DAY TEN! Jul 3, 2012 22:38:02 GMT -5
Post by wombat99 on Jul 3, 2012 22:38:02 GMT -5
No, no PM from Meeko. (I did take that as a joke). You're right, though, that does look odd the way I posted. These are two parallel thoughts I had, not sequential. In other words, I do think that a good case has been made for you being scum, and a related side thought is that I would like for Meeko to explain why *he* thinks you are scum. (I'm really looking for some insight into Meeko there).
Here's the case on you as I see it:
D1 - random vote on dizzymrslizzy
(D4 no vote, and D3, D6, D7 were detective scum reveals)
You haven't done much actual scum hunting; you've placed safe votes on Meeko. By safe, I mean that a vote for Meeko is always justifiable on some base level because of his play style. He's so votable!
CIAS makes a good point there. And guiri is Town and Gnarly, RIP.
Thirdly, the gnarlycharlie vote:
I still think Meeko is Scum, but since nobody seems to agree with me. I find gnarly more suspicious than Patricia at this point, so I'm changing my vote to put a bit of distance there to try to avoid any late-Day shenanigans.
Of the unconfirmed gnarly voters, I think you gave the weakest reason for voting for him. You said you didn't totally buy the reasoning against him but that you preferred the case against him over Patricia. They were both weak arguments; why not just vote Meeko again (or look elsewhere)? The other days you voted for Meeko there were between 1 and 3 votes for him, not enough to put him in lynch danger there either or sway the vote.