|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 15, 2011 15:10:54 GMT -5
Hi, and welcome back to Wedlock. I'm your host Rick Rothman and we rejoin our contestants as they wake on this fine morning.
Well, some of them wake on this fine morning, as overnight, more have fallen by the wayside.
We were hoping for some action following the last couple of days and we certainly got it.
Over to Linda for details
The scoreboard comes up and two more faces are shown with crosses through them. Both the new borders are in blue.
Drain Bead was a member of the Blue Team
Just Being Ginger was a member of the Blue Team
Thank you kindly Linda, and now down to the compound to see what happens next on Wedlock.
Day 5 Ends on Sun 18th at 20:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Dec 15, 2011 15:22:05 GMT -5
Damn that was not nice! Go Blue Team!!!
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 15, 2011 16:12:08 GMT -5
Farewell, you two. I've got some thoughts on these two deaths. I'm going to ponder and finish up a few things, then see if I can write some sense.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 15, 2011 18:08:46 GMT -5
So... the reveal at Dawn was initially confusing to me... Why would scum want to kill either of those two? So I went back to see who they voted for... Ginger... If she was the scum target, I don't get it... She voted for Archangel twice... then Gnarly... then Sinjin.... I suppose you could make the case that Gnarly and Sinjin are both scum and they didn't like that she fingered both of them on consecutive Days.... but I feel like that is reaching... DrainBead.... much more interesting. voted for Inner Stickler... then Inner Stickler... then Inner Stickler... then Colby. My first thought here was that Inner must be scum and wanted Drain gone.... My second thought was that Inner is much smarter than that and it's too obvious and point right back at Inner.... so I decided to see who Inner has been voting for... Inner... voted for Mahaloth (he was the 4th vote on Mahaloth and pretty much cemented Mahaloth as vote leader).... then myself... then Sinjin for the last 2 Days. My thoughts? Sinjin is scum and killing DrainBead was an attempt to setup Inner. So let's look at Sinjin's vote record... D1: Paranoia, who later flipped town after dying without a collared partner as the Night 3 NK. D2: Archangel, 3rd vote out of a bandwagon of 5 that resulted in Archangel's lynch. (Yeah yeah yeah... 3rd vote... whatever...) What I find more interesting is that out of the 5 who voted for Archangel, 3 have died and flipped town... only Gnarly and Sinjin are left. How often is someone mislynched by 5 people and every one of those 5 turns out to be town? I'm willing to bet it's not very common... I think there was a scum on that wagon... and right now I think it was Sinjin. I'll be shocked if both her and Gnarly turn up town. D3: Caerie, We don't have her flip yet, so let's look at Sinjin's reasoning. It looks to me as though you've been voting on Paranoia because you needed somewhere to put your vote, so it wouldn't look suspicious that you weren't voting. Yet you couldn't have felt that strongly about, since you were so willing to change. The third vote in a forming bandwagon is generally a "safe" hiding place for scum. You didn't start it and you didn't jump on at the end. You almost had Paranoia, someone you've been suspicious of from the start, and yet you decided to switch with little justification except that Archangel hadn't been very active? I'd been suspicious of you before, but this "defense" clinches it for me. Vote sinjinNow you're just being silly. The third vote has never been a "safe" hiding place for scum. Would it have been better if my unvote/vote was 4th after sacher's. Do you never change your mind about who you think might be scum or is scummiest? The only time I'm SURE is when I'm scum. vote Caerie I think you are scum and know way more than me. Hmmm.. the defense, IMO, is a little much... It was the first of only 2 votes that Sinjin received... seems more aimed to make Caerie seem scummy than to defend her voting record. I don't see how anything in Caerie's vote implies information that isn't common knowledge... D4: Colby, Now... a lot of us voted for Colby.... but Sinjin voted for him on Day 4 and not on Day 3.... why? Why would she want Colby lynched more than Caerie? She knew from our Night 3 comments that alot of us wanted him dead... so she joined the hunt for his head because it was a monumental bad move for town. It kept us from looking for scum and ensured that we would waste our lynch without making her look too scummy. It was an anti-town but not pro-scum move (in retrospect at least). Vote: Sinjin I think she is trying to set up Inner Stickler for the death of DrainBead because IS has been out for her blood.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 15, 2011 18:08:51 GMT -5
A recap of CaerieD's post for those who are interested:
Day 1, she was very active with many comments and opinions:
A bunch of idle speculation followed by this non-substantial vote on Jan:
Tossing a little suspicion on deon:
And a little more backhanded smudge on Deon: And neither did CaerieD.
Day 2 not so much:
And a tiny bit more speculation:
But no vote on Day 2, her only real response was to assuage Paranoia's suspicions, hmmm.
Day 3 she gets much more active finding a better target....ME!!
Then kisses up to Bill then smudges him.
And then the meat of her case against moi.
Note my case on Paranoia was late Day 1 and my revote was early Day 2.
Then another smudge on BillMc:
Oh wait it wasn't the third vote, it's that you should never change your mind, no wait that's not it: Paranoia and sinjin are scum buddies.
Another Bill smudge
You forgot about why you voted me in the first place? And now Paranoia maybe isn't my scum buddy?
More Bill speculation:
More idle speculation about the red team:
Day 4 was spent mainly defending colby except for a last vote for??
Bleh: vote Caerie I think you are scummy, scum, scum.
*I hope I got the quote tags right*
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 15, 2011 18:37:44 GMT -5
@pwiag: I wish I was that devious when I'm scum
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 15, 2011 20:29:49 GMT -5
All righty. There'd been some speculation about the NKs not activating the collar links, with two kills a Night being the work of the scum plus somebody with a vigilante gadget. When there was only one NK yesterDay, we got this suggestion: On a side note- apparently we did have a vig, and they have apparently bit the dust. So, I think that some of the future lynches will be single lynches because I think the 2 kills every night was because of 1 scum kill and 1 viglante kill. I find it very doubtful that we had a vigilante, because I've got a pretty good idea of how the collars work. I have a gadget that I can use to prevent kills, but it does not prevent the collar from sending out a signal to its mate. This implies if the gadget is protecting one person at night, an attempted NK can still kill that person's "partner." I believe that Paranoia's and my collar were mates and I was targeted on Night 3 after I came down so hard on sinjin. My gadget works something like the "Doctor" role in that I can pass it to others to protect them instead, but since I couldn't verify who anyone was I was using it on myself on Night 3. Here's the text of my PM: I'd been hoping I'd be targeted again last night, so as to deprive the scum of any kills at all. Unfortunately, they didn't go after me. The double kill does reinforce my belief that the collars are linked during NKs and I'd been the target the previous Night. I'd wanted to keep this quiet longer in the hopes that I could get the scum to waste more NK attempts on me, but I think they must have learned their lesson and decided to focus on others for their kills. Our numbers have to be getting seriously low with all of these double kills, too, so I worried about keeping quiet any longer. I'm hoping that knowing how Night Kills most likely work will be of use to the townies. Having a better idea of this will hopefully give townies better strategy ideas, particularly if there's the chance the scum knew this all along. I do still stand by my suspicion of sinjin. After the single kill on Night 3, I guessed that my suspicion had led the scum to try to remove me from the game. I'm a bit suspicious of Lightfoot and moodymitchy after these two posts yesterDay: What the hell is this? If it was scum, wouldn't it make more sense to lie and say it isn't a one time power? Maybe suggest it can be used like a doctor role? He just told us all he can be lynched. If he was scum, wouldn't it make more sense for him to lie and say he was third party because we'd avoid lynching him til the end? And to suggest it can be used like a doctor role. Something discussed on the Scum Board? I'm interested in the little chat that sinjin and Caerie have been having... I find it interesting that sinjin is quite happy to accept that Caerie just happened to miss the whole of the claim post by colby11. Yes I know it happens sometimes but I just feel that some people would have been a little more intense in their questioning of it. These seem like rather bizarre and flimsy things to question. It's entirely possible for townies to get suspicious of minor interactions, but since I knew that the scum would know something was up with me on Day 4 it made me a bit more paranoid about people suddenly acting differently toward me. Again, these are things I'd hoped to get more of by drawing this out longer, but with two more townies down I worry holding back any longer might make us lose the game. Obviously, I have no way of proving my alignment here, and I wouldn't blame people for being suspicious of this claim. Just please take it into account and consider what I've said. There is, of course, the possibility that sinjin is not scum and I was targeted by the scum in order to frame her, with this failing when I didn't die. I still feel pretty comfortable with this vote, though: Vote sinjin
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 15, 2011 20:54:02 GMT -5
Taking a moment to address comments from yesterday as people always want to talk to me after I've left for work on the last day of the cycle. Hey, all, re-reading and commenting and trying to catch up after my series of unfortunate events. Regarding the above, @stickler: How do you know this? Because he said so? Did you expect him to just say, "hey, I'm Scum?" Or "hey, I'm a malicious third party mad bomber?" What possible reason do you have for swallowing his claim so entirely as to assume that the day was wasted and the death will not affect our win condition? Note that I am not really smudging you here. If you were Scum, you'd know that colby is not, but you wouldn't know whether he is a survivor-type third party (and therefore harmless to the hypothetical Scum you) or a third party with an exclusive win con (and therefore someone you should want lynched as quickly as possible). I don't understand your reasoning here. Paul said that the worst case scenario was that we lynch him and he's telling the truth. In that case, given that he'd claimed survivor, we' have wasted an entire day an a lynch on someone we should have just ignored. And if he had turned up scum, while we would have bagged a scum which is good, there would be no new information in the vote count. Had everyone agreed to a discussion of players and maybe an unofficial tally of noncolby lynch candidates and then lynched colby in the latter half of the cycle, I would have been a lot less obnoxious. As it stands though, Yesterday is really 4 pages of people agreeing that colby is scum which is a) not true and b) not useful. And the reason I swallowed his claim was because it rang true to me. I didn't see the discrepancies that others did, or at the least I feel they're not as revealing as everyone else thought.
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 15, 2011 21:01:47 GMT -5
PWIAG, while I find your post and its logic compelling, I do want to point out that scum may have had reason to believe that either Drain or Ginger were in possession of a gadget or information that would be damaging to town, rather than attempting any real gambit.
Vote: sinjin as I am not relieved of any of the suspicions I accused her of in previous days. (And it's not that you're changing your vote, it's that every day you vote someone just absolutely sure that they're scum and then the next day regardless of whether they're dead or not, you have moved onto someone else who looks like they're going to be an easier mislynch.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 15, 2011 21:59:51 GMT -5
PWIAG, while I find your post and its logic compelling, I do want to point out that scum may have had reason to believe that either Drain or Ginger were in possession of a gadget or information that would be damaging to town, rather than attempting any real gambit. Vote: sinjin [/color] as I am not relieved of any of the suspicions I accused her of in previous days. (And it's not that you're changing your vote, it's that every day you vote someone just absolutely sure that they're scum and then the next day regardless of whether they're dead or not, you have moved onto someone else who looks like they're going to be an easier mislynch.[/quote] I really resent this mis-characterization. I voted Paranoia late Day one after my reread focusing on Jan. I revoted him early Day 2 based on my Day one perceptions. On Day 2 Paranoia posted a lot of back and forth with sachertorte which made me start to reconsider my vote (sorry I didn't post that at the time but I was busy and what is is what is). Archangel then blew in with a totally anti-town vote and I moved my vote to her. Day three Caerie came down on me and accused me of being scum buddies with Paranoia and other stuff that changed every time I contradicted what she said so I voted her. And part of PWIAG's case against me, which you seem to both like and dismiss, is that I didn't vote Colby Day 3. But if I had changed my vote Day 3 wouldn't that bolster your case against me? Day 4, after Colby admitted being NOT TOWN, I voted him. But that doesn't come into the discussion does it. So it kind of boils down to damned if I do and damned if I don't.
|
|
|
Post by moodymitchy on Dec 16, 2011 10:50:16 GMT -5
A couple of things I'd like to know.....
@Paulwhoisaghost When exactly were you passed on the power that colby11 said that he had ? And were you informed as to how close he had got to reaching what he said was his WinCon ? I'm curious because if he was only one away and you just carried on for him... It must be pretty tempting to use it and gain a win... even though you say you are not going to.
Is anyone prepared to say that they have picked up the "gadget baton" from BillMc because , if I'm remembering that one correctly. That could also be passed on with his demise...
And now we have another one where someone says they can "choose" to pass on their gadget... though I feel that that's a pretty dodgy thing to do with a "protective" gadget as you'd apparently be passing it on blind.. Not knowing if it was going to a Blue team member or a Red team member...
I can't actually work out what use it might be to a Red team member but I'm sure others of you out might have ideas as to how it could be useful to them...
@Caerie I'm not really buying your claim... I can't work out howcome you're SO sure that you were targeted Night 3... There could be other reasons for the death of Paranoia other than the fact that you say you protected yourself , and there was only one Night Kill.
Not sure why you felt you had to claim so early in the Day either.. BUT as a "claimed" Blue team gadget holder.... I guess I'll have to let this go for now , until there is possibly a counter or something else that shows you to be lying.
I am though interested that you pick up on my post where you say I am questioning something flimsy....
Nothing is flimsy in this game.... And yes I did feel that sinjin let it slide by quite easily that you'd missed a post where someone had claimed..
I'm happy to vote sinjin toDay as I think there could be a distinct possibility that you are both on the Red team and you are trying to buy some cred toDay by voting them.
Also because , as I said... it seemed very "matey matey" the chat you and she had regarding the "missed claim" thing.
Vote sinjin
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 16, 2011 13:01:42 GMT -5
@ Paulwhoisaghost When exactly were you passed on the power that colby11 said that he had ? And were you informed as to how close he had got to reaching what he said was his WinCon ? I'm curious because if he was only one away and you just carried on for him... It must be pretty tempting to use it and gain a win... even though you say you are not going to. God... this is annoying. I got the PM at the start of Day 4. Immediately following the opening color. 8 minutes after the color was posted.... which is so metagaming it makes me sick... this is stupid. I'm curious why and how you made the jump from me getting Colby's gadget to me switching to his wincon? My wincon never changed... I have no information about Colby's wincon... The only thing the gadget gave me was the gadget.
|
|
|
Post by moodymitchy on Dec 16, 2011 13:06:37 GMT -5
I asked because you stated that you weren't going to use the "gadget".
I took this to mean that you would still play as a Blue team member.
I can't therefore understand what use the gadget is to you IF you're wincon hasn't changed...
To me it just seems to be another gadget that now has very little use..
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 16, 2011 15:48:32 GMT -5
Since the gadget was supposedly passed out randomly, it could be very useful. If it fell into scum hands. We just have to hope PWIAG is Blue team.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 16, 2011 19:25:51 GMT -5
Although the sinjin and caerie show is intriguing , my suspicions have not swayed from SisC
To refresh your memories, Every Day’s vote has been a weak me-too-ish vote EXCEPT yesterday when she didn’t bother to vote ( and was here= posted after the last vote count)
I may be pit bulling this but I still Vote: Sistercoyote
@ SisC feel free to OMGUS me ( per yesterDay’s comment) If we are both Town ( which I doubt) hopefully there is a Scum collar attached
I miss posted this EOD 4 would your mod-ness please delete that one
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 16, 2011 19:33:52 GMT -5
I realize this is hopeless but in order to give town more information I'm going to claim now. I guess I should have claimed yesterday. Given Caeries pre-emptive claim today, I'm sure this will seem like a "me too."
I have a gadget. I was afraid I telegraphed this day one when I said this:
and this:
From my role pm:
The not being able to use the gadget on myself kind of freaked me out day one, hence my if I die post.
I used the gadget on Paranoia Night one, Special Ed Night two, Caerie Night three and no one last night.
By the way my gadget passes on my death not by my choice. I strongly feel that blue team gadgets will only be passed to blue team members. It would be totally unbalanced if blue team powers were given to the red team.
I disconnected Ed because even though I thought he was town I was concerned that his new play style was going to get him lynched and I didn't want him to take a town member with him. This was based on my belief that there were more blue/blue than blue/red connections.
I disconnected the other two in order to reduce red lynch/blue detonation and it seems I have failed horribly. The only double death I may have prevented was Caerie's whom I am now totally convinced is red team. Joke's on me, heh.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 16, 2011 19:50:20 GMT -5
I see it was touched on but the fact is that Bill’s gadget could have been passed on. (I read it as his choice )
* although subsequent gadgets appear to be either randomly passed or voluntary*
It is possible that he did not pass it on
it is possible that it was passed on to one who has died since
it is possible that someone else does have it and they don’t want to single themselves out ( since that worked so well for Bill’s health )
PWIAG claims to have Colby’s gadget
caerie claims to have a gadget that has protective powers?
So three gadgets accounted for so far. Am I correct?
this just in
sinjin now claims to have a gadget which severs the ties.
Four gadgets in game so far By process of elimination atleast ONE of these gadgets would be in Scum hands. Non?
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 16, 2011 19:55:18 GMT -5
Additionally, caerie claims to have self protected.
While sinjin claims to have been the one that helped to protect caerie
Both on Night 3
my time here is short this clock evening I'm trying to share my thoughts
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 16, 2011 21:26:37 GMT -5
Interesting claim, sinjin. While it could be possible we're both Blue team, I'm actually kind of wondering if that gadget exists at all. There's no description of whether or not the "split" is permanent. Since the other gadget descriptions we've seen have had their limitations explained, color me skeptical.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 16, 2011 21:28:29 GMT -5
I asked because you stated that you weren't going to use the "gadget". I took this to mean that you would still play as a Blue team member. I can't therefore understand what use the gadget is to you IF you're wincon hasn't changed... To me it just seems to be another gadget that now has very little use.. o.0 The way I interpret the gadget... It passed to someone at random... this didn't prevent Colby from meeting his wincon, it just made it harder... he basically would have had to rely on someone else to use the collar enough times to fulfill the conditions he was given. My wincon didn't change though, so I don't know.... all I know is that adding a second frequency to a collar doesn't benefit my wincon... So why use the gadget? Like I said, when I probed the mod about what effects the second frequency have, I got the response of "No Comment". If it's something I'm not meant to know, then I don't think it will help me.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 16, 2011 21:53:08 GMT -5
First off to Lightfoot, I did not try to protect Caerie. I tried to protect town FROM Caerie. Interesting claim, sinjin. While it could be possible we're both Blue team, I'm actually kind of wondering if that gadget exists at all. There's no description of whether or not the "split" is permanent. Since the other gadget descriptions we've seen have had their limitations explained, color me skeptical. Nice way to cover all the bases "it's possible we're both Blue team" "color me skeptical" hahahaha. The way I understand my gadget is that the split is permanent. Your gadget on the other hand baffles me. Your doctor gadget can be passed at night instead of you using it? So for one night, while you are still alive you can decide not to protect yourself or anyone else and pass it to someone else, but you have no idea if you are actually passing it to a blue team member or a red team member? "color me skeptical"
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 16, 2011 22:30:38 GMT -5
After reading through, I think I need to apologise to the blue team for my absence as I do have information regarding the collars. I have a gadget - yes, they do exist. Each night, the gadget allows me to scan someone and determine information about the collar transmitter and the collar explosive: - Transmitter States: Enabled/Disabled/Duplicated. - Explosive States: Enabled/Disabled. So this suggests to me that there are several powers or other gadgets in play that can: - enable/disable the transmitter - enable/disable the explosive - duplicate a transmitter The gadget does not have a "disconnected/separated" result - so I would presume that there is no power/gadget to disconnect/separate. I can pass the gadget to someone else upon my death. My gadget works something like the "Doctor" role in that I can pass it to others to protect them instead, but since I couldn't verify who anyone was I was using it on myself on Night 3. Here's the text of my PM: I'd been hoping I'd be targeted again last night, so as to deprive the scum of any kills at all. Unfortunately, they didn't go after me. The double kill does reinforce my belief that the collars are linked during NKs and I'd been the target the previous Night. I'd wanted to keep this quiet longer in the hopes that I could get the scum to waste more NK attempts on me, but I think they must have learned their lesson and decided to focus on others for their kills. Did you protect BillMc after he claimed?
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 16, 2011 22:39:18 GMT -5
Although, wait - I think I misread your power - I missed that you had to pass it to someone to protect them.
Honestly the sudden profusion of gadgets is a bit unbelievable. One of the three, PWIAG, Caerie or Sinjin, must be scum.
At the moment, I'm most wtf'ing about Paul saying he got his gadget at Dawn. Does that mean Colby got to use it one more time after being (kind of) lynched? Or that he had to pass it to Paul as a Night action?
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 16, 2011 23:56:14 GMT -5
Did you protect BillMc after he claimed? I did not, because his gadget sounded like it was more useful to scum than to town. Because the description sounded plausible to me based on what I knew from my own PM, I believed his claim. I just had a hard time believing it would be useful for town. Since he was revealed to be town and sinjin's claimed gadget appears to be exactly what his gadget was meant to look for, I don't know what to make of that. It does potentially cast Bill's gadget in a new light, though. They may have been meant to be complimentary or antagonistic.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 17, 2011 7:52:57 GMT -5
...man, you people are slow toDay. Further elaborating, I didn't have a chance to use my gadget on Bill anyway. I can only use it at Night. I'd made my decision that Day not to risk protecting a power I found potentially scummy, but it would have been moot when Colby's lynch took him out.
Since the gadget is used at Night and my PM says it's only good for a few hours, I've been operating on the assumption that it doesn't protect from lynches. That seems logical for this type of gadget.
|
|
|
Post by moodymitchy on Dec 17, 2011 8:24:27 GMT -5
@Paulwhoisaghost Thanks for getting back regarding colby11.
So if I've got this right you're saying that colby11 although now dead, could still achieve their WinCon IF whoever was passed the gadget, chose to use it...
But it would be very hard because you (if you indeed do have the gadget) 1, Don't know how many people he'd already used it on. and 2, You don't know who he'd used it on, so you could possibly use it on the same person.
@sinjin I find it interesting that you chose to claim a role now that appears to be sort of "verified" because we had BillMc (Now known Blue Team) Claim he had a power that could check the state of peoples collars...
You say you can disable a transmitter... WHY "if" you have a protective role... did you choose not to use it Night 4 ?
Also BillMc's death reveal the end of Day 3 only shows him as a Blue Team member... The only reason we have to believe that the gadget actually exists is because as a Blue Team member, he had no reason to lie.
Mr Special Ed what do you make of it all.... feel free to join in.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Dec 17, 2011 10:04:08 GMT -5
I do not agree with scathatch or other suggestions that, for certain, all the people who've claimed gadgets must be lying. However, if everyone who has claimed is telling the truth and is Town, then: (1) the number of Scum at the outset would have been quite high - 5 or even 6; and (2) this would put us at or very near lynch-or-lose right now.
Unfortunately, I have very much lost the thread of this game due to real-life stuff. I will have free time tomorrow (Sunday) to read extensively and play, but this will wind up being very late. My three main goals will be these:
1. To read everything Lightfoot has done. When the real-life stuff started, she was my primary suspect, but she has slipped entirely under the radar since then and I think she needs to be revisited.
2. To figure out the case on sinjin, which has not been particularly well articulated in my view.
3. To handle the answer to a question. It is for Special Ed, and it is this:
Ed, I have not mentioned what follows so far, because I saw no particular reason to draw attention to it. But given everything that's happened toDay, and the possibility that we may be at or near L-o-L, I feel it's time to puts cards on the table. So here we go:
It is my impression that you have soft claimed something more than vanilla on at least two occasions in this game. I am posting this in a hurry, so I can't find and call out the specific posts, but I will if necessary. Will you confirm whether it was your intention to soft claim?
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 17, 2011 10:52:26 GMT -5
Day 5 Vote Count
sinjin (4): PWIAG(#3), caerie(#6), Inner Stickler(#8), moodymitchy(#10)
caerie (1): sinjin(#4) Sister Coyote (1): lightfoot(#14)
With these votes, sinjin will be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 17, 2011 10:57:48 GMT -5
First off to Lightfoot, I did not try to protect Caerie. I tried to protect town FROM Caerie. ~snipped~ Bad wording on my part- but still. you claimed to have severed caerie's collar . Which essentially stopped them from being exploded if/when their collar-mate was killed.( or v/v) I don't recall caerie being a lynch candidate and if you thought them Scum then not a NK target either. Am I missing something here?? You now say that the disconnect only lasts a few hours, where your PM post makes no mention of the duration.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 17, 2011 12:06:54 GMT -5
You know, Lightfoot, I have been very clear about why I was voting for you. I also said I would be accused of OMGUS voting you, when I would have been voting you for the same reasons I voted you the days before. Not that I would OMGUS you on Days 4 or 5, when we have plenty of information about people to vote for.
Yes, I missed yesterDay's deadline. Things have been a little chaotic in meatspace and I thought I had a couple more hours than I actually did.
|
|