|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 20:32:43 GMT -5
I'd like to hear from Jan regarding Bill and peeker.
If she confirms peeker, then I'm willing to lynch Bill first. Beacuse, like peeker says, I'd rather take a shot at an undead or a cabal even than another wolf (assuming septimus is being honest, and I see no reason why he wouldnt be at this point.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On a completely different note, is there any thought to the idea that maybe we don't have Vampires? Maybe a Necromancer or two for the undead? And maybe no witchdoctor or vicar to counteract them? Just a thought.
The single Night kills could be from protections as well.
~~~~~~~~~~~
Now, for the meet. I'd like to get Bill lynched
Vote: BillMc
However, even more than that, I'd rather have Days end on Friday than on Tuesday. So if we can end the Day quickly, we can go into Night and have Night be over the weekend. A potential draw back for the Wolves (and witches too, I suppose). But it also allows for greater participation in the Day thread.
so,
Vote: End Day
Now, I suppose I'm unlikely to convince a lot of people to Kill Bill, so I'll
Vote: Pollux Oil
in order to have a lynch toDay. What's the difference in Killing Bill toMorrow? If he's Cabal, so what? If he's Vampire, maybe another death? (hopefully Cabal or Wolf). If he's Necromancer, we might get another Zombie. And if he's Wolf, no real difference.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jan 26, 2012 20:34:14 GMT -5
that's lame and you know it you got a false claiming witch and you vote for someone else (not that it is a bad vote) but that is all sorts of messed up. how long were you going to go along with his false claim? a day, a month, a quarter, a year? so he is lying and you dont vote for him. heh heh. woot woot pollus you fucking rock. I could vote for him, but it doesn't really do any good. Unless other people think we should lynch a Cabal when they're not really a threat right now. I mean, you yourself want to lynch an Undead before a supposed Wolf, right? Cabal aren't even on your radar. pollus: a hard indentation on the foot pollux: a stud muffin that saves damsels in distress gotta help you out, dude. If you know of any damsels who need saving please let me know, it's been a while since I've met any.
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Jan 26, 2012 21:05:35 GMT -5
How did I read Scathach as septimus TWICE?
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jan 26, 2012 21:47:16 GMT -5
I'll go with the witches. But I would like to add that I'm a Mason, and peeker isn't. You know, just for future reference. I'll be checking Jan toDay.
vote: Pollux Oil
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:02:32 GMT -5
I'll go with the witches. But I would like to add that I'm a Mason, and peeker isn't. You know, just for future reference. I'll be checking Jan toDay. WTF?
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:03:07 GMT -5
Unvote: Bill
Vote: peeker
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 22:04:01 GMT -5
that's lame and you know it you got a false claiming witch and you vote for someone else (not that it is a bad vote) but that is all sorts of messed up. how long were you going to go along with his false claim? a day, a month, a quarter, a year? so he is lying and you dont vote for him. heh heh. woot woot pollus you fucking rock. I could vote for him, but it doesn't really do any good. Unless other people think we should lynch a Cabal when they're not really a threat right now. I mean, you yourself want to lynch an Undead before a supposed Wolf, right? Cabal aren't even on your radar. pollus: a hard indentation on the foot pollux: a stud muffin that saves damsels in distress gotta help you out, dude. If you know of any damsels who need saving please let me know, it's been a while since I've met any. ok. fair enough. my concern at this point is that undead are about two cycles from winning. do the fucking math. boozy wants to play shit - fuck him. us lynchling wolf don't do jack shit at this point. let's kill him. only unded want woves or townies dead. fucker. bank this one.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jan 26, 2012 22:05:08 GMT -5
lazy turd ass not justified vote out of the gate. fuck dude, you dissed me for being distractionary before i even fucking posted in thread. that's so lame you need to be tossed from the bus just on general principle. This can't possibly be the first time I did this to you, and only now do you get butthurt about it?
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jan 26, 2012 22:06:06 GMT -5
Yep. Makes my first day vote feel even shinier.
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:07:36 GMT -5
Yep. Makes my first day vote feel even shinier. Have you found any other masons? (You needn't say who) And when did you investigate peeker?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 22:08:06 GMT -5
I'll go with the witches. But I would like to add that I'm a Mason, and peeker isn't. You know, just for future reference. I'll be checking Jan toDay. WTF? i my other masos would potentiallly be helpful to weight in at this point. i think ed went wolf, again.
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:10:24 GMT -5
i my other masos would potentiallly be helpful to weight in at this point. i think ed went wolf, again. Why is it every time anyone questions your masonhood, you accuse me of being a wolf? What exactly do the 2 things have in common? Or are you just hoping to create any type of distraction?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 22:21:18 GMT -5
lazy turd ass not justified vote out of the gate. fuck dude, you dissed me for being distractionary before i even fucking posted in thread. that's so lame you need to be tossed from the bus just on general principle. This can't possibly be the first time I did this to you, and only now do you get butthurt about it? no, you play the same old tired shit that i get sick of. least you could do is wait until i play it until i play it. jeebuz.
|
|
|
Post by septimus on Jan 26, 2012 22:26:18 GMT -5
Only one NK each last Night and the Night before? Surely there's at least 1 Vampire, as otherwise a large chunk of the rules becomes irrelevant. With either a Vig or 2nd Vampire, we'd expect three NK's per Night, not just one.
I guess it's legal to post PM's so here's what I got this morning:
Except for the name change, this is the same PM I got about Ginger.
I thought maybe Ginger (and now Scathach?) was NK'ed by two Night Killers, and the double Killing leaves the corpse mutilated, but that probably doesn't make sense. All the rules are visible except the Special Powers, one per team. But what special power would cause this interference? (Surely the special power isn't just to interfere with Coroner: it would be too weak a Power.) One possibility is that some team (Cabal?) nominates a Player each Night and pre-empts his Power; they choose me because no stronger Power is yet revealed. I still get the Lynch reveals, because that's a "day power."
As far as the fake Witches and fake Masons are concerned I'll admit to confusion. I'm not even sure I believe Idle over Pollux, so will defer my voting for now.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 22:33:07 GMT -5
i my other masos would potentiallly be helpful to weight in at this point. i think ed went wolf, again. Why is it every time anyone questions your masonhood, you accuse me of being a wolf? What exactly do the 2 things have in common? Or are you just hoping to create any type of distraction? what are you looking for? i know of another mason(s). matter of fact i know of a couple (or maybe one) that can cross confirm. i know that you are not a mason, which can be confirmed by at least one other (or more). iwe need to get rid of the undead, dude. and i will make an educated guess at the vamp. but the fucking nec is going to steal this if we are not careful.
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:36:08 GMT -5
Why is it every time anyone questions your masonhood, you accuse me of being a wolf? What exactly do the 2 things have in common? Or are you just hoping to create any type of distraction? what are you looking for? i know of another mason(s). matter of fact i know of a couple (or maybe one) that can cross confirm. i know that you are not a mason, which can be confirmed by at least one other (or more). iwe need to get rid of the undead, dude. and i will make an educated guess at the vamp. but the fucking nec is going to steal this if we are not careful. OK, then can you explain why both Bill and Boozy would counter claim mason? And can you explain Jan's confusion (at least until she shows up to explain herself)?
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jan 26, 2012 22:37:25 GMT -5
Yep. Makes my first day vote feel even shinier. Have you found any other masons? (You needn't say who) And when did you investigate peeker? No, Peeker's my only found mason. I investigated him yesterDay.
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:38:40 GMT -5
Have you found any other masons? (You needn't say who) And when did you investigate peeker? No, Peeker's my only found mason. I investigated him yesterDay. He's a mason now? You said he wasn't earlier.
|
|
|
Post by special on Jan 26, 2012 22:40:18 GMT -5
Is there some mason special power where they have to deny each other at first?
Or does peeker have some special power to force others to confirm his role?
Or is this game just completely fucked up?
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Jan 26, 2012 22:49:19 GMT -5
Yeesh. Sorry, peeker's my only confirmation of anything, rather. He's not a Mason, and he said he was. My first day, I didn't come up with anything of use to the game (given current Mason claims, that is)
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jan 26, 2012 23:19:38 GMT -5
So let me get this straight:
Peeker says he's a mason. Silver Jan and peeker say Ed is not a mason. Ginger says septimus is not a mason. Ginger dies and is town for certain. Silver Jan says Peeker is not a mason, then says she misread her PM and says he IS a mason. Bill says he is a mason, and peeker is not a mason. Boozy says he is a mason, and peeker is not a mason. Peeker says he knows of another mason that can confirm he's a mason.
Is that about right?
What the heck is going on?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 23:31:51 GMT -5
Yeesh. Sorry, peeker's my only confirmation of anything, rather. He's not a Mason, and he said he was. My first day, I didn't come up with anything of use to the game (given current Mason claims, that is) you sir are full of shit.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Jan 26, 2012 23:36:40 GMT -5
cmom day 1 handshakers let blow this fuker up. obviously squid is a lying sack of horse hockey. oh whoos, that's what undead want. just a wee bit of time. heh heh even if i gets screwed at least i know i was right. and within the first ten posts. jeebuz i crack my ass up.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jan 27, 2012 0:34:35 GMT -5
I'll go with the witches. But I would like to add that I'm a Mason, and peeker isn't. You know, just for future reference. I'll be checking Jan toDay. vote: Pollux Oil It's like I said in an earlier post..I'm more wont to believe Bill whereas Jan did a huge flip flop (like she needed to get her story straight after she forgot it)...so no idea why people chose to believe Bill over her/peeker. I'm guessing Jan and Peeker might be Cabal..and Ginger/Boozy/Bill might be masons* *This is just a guess, we haven't investigated any of them yet.
|
|
|
Post by Nanook on Jan 27, 2012 1:00:37 GMT -5
Interestingly, if you actually read what Jan said, she never actually said that peeker was a mason. She only said that he was a "good oke", which I assume is a typo of one. That isn't the same. A fake claim gone bad perhaps?
I've changed my mind. With TWO people counterclaiming peeker/maybe Jan, I would rather we resolved the new Monkgate before we kill Pollux. The only downside to keeping Pollux alive is that any detectives we have would be worthless for as long as he's alive.
Oh and Pollux a question for you and your supposed Witch buddies. Why did you investigate Idle?
Unvote: Pollux Vote: peeker
I think I believe Bill and Boozy more than Peeker. Peeker's initial claim made no sense, coming out of the blue as it did. It really felt like he was trying to get masons to claim with him to exposes them to being killed. Which seems to have worked, at least in the case of JBG.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jan 27, 2012 1:56:02 GMT -5
First of all, it was late and I was tired and I totally misread my PM. However I did find out another Mason and I am not prepared to out them yet as they apparently haven’t outed themselves yet. With this odd information that I received I just immediately jumped up and down and assumed the worst.
Vote Pollux Oil
Vote Gnarlycharlie
My suspicions of him haven’t changed.
|
|
|
Post by guiri on Jan 27, 2012 2:28:11 GMT -5
I think I believe Bill and Boozy more than Peeker. Peeker's initial claim made no sense, coming out of the blue as it did. I'm more wont to believe Bill whereas Jan did a huge flip flop (like she needed to get her story straight after she forgot it)...so no idea why people chose to believe Bill over her/peeker Boozy's claim make less sense than Peeker's and his and flip flop is comparable to Jan's: I'll go with the witches. But I would like to add that I'm a Mason, and peeker isn't. You know, just for future reference. I'll be checking Jan toDay. No, Peeker's my only found mason. I investigated him yesterDay. Yeesh. Sorry, peeker's my only confirmation of anything, rather. He's not a Mason, and he said he was. My first day, I didn't come up with anything of use to the game (given current Mason claims, that is) Peeker claimed Day 1. Anyway, I too am a freemason. On Day1, following his claim, I asked about Peeker, and the result was:On Day 2 I asked about SilverJan and the result was: As for the current claims and counterclaims, I can think of three explanations: - Boozy and Bill are not masons but are trying to leverage Jan's confusion to get Peeker and Jan lynched or Nked, seems quite risky - there are two separate groups of Freemasons who are unable to cross-confirm, seems somewhat game breaking given the rules - Peeker had the power to imitate a Freemason on N1 only and so passed my handshake but failed successive ones, is plausible but would imply 5 masons (Jan, Ginger, Bill, Boozy, and me) and failed handshakes with Boozy, Bill and Jan yesterDay SilverJan, who did you attempt to handshake with yesterDay? Can you post your PM with the result?
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jan 27, 2012 4:09:07 GMT -5
I think I believe Bill and Boozy more than Peeker. Peeker's initial claim made no sense, coming out of the blue as it did. Boozy's claim make less sense than Peeker's and his and flip flop is comparable to Jan's: Peeker claimed Day 1. Anyway, I too am a freemason. On Day1, following his claim, I asked about Peeker, and the result was:On Day 2 I asked about SilverJan and the result was: As for the current claims and counterclaims, I can think of three explanations: - Boozy and Bill are not masons but are trying to leverage Jan's confusion to get Peeker and Jan lynched or Nked, seems quite risky - there are two separate groups of Freemasons who are unable to cross-confirm, seems somewhat game breaking given the rules - Peeker had the power to imitate a Freemason on N1 only and so passed my handshake but failed successive ones, is plausible but would imply 5 masons (Jan, Ginger, Bill, Boozy, and me) and failed handshakes with Boozy, Bill and Jan yesterDay SilverJan, who did you attempt to handshake with yesterDay? Can you post your PM with the result? This is my PM
|
|
|
Post by guiri on Jan 27, 2012 4:22:37 GMT -5
OK. Can you confirm that you asked Pleonast if Peeker was a freemason yesterDay?
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 27, 2012 4:35:45 GMT -5
this game is getting stranger and stranger.
first off,
Vote Hoopy Frood
Vote Pollux Oil
also, I'm a Freemason. i sent a handshake to peeker and this is what i got:
i don't know if he's lying or if there's some power that affects handshaking so i'd like to hear from the others claiming Freemason. in the meantime:
Vote peeker
Vote Silver Jan
|
|