|
Post by JustBeingGinger on May 22, 2012 9:45:55 GMT -5
-bleached- Wow, we lost a doctor and a mason in the same night - these scum are either very clever or very lucky, or perhaps a combination of the two. At least one of them went down as well. Vote: endhoot since it certainly looks like Hal's telling the truth. There better be a doctor left to protect this valuable detective. I agree with Ullz on the scum gloating here, but it's the part I've bolded that worries me most.(Hooray for my first quote!!!) This strikes me as more of a threat than a fellow townie being concerned. Of course townies want Hal to stay intact, but this last sentence is definitely keeping you on my naughty list. Yes keeping, you were already there. annem also just so happened to be on both mislynch wagons, as dizzy pointed out in an earlier post. Going over annem's posts, the lack of content there is astounding. I understand many are new, but I am too, so I'm not seeing that as an excuse here. Seems like annem is trying to blend in just under the radar. Thoughts anyone? She was on my radar in Night 2. I would be very comfortable with voting for Annme if I was not voting for the lynch of Endhoot. In fact I will be so bold as to: Unvote Endhoot Vote AnnmeI don't care for the reason that she voted for Michelle71, being that basically she did not convince her of her innocence... It is not so much her voting record. All townies have one time or another been on a mis-lynch... I don't like the gloating in her post toDay. Going on the record with this one, since the death of endhoot is either going to be through the lynch or the vig.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on May 22, 2012 9:54:02 GMT -5
I appear to have missed quite a bit.
michelehunter v1 - Apologies, it appears you really were a Crazy Townie. It also confirms one of the missing power roles.
Hal Briston - at this moment, I'm willing to go along with it, there isn't that much reason to doubt him and will be interesting to see what happens with his investigations from here on.
From that:
Vote: endhoot
But that does leave a bit of a quandary. If the other missing role is a Vig, then we either have two vigs and a crazy townie or two crazy townies and a vig. But with four deaths a Night, it means there is another process in place which is killing players.
Is it possible the scum get a couple of extra kills if they sacrifice one of their own?
And I thought this game wasn't gastardly.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on May 22, 2012 10:11:28 GMT -5
Vote End Day
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on May 22, 2012 10:50:22 GMT -5
Sorry, I still have not caught up since getting sick. I'm now trying to catch up at work. Once I've done that I'll read through the rest of Day Two, Night Two, and the ToDay.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 22, 2012 12:21:18 GMT -5
Endhoot - 23 votes (Susan K Murphy, kagemoto, Suits101, michelehunter, meeko, Mahaloth, texcat, wombat99, dizzymrslizzy, crys, richardbeckman, jmj697mn, annem, cassipietz, cathi, supermel, jlrinmke, Silver Jan, colby11, Total Ulla, Septimus, gnarlycharlie, CatInASuit) annem - 1 vote (JustBeingGinger)
End of Day votes: 4 of 23
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on May 22, 2012 12:25:57 GMT -5
I appear to have missed quite a bit. michelehunter v1 - Apologies, it appears you really were a Crazy Townie. It also confirms one of the missing power roles. Hal Briston - at this moment, I'm willing to go along with it, there isn't that much reason to doubt him and will be interesting to see what happens with his investigations from here on. From that: Vote: endhoot [/color] But that does leave a bit of a quandary. If the other missing role is a Vig, then we either have two vigs and a crazy townie or two crazy townies and a vig. But with four deaths a Night, it means there is another process in place which is killing players. Is it possible the scum get a couple of extra kills if they sacrifice one of their own? And I thought this game wasn't gastardly. [/quote] Could it be two NKs and two vigs? And one of the vigs has just mis-killed a townie each Night?
|
|
|
Post by patricia on May 22, 2012 12:47:38 GMT -5
I don't think taking out endhoot right now is important as Hal said for michelehunter to take either that would make them both plain scum (without a power role) so we need as a town to try to find another scum to take out today.
People that pinged me with comments today were Aleetha, Total Ullz, Annem & Jmj69nm - anyone else have someone on radar or any comments on the above?
|
|
|
Post by annem on May 22, 2012 13:04:21 GMT -5
-bleached- I agree with Ullz on the scum gloating here, but it's the part I've bolded that worries me most.(Hooray for my first quote!!!) This strikes me as more of a threat than a fellow townie being concerned. Of course townies want Hal to stay intact, but this last sentence is definitely keeping you on my naughty list. Yes keeping, you were already there. annem also just so happened to be on both mislynch wagons, as dizzy pointed out in an earlier post. Going over annem's posts, the lack of content there is astounding. I understand many are new, but I am too, so I'm not seeing that as an excuse here. Seems like annem is trying to blend in just under the radar. Thoughts anyone? She was on my radar in Night 2. I would be very comfortable with voting for Annme if I was not voting for the lynch of Endhoot. In fact I will be so bold as to: Unvote Endhoot Vote AnnmeI don't care for the reason that she voted for Michelle71, being that basically she did not convince her of her innocence... It is not so much her voting record. All townies have one time or another been on a mis-lynch... I don't like the gloating in her post toDay. Going on the record with this one, since the death of endhoot is either going to be through the lynch or the vig. If you're going to vote for me, please can you at least spell my name correctly? Thanks! I don't intend to sound like I'm gloating or making threats. As a person who tends to be quiet and not repeat things that have already been said well by others, I'm finding it a struggle to put more than just a vote in my posts. With endhoot being such an obvious lynch today, there wasn't much to say beyond reacting to the night's results. It seems like that's making me look like something I'm not. I'm not sure I'm understanding your comment about my vote for Mchlle. It wasn't that she didn't convince me that she was innocent, it was that she seemed to be defending against something that had already been explained. This made me feel that she felt she had something else to feel defensive about. Evidently that wasn't right, but it was my thinking at the time.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on May 22, 2012 14:09:18 GMT -5
People that pinged me with comments today were Aleetha, Total Ullz, Annem & Jmj69nm - anyone else have someone on radar or any comments on the above? Please don't think I am sarcastic - because I am not I think this is great in some ways (the scum-hunting by pings) but you don't give the rest of us much to work from or benefit by just saying "pings". Could you point to posts, add a little content or perhaps also point to actions before this Day? That would be really helpful
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on May 22, 2012 14:13:41 GMT -5
The point is that we seem to have a lot of dead townies every morning. One reason for this could be that some Scum-roles have the power to preform an extra kill (other than the "normal" Scum NK). So we should get rid of all Scum we find as soon as possible because they might be the ones with the extra kill. That makes sense. Nevertheless, I still think people should go on record as saying who they would vote for if not Endhoot. I missed the one where you did this and on the phone (so please forgive me not going back to find it). I personally have to admit I am playing this game a bit too lazy (sorry) - and so I tend to forget all the names of newbies/subs/re-subs - but on reading Day 1 Inner really pinged me. But maybe I missed him subbing out?
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on May 22, 2012 14:14:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by starrirain on May 22, 2012 14:25:19 GMT -5
I don't think taking out endhoot right now is important as Hal said for michelehunter to take either that would make them both plain scum (without a power role) so we need as a town to try to find another scum to take out today. People that pinged me with comments today were Aleetha, Total Ullz, Annem & Jmj69nm - anyone else have someone on radar or any comments on the above? I want to applaud your deductive skills when it comes to your first statement, however, would you care to elaborate on the second statement? I appreciate the name dropping, but a lil meat on those bones to feed us hungry townies would be preferred. In other words, which comments specifically did these players make that pinged you? It's always good to give this type information so that others may analyze it as well and debate if need be. Maybe you saw something others missed? But we'll never know if you don't share your thoughts She was on my radar in Night 2. I would be very comfortable with voting for Annme if I was not voting for the lynch of Endhoot. In fact I will be so bold as to: Unvote Endhoot Vote Annme I don't care for the reason that she voted for Michelle71, being that basically she did not convince her of her innocence... It is not so much her voting record. All townies have one time or another been on a mis-lynch... I don't like the gloating in her post toDay. Going on the record with this one, since the death of endhoot is either going to be through the lynch or the vig. If you're going to vote for me, please can you at least spell my name correctly? Thanks! I don't intend to sound like I'm gloating or making threats. As a person who tends to be quiet and not repeat things that have already been said well by others, I'm finding it a struggle to put more than just a vote in my posts. With endhoot being such an obvious lynch today, there wasn't much to say beyond reacting to the night's results. It seems like that's making me look like something I'm not. I'm not sure I'm understanding your comment about my vote for Mchlle. It wasn't that she didn't convince me that she was innocent, it was that she seemed to be defending against something that had already been explained. This made me feel that she felt she had something else to feel defensive about. Evidently that wasn't right, but it was my thinking at the time. I don't think you intended it to sound scummy, that was my take on it though. Why would a scum intentionally sound scummy, unless of course they're just feeding us the wine? I was even more sure of your scumminess after the following contradiction: AFTER several people have stated they hope another doc is in play to protect Hal, you say something along the same lines, yet in the above quote you tend 'to be quiet and not repeat things that have already been said well by others'. So I guess what I'm getting at is the fact that several people stated along the lines of the same as you, without coming off looking scumish, yet you hate to repeat what others have already said well? Am I the only one questioning this? FURTHERMORE, you stated 'With endhoot being such an obvious lynch today, there wasn't much to say beyond reacting to the night's results' which also strikes me as scum behavior, due to the fact several town are wanting more posts and info at this point to hunt more scum, one just isn't enough for a townie imo, we can't win til we get them ALL. that said unvote: endhoot vote: annem
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on May 22, 2012 14:52:46 GMT -5
Septimus #2,
Now that you have come back to the game and you share the same mind and memory with Septimus #1, who was a Town Doctor, I wonder if you can share some information based on your knowledge of Septimus #1's Night 1 and Night 2 acts:
1. You said Septimus #1 did not self-protect. Did Septimus #1 protect the same player in both Nights?
2. If Septimus #1 protected 2 different players in Night 1 and Night 2, did the player being protected in Night 1 survive Day 2 and Night 2?
I don't think the names of the protected player (or players) should be disclosed at this point, so I asked the questions the above ways.
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on May 22, 2012 14:57:31 GMT -5
Vote: Special Ed
Does anyone else remember lianne getting hella defensive when it was suggested she n' ed were teamed up?
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on May 22, 2012 15:01:15 GMT -5
EBWOP:
Hmm. So today's lynch is basically decided because of a cop claim right?
I am of the opinion day should be ended if we will not get anything else out of it - Vote: End day.
Unvote: Ed Vote: Endhoot
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 22, 2012 15:44:59 GMT -5
Starrirain...I never saw you vote for Endhoot in the first place...so how can you UNVOTE her? Endhoot - 24 votes (Susan K Murphy, kagemoto, Suits101, michelehunter, meeko, Mahaloth, texcat, wombat99, dizzymrslizzy, crys, richardbeckman, jmj697mn, annem, cassipietz, cathi, supermel, jlrinmke, Silver Jan, colby11, Total Ulla, Septimus, gnarlycharlie, CatInASuit, Paranoia) annem - 2 votes (JustBeingGinger, starrirain) End of Day votes: 5 of 23
|
|
|
Post by septimus on May 22, 2012 15:54:58 GMT -5
Septimus #2, Now that you have come back to the game and you share the same mind and memory with Septimus #1, who was a Town Doctor, I wonder if you can share some information based on your knowledge of Septimus #1's Night 1 and Night 2 acts: 1. You said Septimus #1 did not self-protect. Did Septimus #1 protect the same player in both Nights? 2. If Septimus #1 protected 2 different players in Night 1 and Night 2, did the player being protected in Night 1 survive Day 2 and Night 2? I don't think the names of the protected player (or players) should be disclosed at this point, so I asked the questions the above ways. I'm not sure how Town would benefit by my answering these questions. But I see a benefit to Scum. It's still possible there are five Night Kills but only four occur due to collisions or protections. If Scum did have a Night Kill that failed they might be very interested in learning whether or not the now-deceased septimus #1 was the Doctor stopping their Kill.
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on May 22, 2012 16:31:08 GMT -5
Septimus #2, Now that you have come back to the game and you share the same mind and memory with Septimus #1, who was a Town Doctor, I wonder if you can share some information based on your knowledge of Septimus #1's Night 1 and Night 2 acts: 1. You said Septimus #1 did not self-protect. Did Septimus #1 protect the same player in both Nights? 2. If Septimus #1 protected 2 different players in Night 1 and Night 2, did the player being protected in Night 1 survive Day 2 and Night 2? I don't think the names of the protected player (or players) should be disclosed at this point, so I asked the questions the above ways. I'm not sure how Town would benefit by my answering these questions. But I see a benefit to Scum. It's still possible there are five Night Kills but only four occur due to collisions or protections. If Scum did have a Night Kill that failed they might be very interested in learning whether or not the now-deceased septimus #1 was the Doctor stopping their Kill. Septimus, I don't disagree that the information may be used by Scum. However, we confirmed Septimus #1 as Town, but we do not know if Septimus #2 is Town or Scum. If you are now a Scum, I am not surprised that you will definitely share the information with the Scums. I asked the questions, but I can't force you to answer them. It is your option to answer these questions or not.
|
|
|
Post by Archangel on May 22, 2012 16:32:11 GMT -5
That makes sense. Nevertheless, I still think people should go on record as saying who they would vote for if not Endhoot. I missed the one where you did this and on the phone (so please forgive me not going back to find it). I personally have to admit I am playing this game a bit too lazy (sorry) - and so I tend to forget all the names of newbies/subs/re-subs - but on reading Day 1 Inner really pinged me. But maybe I missed him subbing out? You didn't miss it because I haven't done it yet. I have a new full time job. I was around all weekend because I was sick in bed, but today was at work and just replied to your post on the run this morning. Mahaloth, why are you so keen on ending day? Paranoia, did you even read Day 2?
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on May 22, 2012 17:09:20 GMT -5
Paranoia, did you even read Day 2? He's gonna be very surprised that you're in the game
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Total Ullz on May 22, 2012 17:12:58 GMT -5
Septimus #2, Now that you have come back to the game and you share the same mind and memory with Septimus #1, who was a Town Doctor, I wonder if you can share some information based on your knowledge of Septimus #1's Night 1 and Night 2 acts: 1. You said Septimus #1 did not self-protect. Did Septimus #1 protect the same player in both Nights? 2. If Septimus #1 protected 2 different players in Night 1 and Night 2, did the player being protected in Night 1 survive Day 2 and Night 2? I don't think the names of the protected player (or players) should be disclosed at this point, so I asked the questions the above ways. How much of this is allowed in your game? [/green]
|
|
|
Post by Archangel on May 22, 2012 17:16:31 GMT -5
Kagemoto, are you Calvin on FB?
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on May 22, 2012 18:18:59 GMT -5
Kagemoto, are you Calvin on FB? Yes and I have stated it before. Why do you ask?
|
|
|
Post by Archangel on May 22, 2012 18:33:27 GMT -5
Kagemoto, are you Calvin on FB? Yes and I have stated it before. Why do you ask? If you stated it before, I missed it, sorry. Asked because knowing who is who makes it a tiny bit easier to keep track of this game. I am seeing comments about people such as Inner Stickler who I didn't even realize were in the game.
|
|
|
Post by Archangel on May 22, 2012 18:36:27 GMT -5
guiri why were you exhorting people to vote one of the lynch leaders yesterday and pointing out that lianne was ahead by only one vote?
wombat, why did you switch your vote?
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 22, 2012 18:36:56 GMT -5
Septimus #2, Now that you have come back to the game and you share the same mind and memory with Septimus #1, who was a Town Doctor, I wonder if you can share some information based on your knowledge of Septimus #1's Night 1 and Night 2 acts: 1. You said Septimus #1 did not self-protect. Did Septimus #1 protect the same player in both Nights? 2. If Septimus #1 protected 2 different players in Night 1 and Night 2, did the player being protected in Night 1 survive Day 2 and Night 2? I don't think the names of the protected player (or players) should be disclosed at this point, so I asked the questions the above ways. How much of this is allowed in your game? [/green] It's all fine. *shrugs*
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on May 22, 2012 19:28:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AmyKay on May 22, 2012 19:34:51 GMT -5
great eye, richbeckman. It is certainly the same person - the profile shows francescaj is the username for Suits101. could be a sub-in, could be someone trying to get away with a second identity again...
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on May 22, 2012 20:02:28 GMT -5
Mahaloth, why are you so keen on ending day? Meh, I wouldn't say so keen. Just keenish. I just think we have our lynch chosen and should go ahead and end the Day. Or not. I don't mind waiting if that is what folks want. Not sure what to talk about, though.
|
|
|
Post by cathi on May 22, 2012 20:03:53 GMT -5
Are we still discussing what we would do if we were without Hal's (assumed) detective work? I've been re-reading wombat99's posts in particular and there's some scummy-ness there beyond her eleventh hour save of lianne, short-lived though it was.
|
|