|
Post by sinjin on Dec 17, 2011 13:11:04 GMT -5
First off to Lightfoot, I did not try to protect Caerie. I tried to protect town FROM Caerie. ~snipped~ Bad wording on my part- but still. you claimed to have severed caerie's collar . Which essentially stopped them from being exploded if/when their collar-mate was killed.( or v/v) I don't recall caerie being a lynch candidate and if you thought them Scum then not a NK target either. Am I missing something here?? Yes you are, I think Caerie is scum and want her lynched. I also didn't want to take the chance of another potential town dying with her. Note that all the secondary kills after lynching have been town members. However, my little gadget is kind of a double edged sword. That is why I didn't use it last night MoodyMitchy. I couldn't figure out who to use it on. Are you reading for comprehension? Caerie is the one who says her Dr. gadget only works for a couple of hours.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 17, 2011 13:12:50 GMT -5
You know, Lightfoot, I have been very clear about why I was voting for you. I also said I would be accused of OMGUS voting you, when I would have been voting you for the same reasons I voted you the days before. Not that I would OMGUS you on Days 4 or 5, when we have plenty of information about people to vote for. Yes, I missed yesterDay's deadline. Things have been a little chaotic in meatspace and I thought I had a couple more hours than I actually did. You posted me-too-ish votes on other player's weak cases ( but you like d the cases) Look at the end of the last Day you were there and could have voted - were you waiting for a last minute swing vote to look good? I'm just not buying a ticket for that ride
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 17, 2011 13:21:32 GMT -5
Bad wording on my part- but still. you claimed to have severed caerie's collar . Which essentially stopped them from being exploded if/when their collar-mate was killed.( or v/v) I don't recall caerie being a lynch candidate and if you thought them Scum then not a NK target either. Am I missing something here?? Yes you are, I think Caerie is scum and want her lynched. I also didn't want to take the chance of another potential town dying with her. Note that all the secondary kills after lynching have been town members. However, my little gadget is kind of a double edged sword. That is why I didn't use it last night MoodyMitchy. I couldn't figure out who to use it on. Are you reading for comprehension? Caerie is the one who says her Dr. gadget only works for a couple of hours. it's early ( or was) Sat mornin here. you are correct it seems on my confusion there. But, Still, by disconnecting caerie you cut the chances of them dying in half. I understand you think they are scum and want them lynched. But if that does not happen and the one they are linked to IS killed then you would have prevented that death. on a lighternote these timed out errors are f.u.n.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 17, 2011 14:19:46 GMT -5
I do not agree with scathatch or other suggestions that, for certain, all the people who've claimed gadgets must be lying. However, if everyone who has claimed is telling the truth and is Town, then: (1) the number of Scum at the outset would have been quite high - 5 or even 6; and (2) this would put us at or very near lynch-or-lose right now. If we had that high of a number of scum at the outset, it would sort of imply that they know to whom they're linked, since none of the NKs have taken out scum along with Blue Team. At the very least, it'd make it an extraordinary coincidence that none of them have gone off in the NKs. I'm really hoping that isn't the case. Out of 24 players, we've lost 11 Blue Team and only caught 1 Red Team, plus our unaligned third party. Even our sole Red Team hit with the lynch had been the direct target, not the linked partner. It's always only been Blue Team dying from NK, yet you'd think the scum would have hit somebody linked to one of them by now. So is it luck, knowledge on their part, or an extremely small Red Team? There's also the possibility that sinjin is telling the truth about her gadget but is still scum. In which case the night with only one kill wasn't the result of them going after me, but of them finally taking out someone linked to scum...whom she'd disconnected.
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 18, 2011 10:37:00 GMT -5
Is anybody else worried that the absolute lack of discussion here is because sinjin is actually town and scum are trying to avoid upsetting a mislynch? No, just me?
*bites nails*
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 18, 2011 11:10:47 GMT -5
Day 5 Vote Count
sinjin (4): PWIAG(#3), caerie(#6), Inner Stickler(#8), moodymitchy(#10)
caerie (1): sinjin(#4) Sister Coyote (1): lightfoot(#14)
Not Voting: Sister Coyote, Special Ed, scathach, gnarlycharlie, storyteller.
With these votes, sinjin will be lynched.
Day ends in just under 4 hours.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 18, 2011 11:13:59 GMT -5
Well, it looks like I'm going down today and there's not much more I can say. I would urge people to reread the case against me and really, really see if it makes sense to them. I late voted Paranoia because of his "I'm here but not saying anything posts Day 1" I was accused of being overly dramatic about my post and admit I was nervous going into the Night because my gadget gave me a pretty good idea about how how the collars worked. And in particular specified that I could do nothing about my own Early Day 2 I revoted Paranoia but then unvoted him and voted Archangel, who turned out to be town, and alas so did Paranoia. So as usual my scumdar sucks. What else is new. I then voted for CaerieD for her silly "safe" vote analysis instead of revoting Paranoia whom I had come to suspect less. And finally I voted colby11 on Day 4 after he admitted to not being town. ToDay the kitchen sink has been thrown at me, seems almost like a replay from Day2 of last game*. PWIAG thinks I diabolically tried to frame IS for Drain Bead's night kill. Moody thinks I'm Caerie's scum buddy, lightfoot can't tell Caerie and I apart and Caeire seems to be going back and forth about whether I'm scum or town in every post. Lastly IS thinks I changed my vote too frequently except in the case of colby11 where I didn't change my vote soon enough. *where, by the way PWIAG, on Day 2, 5 town lynched a town player, no scum on the wagon at all. You might recall that, you played in the game. Half of those alive don't seem to be playing at all. So, it's a beautiful sunny day and I'm going to spend it riding my new pink bicycle on the beach. It is unlikely I'll be back by end of day.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 18, 2011 11:23:36 GMT -5
Is anybody else worried that the absolute lack of discussion here is because sinjin is actually town and scum are trying to avoid upsetting a mislynch? No, just me? *bites nails* It's not just you. I'm really, really unhappy with how quiet toDay has been and all of the non-voters. This doesn't look good for town, but as we're coming down to the wire I'm not sure what else to do.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 12:54:45 GMT -5
Is anybody else worried that the absolute lack of discussion here is because sinjin is actually town and scum are trying to avoid upsetting a mislynch? No, just me? *bites nails* yup It looks like another Day where one is the target and no other scum hunting is happening I don't think this play style is helping Town. Granted it is the 'holiday season' and many are busy with home stuff ( self included)
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 18, 2011 13:09:28 GMT -5
Yeah, unfortunately, my parents arrived yesterday and I don't have time to go back and review the cases on much of anybody.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 18, 2011 13:15:33 GMT -5
Uff, sorry everyone, last weekend before Christmas so was out doing the 12 pubs last night & the night before. I shall try to struggle with my hangover enough to get a vote in before EOD
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 13:16:47 GMT -5
Yeah, unfortunately, my parents arrived yesterday and I don't have time to go back and review the cases on much of anybody. OOG I envy you having them. this time of year I do miss mine
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Dec 18, 2011 13:30:57 GMT -5
sorry for my absence. i've been busy checking papers. final grades are due tomorrow.
i'm not against a sinjin lynch but since her lynch is likely i'll
Vote Lightfoot
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 18, 2011 13:32:00 GMT -5
I do not agree with scathatch or other suggestions that, for certain, all the people who've claimed gadgets must be lying. However, if everyone who has claimed is telling the truth and is Town, then: (1) the number of Scum at the outset would have been quite high - 5 or even 6; and (2) this would put us at or very near lynch-or-lose right now. I didn't say all the people with gadgets were lying, but I find it very likely that at least one of them is. I'm ok with the sinjin lynch because her claimed gadget and BillMc's seem less likely to be on the same team, and we know Bill was blue team. I'm still a bit iffy as to how PWIAG got his new gadget though. To me, the passing of colby's gadget doesn't make sense, so I'll vote paulwhoisaghost with the intention of examining his post history in full tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 13:37:24 GMT -5
sorry for my absence. i've been busy checking papers. final grades are due tomorrow. i'm not against a sinjin lynch but since her lynch is likely i'll Vote LightfootWould you care to elaborate? Are you voting me because my screen name has 9 letters ? or ?
|
|
|
Post by special on Dec 18, 2011 13:42:03 GMT -5
Sorry for being AWOL Although, wait - I think I misread your power - I missed that you had to pass it to someone to protect them. Honestly the sudden profusion of gadgets is a bit unbelievable. One of the three, PWIAG, Caerie or Sinjin, must be scum. At the moment, I'm most wtf'ing about Paul saying he got his gadget at Dawn. Does that mean Colby got to use it one more time after being (kind of) lynched? Or that he had to pass it to Paul as a Night action? Vote: scathach
|
|
|
Post by special on Dec 18, 2011 13:43:36 GMT -5
Ed, I have not mentioned what follows so far, because I saw no particular reason to draw attention to it. But given everything that's happened toDay, and the possibility that we may be at or near L-o-L, I feel it's time to puts cards on the table. So here we go: It is my impression that you have soft claimed something more than vanilla on at least two occasions in this game. I am posting this in a hurry, so I can't find and call out the specific posts, but I will if necessary. Will you confirm whether it was your intention to soft claim? It was my intention to soft claim, yes. However, I am powerless. My intent was to draw a NK.
|
|
|
Post by special on Dec 18, 2011 13:46:14 GMT -5
Who is around? Are we really lynching sinjin?
I hope we're right
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 18, 2011 13:49:07 GMT -5
Ugh, all the new votes are one-offs so even should I find their cases worthwhile, switching targets won't change anything. (Which is not to say that I no longer find sinjin lynchworthy, it's just that I would feel better about it if there had been some real resistance to the cases rather than the ho-humness we've seen today)
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 13:52:18 GMT -5
Ugh, all the new votes are one-offs so even should I find their cases worthwhile, switching targets won't change anything. (Which is not to say that I no longer find sinjin lynchworthy, it's just that I would feel better about it if there had been some real resistance to the cases rather than the ho-humness we've seen today) Either Scum is sleeping in or sinjin is Town by my maths ( although I can/have/will be completely wrong)
|
|
|
Post by special on Dec 18, 2011 14:02:55 GMT -5
Well, we're here. How do we want to work this?
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 14:04:41 GMT -5
It seems there is just the three of us = not enough to change the lynch
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 18, 2011 14:07:41 GMT -5
Or scum are trying to psyche town out with lack of posting.
Ed, any chance we'll get more of an explanation of why you voted for Scathach? Because I don't see much more in that post except that she's set up one of Caerie, Sinjin, and Paul as being scum when that's not necessarily the case.
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 18, 2011 14:10:44 GMT -5
We can't lynch anyone we wanted but we can change the sinjin lynch. If I unvote her, she drops to 3. If the three of us then pile on a one-off who's not currently being voted for by one of us, then they get 4 votes, take the lead and get lynched.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 18, 2011 14:13:12 GMT -5
Day 5 Vote Count
sinjin (4): PWIAG(#3), caerie(#6), Inner Stickler(#8), moodymitchy(#10)
caerie (1): sinjin(#4) Sister Coyote (1): lightfoot(#14) lightfoot(1): gnarlycharlie(#42) PWIAG(1): scathach(#43) scathach(1): Special Ed(#45)
Not Voting: Sister Coyote, storyteller.
With these votes, sinjin will be lynched.
Day ends in just under 1 hours.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 14:18:28 GMT -5
We can't lynch anyone we wanted but we can change the sinjin lynch. If I unvote her, she drops to 3. If the three of us then pile on a one-off who's not currently being voted for by one of us, then they get 4 votes, take the lead and get lynched. If sinjin isn't scum could caerie be? The two of them have been at each other ( but they could both be missguided Town too)
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Dec 18, 2011 14:30:05 GMT -5
Of course if we swing the vote and that person is Town we all get Scum jackets
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 18, 2011 14:36:00 GMT -5
This is true. And there's always the chance scum would rather sacrifice one member than try to change the vote dramatically when there are so few players left, so every little move stands out.
If Special Ed were the lynch candidate, we'd find out fairly quickly whether or not sinjin's gadget claim was true. That's a terrible reason to lynch somebody, though.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Dec 18, 2011 14:43:53 GMT -5
i'm still here in case you need me. *goes back to checking papers*
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 18, 2011 15:02:37 GMT -5
Day is over
|
|