|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2011 15:44:36 GMT -5
Ok, this is serious, I mean, how are we going to sell this.
I have no idea, but upstairs are mad.
That may be true, but you can't change it, it happened.
Rick... Rick, what do you think.
I think... I'll tell you what I think
Hi, and welcome back to Wedlock. I'm your host, Rick Rothman and it's our Post-Christmas special. Down there in the Stockade, well it's been a bit special.
The contestants got to gather round a tree and sing carols. They go to open presents on Christmas morning and eat a full Christmas Meal. Most of them have spent their time treating it as if it was their last meal.
A wise choice that eating every meal like its your last.
And yet, its a time of joy, of hope and of miracles.
Yes, Miracles, because last Night was the most peaceful I have ever seen the camp. Contestants putting aside the game to show love and caring towards each other.
There's no need to show the scoreboard, nothing happened, other than they all got a peaceful nights sleep.
Truly, the Christmas spirit can be found even here in the hearts of these criminals for just one Night of the year and I, for one, am happy to see it.
I'm Rick Rothman, and this is a tranquil and harmonious Wedlock.
...aaaand cut. Nice one Rick, think they'll buy it
No idea, but they've used the same line every year since Christmas started, it's good for another one at least.
Day 7 ends at 8pm GMT on 30th Dec
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 27, 2011 15:59:39 GMT -5
Well, that's interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 27, 2011 17:12:41 GMT -5
I'd assume the scum ran afoul of a gadget. I'm not really seeing much strategy for them in not committing a NK at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 27, 2011 17:15:11 GMT -5
Or, they missed the deadline; could go either way.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 27, 2011 17:31:04 GMT -5
That's true. Without knowing the terms the scum are operating under (are they required to kill every Night?), it's hard to say. CIAS is tricksy.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 29, 2011 10:10:34 GMT -5
Day 7 Vote Count
Calling Birds (4): French Hens (3): Turtle Doves (2): Partridge (1):
With these votes the Calling Birds will be taken out, shot, stuffed and served for dinner.
No contestants will be currently harmed in the making of dinner.
Day ends in just under 29hrs or so.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 29, 2011 11:02:07 GMT -5
Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year?
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 29, 2011 11:24:14 GMT -5
Uh... Hi! I'm a go read now...
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 29, 2011 11:36:15 GMT -5
Can we kill Storyteller now? I'm always suspicious when someone is on the lynch block and gets ousted from the lead because "people don't like the case against X" or "don't like how quickly the wagon on X formed". In this case, it resulted in a townie lynch Yesterday. So... Story was saved and a townie was lynched... that smells fishy to me... could be nothing... but I think it's something... still haven't had a thorough enough reread to figure out why my sticky note said to be suspicious of Story to begin with, but this event is enough for me to be comfortable voting for him again Today.
Vote: Storyteller
|
|
|
Post by special on Dec 29, 2011 13:10:17 GMT -5
Vote: Storyteller
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Dec 29, 2011 13:19:02 GMT -5
Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year? You seem to have a lot to say yourself...
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 29, 2011 13:26:08 GMT -5
Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year? You're here too, you know. Well, storyteller has been fairly quiet over the course of the game and I know that when he's scum, he does get quieter. On the other hand, he's off in DisneyWorld and will probably not see much of the game Today. On the other hand, (yes, I have 3 hands, don't stare, it's rude) he's already said that he has nothing to claim. Whether that means he's vanilla town or disavowing knowledge of any gadgets, I am not sure. I am more interested in Sister Coyote. She and Lightfoot have been biting each other's ankles the whole game and I'm curious if Lightfoot did manage to spot something even if she failed to articulate it well enough to interest the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Inner Stickler on Dec 30, 2011 0:32:01 GMT -5
All right then, Storyteller lynch part deux. Here's hoping for a repeat of the sinjin lynch.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 12:12:40 GMT -5
Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year? I find this post fairly richly ironic since the sum total of your contribution yesterday was and Despite her constant claims that my reasoning is "weak," I'm actually comfortable with the vote I've had on Lightfoot and haven't seen anything to change my mind as of yet, so. Vote: Lightfoot And yet you popped in to chastise us all for talking, but didn't actually vote yourself. I'd be interested in your opinions on who is next in your scum list. You were suspicious of Lightfoot for days, but I don't think you've given us much opinions on the other players. vote Sister Coyote
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 12:19:55 GMT -5
... still haven't had a thorough enough reread to figure out why my sticky note said to be suspicious of Story to begin with, but this event is enough for me to be comfortable voting for him again Today. And seriously, why is no one calling you guys for this kind of voting? PWIAG: I think I had a reason for voting story but I can't remember it. Welp, I'll just vote him anyway SpecialEd: Not even a hint at justification. Yesterday he said that storyteller hadn't contributed much except suspicion of special ed. OMGUS and rich rich irony. I was trying to read the case against storyteller, and there just isn't one. The only other vote on him yesterday was from Lightfoot who admitted she was only voting him out of self preservation.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 30, 2011 12:31:55 GMT -5
Well, see, here's the thing.
I was having a conversation with gnarlycharlie about whether or not the two of us should claim. And we hadn't come to a decision yet. But now we have.
We are the masons, he and I; we were in the same gang on the outside and on the inside our gadget allowed us to identify each other from Day One (and had no other uses). So a vote for me is a vote for the wrong person.
Charlie will be along at some point to verify.
I'm inclined to agree with scathach that there isn't much of a case on storyteller at the same time I agree with IS that he's been awfully quiet. So I could go either way on him.
Also, I'm a little leery of Caerie's statement that a gadget had to be in play for there to have been no kill last night; I know there have been cases made on her on past days but between my family being in town and things being a little nutty at work I haven't had a chance to review the past six days, which is why I haven't put a vote down yet.
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 30, 2011 12:32:21 GMT -5
I've certainly seen nothing to lessen my suspicion of Sister Coyote from yesterDay. We haven't gotten much from anyone (and I do suspect a post holiday haze or preparing-for-New-Year's-rush is largely responsible for that), but it's been particularly bad from her. If you're scum and it's getting toward the end of the game, that's not a bad strategy. Just lay low and wait to gain the upperhand from NKs. As scathach points out: Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year? I find this post fairly richly ironic since the sum total of your contribution yesterday was and Despite her constant claims that my reasoning is "weak," I'm actually comfortable with the vote I've had on Lightfoot and haven't seen anything to change my mind as of yet, so. Vote: Lightfoot And yet you popped in to chastise us all for talking, but didn't actually vote yourself. I'd be interested in your opinions on who is next in your scum list. You were suspicious of Lightfoot for days, but I don't think you've given us much opinions on the other players. There just hasn't been much of a case against storyteller other than some quick votes getting fired off. vote Sister Coyote
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 30, 2011 12:41:44 GMT -5
Day 7 Vote Count
storyteller (2): PWIAG(#8), Special Ed(#9) Sister Coyote (2): scathach(#13), caerie(#16)
With these votes storyteller will be lynched.
Day ends in just over 2 hours.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 12:45:16 GMT -5
I was having a conversation with gnarlycharlie about whether or not the two of us should claim. And we hadn't come to a decision yet. But now we have. We are the masons, he and I; we were in the same gang on the outside and on the inside our gadget allowed us to identify each other from Day One (and had no other uses). So a vote for me is a vote for the wrong person. Charlie will be along at some point to verify. oh nuts, I hate last hour claims. unvote Sister Coyote I suppose the only way ye aren't town is if ye're both scum. And it would be pretty risky to out both of yourselves like that.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Dec 30, 2011 12:51:02 GMT -5
i was thinking of voting for Caerie but since Sister Coyote is might be lynched with a couple of hours left i need to save my fellow mason.
Vote Storyteller
i see on preview that SisC has lost a vote. i may still switch.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 30, 2011 12:51:47 GMT -5
Sorry, it was the first chance I had to get online.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 12:58:27 GMT -5
Seriously, people? Is everyone still recovering from Christmas or remaining drunk in anticipation of the New Year? You're here too, you know. Well, storyteller has been fairly quiet over the course of the game and I know that when he's scum, he does get quieter. On the other hand, he's off in DisneyWorld and will probably not see much of the game Today. On the other hand, (yes, I have 3 hands, don't stare, it's rude) he's already said that he has nothing to claim. Whether that means he's vanilla town or disavowing knowledge of any gadgets, I am not sure. I am more interested in Sister Coyote. She and Lightfoot have been biting each other's ankles the whole game and I'm curious if Lightfoot did manage to spot something even if she failed to articulate it well enough to interest the rest of us. All right then, Storyteller lynch part deux. Here's hoping for a repeat of the sinjin lynch. These posts are kind of pinging me actually. Suspicion of Lightfoot but no vote. And then suspicion of storyteller, but no vote. And is happy to just watch the wagon roll.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 12:59:19 GMT -5
Heh, and by suspicion of Lightfoot, I mean suspicion of Sister C.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Dec 30, 2011 13:00:12 GMT -5
You're here too, you know. Well, storyteller has been fairly quiet over the course of the game and I know that when he's scum, he does get quieter. On the other hand, he's off in DisneyWorld and will probably not see much of the game Today. On the other hand, (yes, I have 3 hands, don't stare, it's rude) he's already said that he has nothing to claim. Whether that means he's vanilla town or disavowing knowledge of any gadgets, I am not sure. I am more interested in Sister Coyote. She and Lightfoot have been biting each other's ankles the whole game and I'm curious if Lightfoot did manage to spot something even if she failed to articulate it well enough to interest the rest of us. All right then, Storyteller lynch part deux. Here's hoping for a repeat of the sinjin lynch. These posts are kind of pinging me actually. Suspicion of Lightfoot but no vote. And then suspicion of storyteller, but no vote. And is happy to just watch the wagon roll. are you suggesting a switch to I nner Stickler? i'm not against it.
|
|
|
Post by scáthach on Dec 30, 2011 13:07:34 GMT -5
His admission of skimming yesterday pinged me then too. It's not a super strong case but it's better than the nothing on storyteller vote Inner SticklerSkimming posts: Did moodymitchy claim something? If not, I'm a little surprised at his death. (CIAS' comment in the N5 thread about the game is still on intrigues me. Could we have had a 2 scum team and two third parties, one a survivor and one a serial killer? In which case we're still hunting for the serial killer. Would it be too much to ask for people who're voting based on previous days' reasoning to at least quote a previous post that lays out their reasoning? Slow down there, pardner. I was throwing out a possible scenario and I haven't really been keeping track of what nights 1 person has died and what nights have had 2 deaths. But, we lynched a scum, CIAS said the game's not over yet and there was only one death last night. I don't see where gadgets come into this specific scenario at all. (Other than various snipping and protecting gadgets could be affecting NKs but I don't have any information beyond the mod posts for that.) (my emphasis)
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Dec 30, 2011 13:11:55 GMT -5
not sure if this can be pulled off.
Unvote Storyteller
Vote Inner Stickler
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 30, 2011 13:18:28 GMT -5
Day 7 Vote Count
storyteller (2): PWIAG(#8), Special Ed(#9), gnarlycharlie(#19,#25) Inner Stickler (2): scathach(#24), gnarlycharlie(#25)
Sister Coyote (1): scathach(#13,#18), caerie(#16)
With these votes storyteller will be lynched.
Day ends in just over 1 3/4 hours.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Dec 30, 2011 14:34:51 GMT -5
vote Inner Stickler
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 30, 2011 14:36:10 GMT -5
Also, I'm a little leery of Caerie's statement that a gadget had to be in play for there to have been no kill last night; I know there have been cases made on her on past days but between my family being in town and things being a little nutty at work I haven't had a chance to review the past six days, which is why I haven't put a vote down yet. I've got a gadget, as I've said before. I used it. I don't know if it is the reason behind the lack of a NK, but it's an easy assumption to make. I can understand people not believing my gadget claim, but if I make references to gadgets being responsible for the lack of a NK and I've told everyone I have a gadget that prevents NKs...well. What do you expect? Should I, now that I've claimed, pretend I don't have the gadget? The only real "case" made against me had been from confirmed scum, whose lynch I was pushing at the time. While I've been a little suspicious of Inner Stickler, this sudden "mason" claim stinks to high heaven to me. We're coming down to the wire here and two players claim they can back each other up on this. Fantastic, except it's entirely possible they're the two scum that are left at this point. Largely because I distrust gnarlycharlie after this claim and I do trust PWIAG, I'm changing my vote. Unvote Sister CoyoteVote storyteller
|
|
|
Post by Caerie on Dec 30, 2011 14:52:33 GMT -5
Sticks, if you don't show up and vote to save your butt, I reeeaaaaally hope you are scum. Otherwise I fear tonight's game over.
|
|