|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 20:36:06 GMT -5
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Dec 5, 2012 20:36:06 GMT -5
In a five minute span you had 'second thoughts' Did your teammates tell you to unvote right away? Even they will tell you this looks very suspect so you suspect she has off board communications? That would be funny and pretty contradicting since I questioned your ability Peekers on D1 for knowing who your team was.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 20:37:42 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 20:37:42 GMT -5
You don't share my win-condition.. <snipped> i would stongly suggest we (communally the good folks) that we kill chucara pdq. i kind of thought you were lg. meh, shows how fucking wrong i can be.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 20:46:23 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 20:46:23 GMT -5
so you suspect she has off board communications? That would be funny and pretty contradicting since I questioned your ability Peekers on D1 for knowing who your team was. i know who the teammates that am aligned with are. methinks we have another.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:00:04 GMT -5
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Dec 5, 2012 21:00:04 GMT -5
Peekers, I still just don't understand your initial and continued claim. I haven't seen this answered, which is part of the reason I'm doubting where you lie right now.
Are you Maha and the one other person you claim may or may not be on your mason team the only people on your full aligned team?
Or is your mason team a subset of your full team?
As for me, I personally have no offboard communication.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:00:32 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 21:00:32 GMT -5
In a five minute span you had 'second thoughts' Did your teammates tell you to unvote right away? Even they will tell you this looks very suspect so you suspect she has off board communications? The way I read it yes a complete turn around that fast seems like someone said "don't do that!" and in panic she unvoted quickly
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:03:18 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 21:03:18 GMT -5
so you suspect she has off board communications? That would be funny and pretty contradicting since I questioned your ability Peekers on D1 for knowing who your team was. It would make sense if you were CE though youknow, if you were thinking in us vs them mode
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:10:58 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 21:10:58 GMT -5
Peekers, I still just don't understand your initial and continued claim. I haven't seen this answered, which is part of the reason I'm doubting where you lie right now. Are you Maha and the one other person you claim may or may not be on your mason team the only people on your full aligned team? Or is your mason team a subset of your full team? As for me, I personally have no offboard communication. otie dotie. there is at least one and may be more. heh heh. yes, we are a subset of good. but we do not know all the good. that would be broken. but i believe that we are getting close.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:15:21 GMT -5
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Dec 5, 2012 21:15:21 GMT -5
How exactly would that be Lightfoot?
My first instinct was that Peekers was CE because I knew that CE know each other. And guess what you'd probably have an us vs them feeling on everyone if you were LG OR CE.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:23:34 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 21:23:34 GMT -5
and i don't know if this is copacetic or not. but i would be willing to call this a push at this time if all le and ce just lay down. we've gotcha. i'll take a 1/2 if you will. of course, the rest of the goods might want to have blood on their teeth. so i can't speak for all of them. but i know that the masons can be convinced to accept in the spirit of this endeavor. maha if you would like to disagree now would be the time.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:24:51 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 21:24:51 GMT -5
it's fucking christmas time, ffs. let's all start acting nice to each other and shit.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:29:09 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 21:29:09 GMT -5
How exactly would that be Lightfoot? My first instinct was that Peekers was CE because I knew that CE know each other. And guess what you'd probably have an us vs them feeling on everyone if you were LG OR CE. So why did you just say this "That would be funny and pretty contradicting since I questioned your ability Peekers on D1 for knowing who your team was." Read more: www.idlemafia.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=awt&thread=2077&page=4#ixzz2EEcoUKMP
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:38:08 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 21:38:08 GMT -5
if it would help. if a ce would claim maha and i could vote them and you would see our votes count.
and if that doesn't prove that i am working for good then i don't know what else.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 21:44:01 GMT -5
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Dec 5, 2012 21:44:01 GMT -5
What are you having problems reading?
How many different ways could I say the same thing.
D1- I thought Peekers was CE because he seemed to know with 100% fact that Pizza wasn't on his team.
Peekers posted:
It's ironic to suspect I have off board communication, when on D1, I obviously didn't realize that players other than CE had off board communication, and used that information to deduct that Peekers was CE.
(For the record- I did know that other teams may be able to communicate. My understanding at the time, was that it was like the list of roles. Some teams may be able to communicate, not that every team but LG would have ways to talk....I would have kept my mouth shut about this whole issue on D1, if I had known that all teams but LG could talk....)
Let me turn it back to you. Do you believe Peekers claim and subsequent test to be genuine? or do you think it's more of ploy, like I'm leaning?
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:08:57 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 22:08:57 GMT -5
What are you having problems reading? How many different ways could I say the same thing. D1- I thought Peekers was CE because he seemed to know with 100% fact that Pizza wasn't on his team. Peekers posted: It's ironic to suspect I have off board communication, when on D1, I obviously didn't realize that players other than CE had off board communication, and used that information to deduct that Peekers was CE. (For the record- I did know that other teams may be able to communicate. My understanding at the time, was that it was like the list of roles. Some teams may be able to communicate, not that every team but LG would have ways to talk....I would have kept my mouth shut about this whole issue on D1, if I had known that all teams but LG could talk....) Let me turn it back to you. Do you believe Peekers claim and subsequent test to be genuine? or do you think it's more of ploy, like I'm leaning? Reading is not my problem- grasping is The way I read your statements D1 You thought peeker was CE But you questioned how he knew who his team-mates were I had my own kerfluffle D1 regarding the LE and CG teams knowing each other. That’s not my crayfish To your question: I don’t think it would make sense if CE could not vote each other – except their RK when neutered peeker & Mahaloth have claimed Chaotic Good although why in the world peeker at one time was voting Mahaloth D1 when there was a danger of a lynch is beyond me-risking a life to prove a point? We’ve not had a Lawful Evil claim (and the dead ones never voted each other) so we can’t know for certain how the mechanic really works. The game is fresh we can operate under that guise for now I think we can safely assume that atleast the two of them can communicate off board Nothing is gospel ‘til you’re dead-it’s Mafia
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:29:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 22:29:25 GMT -5
i also know that other teams have been given special dispensation to talk during this Day. i would strongly consider that you accept my team's offer. because it is off the table at the end of the Day.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:36:34 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 22:36:34 GMT -5
but lightfoot you also know that i moved my vote off him and to an evil since the mog was not around to give a vote count. i kind of wanted to prove my point before eoD yesterDay but timing went awry. i was not going to let a brethren swing so i moved to burby. certainly you saw that. and you also should have seen how maha followed right along. if you stab at one of us you better get us both.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:43:38 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 22:43:38 GMT -5
What are you having problems reading? How many different ways could I say the same thing. D1- I thought Peekers was CE because he seemed to know with 100% fact that Pizza wasn't on his team. Peekers posted: It's ironic to suspect I have off board communication, when on D1, I obviously didn't realize that players other than CE had off board communication, and used that information to deduct that Peekers was CE. (For the record- I did know that other teams may be able to communicate. My understanding at the time, was that it was like the list of roles. Some teams may be able to communicate, not that every team but LG would have ways to talk....I would have kept my mouth shut about this whole issue on D1, if I had known that all teams but LG could talk....) Let me turn it back to you. Do you believe Peekers claim and subsequent test to be genuine? or do you think it's more of ploy, like I'm leaning? man, i am confused. on D1 you didn't realize there was off board communication. but "... some teams may be able to communicate....". and hey, lynch my ass. i'm going to flip cg (who the fuck doesn't know that at this point). that means maha is also good. and we have at least another. the only folks that would want me or maha dead are le. sorry ce but you are off our radar.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:50:17 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Dec 5, 2012 22:50:17 GMT -5
and last game i get an unkillable annoyer role. this one out i get chaos. i know christmas came early to my house this year.
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 22:58:27 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 22:58:27 GMT -5
i also know that other teams have been given special dispensation to talk during this Day. i would strongly consider that you accept my team's offer. because it is off the table at the end of the Day. You were doing pretty good until you tossed that fish who is supposed to accept your 'offer' LG? Do you know who is LG? there are a few of us that are willing to take you at face- for now- but a hostage situation is a bad play
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 23:01:14 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 23:01:14 GMT -5
NETA the off board during the Day bit could re-enforce my thoughts on dizzy's change of heart
|
|
|
Day Two
Dec 5, 2012 23:03:51 GMT -5
Post by LightFoot on Dec 5, 2012 23:03:51 GMT -5
but lightfoot you also know that i moved my vote off him and to an evil since the mog was not around to give a vote count. i kind of wanted to prove my point before eoD yesterDay but timing went awry. i was not going to let a brethren swing so i moved to burby. certainly you saw that. and you also should have seen how maha followed right along. if you stab at one of us you better get us both. That's why that comment was in sub text. My guess is the other teams get a Day pass because *someone- got busted communicating during a Day cycle?
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Dec 6, 2012 3:12:24 GMT -5
Vote: Peeker
I accept and appreciate the proving people are not on team X or are on team Y stuff, but I also find it incredibly boring and meta when everyone does it.
This vote serves two purposes: One, to indicate my irritation with peeker for moving the game in this direction, and to pledge that I will never go along with such a buzzkilling method of play.
|
|
|
Post by guiri on Dec 6, 2012 3:18:32 GMT -5
Mod, can we get a vote count please
We are dangerously close to reaching the hammer, please vote someone else!
|
|
|
Post by KidVermicious on Dec 6, 2012 4:06:51 GMT -5
Day Two, as of post 112: Guiri (5): Peeker (45), Patricia (50), Chucara (65), Hockey Monkey (71), Mahaloth (87) Peeker (2): Guiri (39), Pizza (111) The last vote was on 12/6 at 1:12 AM MST (GMT -7). If there are no further valid votes, a 24 hour countdown to EOD will begin on 12/7 at 1:12 AM. Lest you call think I'm ignoring the calls for vote counts, please know I work graveyards and have busy mornings. I'll post vote counts when I can, and when I'm sleeping is not one of those times. There's a perfectly good script Chucara wrote that will give you a rough idea of where the votes stand, but I don't carry a pager and I don't sit in front of the computer waiting with bated breath for a call for a vote count.
|
|
|
Post by guiri on Dec 6, 2012 7:12:58 GMT -5
Unvote PeekerVote Hockey Monkey!In addition to yesterDay's case, check out her contributions toDay: Ok, to prove I'm not a killa - Vote guiri And:
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Dec 6, 2012 9:39:56 GMT -5
Vote: PeekerI accept and appreciate the proving people are not on team X or are on team Y stuff, but I also find it incredibly boring and meta when everyone does it. This vote serves two purposes: One, to indicate my irritation with peeker for moving the game in this direction, and to pledge that I will never go along with such a buzzkilling method of play. so your flinch voting maneuver in order to determine who is on a certain team is ok but a voting when you know the results manuever is not? color me confused.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Dec 6, 2012 9:41:16 GMT -5
i also know that other teams have been given special dispensation to talk during this Day. i would strongly consider that you accept my team's offer. because it is off the table at the end of the Day. You were doing pretty good until you tossed that fish who is supposed to accept your 'offer' LG? Do you know who is LG? there are a few of us that are willing to take you at face- for now- but a hostage situation is a bad play was not the intent.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Dec 6, 2012 9:43:05 GMT -5
unvote guiri[/color]
the vote accomplished what i intended.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Dec 6, 2012 9:48:18 GMT -5
vote pizza
really his ability to characterize one strategy as "buzzkill" while thinking that a similar strategy (his) is like uber the best is really too dichotomous even for me.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Dec 6, 2012 9:56:54 GMT -5
but lightfoot you also know that i moved my vote off him and to an evil since the mog was not around to give a vote count. i kind of wanted to prove my point before eoD yesterDay but timing went awry. i was not going to let a brethren swing so i moved to burby. certainly you saw that. and you also should have seen how maha followed right along. if you stab at one of us you better get us both. That's why that comment was in sub text. My guess is the other teams get a Day pass because *someone- got busted communicating during a Day cycle? well i guess you got the ass part of asterisk part correct.
|
|