|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 20:35:16 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Jan 10, 2011 20:35:16 GMT -5
You awake before dawn. You put your boots on. You take a face from the ancient gallery, and you walk on down the hall. You go into the room where cookies should live, but she seems to be missing her head. In its place is--not surprisingly, by now--a single tarot card: VIII. Strength. You walk on down the hall. You go into the room where catinasuit should live, but you see only an empty suit with a card sticking out of its front pocket: II. The High Priestess. You figure it's time to call "the end" on this particular stroll, and you go back to bed.
cometothedarksidewehavecookies, Town Sacrificial Doctor, is dead.
catinasuit, Scum tracker, is dead.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 21:05:05 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Jan 10, 2011 21:05:05 GMT -5
sorry to see you go cookies but a one for one, if that is what it was, we can take every Night.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 21:15:35 GMT -5
Post by brewha on Jan 10, 2011 21:15:35 GMT -5
Yeah, I'm good with a one for one. But we really need to get some participation going today. I suspect there was some significant scum presence on that last lynch. I gotta go through some vote histories.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 21:18:18 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 10, 2011 21:18:18 GMT -5
Good news and bad news, eh? Town sacrificial doc? Does that mean that cookies gave her life protecting someone else? Or I guess she could have just been the target? In any case, we'll miss her.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 22:11:42 GMT -5
Post by Sister Coyote on Jan 10, 2011 22:11:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 22:20:39 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 10, 2011 22:20:39 GMT -5
How come only some of your answers are in verse?
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 10, 2011 23:25:52 GMT -5
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Jan 10, 2011 23:25:52 GMT -5
Go Town!
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 0:26:49 GMT -5
Post by Paranoia on Jan 11, 2011 0:26:49 GMT -5
It's at this point when I start to wonder if we really do have a vigilante - if so, grats to them, for both hitting scum 2/2 and not having the itchiest trigger finger in the world.
On another note, I'm finding it less and less likely Crazy is scum the more scum prs drop dead. It feels positively unlikely.
Does this mean he's town? No. I'm thinking he may very well be a third party pfk type deal that got a lynch/hit block to go along with his normal powers. I don't know - it's getting to that point I'm really interested in his alignment.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 5:09:06 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Jan 11, 2011 5:09:06 GMT -5
Bah Humbug
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 5:19:09 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 5:19:09 GMT -5
Day 2 I voted to lynch Crazypunker with this post (bleached for the Mod cause I like her): So while I didn't really think that Hockey was scum, I felt like Hockey was more likely to be scum than story was at the time. The votes for Crazypunker might not be what Cookie think is a strong case. But this comment keeps standing out to me. How would "really think that Hockey was scum" and still vote for her? Why make this into a Hockey >< Story-vote. With so few votes YesterDay anyone could have made a big difference with a vote backed up with reason and good observations on the game. Also I simply can't see why Crazy is so fixed on Cookie while leaving others with much less contribution to the game flying by. I tried to ask about it earlier but since he's not yet posted in this thread after that, I can't blame him for not giving me an answer (yet). Vote Crazypunker for voting for Hockey Monkey while really not believing she was scum the handwave post Day 2 where he's vote "still stands" not even acknowledging that Mahaloth also had votes on him Day 2 and for his double standards with past games. It's okay to ask guiri about past games and players game-style still talk about how games "in a galaxy far, far away" matters not. (the last is a minor point. But I didn't like it and so I added it to my list). I made it very clear that a large part of the vote was based on his comment that he " didn't really think that Hockey was scum" yet he voted for Hockey Day 1 because she was "more likely to be scum than story was at the time". I would very much like to point to the fact also that Crazypunker with that comment completely ignored the votes on Mahaloth. Day 5 Guiri asked me to at least consider moving my vote for Charr to Crazypunker and I replied (explaining why I wanted to cut the dead weigh rather the lynching an active player). I'll come back to this later in this post. However Crazypunker then ended the Day with this: I think it's already been shown in the Ed and Peeker-discussion. We simply view Charr very differently ATM. I have no idea if he's Town or Scum. As I've said I was getting townie-vibes from his confusion. However when I did my review of NAF's posts in this game he also said (over and over) that he thought Charr to be town. So I can only say that Charr's confusion has left me with very little to judge his alignment by. However Crazypunker is posting and therefore every Day he's in the game will give me more data to process. Charr will not. Let's just say that yes Charr is Town and Crazypunker is Scum. Then if we leave Crazypunker for now and lynch him toMorrow instead we will have more post to re-read and analyze. There will be a vote-record to look at. We might even catch a Scum-body based on what Crazypunker has posted. So for me it's like handing the participation Scum a longer rope to hang themselves with. I hope it makes sense. If not I'd be more than happy to elaborate. Something about this post pinged me a bit. I don't like this logic. I don't think a scum would give much away if he knew he was likely to be lynched in a day or two anyways. In fact, I think he would be more likely to side with townies to make them look bad when he turned up scum. If you think that somebody is scum you should vote them. That is unless somebody is more scummy or you are trying to save your own skin I think the best play is to vote somebody who you think is scum over somebody who is a non-participant. For the record I am not saying vote for me. I'm saying you should vote for who you think is scum. I don't like how this post feels like you have come to the conclusion that I am scum but you aren't voting me anyways. First off Crazypunker isn't the first, nor will he be the last to dislike my logic However I am a bit surprised to read that "If you think that somebody is scum you should vote them" from the player voting Hockey while really not believing her to be scum. Second I'm even more surprised when it comes from a player voting Charr solely as a self-preservation-lynch. But I'll like to explain my vote for Charr a bit better. Because I feel that Crazypunker is mis-interpreting what I was saying. To find Scum we all agree that we must view players actions. Then we question the motives behind the actions and we discuss different scenarios of why, who and so on. However important actions can be to the game, I find that inter-actions with other players are almost if not equally important. That is one of the reasons why I tend to do Wall-Of-Words on dead players. So while I think we should lynch Scum I also think that participating Scum can actually be an asset to the game as well as town simply because Scum very often end up making a mistake. It might not be a slip - it can also be Scum ignoring a blatant case on an other member of the scum-team. Or pushing hard for the lynch of town while trying to save a Scum-buddy. I'll be looking at CatInASuit's posts toDay and after that I'll try and find the time to also look into Cookies and depending on what happens I think I'd like to re-read Crazypunker as well.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 5:47:13 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 5:47:13 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Night Zero 3 posts # 50 PM received and understood # 187 7 pages already, do some of you people never stop.# 200 fluff regarding books
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 6:10:33 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 6:10:33 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day One 5 posts # 12 Not a good start to the Day # 174 Apologies all, due to the inclement weather I have been otherwise occupied. I'll try and catch up now.# 175 26 players, so expecting 5/6 scum + don't think a nameclaim in a buff game is going to do any good + not in favour of a mass claim because it can fills in the gaps for the scum + speculates on Pleo's claim and asks him why he didn't reveal a name # 176 points to Guiri's double posts against an early claim + responds to Mr. Ed that the value of power roles don't decreases but are very important at Endgame + votes Rysto pending an answer regarding Pleo and scum knowing he wasn't a power role # 186 comment on Rysto saying "power role" and not "Town power role" + I need to think about it
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 7:02:19 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 7:02:19 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day Two 6 posts # 6 Suckage - Bye MHaye.# 123 Time flies when you're not having fun. I'll see if I can catch up today.# 124 it was a strange thing Brewha said + SPPeople are coming down on him for saying something stupid + agree with Texcat that all should try and vote + Storytellernot shoes again. Post restrictions?? + saw more from Brewha with a defense from cookie on page 2 + Story is making him nervous, slow burn paranoia to you Cookies + that's a pair of backtracks during the day on phrases used from storyteller and brewha. The other thing intriguing me though is Suburban Plankton and Cookies with IMHO "defences" of brewha. + votes for Storyteller# 125 can think of a restriction but it is definitely not a post restriction + definitely curious as to what kind of post restriction it isn't.# 131 Responding to Cookie that Story has either lied or been misinformed + asks Are you saying we should just ignore it? What are your thoughts, that its just a minor slip and a null tell really?# 133 responds to Story f you are town and you have been minsinformed it makes you look like a liar even though you are not. + leaning towards Story being lying scum rather than misinformed townie
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 7:38:53 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2011 7:38:53 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day Two 6 posts # 6 Suckage - Bye MHaye.# 123 Time flies when you're not having fun. I'll see if I can catch up today.# 124 it was a strange thing Brewha said + SPPeople are coming down on him for saying something stupid + agree with Texcat that all should try and vote + Storytellernot shoes again. Post restrictions?? + saw more from Brewha with a defense from cookie on page 2 + Story is making him nervous, slow burn paranoia to you Cookies + that's a pair of backtracks during the day on phrases used from storyteller and brewha. The other thing intriguing me though is Suburban Plankton and Cookies with IMHO "defences" of brewha. + votes for Storyteller# 125 can think of a restriction but it is definitely not a post restriction + definitely curious as to what kind of post restriction it isn't.# 131 Responding to Cookie that Story has either lied or been misinformed + asks Are you saying we should just ignore it? What are your thoughts, that its just a minor slip and a null tell really?# 133 responds to Story f you are town and you have been minsinformed it makes you look like a liar even though you are not. + leaning towards Story being lying scum rather than misinformed townie I've only got a minute or two, but was CIAS actually trying to hint to story that maybe it wasn't a post restriction in post 125? Did that come before story changed his story?
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 7:39:44 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 7:39:44 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day 3 4 posts # 47 good to see Mahaloth and Rysto lynched and killed + voted Story Day 2 instead of Rysto (his Day 1 vote) because storyteller appeared scummier on Day 2 than rysto and I stated why + I hadn't forgotten about rysto, but then I did get dragged into an argument with Cookies + Cookies, yes, I am interested in why you appeared to defend brewha, so I'm going note it down and try to follow it up + this will also apply to SP# 50 Oog + stop posting in the Day 2 thread. Please. # 99 responds to Guiri that his participation hasn't been what it should be + think it's a misrepresentation to say he ignored Rysto's explanation + states why he think Storyteller is scummy + trying to understand is why Mahaloth switched like that to storyteller and then Hockey Monkey. And you know what, I get the feeling storyteller is a vanilla scum bluffing the town + votes Storyteller# 207 This post was meant for Day 4 #49 and was re-posted there.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 7:56:52 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 7:56:52 GMT -5
I've only got a minute or two, but was CIAS actually trying to hint to story that maybe it wasn't a post restriction in post 125? Did that come before story changed his story? Story explained the mix-up regarding restriction/post restriction in his post # 104Or at least I think that's the post you're referring to...
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 8:29:22 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 8:29:22 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day Four 1 post # 49 reply to Story why he didn't re-vote Rysto + looking at Day 2 it looks as though it tries to save both Mahaloth and storyteller from a lynch + agrees with these reasons around the EOD2 lynch regarding crazypunker vote for Hockey Monkey. It also adds more to any saving of Mahaloth and storyteller or possibly just getting Mahaloth out of trouble. + is slightly worried by the detective call out from Inner Stickler + votes Crazypunker based on his vote actions towards the end of Day 2 are likely scummy, as it certainly pushed a known scum further down the lynch list at EOD
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 8:56:00 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Jan 11, 2011 8:56:00 GMT -5
CatInASuit - Day Five 5 posts # 43 Happy New Year + sorry to see SP go and wonders what Inner Stickler was up to + worrying why Charr is no longer a member + takes a look at NAF1138 + puts paranoia more towards the non-scum category + points to NAF's comment on Charr not flipping scum + NAF was quick to follow up with Storyteller + NAF seemed happier to lynch Crazypunker but whether that was to confirm his role (although not necessarily his side) or remove an obstacle, we don't know + will think some more. # 96 responds to Texcat that his guess is that NAF was going to build cred for a scum-buddy with his post about looking into the votes lynching Mahaloth + and it might be possible to semi-confirm a couple of non-scum + So I guess the only thing to do is go back and look over it again and try and draw my own conclusions.# 100 a recap of the voting taking place Day 2 # 101 conclusion regarding the votes Day 2: 1. BillMc switched votes at a time where Mahaloth was safe (unless someone switched from Hockey Monkey + 2. Mister B's vote didn't change anything + asks Mister B's why he voted Mahaloth + 3. Would guess that Punker's vote on HM would have been enough for a lynch + 4. Speculates on Mahaloth's strange vote pattern. # 101 Mahaloth #178 made an interesting vote choice between charr and storyteller[/B][/I] + undecided on lynching Charr + votes for Crazypunker + still don't trust Storyteller but it now appears that what I thought post restriction means is not what I think it means
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 10:52:13 GMT -5
Post by Sister Coyote on Jan 11, 2011 10:52:13 GMT -5
]How come only some of your answers are in verse? Take it up with the Mod, who has said that the only important thing is what/whom I see or don't see.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 13:18:57 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 11, 2011 13:18:57 GMT -5
Vote: Blockey
He failed to vote days 1, 3, and 5. He had time yesterDay to stop in and question Sister about her claim, but no time to vote? Is it possible that he was overly interested in the claim because he had something to do with BillMc's death?
His vote on Mahaloth on Day 2 was enough to skate by for a while, but it's been pointed out several times that Mahaloth was not actually in any danger when Blockey voted. It's possible he just voted for the town cred and has been hoping to stay in the shadows ever since.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 16:03:42 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Jan 11, 2011 16:03:42 GMT -5
It's at this point when I start to wonder if we really do have a vigilante - if so, grats to them, for both hitting scum 2/2 and not having the itchiest trigger finger in the world. On another note, I'm finding it less and less likely Crazy is scum the more scum prs drop dead. It feels positively unlikely. [/color] You're making a fetish of votes that can't come back to bite you (minus the never-pursued OMGUS on NAF), you've been avoiding voting crazypunker despite consistently saying you find him scummy (referring to a post I didn't keep from the end of day three, and to this one), and today you're trying to make him not-scum-yet-still-votable on thin reasoning.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 16:12:17 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Jan 11, 2011 16:12:17 GMT -5
Vote Count
mr blockey (1): texcat [19]
paranoia (1): renata [20]
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 16:13:44 GMT -5
Post by Renata on Jan 11, 2011 16:13:44 GMT -5
Oh for Petes's sake. Initial paragraph up there is a quote from Paranoia; most of what's in the quote box is from ME, except the last bit, which is again from Paranoia.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 17:07:44 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2011 17:07:44 GMT -5
]How come only some of your answers are in verse? Take it up with the Mod, who has said that the only important thing is what/whom I see or don't see. good idea! I'll just ask the mod that, I'm sure she'll answer me
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 17:11:12 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2011 17:11:12 GMT -5
I wish to purchase the case that Renata has built.
Unless someone would like to invest with me on some more storytelling.
Vote: Paranoia
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 19:39:44 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Jan 11, 2011 19:39:44 GMT -5
When I voted for Hockey he was tied with Story. Malhaloth was a vote back. I explained my reasoning then. If I had voted for Malhaloth it would have been a 3 way tie and the scum could have chosen whoever they wanted to vote for. I voted to keep the lynch out of scum hands. It didn't occur to me that one of Hockey's voters was going to switch at the last minute cause a two vote swing.
I think you are trying to look for something that's not really there. You believe what you believe though.
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 20:15:25 GMT -5
Post by texcat on Jan 11, 2011 20:15:25 GMT -5
I wish to purchase the case that Renata has built.
Unless someone would like to invest with me on some more storytelling.
Vote: Paranoia [/color][/size][/quote]
Vote Metallicksquink: For trying to push a case based on Brewha's question without voting. For repeatedly calling him defensive when I saw no such thing. For very subtle smudging Brewha but not ready to actually point out any IMO scummy behavior.
I can get jiggy wit this
Vote: Metallic Squink [/color] PS, here I am. [/size][/quote] That's twice you've me-too'd. It would be nice if you could add something -- like why you like the case, why you think it's worth voting? I'm not sure I could agree so quickly on a case based not on what paranoia has done, but on what the scum have done. As for paranoia's OMGUS vote on NAF that he never followed up, I recall that you OMGUS voted me Day 1 and never followed up. Also I don't recall that NAF or CIAS ever voted you. Does that make you scum?
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 20:25:14 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2011 20:25:14 GMT -5
I wish to purchase the case that Renata has built.
Unless someone would like to invest with me on some more storytelling.
Vote: Paranoia [/color][/size][/quote] I can get jiggy wit this Vote: Metallic Squink [/color] PS, here I am. [/size][/quote] That's twice you've me-too'd. It would be nice if you could add something -- like why you like the case, why you think it's worth voting? I'm not sure I could agree so quickly on a case based not on what paranoia has done, but on what the scum have done. As for paranoia's OMGUS vote on NAF that he never followed up, I recall that you OMGUS voted me Day 1 and never followed up. Also I don't recall that NAF or CIAS ever voted you. Does that make you scum? [/quote] No, but I suppose you could use that as data in a case against me. It's Day 6. I cast a Day 1 vote that I categorized as potentially OMGUS but actually followed a post where I made 4 comments refuting the basis of your case against me that you failed to respond to. Ever, as far as I recall I've agreed with 2 other cases. Are you actually accusing me of not contributing my own cases?
|
|
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 21:08:06 GMT -5
Post by special on Jan 11, 2011 21:08:06 GMT -5
I'm certain that there are errors. I did this once and didn't double check at all
Please feel free to post corrections.
Vote history
total ullz sistercoyote peeker hockey monkey texcat paranoia renata storyteller guiri brewha mister blockey crazypunker metallic squink special ed
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Day 1
pleonast (5): crazypunker [103-207], mahaloth [104-236], metallicsquink [165], darksidecookies [169], brewha [213], peekercpa [216], rysto [238]
rysto (4): hockey monkey [164], catinasuit [176], inner stickler [221], charr [230]
mahaloth (3): guiri [113], mhaye [225], sistercoyote [240]
mr ed (2): renata [200], texcat [224]
paranoia (1): peekercpa [143-216], mr ed [199-227], naf1138 [202]
suburban plankton (1): pleonast [17], rysto [142-238]
naf1138 (1): suburban plankton [133]
texcat (1): mr ed [227]
charr (1): mahaloth [236]
sister coyote (0): brewha [212-213]
catinasuit (0): guiri [94-113]
storyteller (0): peekercpa [93-143]
Not voting: total ullz billmc paranoia storyteller mister blockey crazypunker
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Day 2
mahaloth (5): guiri [109], texcat [248], sistercoyote [266], mister blockey [300], billmc [301]
hockey monkey (4): renata [160], total ullz [256], billmc [264-301], mahaloth [270], crazypunker [276]
storyteller (3): peekercpa [115], catinasuit [124], mr ed [242], mahaloth [269-270]
paranoia (2): naf1138 [23], suburban plankton [100], metallicsquink [108-199]
metallic squink (2): total ullz [176-223], mr ed [188-242], brewha [194], rysto [286]
rysto (1): hockey monkey [101]
total ullz (1): texcat [16]
catinasuit (1): cookies [169]
naf1138 (1): paranoia [177]
brewha (1): metallic squink [199]
cometothedarksidewehavecookies (0): crazypunker [244-255]
charr (0): mr blockey [27-140], billmc [31-264], mahaloth [178-269]
Not voting: storyteller inner stickler char
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Day 3
crazypunker (11): hockey monkey [39], billmc [44], sister coyote [77-100], total ullz [127], cookies [130], texcat [138], suburban plankton [142], sister coyote [143-151], naff1138 [163], charr [166], renata [172], brewha [180], inner stickler [190]
storyteller (2): mr ed [91], catinasuit [99], suburban plankton [102-142]
catinasuit (1): guiri [71], cookies [112-130], brewha [131-180]
paranoia (1): metallic squink [69]
charr (1): peekercpa [132]
inner stickler (1): crazypunker [183]
suburban plankton (1): paranoia [196]
cometothedarksidewehavecookies (0): crazypunker [38-133]
mr ed (0): renata [78-172]
Not voting: sistercoyote storyteller mister blockey
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Day 4
inner stickler (9): mr ed [12], guiri [13], total ullz [15], crazypunker [18], texcat [44], cookies [56], renata [66], blockey [70], sister coyote [72]
crazypunker (4): hockey monkey [27], brewha [32], catinasuit [49], suburban plankton [88]
charr (2): peekercpa [99], paranoia [106]
suburban plankton (0): paranoia [33-106]
storyteller (0): peekercpa [39-99]
Not Voting: storyteller inner stickler char metallic squink
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Day 5
charr (6): peekercpa [11], paranoia [42], cookies [86], hockey monkey [97], ullz [99], crazypunker [110]
crazypunker (4): brewha [44], catinasuit [102], sister coyote [103], mr ed [104]
catinasuit (2): guiri [41], texcat [133]
storyteller (1): mr ed [21-104], renata [54]
Not voting: storyteller mister blockey char metallic squink
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Jan 11, 2011 21:45:18 GMT -5
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jan 11, 2011 21:45:18 GMT -5
I'm going to vote for Paranoia based on an analysis of his vote history.
Day One: no vote - easy for scum Day Two: one off on NAF - one offs are an easy place for scum to hide Day Three: one off on Plankton - another one off Day Four: Joins Peek in voting for Charr - almost a one off Day Five: Votes Charr, Charr is lynched - almost have to be at least one scum on that wagon (and I know it wasn't me)
vote Paranoia
|
|