|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 2, 2012 17:50:36 GMT -5
And I see now after posting that peeker is apparently claiming cabal.
And Silver Jan seems to be waffling about what she wants to claim, based on her 4 faction post and then her posting of the freemason PM.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Feb 2, 2012 17:52:23 GMT -5
Sorry I am off to bed, Its 1am and that's me done.
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 2, 2012 17:52:56 GMT -5
So with the evidence that cabal are faking mason, we might want to do another circle shake, particularly since no masons are really confirmed at this point based on Ed's analysis. Another circle shake? I wasn't aware we had done a first one. It seemed that people were roughly following guiri's circle shake post from YesterDay based on their results. Though, gnarley seemed to shake backwards on that one. (And conveniently got shaken by the freemason who's AWOL.) But, maybe I should have worded that better as "we might want to attempt to do another circle shake" toDay.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 17:55:52 GMT -5
A Mass claim might not be needed until morning with a sure lynch, but since you're our #1 lynch target, how about that PM. 07. Freemason - Silver Jan You are a Freemason, a member of the Town. Each Day you may check if one other player is also a Freemason. If the target is a Freemason, both of you will be informed of the discovery. Otherwise, no effect. Read more: idlemafia.com/index.cgi?action=pmview&view=1&id=42506#ixzz1lGdMWQ1jenough jan. if town wants to have a prayer or winning they need to play nice with us.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 18:06:14 GMT -5
well at least i know who the vamp is. two deaths last Night. i blocked gnarley on N1 and N2. two deaths last Night when i blocked ed. and with that folks an insta lynch on me and jan results in an undead victory.
jeebuz, ed [/b] you get a kewpie doll kind of. i mean you are damn close but you still lose going down this path. plus some of your conclusions are not right. although, i am impressed on the proximity to truth. oog onyaknow i just give ed shit primarily because he pisses me off since he is a better player than i am. and that feels like losing a sprint to an amputee. [oog off] vote gnarly. he ain't mason, he ain't cabal. and now we get an extra death. so he's our vamp. i'd like to slow the killing down and then go nec hunting. plus let me and jan hang around. we might offer up some more interesting tidbits.[/quote] This has some legs, because we still have too many Masons, even if one of Hoopy, Suburban or Boozy is Cabal[/quote] now i guess town gets to do their math assignment. do you want to lynch out of the undead possibility? which ends up in a net loss of two or three. plus adds one to the zombie faction. unless town has a vig (so doubtful as to be ludicrous) there ain't no more killers except for our remaining wolf and our vamp. right now, it seems to me, that town shoots itself in it's collective foot by not going after an undead. but what the fuck do i know?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 18:07:21 GMT -5
And I see now after posting that peeker is apparently claiming cabal. And Silver Jan seems to be waffling about what she wants to claim, based on her 4 faction post and then her posting of the freemason PM. actually i am claiming that gnarley is a fucking vampire. jeebuz you folks really need for content.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 18:31:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Feb 2, 2012 18:35:19 GMT -5
It seemed that people were roughly following guiri's circle shake post from YesterDay based on their results. Though, gnarley seemed to shake backwards on that one. (And conveniently got shaken by the freemason who's AWOL.) But, maybe I should have worded that better as "we might want to attempt to do another circle shake" toDay. Ah...I hadn't really paid much attention to the order that guiri had proposed, since we never got a consensus. I had picked guiri as my target quite early on in the Day. I did ask Pleonast last Night if it were possible for Bill to have designated his investigation targets ahead of time, and was told that was allowed, so it is possible that gnarly's report was genuine. Of course, it's equally possible that it's made up, since Bill isn't likely to be around to refute it. If we take peeker and Jan out of the mix, we have the following Mason claimants left: BillMc Boozahol Squid gnarlycharlie Suburban Plankton Hoopy Frood The only person among these who has been directly investigated is Boozy, who was found to be a Mason by guiri on Day 3. As for the rest of us: Suburban Plankton has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-2) Hoopy Frood has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-14) gnarlycharlie has not handshaken with anyone successfully BillMc has not handshaken with anyone successfully, and is not around to do so. guiri is the sole person who confirmed any of us as Masons; furthermore, he confirmed us all on Day 3. Assuming that guiri is on the level, that would mean that at least 2 of us must be Masons (the third could be a Cabalist using their Secret Power). So that would mean we have at least 4 Masons (JBG, guiri, and 2 of the set [Suburban,Hoopy,Boozy]). That's as many as in any of the previous Conspiracy games. vote gnarlycharlieI'm willing to believe peeker's latest claim for the moment, which does strongly implicate gnarly as a Vampire. I don't know if we'll be able to agree on a 'circle shake' or not Today, but if we do hopefully it will help weed out what I think is at least one other false Mason claim among the rest of us. I think the biggest problem is how to handle Bill.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Feb 2, 2012 19:14:52 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense for us to lynch one of the Cabalists today, test gnarlychuck out with a handshake, and the nlynch him tomorrow if it doesn't work? Killing the Cabal is obviously our lowest priority, but it's better than the possibility of killing an actual Mason. I'll be shaking charlie toDay, and will report my result toNight. If he's not on the level, we can lynch him tomorrow. I'd suggest someone else between you and Hoopy shake BillMc, and possibly give us a lynch target for the Day after. (Bill's a lower priority than charlie, given his inactivity)
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Feb 2, 2012 19:18:33 GMT -5
I don't trust Peeker, Silverjan, or Gnarlycharlie.. But Peeker's claim seems logical, so I'm willing to believe that he is telling the truth for now.
Vote: Silverjan Vote: Gnarlycharlie
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Feb 2, 2012 19:21:07 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense for us to lynch one of the Cabalists today, test gnarlychuck out with a handshake, and the nlynch him tomorrow if it doesn't work? Killing the Cabal is obviously our lowest priority, but it's better than the possibility of killing an actual Mason. I'll be shaking charlie toDay, and will report my result toNight. If he's not on the level, we can lynch him tomorrow. I'd suggest someone else between you and Hoopy shake BillMc, and possibly give us a lynch target for the Day after. (Bill's a lower priority than charlie, given his inactivity)Because the Cabal has to eliminate the wolves, the undead, AND 2 of the 3 witches. All of the other factions need to kill Undead, all we've been killing (that we know of) are either town or wolves.
|
|
|
Post by Nanook on Feb 2, 2012 19:23:50 GMT -5
Peeker's claim seems like a load of BS to me. He's been hyper focused on the undead for a while now. I think it just as likely he and Jan are undead as they are Cabal.
Unvote: peeker Vote: Jan
Since the logic behind her over him makes some sense.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 19:28:28 GMT -5
Peeker's claim seems like a load of BS to me. He's been hyper focused on the undead for a while now. I think it just as likely he and Jan are undead as they are Cabal. Unvote: peeker [/color] Vote: Jan [/color] Since the logic behind her over him makes some sense.[/quote] and since i don't think undead know each other this makes about as much sense as concluding that chickpeas are a consumable food. vote nookie
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 19:44:01 GMT -5
Peeker's claim seems like a load of BS to me. He's been hyper focused on the undead for a while now. I think it just as likely he and Jan are undead as they are Cabal. Unvote: peeker [/color] Vote: Jan [/color] Since the logic behind her over him makes some sense.[/quote] yaknow nookie we've been around the block a couple of times. and if you played more often i'd put you in the parthenon. wanna share this logic? kind of in your words. and if not that be cool. but it could prove to be instructive for the rest of the players.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 19:54:53 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense for us to lynch one of the Cabalists today, .... <snipped> well, sure if you are undead it does. if you are town then no fucking way. cabal can't kill or create zombies. yaknow that would concern me a fuck load more than a group that is blocking NKs.
|
|
|
Post by special on Feb 2, 2012 20:58:17 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense for us to lynch one of the Cabalists today, .... <snipped> well, sure if you are undead it does. if you are town then no fucking way. cabal can't kill or create zombies. yaknow that would concern me a fuck load more than a group that is blocking NKs. Peeker, how about this: 1. We lynch Jan toDay. 2. You block gnarly again toNight. 3. Masons do some more digging, and probably find the 3rd Cabal. 4. We let you and your teammate live for a while digging for Undead and Wolves in the rubble left behind from Cabal and Town. However, if we lose two Witches, then we must keep in mind Town needs ALL Cabal dead before killing off the last Wolf and Undead.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Feb 2, 2012 22:08:23 GMT -5
first off, Vote Silver JanAnd I see now after posting that peeker is apparently claiming cabal. And Silver Jan seems to be waffling about what she wants to claim, based on her 4 faction post and then her posting of the freemason PM. actually i am claiming that gnarley is a fucking vampire. jeebuz you folks really need for content. still at it? you've claimed Cabal and people are supposed to take your word i'm Undead? that's freaking hilarious. how would you know i'm undead? your powers apparently are the ability to look like a Freemason and block. i don't see investigate. go ahead and try to block me. i got results for both Nights so either you're bullshitting us or handshaking can't be blocked. Vote peekerIt seemed that people were roughly following guiri's circle shake post from YesterDay based on their results. Though, gnarley seemed to shake backwards on that one. (And conveniently got shaken by the freemason who's AWOL.) But, maybe I should have worded that better as "we might want to attempt to do another circle shake" toDay. Ah...I hadn't really paid much attention to the order that guiri had proposed, since we never got a consensus. I had picked guiri as my target quite early on in the Day. I did ask Pleonast last Night if it were possible for Bill to have designated his investigation targets ahead of time, and was told that was allowed, so it is possible that gnarly's report was genuine. Of course, it's equally possible that it's made up, since Bill isn't likely to be around to refute it. If we take peeker and Jan out of the mix, we have the following Mason claimants left: BillMc Boozahol Squid gnarlycharlie Suburban Plankton Hoopy Frood The only person among these who has been directly investigated is Boozy, who was found to be a Mason by guiri on Day 3. As for the rest of us: Suburban Plankton has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-2) Hoopy Frood has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-14) gnarlycharlie has not handshaken with anyone successfully BillMc has not handshaken with anyone successfully, and is not around to do so. guiri is the sole person who confirmed any of us as Masons; furthermore, he confirmed us all on Day 3. Assuming that guiri is on the level, that would mean that at least 2 of us must be Masons (the third could be a Cabalist using their Secret Power). So that would mean we have at least 4 Masons (JBG, guiri, and 2 of the set [Suburban,Hoopy,Boozy]). That's as many as in any of the previous Conspiracy games. vote gnarlycharlieI'm willing to believe peeker's latest claim for the moment, which does strongly implicate gnarly as a Vampire. I don't know if we'll be able to agree on a 'circle shake' or not Today, but if we do hopefully it will help weed out what I think is at least one other false Mason claim among the rest of us. I think the biggest problem is how to handle Bill. why are you willing to believe peeker's claim that i'm Undead? did he present any logic? if you're reading this, then you've read my rebuttal of his accusation. also i may not have successfully found a mason but Bill found me. i assume you will change your mind when he comes and confirms it. do you actually believe you've Bill and i are therefore Undead? wow, game over then.Cabal is out, Undead are out and Wolves are on life support. i'd vote for you but you've claimed Freemason and i'll take your word at face value until i get proof you're not. in the end you'll see i was right and my results nailed peeker and Silver Jan. I don't trust Peeker, Silverjan, or Gnarlycharlie.. But Peeker's claim seems logical, so I'm willing to believe that he is telling the truth for now. Vote: Silverjan [/color] Vote: Gnarlycharlie [/color][/quote] why is peeker's claim logical? because he said so? you don't trust him but you believe him. that's rich. perhaps you're Undead. Vote Colbywell at least i know who the vamp is. two deaths last Night. i blocked gnarley on N1 and N2. two deaths last Night when i blocked ed. and with that folks an insta lynch on me and jan results in an undead victory.
jeebuz, ed [/b] you get a kewpie doll kind of. i mean you are damn close but you still lose going down this path. plus some of your conclusions are not right. although, i am impressed on the proximity to truth. oog onyaknow i just give ed shit primarily because he pisses me off since he is a better player than i am. and that feels like losing a sprint to an amputee. [oog off] vote gnarly. he ain't mason, he ain't cabal. and now we get an extra death. so he's our vamp. i'd like to slow the killing down and then go nec hunting. plus let me and jan hang around. we might offer up some more interesting tidbits.[/quote] This has some legs, because we still have too many Masons, even if one of Hoopy, Suburban or Boozy is Cabal[/quote] why are you sure there are too many Freemasons? isn't it possible that Pleo purposely made several Freemasons to sow more confusion?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 22:19:24 GMT -5
jan is off the table for the moment. lynch gnarley the vamp or i don't play. i mean i need witches dead. so i am definitely making a reasonable request. but i am not going to be stupid and push me one back and everyone else goes forward one. we can only kill through lynch. ain't no way i can swing a block of cross confirmed witches.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 22:23:25 GMT -5
first off, Vote Silver Janactually i am claiming that gnarley is a fucking vampire. jeebuz you folks really need for content. still at it? you've claimed Cabal and people are supposed to take your word i'm Undead? that's freaking hilarious. how would you know i'm undead? your powers apparently are the ability to look like a Freemason and block. i don't see investigate. go ahead and try to block me. i got results for both Nights so either you're bullshitting us or handshaking can't be blocked. Vote peekerAh...I hadn't really paid much attention to the order that guiri had proposed, since we never got a consensus. I had picked guiri as my target quite early on in the Day. I did ask Pleonast last Night if it were possible for Bill to have designated his investigation targets ahead of time, and was told that was allowed, so it is possible that gnarly's report was genuine. Of course, it's equally possible that it's made up, since Bill isn't likely to be around to refute it. If we take peeker and Jan out of the mix, we have the following Mason claimants left: BillMc Boozahol Squid gnarlycharlie Suburban Plankton Hoopy Frood The only person among these who has been directly investigated is Boozy, who was found to be a Mason by guiri on Day 3. As for the rest of us: Suburban Plankton has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-2) Hoopy Frood has handshaken successfully with guiri (N3-14) gnarlycharlie has not handshaken with anyone successfully BillMc has not handshaken with anyone successfully, and is not around to do so. guiri is the sole person who confirmed any of us as Masons; furthermore, he confirmed us all on Day 3. Assuming that guiri is on the level, that would mean that at least 2 of us must be Masons (the third could be a Cabalist using their Secret Power). So that would mean we have at least 4 Masons (JBG, guiri, and 2 of the set [Suburban,Hoopy,Boozy]). That's as many as in any of the previous Conspiracy games. vote gnarlycharlieI'm willing to believe peeker's latest claim for the moment, which does strongly implicate gnarly as a Vampire. I don't know if we'll be able to agree on a 'circle shake' or not Today, but if we do hopefully it will help weed out what I think is at least one other false Mason claim among the rest of us. I think the biggest problem is how to handle Bill. why are you willing to believe peeker's claim that i'm Undead? did he present any logic? if you're reading this, then you've read my rebuttal of his accusation. also i may not have successfully found a mason but Bill found me. i assume you will change your mind when he comes and confirms it. do you actually believe you've Bill and i are therefore Undead? wow, game over then.Cabal is out, Undead are out and Wolves are on life support. i'd vote for you but you've claimed Freemason and i'll take your word at face value until i get proof you're not. in the end you'll see i was right and my results nailed peeker and Silver Jan. why is peeker's claim logical? because he said so? you don't trust him but you believe him. that's rich. perhaps you're Undead. Vote ColbyThis has some legs, because we still have too many Masons, even if one of Hoopy, Suburban or Boozy is Cabal[/quote] why are you sure there are too many Freemasons? isn't it possible that Pleo purposely made several Freemasons to sow more confusion?[/quote] what the fuck were your results then? c'mon dude its going to be fucking easy to just quote your pm. just do a copy and paste. shouldn't take more than five minutes. capiche. you lying sack of shit.
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 2, 2012 22:23:36 GMT -5
first off, Vote Silver Janactually i am claiming that gnarley is a fucking vampire. jeebuz you folks really need for content. still at it? you've claimed Cabal and people are supposed to take your word i'm Undead? that's freaking hilarious. how would you know i'm undead? your powers apparently are the ability to look like a Freemason and block. i don't see investigate. go ahead and try to block me. i got results for both Nights so either you're bullshitting us or handshaking can't be blocked. Freemason handshakes are a Day power and as such, would not be affected by the Cabal blocking you at Night. If you were truly a Freemason, you'd know that. Vote: gnarlycharlie
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Feb 2, 2012 22:33:53 GMT -5
what the fuck were your results then? c'mon dude its going to be fucking easy to just quote your pm. just do a copy and paste. shouldn't take more than five minutes. capiche. you lying sack of shit. why don't YOU read, you lying sack of shit? my results were Silver Jan is not a Freemason but Bill is a Freemason. i targeted Silver Jan and i assume Bill targeted me. if you want the exact PM, Freemason handshakes are a Day power and as such, would not be affected by the Cabal blocking you at Night. If you were truly a Freemason, you'd know that. Vote: gnarlycharlie [/color][/quote] of course i know that. that's why i missed D1. i didn't say i sent out handshakes at Night. i said i got results for both Nights which are when results come in. are you the third Cabal member trying to save Silver Jan? Vote Drain Bead
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 2, 2012 22:36:52 GMT -5
Weak. Why would you bring up the idea that handshaking can't be blocked if you have a Day power and Cabal has a Night power?
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 2, 2012 22:40:12 GMT -5
Wouldn't it make more sense for us to lynch one of the Cabalists today, test gnarlychuck out with a handshake, and the nlynch him tomorrow if it doesn't work? Killing the Cabal is obviously our lowest priority, but it's better than the possibility of killing an actual Mason. I'll be shaking charlie toDay, and will report my result toNight. If he's not on the level, we can lynch him tomorrow. I'd suggest someone else between you and Hoopy shake BillMc, and possibly give us a lynch target for the Day after. (Bill's a lower priority than charlie, given his inactivity)The tradeoff is that if gnarley is the vamp, and we let the vamp live another Night, what reason other than the risk that the vamp targets cabal, do cabal really have to block the vamp. All factions other than Town benefit from the witches being dead. If the cabal have been blocking charlie, and charlie is the vamp, we have these things to consider: 1) With one kill every night up until peeker claims the cabal didn't block gnarley, in which case there was two, the wolves no longer really need to fear targeting charlie the vamp, which means they may shoot for a witch. If there's another vampire, that player is probably one of those who hasn't even bothered to show up this game. The wolves simply target the active non-claimed. They need the necro dead, they want the witches powerless, they've already lost 3 of their number, there's really no reason for them to take the safe route anymore if they want to win. 2) Gnarley, if vamp, knows he's exposed. He can pretty much shoot anywhere, but he's partnered with a necromancer than can be exposed to the witches. So he's got to decide if trying to hit a witch and possibly taking out his necro is a better option or not than hitting a safe target and leaving his necro open to investigation. If he's got a bead on a witch, he might take the risk and play WIFOM with whom the witches protect (Idle, or another one). 3) Cabal losing a member doesn't hurt them all that much. So they don't have a lot of reason to block the vampire. I don't know which way is the best here. Town is risking something either way. With taking out the vamp we increase the chance our witches survive. By targeting the cabal, we increase the risk of losing a witch, though, it might happen anyway, and this way we weaken the cabal. If we do decide to keep charlie alive, I propose this as our circle handshake: Boozahol shakes with Charlie Charlie shake with suburban plankton suburban plankton shakes with Hoopy Frood Hoopy Frood shakes with Boozy Bill doesn't enter into this, because until he comes back and confirms his charlie handshake, we can't rely on him actually doing anything. He did say he wasn't going to play anymore, and I find it really odd that he played simply to handshake with a guy who might just be a vampire but didn't bother to inform anyone that he was going to do so or that he got a result. If we decide to kill Charlie, the rest of us masons can drop him out of the circle so that boozy-->plankton, plankton-->hoopy, and hoopy->boozy for a mason menage-a-trois.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Feb 2, 2012 22:45:53 GMT -5
Weak. Why would you bring up the idea that handshaking can't be blocked if you have a Day power and Cabal has a Night power? i wouldn't know if the blocking power is Night only or anytime. i also ask what i asked Suburban Plankton. would you change your mind if Bill comes and agrees that he shook hands with me? or would you consider him Undead too? why prefer to vote for someone who might be a Freemason and not claimed Cabal? drinking the peeker Kool Aid? are the Undead overwhelming Town? as Boozy said, the Freemasons can test me easily. if i were Undead, i wouldn't be able to mask my identity to fool the Freemasons. in fact, if i were Undead, i wouldn't be able to discover that peeker and Silver Jan are NOT Freemasons.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Feb 2, 2012 22:50:04 GMT -5
If we decide to kill Charlie, the rest of us masons can drop him out of the circle so that boozy-->plankton, plankton-->hoopy, and hoopy->boozy for a mason menage-a-trois. i've sadi my peace. if you decide to lynch me and i flip Town, the current voters for me except perhaps Burby are very likely not Town.
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 2, 2012 22:59:36 GMT -5
i wouldn't know if the blocking power is Night only or anytime. i also ask what i asked Suburban Plankton. would you change your mind if Bill comes and agrees that he shook hands with me? or would you consider him Undead too? Well, considering the cabal block is a night block by definition, (it's in the rules, you know the things that people not playing mindless killers such as a vampire role might want to actually read), you'd have to be claiming that the cabal secret power is to be able to block during the Day. It's possible, but that means either everyone who's confirmed a cabal as mason is lying, or cabal secret power is not the ability to block by Day. So which do you think it is? And undead do not know each other by the rules (unless it's their secret power), so if Bill comes in and says "Hey, Charlie is a mason", we'll all likely believe him. There'd be no reason to think he's undead covering for another undead. However, he said he wasn't going to play anymore, and he's done nothing to indicate otherwise, other than your claim. So until he shows up, we have no reason to believe you. Sure, but other people had already said they weren't. It's not as if you were the first to claim they weren't. Really, if they turn out to be legitimate masons, then you can claim that other people had the same result, so clearly something strange was going on to mess with their result. If they aren't masons, you can simply say you were right. It's a win-win situation for you. So why wouldn't you take it as the vamp? The fact that you did this action indicates nothing about what you are. The fact that you actually think this is some valid defense of you being mason smacks of desperate outed scum. Vote: gnarelycharlie Really, when you find yourself in a hole, it's better to stop digging. I'm fine lynching either a cabalist or gnarley depending on what people think is better. I've already explained the risk we take with either one.
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 2, 2012 23:03:43 GMT -5
If Bill verified, I'd want to get at least two Days of other Masons handshaking you. Obviously that'll be done by Tomorrow Night. Luckily, we have Jan and Peeker to get rid of. I'm sure they're not the only two Cabal members, and I'm hoping that a remaining Cabalist will block you toNight, especially if someone handshakes with you and finds that you're not a Freemason. I put a vote down mainly as a backup to my voiced suspicions, not because I thought it would end up going somewhere Today.
And a big fat chile please to your "how would I know that" schtick. You'd know it by checking the Rules thread, like I did before I called you out.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Feb 2, 2012 23:07:23 GMT -5
Weak. Why would you bring up the idea that handshaking can't be blocked if you have a Day power and Cabal has a Night power? uh, because he is undead. and didn't read the read the rules all the way through. still waiting for those og pms that you got.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Feb 3, 2012 4:38:01 GMT -5
Hmm. First off, a polite request to peekercpa and gnarlycharlie. Please keep it civil. Secret powers; At a rough guess I would say the Cabal power was to mimic another role. I would also guess the Wolf power was an Alpha Wolf power to desecrate the corpse and prevent it being read by Coroner or Detective. Concerning the masons: Having read over it, I am happier lynching Silver Jan. If she does come back mason, then a lot of players who said she was not are due for the block. But somehow I doubt it. Concerning gnarlycharlie. It makes a certain amount of sense for him to be a vampire given peekercpa's claim. However, a mason handshake check could and should clear or convict him and would make an ideal lynch for tomorrow or... ...given the role claim idea, if gnarlycharlie comes back false, then it would provide the ideal method to confirm a Vigilante if one exists in the pool. I'm not sure it is a good idea to fully claim now, as there are given lynches coming up. Once we run out of them, it should be considered. Vote: End of Day Vote: Silver Jan *offers final meal of fish and chips *
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Feb 3, 2012 4:48:14 GMT -5
Known Dead texcat - Wolf mahaloth - Wolf - Werewolf scathach - Town JustBeingGinger - Town - Freemason
Unknown Dead Pollux Oil - suspected Wolf septimus - suspected coroner guiri - suspected Freemason
Claims Hoopy Frood - Freemason BillMc - Freemason Silver Jan - Freemason gnarlycharlie - Freemason peekercpa - Freemason/Cabal Suburban Plankton - Freemason Boozahol Squid - Freemason Idle Thoughts - Witch
Unknown Mr Special Ed colby11 Nanook Drain Bead hirkatbawa Inner Stickler Sister Coyote CatInASuit Merestil Haye deon
|
|