer, will his kills (if any) be recognisable as such. Wouldn't want to introduce too much certainty into the game, after all. ;D I suppose it was too much to hope for that we could get rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty. Thanks for the response, even if it shot down a half-formed and now invalidated hypothesis.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:42:10 GMT -5
Post by Malacandra on May 30, 2007 15:42:10 GMT -5
I make this the current vote count: hockeymonkey 2 (Lakai, NAF1138) ArizonaTeach 1 (zuma) auntbeast 1 (Mad The Swine) Cookies 1 (Pleonast) FCoD 1 (hockeymonkey) MHaye 1(Blaster Master) zuma 1 (storyteller0910)psst...I also voted for hockeymonkey. --FCOD You sure did. (I was so preoccupied looking for NAF1138's unvote that I missed it.) That makes the count: hockeymonkey 3 (Lakai, NAF1138,FlyingCowOfDoom) ArizonaTeach 1 (zuma) auntbeast 1 (Mad The Swine) Cookies {now Tirial} 1 (Pleonast) FCoD 1 (hockeymonkey) MHaye 1(Blaster Master) zuma 1 (storyteller0910)
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:44:44 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 15:44:44 GMT -5
NAF1138, I'm not liking your strategy. You could be a Crew with an Inquisitorial calling, but the sense I'm getting is more of a scum trying to start a bandwagon. Sure, you have reasons to vote someone, but when you back down and admit you're only trying to pressure them... That comes across as flaky. I'm not going to vote someone over a strategy disagreement, and frankly this is more a distaste for your style. But fair's fair and I want to bring this to everyone's attention for their own deliberation. I can see why you think it seems flaky. But frankly at this stage of the game it is one of the only reliable methods I can see of ferreting out scum. If I see something scummy I turn up the heat. This is a strategy I developed while moding M2 and watching the more traditional strategies being employed fail time and again. This is the first time I have lived past day one, and I will admit that it is a work in progress and if it starts getting bad results I will abandon it. I also think it is only necessary to use until we catch our first pirate. After that different strategies need to be employed. If you don't like it, or if you see any genuine flaws with the way I am using it let me know. The beauty of the system (as I see it) is that it doesn't matter if people know that this is what I am doing. If they are scum they will still make the same mistakes. NAF, I am not the only one to have called you on the flakiness of your stick poking strategy. You've got a real jones for my head in the noose right now, and I understand why. Every time I open my yap and post something, somebody thinks it's scummy. When I don't post anything, it's scummy. If we have learned anything from previous games, it's that some of the scummiest looking players were town affiliated. I've explained everything that everyone has brought up, but if it's not good enough, so be it. I know I'm crew, and a mistake will be made if I am lynched. That's all I can tell you. Cookies, I'm sorry to hear that you are sick, and hope you feel better. My FOS is withdrawn until someone is subbed in. That narrows my pool of people that I feel comfortable voting for right now. NAF, I'm not going to FOS you for voting for me, because your reasons are valid. They are just wrong. I will lightly FOS you for your dogged pursuit of it. ;D FCOD, still not getting warm and fuzzies about you either, but I don't have anything concrete to base a vote on, except other people's analysis. Light FOS on you. Lakai, FOS on you for calling me out twice and voting for me for behaving exactly the same way you are. I would like to hear more from Pleonast and zuma. I'm going to go out on a limb here and be the first to vote Lakai. (ooooooh, my 2nd vote of the day!)
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:46:45 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 15:46:45 GMT -5
I make this the current vote count: hockeymonkey 2 (Lakai, NAF1138) ArizonaTeach 1 (zuma) auntbeast 1 (Mad The Swine) Cookies 1 (Pleonast) FCoD 1 (hockeymonkey) MHaye 1(Blaster Master) zuma 1 (storyteller0910)psst...I also voted for hockeymonkey. --FCOD and I had also unvoted FCOD.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:52:27 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on May 30, 2007 15:52:27 GMT -5
NAF, I am not the only one to have called you on the flakiness of your stick poking strategy. No, you are not. But you are the only one to try to use is as a valid defense. And for the record, I still don't think I am flaky, I am just misunderstood! ;D
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 15:59:07 GMT -5
Post by autolycus on May 30, 2007 15:59:07 GMT -5
Arrrrr, me wench sailed back to tha Orient at sunrise. Spirits are low, but also high. Yo ho ho! *glugs*
Oh right, right, the cuthroats an' stuff. Well, I read the logs for today, but I dont think I'm grokkin' a way to capture the culprits. Gadarene and Hokey Pokey posted sum good analysis, but how do we really know who to persecute.. prosecute... go after?!
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:02:22 GMT -5
Post by Gadarene on May 30, 2007 16:02:22 GMT -5
"Hokey Pokey"?
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:06:05 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 16:06:05 GMT -5
NAF, I am not the only one to have called you on the flakiness of your stick poking strategy. No, you are not. But you are the only one to try to use is as a valid defense. And for the record, I still don't think I am flaky, I am just misunderstood! ;D I was simply pointing out that you had voted for at least as many people as I did on day one. I'm saying that your offense is flawed using the logic that I voted for a whole bunch of people and jumped on any bandwagon that rolled along. If you voted for me based on my low post/low content, I can't argue with you. Saying that I voted for a lot of people and rode all the bandwagons is a wrong characterization and I have said so. I didn't say you were flaky, just your strategy.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:07:52 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on May 30, 2007 16:07:52 GMT -5
Arrrrr, me wench sailed back to tha Orient at sunrise. Spirits are low, but also high. Yo ho ho! *glugs* Oh right, right, the cuthroats an' stuff. Well, I read the logs for today, but I dont think I'm grokkin' a way to capture the culprits. Gadarene and Hokey Pokey posted sum good analysis, but how do we really know who to persecute.. prosecute... go after?! Does he mean me? Go back to your rack Auto and sleep off a little more of that grog, eh?
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:12:45 GMT -5
Post by capybara on May 30, 2007 16:12:45 GMT -5
Ok, I've been looking over old posts, and someone who is standing out a bit to me is MadTheSwine. Hasn't posted a lot, and posts aren't necessarily "unsubstantintive" (and is defensive if one suggests it-- they DO relate to the matters at hand but ONLY to the matters immediately at hand, offering nothing more than a driveby vote, and then frequently of easy targets-- noobs and the absent Auto)) but he tends to swoop in with short posts, usually accusatory, and very frequently invoking authority: "That's a scum tell according to mafiascum.net". Has done this citation of mafiascum.net a fair number of times, especially for a veteran player: a sort of passing the blame of suspicion onto the Gods. Also some spots of spurious logic--like "those who didn't vote for KatiRoo" includes a majority of the ship-- not too helpful. So for driveby shootings, limiting himself to the very immediate without any additional analysis, and excessive appeals to authority for reasoning, I vote MadTheSwine for the time being.
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:25:21 GMT -5
Post by tirial on May 30, 2007 16:25:21 GMT -5
Just to say hello. and confirm I'm subbing in for Cookies and just finished registering. I probably won't post seriously until tomorrow, as it seems I have quite a bit of reading to do (7 pages? Just for Day Two? What have I got myself into?).
Tirial
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 16:34:37 GMT -5
Post by Gadarene on May 30, 2007 16:34:37 GMT -5
Welcome, tirial! I don't envy those of you who are in both this game and Mafia III (although, come to think of it, Cookies is/was as well)...the games are in such different stages, and both require so much potential participation, that it seems like it'd be a real gear shift to go back and forth. Heck, I can't imagine being the crazy bastard who's running that game while playing this one; why would anyone let themselves in for that kind of abuse?
|
|
Blaster Master
Mome Rath
The player formerly know as BLAM!
Now 34.788% less repellant to Sharks! :( [on:I WANT TO DIE!][of:I WANT TO LIVE!]
Posts: 0
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 17:31:25 GMT -5
Post by Blaster Master on May 30, 2007 17:31:25 GMT -5
Just to say hello. and confirm I'm subbing in for Cookies and just finished registering. I probably won't post seriously until tomorrow, as it seems I have quite a bit of reading to do (7 pages? Just for Day Two? What have I got myself into?). Tirial No no... that's 7 pages for just today! There's at least twice as much for day one. ;D
|
|
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 17:33:33 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on May 30, 2007 17:33:33 GMT -5
Welcome tirial! Don't plan on working anytime soon.
--FCOD
|
|
Blaster Master
Mome Rath
The player formerly know as BLAM!
Now 34.788% less repellant to Sharks! :( [on:I WANT TO DIE!][of:I WANT TO LIVE!]
Posts: 0
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
May 30, 2007 17:39:44 GMT -5
Post by Blaster Master on May 30, 2007 17:39:44 GMT -5
Okay... looking at some of the vote getters:
I'm still a little suspicious of Hockey Monkey, but her defenses seem fair enough, and I'm getting a crew vibe from them. OTOH, while FCoD's defenses are equally reasonable, I'm not getting the same vibe, as the defenses seem somewhat contrived. Similarly, I'm inclined to agree with Storyteller's attack and vote on Zuma, but because of his low level of participation, I'm loathe to jump in there without seeing a little more from him at this point.
Auto: I see you posted and, yet again, it is without any content. I'd hoped from the previous game, that you picked up that that sort of posting is not helpful at best, and most likely a distraction if you're pro-crew or a pirate pretending to be pro-crew.
|
|