|
Post by KidVermicious on Oct 3, 2012 16:54:43 GMT -5
Lemme ask you this, Crys - why did you choose to claim?
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on Oct 3, 2012 16:57:22 GMT -5
I do not understand the confusion over this:
emphasis added
ANY investigation will turn up Hostile. Regardless of who is investigating crys, if she is out biting that Night, the returned result will be Hostile.
|
|
|
Post by KidVermicious on Oct 3, 2012 17:10:52 GMT -5
I do not understand the confusion over this: emphasis added ANY investigation will turn up Hostile. Regardless of who is investigating crys, if she is out biting that Night, the returned result will be Hostile. I'm not confused about it at all. I think Crys is hostile, and can choose to appear non-hostile at the expense of her Night action.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 17:10:55 GMT -5
I feel strongly that Pleo was Town from Day One... Why? There was that one post where he spells out that possibility, but all that makes it is a couple of glasses of wine. What makes you inclined to drink that particular glass?
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 3, 2012 17:14:11 GMT -5
Ummm I never said I wouldn't bite people. That would be pointless. I never said I woulnt play the game but I am 2 votes til the merc is gone. Um Crys Explain-em that one again....."I am 2 votes til the merc is gone" What does that mean???
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 17:19:03 GMT -5
I do not understand the confusion over this: emphasis added ANY investigation will turn up Hostile. Regardless of who is investigating crys, if she is out biting that Night, the returned result will be Hostile. I'm not confused about it at all. I think Crys is hostile, and can choose to appear non-hostile at the expense of her Night action. What about her play makes you think that is more likely than what she claims? The timing of the claim? That she fudged up her PM? What is it with all of these conclusions with no supporting evidence? This is context that shouldn't have to be dragged out of people ( @ Peeker) Show your work, people! :nun-with-a-ruler-smiley:
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on Oct 3, 2012 17:25:49 GMT -5
I feel strongly that Pleo was Town from Day One... Why? There was that one post where he spells out that possibility, but all that makes it is a couple of glasses of wine. What makes you inclined to drink that particular glass? Once someone pointed out that post, it all made sense to me. Given what I know of Pleo and his role, it makes sense to me that he changed the alignment in his PM from Town to 3rd Party hoping to inoculate himself from both sides and enabling his beloved early declaration. I do not know any of this as fact, but it makes sense to me. Did I mention it makes sense to me? ;D Also, I do not believe we have any evidence of a recruitment other than he flipped Town when we were expecting 3rd Party.
|
|
|
Post by KidVermicious on Oct 3, 2012 17:30:12 GMT -5
I'm not confused about it at all. I think Crys is hostile, and can choose to appear non-hostile at the expense of her Night action. What about her play makes you think that is more likely than what she claims? The timing of the claim? That she fudged up her PM? Mad bomber, mostly. That role is hard enough to win with, it makes more sense to me that she'd be hostile with the chance to appear nonhostile, making it easier for her.
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on Oct 3, 2012 17:31:03 GMT -5
I do not understand the confusion over this: emphasis added ANY investigation will turn up Hostile. Regardless of who is investigating crys, if she is out biting that Night, the returned result will be Hostile. I'm not confused about it at all. I think Crys is hostile, and can choose to appear non-hostile at the expense of her Night action. So you are accusing her of rewriting her win-con?
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:32:30 GMT -5
I do not understand the confusion over this: emphasis added ANY investigation will turn up Hostile. Regardless of who is investigating crys, if she is out biting that Night, the returned result will be Hostile. I'm not confused about it at all. I think Crys is hostile, and can choose to appear non-hostile at the expense of her Night action. Did you read my pm. What are you hiding. Sent from my SCH-I405 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:34:14 GMT -5
What about her play makes you think that is more likely than what she claims? The timing of the claim? That she fudged up her PM? Mad bomber, mostly. That role is hard enough to win with, it makes more sense to me that she'd be hostile with the chance to appear nonhostile, making it easier for her. I don't even know enough about pollux or this f'd up game to recreate my wincon. Are you stoned? Sent from my SCH-I405 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:35:19 GMT -5
Lemme ask you this, Crys - why did you choose to claim? Give me two minutes to get to my pc doing this all on my phone with carpotunnel sucks Sent from my SCH-I405 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:41:17 GMT -5
Lemme ask you this, Crys - why did you choose to claim? 2 reasons actually 1. I claimed while I was under no real pressure to do so. I was hoping to try and avoid some mass hysteria. I also made it equally known that I was going to edit my pm to keep some information from scum, but I botched that. Like I said earlier me trying to be deceitful=fail. 2. Town had just lost 2 players and power roles at that. I wanted to let town know that even though I was non-hostile 3rd party that I wanted to play with town than against them. Like I have said earlier I have given you the information, now you guys have to decide whether you want to give me the benefit of the doubt or not.
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:43:28 GMT -5
Ummm I never said I wouldn't bite people. That would be pointless. I never said I woulnt play the game but I am 2 votes til the merc is gone. Um Crys Explain-em that one again....."I am 2 votes til the merc is gone" What does that mean??? That means that until the mercenary is dead we both have 2 votes. If I am still alive and playing and I have 2 votes those are 2 votes that can help town.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 3, 2012 17:49:27 GMT -5
2 votes for what? I'm still not understanding?
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 17:50:53 GMT -5
2 votes for what? I'm still not understanding? 2 votes for lynching scum.....did you not have enough caffeine today?...Here's some coffee
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on Oct 3, 2012 18:01:36 GMT -5
Yeah, I see the point about the Mad Bomber thing. That is very weird. I only have a vague notion of what the Mad Bomber does, but I do not see anything else in the PM that would relate to a Mad Bomber.
I suppose it could have originally said that she designated the bomb by giving the virus...but doesn't that seem a stretch?
[green]Pollux, I do not imagine you would card to admit to an error in composing crys' PM, would you?[/green]
Yeah, I know. He will not answer. But it is worth a try.
I do think there must be a Mad Bomber in the game. Either it is crys or it is whoever had their PM composed just prior to the composition of crys' PM.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 3, 2012 18:01:52 GMT -5
I think she's sayig her vote counts double, as does the merc's.
But I'm not sure.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 18:02:52 GMT -5
I'm not really following what you're saying with the 2 votes either. I like lots of cream and sugar.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 3, 2012 18:03:02 GMT -5
Oh, or, whoops -- she's referring to the two votes we ALL have. I definitely haven't had enough caffeine today.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 3, 2012 18:03:37 GMT -5
Interesting. I wasn't actually trying to code a smiley there.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 18:17:48 GMT -5
Ah, the 2 votes we all have to place. Got it.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 18:21:05 GMT -5
I've been in at least one game with a non-pfk Bomber-type role.
[Sinatra]But I can't remember where or when[/Sinatra]
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Oct 3, 2012 18:34:56 GMT -5
[green]Pollux, I do not imagine you would card to admit to an error in composing crys' PM, would you?[/green] The only card I'll admit is the seven of clubs.
|
|
|
Post by crys on Oct 3, 2012 18:53:50 GMT -5
Oh, or, whoops -- she's referring to the two votes we ALL have. I definitely haven't had enough caffeine today. Yes that is what I was referring to. Probably not to clear tonight just scheduled my surgery for oct 25 today Sent from my SCH-I405 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on Oct 3, 2012 18:55:34 GMT -5
[green]Pollux, I do not imagine you would card to admit to an error in composing crys' PM, would you?[/green] The only card I'll admit is the seven of clubs. Geez, if I was gonna typo there, I could have at least typed "carp".
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 3, 2012 19:04:30 GMT -5
[green]Pollux, I do not imagine you would card to admit to an error in composing crys' PM, would you?[/green] The only card I'll admit is the seven of clubs. inside straight or flush draw it is then.
|
|
|
Post by KidVermicious on Oct 3, 2012 19:35:54 GMT -5
The only card I'll admit is the seven of clubs. Geez, if I was gonna typo there, I could have at least typed "carp". Are you Peekers sock?
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 3, 2012 19:38:14 GMT -5
Flush draw, probably, peeks, because I see KS 2C 9C on the table.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 3, 2012 19:47:40 GMT -5
ZOMG!!!!11!!!!11 Super seecreet l33t poke-her codez!!!11!!1
And Pollux is in on it!
Vote NAF Vote Bufftabby Vote Roosh Vote sachertorte [/color]
There's no telling how deep this rabbit hole goes...
|
|