|
Post by Silver Jan on Jun 9, 2012 11:39:33 GMT -5
Right.Wow, what a post!
Unvote Archangel
Vote jlrinmke
|
|
|
Post by Hal Briston on Jun 9, 2012 11:56:09 GMT -5
You'd 'rather not mislynch' Pleo, so you're voting for the current vote leader without any other explanation as to why they deserve it. What if that's a mislynch? Hmmm...that reads very much like a scum slip -- nicely picked up on. Vote jlrinmke
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jun 9, 2012 12:44:57 GMT -5
Due to my schedule, I have to vote now. I see texcat has 7 votes already, and pleonast is next in the vote count. I don't want to see a detective go (not sure if pleo really is one, but I'd rather not mislynch here). Vote texcatSo you are just worried about Texcat and Pleo. Yay for someone who is scum. If my vote is wrong, well!! I am not a great player but my vote stands
|
|
|
Post by guiri on Jun 9, 2012 12:56:03 GMT -5
Silver Jan, Hal, Annem, isn't jlrinmke one of pleo's investigation targets? If you don't believe Pleo, why don't you vote him first?
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jun 9, 2012 13:04:22 GMT -5
Damn
|
|
|
Post by Hal Briston on Jun 9, 2012 13:12:23 GMT -5
Hmmm...completely forgot about that.
Well, let's put it this way -- I'd still be ok with a jlrinmke lynch, simply because A) that post was very "scum-slippish", and B) if he did come up as scum, that would prove damning for Pleo, making a nice two-fer.
Trouble is, jlrinmke isn't really in any danger of a lynch, so that likely won't go off today without a lot of people changing their votes or several lurkers showing up at day's end.
Gonna have to think on this one...
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jun 9, 2012 13:21:55 GMT -5
unvote]
Sheesh I haven't a clue but I am not happy with either wagons. Why would Pleo Lie? To get Town cred?
Vote Pleo
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on Jun 9, 2012 13:42:05 GMT -5
You'd 'rather not mislynch' Pleo, so you're voting for the current vote leader without any other explanation as to why they deserve it. What if that's a mislynch? Hmmm...that reads very much like a scum slip -- nicely picked up on. Vote jlrinmke Setting aside the fact that Pleonast says jlrinmke is town - what about her post reads like a scum slip? I take a "slip" to mean accidentally revealing some pertinent information, not just doing something maybe scumm-ish. If she's town, she's just saying she doesn't want to lynch Pleonast and will vote Texcat to help prevent that. If she's scum, she's just hiding a vote on the lynch leader. If anything, I think Annem should be getting these votes for coming in, reading the last vote above hers, and voting without even realizing that Pleo had declared her town and the WIFOM that entails.
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on Jun 9, 2012 14:13:58 GMT -5
As promised yesterday, it is time to check crys.
Same thing applies: I basically relied on guiri #2's vote history list in D5#48, and I have double-checked crys' vote history, and there was one error in the list, which I will stated below. I did not check other parts of the list though.
crys have voted in all Days 1-4, but Day 1 ended with a no-vote because she unvoted, which the vote history did not show. In Day 1 and Night 1 she has participated regularly, but became quiet afterwards. There were 27 posts (8 posts in Day 1, 6 posts in Night 1, 2 posts in Day 2, 1 post in Night 2, 2 posts in Day 3, 5 posts in Day 4, and so far 3 posts without vote in Day 5). Most of her posts are rather longer posts, and arguably there are some substance in the posts, but most of them are in Day 1 and talked about Pleonast/Meeko/Gadarene. Although the participation was low, I would not call crys a lurker or a non-contributing player. Low participation may be the proper description, which is totally acceptable for a newbie player.
Here's her vote history: Day 1: she voted Meeko in D1#228, then unvoted in D1#440, and did not place the vote again. The unvote was not taken by the vote history list. At the time of the vote, which is the 8th vote, Meeko was the vote leader for a while. And interestingly, at the time of the unvote, Meeko had a tie with Pleonast at 6 votes, leading starrirain#1 and dizzymrslizzy at 4 votes, so the unvote removed Meeko from the vote leading position. Day 2: she voted mchelle71 (D2#414), who was mislynched. At the time of the vote, it was the 6th vote to mchelle71, which put mchelle71 in the vote leading position. Day 3: she voted endhoot (D3#55), who was lynched. The vote was the 12th vote. She did not vote for end of the Day, and she stated in the vote post that "maybe some more daytime discussion is a good idea". Day 4: she voted LadyRogue #1 (D4#236), who was mislynched. The vote was the 9th and the last vote, and LadyRogue was the vote leader with or without the vote. Day 5: at the moment I am doing this, no vote yet.
The Day 2 and Day 4 votes (also Day 5, if she will vote in Day 5) were late votes, which made her look bad. The Day 1 unvote was also bad because there was no subsequent vote. There was almost no discussions about players other than Pleonast/Meeko/Gadarene, and before I mentioned her name, her only Day 5 post in D5#97 stated that she read everything, but the whole post was also about Pleonast/Meeko.
One thing pings me a lot: the post she replied to me in D5#221. She stated in that post that "Lynching me would be a mislynch, but I can understand how the lack of participation would be frustratingly hard to understand and determine what my alignment would be." (literally quote, underline mine)
Generally, when a player is under no risk of being lynched, the proper and shorter statement would be "I am Town", whether the statement was true or a lie. There is no reason for crys to think about being lynched at the time she made the post, because she has not even collect any vote since Day 1 of this game, at least before this post. So why did she say lynching her would be a mislynch?
Vote crys
I guess the bad voting history and low participation pings slightly, but the reply triggers my alarm. There must be some reasons that no one has ever voted her and she thought about the lynching thing.
And lastly, NO, this won't be a mislynch, because it is just 1 vote, and I don't think players will jump on the bandwagon in the last couple of hours. I am interested in seeing crys' response (or lack of response) to my reasons though. Also, I am interested in seeing if she will put a vote in Day 5.
I will be around before the end of the Day, so the vote is subject to potential change.
|
|
|
Post by cathi on Jun 9, 2012 15:45:52 GMT -5
Well, it started out as the Pleonast/Meeko show, but things have definitely devolved. Here's where I stand on our "top three".
I get a Townie vibe from Meeko, although I think that his antics are distracting and therefore actually harmful to the Town. I don't get as strong of a vibe from Pleonast, but, like others, don't want to lose a could-be-Detective. I'd rather let it ride and see what happens.
Now for our other lynch candidate today, Texcat. I read the "evidence" on her and keep coming back to her reference earlier toDay to "you": objectively, I interpret "you" as "Town"; in context, I interpret "you" as "Silver Jan & Mahaloth". Aren't these subconscious slips what we're supposed to be looking for? Vote: Texcat
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jun 9, 2012 16:56:07 GMT -5
Texcat - 9 votes (stairrirain, guiri, Septimus, Colby11, Archangel, dizzymrslizzy, Pleonast, gnarlycharlie, jlrinmke, Cathi) Pleonast - 6 votes (Meeko, richardbeckman, Mahaloth, cassiepietz, michelehunter, Silver Jan) Meeko - 4 votes (patricia, annetastic, Suburban Plankton, texcat) jlrinmke - 2 votes (annem, Hal Briston) Colby11 - 2 votes (Wombat99, amykb) CatInASuit - 1 vote (oldred) patricia - 1 vote (LadyRogue) Archangel - 1 vote (SilverJan) Septimus - 1 vote (CatInASuit) Suburban Plankton - 1 vote (supermel) Crys - 1 vote (Kagemoto)
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jun 9, 2012 16:56:41 GMT -5
DAY ENDS IN TWO HOURS.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jun 9, 2012 16:56:59 GMT -5
Unvote: Meeko Vote: Pleonast The jlrinmke post tipped the balance away from Meeko and towards Pleo.
I sure see a lot of crappy reasons for my mislynch here. Because I called Silver Jan & Mahaloth, you when speaking directly to Silver Jan? Really? For information? Reallly? Because I didn't claim vanilla townier early enough? Really? This looks like a scum conspiracy to me. My best guess for what happened is that when I talked to Silver Jan about a doctor perhaps having protected her and Mahaloth, the scum mis-guessed that I was that doctor. Last Night I am guessing that they decided I would be an easy mis-lynch and not to waste a NK on me. Pleo is the one that wanted me so desperately to claim, tho Archangel is the one who brought up suspicions about me being a doctor. Something is definitely wrong with this lynch and I hope that if town does decide to mis-lynch me that they will look carefully at my voters Tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Jun 9, 2012 17:49:46 GMT -5
Texcat - 9 votes (stairrirain, guiri, Septimus, Colby11, Archangel, dizzymrslizzy, Pleonast, gnarlycharlie, jlrinmke, Cathi) Pleonast - 7 votes (Meeko, richardbeckman, Mahaloth, cassiepietz, michelehunter, Silver Jan, texcat) Meeko - 3 votes (patricia, annetastic, Suburban Plankton) jlrinmke - 2 votes (annem, Hal Briston) Colby11 - 2 votes (Wombat99, amykb) CatInASuit - 1 vote (oldred) patricia - 1 vote (LadyRogue) Archangel - 1 vote (SilverJan) Septimus - 1 vote (CatInASuit) Suburban Plankton - 1 vote (supermel) Crys - 1 vote (Kagemoto)
DAY ENDS in about one hour and ten minutes.
|
|
|
Post by crys on Jun 9, 2012 18:30:44 GMT -5
Got here just in time to vote. I wasn't sure I was going to make it home from work in time to do so, but I did This whole scenario with Meeko and Pleonast stinks. I am extremely suspicious of Pleonast because of the early claim, the way they play, and they refuse to investigate someone that they say they know is scum. Investigating Meeko could gain some credibility for pleo, but since he refuses to do so I really wonder if he is even able to investigate. Vote: Pleonast [/color]
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on Jun 9, 2012 18:34:05 GMT -5
No show player list:
Here's the list of the 10 absent players in Day 3, and if they made fewer than 10 posts in Day 1 and Day 2, their total post numbers:
45.mistde (last post D2#277, 5 posts total) 34.Inner Stickler (last post N1#86)
There is not much to say here. The list tells it all.
|
|
|
Post by kagemoto on Jun 9, 2012 18:34:52 GMT -5
NETA: the list was copied from an old list, and the second line with the "10 absent players in Day 3" should be deleted.
|
|
|
Post by crys on Jun 9, 2012 18:41:17 GMT -5
As promised yesterday, it is time to check crys. Same thing applies: I basically relied on guiri #2's vote history list in D5#48, and I have double-checked crys' vote history, and there was one error in the list, which I will stated below. I did not check other parts of the list though. crys have voted in all Days 1-4, but Day 1 ended with a no-vote because she unvoted, which the vote history did not show. In Day 1 and Night 1 she has participated regularly, but became quiet afterwards. There were 27 posts (8 posts in Day 1, 6 posts in Night 1, 2 posts in Day 2, 1 post in Night 2, 2 posts in Day 3, 5 posts in Day 4, and so far 3 posts without vote in Day 5). Most of her posts are rather longer posts, and arguably there are some substance in the posts, but most of them are in Day 1 and talked about Pleonast/Meeko/Gadarene. Although the participation was low, I would not call crys a lurker or a non-contributing player. Low participation may be the proper description, which is totally acceptable for a newbie player. Here's her vote history: Day 1: she voted Meeko in D1#228, then unvoted in D1#440, and did not place the vote again. The unvote was not taken by the vote history list. At the time of the vote, which is the 8th vote, Meeko was the vote leader for a while. And interestingly, at the time of the unvote, Meeko had a tie with Pleonast at 6 votes, leading starrirain#1 and dizzymrslizzy at 4 votes, so the unvote removed Meeko from the vote leading position. Day 2: she voted mchelle71 (D2#414), who was mislynched. At the time of the vote, it was the 6th vote to mchelle71, which put mchelle71 in the vote leading position. Day 3: she voted endhoot (D3#55), who was lynched. The vote was the 12th vote. She did not vote for end of the Day, and she stated in the vote post that "maybe some more daytime discussion is a good idea". Day 4: she voted LadyRogue #1 (D4#236), who was mislynched. The vote was the 9th and the last vote, and LadyRogue was the vote leader with or without the vote. Day 5: at the moment I am doing this, no vote yet. The Day 2 and Day 4 votes (also Day 5, if she will vote in Day 5) were late votes, which made her look bad. The Day 1 unvote was also bad because there was no subsequent vote. There was almost no discussions about players other than Pleonast/Meeko/Gadarene, and before I mentioned her name, her only Day 5 post in D5#97 stated that she read everything, but the whole post was also about Pleonast/Meeko. One thing pings me a lot: the post she replied to me in D5#221. She stated in that post that " Lynching me would be a mislynch, but I can understand how the lack of participation would be frustratingly hard to understand and determine what my alignment would be." (literally quote, underline mine) Generally, when a player is under no risk of being lynched, the proper and shorter statement would be "I am Town", whether the statement was true or a lie. There is no reason for crys to think about being lynched at the time she made the post, because she has not even collect any vote since Day 1 of this game, at least before this post. So why did she say lynching her would be a mislynch? Vote crysI guess the bad voting history and low participation pings slightly, but the reply triggers my alarm. There must be some reasons that no one has ever voted her and she thought about the lynching thing. And lastly, NO, this won't be a mislynch, because it is just 1 vote, and I don't think players will jump on the bandwagon in the last couple of hours. I am interested in seeing crys' response (or lack of response) to my reasons though. Also, I am interested in seeing if she will put a vote in Day 5. I will be around before the end of the Day, so the vote is subject to potential change. Ok now that I have voted it is time for me to reply to you. Yes I was more active in the first Day/Night of the game. I was available more during that week. Since that time I have had to pick up extra shifts and stay later at work. People want to come and stay where I work so I guess I should be happy for the job security lol. As far as my wording on the post that raised your alarm I just talk that way. I tend to be a very direct person and I am by no means subtle. That is just the way I am take it or leave it. I didn't vote to end that day early because I wanted more information on everyone else. After all since I am town I only know for certain my alignment and no one else's. As far as my voting history I was trying to figure out who was making slips and since I am a new player I was kind of reading what others said and going along with what made sense to me. I plan on going back and rereading everything and see who else voted with me that is still alive and see if there is something I have missed.
|
|
|
Post by supermel on Jun 12, 2012 11:08:20 GMT -5
does the vote count if its on the wrong day?
|
|