|
Post by CatInASuit on Aug 17, 2011 7:46:01 GMT -5
I understand but would you have jumped on a scumbuddy Suburban for the same error in preference to your other scumbuddy Colby who was about to be lynched? Yes, I would of. But then I have never managed to argue the town into voting for someone I have made an argument against and voted for, either as town or scum.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Aug 19, 2011 20:23:37 GMT -5
This game has slowed to a painful crawl. Could gnarly prevent the 1 on 1 by not NKing, to leave it 2 on 1? And would that make sense?
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on Aug 19, 2011 23:45:06 GMT -5
I'd take that above the random chance of one on one.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Aug 20, 2011 23:53:51 GMT -5
Gnarly has been around, but didn't send in any instructions? I would have thought he would at least sent in "no kill". And I repeat, zzzzz, this game has slowed to a crawl. Maybe Gnarly just slept through the night.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Aug 24, 2011 10:18:20 GMT -5
are they still playing?
my this has become a snooze fest
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Aug 27, 2011 2:06:26 GMT -5
Snooze...
And as far as CIAS jumping on lynching me D2- I was already starting to gain suspicion, so I would of been amazed if I had made it to the night, to be honest with everyone. While it might have been a bad move to do so, since I am kinda the newbie Scum out of the bunch, I wouldn't have minded (much) if it would of gotten our team closer towards a win.
Yes... it is kinda quiet... now... I think Meeko maybe should of put an inactive clause like SisC did
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on Aug 27, 2011 23:57:36 GMT -5
With archangel afk day 9 is essentially a randomized lynch.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Aug 30, 2011 6:56:41 GMT -5
Oh well, everyone's voted. Have to wait now to see if Archangel changes her mind at all?
I have no fingernails left.
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on Aug 30, 2011 17:13:25 GMT -5
Sigh. I'd at least considered that Charlie purposefully submitted no nightkill.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Sept 1, 2011 19:21:47 GMT -5
Sigh. I'd at least considered that Charlie purposefully submitted no nightkill. Which was a smart move on his part . do we know if it ws intentional?
|
|