|
Post by tirial on Jun 4, 2007 9:59:00 GMT -5
Capybara P29 "dicking around". Either that's an unfortunate phrase or you were thinking what I was wondering.
Now I haven't had a chance to look into the evidence much yet, so take this with a pinch of salt. However, zuma seemed to go after Arizonateach for investigating who may have actually managed to kill fluiddruid - and whether it was deadeye Dick. storyteller who was killed was one of the two people who voted for Zuma. If we follow Arizonateach's logic and storyteller was killed by DeadEye Dick, then is it possible that was retaliation because he was going after zuma? Someone (can't find the post now) has already commented that the pirates are more likely to use strategy than go for a retaliation kill, while DeadEye would be more direct. Basically I find myself wondering if zuma is DeadEye Dick, rather than a straight out pirate.
Either way, I still think zuma looks a little scummy.
And looking back on it, Idle Thoughts, sorry about the joke earlier. I think I've just cottoned onto your comment in P15. If Deadeye Dick took out storyteller then yes, I would imagine that the scum would like him.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 4, 2007 9:59:06 GMT -5
D2 P32 ArizonaTeach says that "The fact that the knives are such a big deal to the role tells me, at least, that we can make assumptions about the murder description." and asks whether Dick Deadeye would knife someone for targetting him. Except that Mal has explicitly said that the descriptions have nothing to do with who killed who. They are just color, I wouldn't make any assumptions based on that. When I was writing my color descriptions I just tried to come up with interesting methods of death, I am assuming Mal is doing the same. Ok, so we can't make the assumption that Mal accidentally let us know who killed who. Storytellers death makes sense, so the real question to me is, why was Kyrie killed? If Dick killed him, why did he do it? Same question if the pirates offed him. I am going back to look at his posts to see what he said.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jun 4, 2007 10:19:53 GMT -5
Looks like I need to reset my thinking.
It's unlikely AZTeach and FCoD are false claiming--that'd be an extremely gutsy move in what's likely to be a low-Pirate game. I'll assume one of them will die soon to verify the other, in any case.
Has anyone put together a voting timeline for the Day 2? It might be useful to see who jumped on to whose bandwagon when.
BTW, I'll be on travel starting tomorrow (continuing to the 16th) and will have erratic time to think about the game. I expect I'll have enough time to keep participating so I won't ask for a sub.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 4, 2007 10:37:52 GMT -5
Some interesting things about Kyrie. He only posted 34 times total to this board. He only posted 10 times to Day 2. In day 2 most of his posting involved his back and forth with Idle Thoughts. Now personally I think that Idle would have to be a fuckin' idiot to kill Kyrie after a day like that so I think we can ignore all those posts for now. Let's look at his other posts. His first post of the day is a post about Fluid's death in which he states that it is possible fluid was taken out because one of her scum buddies from M3 was worried she might notice that they were scum here too. His next post is a mild accusation of BM, a smudge if you will , saying that he felt BM was warning the other pirates off a particular course of action. Here is what BM said: Kyrie seemed to feel that this was a bit scummy. The next post was saying to MtS that he trusted both zuma and capybara. (This is what got him in trouble with Idle.) The rest of his posts are either votes for FCoD or MHaye, or are part of his argument with Idle. Day one posts next time.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 4, 2007 11:32:53 GMT -5
Ok, so earlier posts by Kyrie
Starts off (first substantive post) voting for me.
In his next post he changes his vote to cowgirl for wanting to talk about power roles. In the same post makes a case for early agressive play.
Post about Idle thoughts being inconsistant and making subtle accusations against cowgirl, then defending her. In his next post he makes it clear that he was not accusing Idle yet, just questioning. This appears to snowball into the Idle vs. Kyrie thing that I already said I think is fruitless. So I am going to skip further back and forth between the two of them.
Post to Idle Thoughts, post to AZ Teach. Skipping both of these as fruitless.
Defends his vote against cowgirl. Says that the case is thin but its the best they have.
Two more anti cowgirl posts.
Then an unvote of cowgirl.
Two posts with ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies. Don't know if these are important or not. They are posts 279 and 295 in Day 1. I will let you guys see if you think there is anything relevant, but I am inclined to think not now that Cookies is out of the game.
Posts that he doesn't like the idea of an Auto lynch.
Votes to lynch Auto.
Vote count. Then another.
Defends the Auto vote.
Unvotes Auto then votes Lakai. This one seemes interesting because I didn't remember him and Lakai having a thing.
And that is his last post for Day 1.
Back to work.
More later.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 4, 2007 11:33:40 GMT -5
Whoops, in the interest of accuracy, he did put in one more vote count at the end of Day 1.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Jun 4, 2007 12:24:49 GMT -5
NAF, see my summary of Lakai's posts. Lakai and Kyrie hashed it out over cowgirl's power role question. I did some looking back at what was said about hockeymonkey yesterday. When I said I thought someone else had said she was crew, I see I was thinking of Gadarene's statements, which all came after her vote for me. The only other one I found who came close was the late MHaye, who only said he found FCOD more scummy. Fair enough. But I also found a few other posts of interest: In this post, she makes a similar 'scum tell' to the one that she was so certain makes me a pirate, mentioning a 'crew vibe' on several players. She later avers that this is not the same as 'accepting them as crew' when called on it. I still find it a bit odd. FCoD (confirmed crew *) also made a case against her based on her defense of capybara. Something in this post struck me (note again the defense of capy): Maybe it's a little twisty, but it seems a bit self-defeating - if a pirate defending a pirate is insanely obvious, doesn't that defeat the purpose of pirate defending crew? The crew's unlikely to fall for that ploy if it's so obvious. What I'm wondering, though, if a pirate at the gallows is more likely to attack someone or not. I think the sequence of events yesterday may be able to tell us something. Question for everyone : What do you think of hockeymonkey's last-minute attack on me? I'm trying to figure out if it really is something a crew would do, or a pirate trying to up the confusion by throwing another name in the mix. To my mind, in that situation, honest crew wouldn't pop up with a brand-new name unless they were really sure about it. While I certainly think the case against me is unfounded, I don't want to make any judgement about it without hearing what others think of it. To add more fuel to the fire, I'll point out that this post : Me being wishy-washy on hockeymonkeyfollowed by my "hockeymonkey is crew not playing well" once she had some votes on her does seem scummy. Next time, I'll try and do more research to come up with an answer before making vague statements. After the end of yesterday, I regret not putting my vote on hockeymonkey. If I felt her the most expendable, I ought to have put my money where my mumbling mouth was. *All it takes is one or two Officers to say he's not, and they don't even have to reveal their exact role. Either way, we catch scum.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Jun 4, 2007 12:43:15 GMT -5
I'm just going crazy with the posting right now.
Statistically interesting - everyone on Gadarene's "high-content, low-post" category is now dead. This makes sense since this is the highest Signal/Noise ratio.
Storyteller could have easily been a target of Deadeye (for being a suspected strong player) or of Ben's (for being a suspected manipulative Pirate). Or the Pirates, for the first reason.
If we're going to look at motives, since two of our Officers are out, the Pirates are gunning for the third, most valuable one. I noticed that FCoD had some trust of storyteller, so possibly a pro-pirate killer went after him trying to bag the doctor.
Kyrie could have been targeted for a similar reason, but I don't see anything in particular that might have been considered a tell.
Or not; again it's hard to know how much we can deduce from motives.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Jun 4, 2007 12:47:24 GMT -5
Crap. That's the 'medium volume/high content' category, NOT the 'low volume/high content'. Anyway, they still were probably among the best contributors to the game, and there's no reason those categories should stay static.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jun 4, 2007 12:59:05 GMT -5
NAF, see my summary of Lakai's posts. Lakai and Kyrie hashed it out over cowgirl's power role question. I did some looking back at what was said about hockeymonkey yesterday. When I said I thought someone else had said she was crew, I see I was thinking of Gadarene's statements, which all came after her vote for me. The only other one I found who came close was the late MHaye, who only said he found FCOD more scummy. Fair enough. But I also found a few other posts of interest: In this post, she makes a similar 'scum tell' to the one that she was so certain makes me a pirate, mentioning a 'crew vibe' on several players. She later avers that this is not the same as 'accepting them as crew' when called on it. I still find it a bit odd. FCoD (confirmed crew *) also made a case against her based on her defense of capybara. Something in this post struck me (note again the defense of capy): Maybe it's a little twisty, but it seems a bit self-defeating - if a pirate defending a pirate is insanely obvious, doesn't that defeat the purpose of pirate defending crew? The crew's unlikely to fall for that ploy if it's so obvious. What I'm wondering, though, if a pirate at the gallows is more likely to attack someone or not. I think the sequence of events yesterday may be able to tell us something. Question for everyone : What do you think of hockeymonkey's last-minute attack on me? I'm trying to figure out if it really is something a crew would do, or a pirate trying to up the confusion by throwing another name in the mix. To my mind, in that situation, honest crew wouldn't pop up with a brand-new name unless they were really sure about it. While I certainly think the case against me is unfounded, I don't want to make any judgement about it without hearing what others think of it. To add more fuel to the fire, I'll point out that this post : Me being wishy-washy on hockeymonkeyfollowed by my "hockeymonkey is crew not playing well" once she had some votes on her does seem scummy. Next time, I'll try and do more research to come up with an answer before making vague statements. After the end of yesterday, I regret not putting my vote on hockeymonkey. If I felt her the most expendable, I ought to have put my money where my mumbling mouth was. *All it takes is one or two Officers to say he's not, and they don't even have to reveal their exact role. Either way, we catch scum. The reason I changed my vote is that when the day ended in the three way tie, it made me go back and think about why that would be. I, in my mind, thought that it was because all three of us were crew, and the pirates really didn't have to do much and one of us would hang. So I went back to see which other people had votes and who was doing the voting. Feeling that there would be at least one pirate in the group of straggle voters, I felt that you would be the likeliest candidate for pirate out of that group. I no longer felt that either Mhaye or FCOD were pirates, so I didn't want to vote for either of them. Also since I thought I might be lynched, I wanted to get my thoughts out there for the benefit of the crew. I still think the thing about the quote was scummy. We are very early into the Day, and my vote will change if someone else comes across more piratey. Mine is only one vote, and I said Yesterday that I thought it merited discussion, so by voting for you today I hope to bring about that discussion. I do agree with you that Lakai deserves some discussion as well because he really hasn't defended the votes against him, or added much to the overall game thusfar. I'm sorry you regret not voting for me, but the end result of a loss of a crew member would have been the same. That's all I have time for at the moment. I hope this helps some.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jun 4, 2007 15:50:43 GMT -5
Here's a timeline of all voting on Day 2 (I apologize if I missed any).
Pirates Day 2 Voting
Number of votes for player in parentheses. All dates/times Pacific.
May 28 #036, 04:49, Zuma votes ArizonaTeach (1) #042, 07:29, FlyingCowOfDoom votes Capybara (1) #067, 10:54, Lakai votes HockeyMonkey (1) #087, 22:27, NAF1138 votes FlyingCowOfDoom (1) May 29 #098, 08:59, Pleonast votes Tirial (1) #104, 09:28, Storyteller0910 votes FlyingCowOfDoom (2) #109, 10:40, BlasterMaster votes MHaye (1) #119, 11:19, NAF1138 unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (1) #132, 13:50, HockeyMonkey votes FlyingCowOfDoom (2) May 30 #148, 07:29, HockeyMonkey unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (1) #149, 07:30, MadTheSwine votes Auntbeast (1) #151, 08:05, NAF1138 votes HockeyMonkey (2) #158, 08:46, FlyingCowOfDoom unvotes Capybara (0) #168, 11:13, FlyingCowOfDoom votes HockeyMonkey (3) #172, 11:33, Storyteller0910 unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (0) #172, 11:33, Storyteller0910 votes Zuma (1) #197, 13:33, HockeyMonkey votes Lakai (1) #204, 14:12, Capybara votes MadTheSwine (1) #214, 20:32, Gadarene votes MHaye (2) May 31 #221, 00:00, PanamaJack votes Lakai (2) #223, 04:33, Zuma unvotes ArizonaTeach (0) #223, 04:33, Zuma votes MHaye (3) #227, 06:08, Storyteller0910 unvotes Zuma (0) #239, 09:15, MadTheSwine unvotes Auntbeast (0) #239, 09:15, MadTheSwine votes Zuma (1) #246, 10:01, Auntbeast votes NAF1138 (1) #250, 10:21, Storyteller0910 votes FlyingCowOfDoom (1) #259, 10:37, Pleonast unvotes Tirial (0) #259, 10:37, Pleonast votes Auntbeast (1) #276, 12:27, HockeyMonkey unvotes Lakai (1) #279, 12:40, MadTheSwine unvotes Zuma (0) #279, 12:40, MadTheSwine votes Auntbeast (2) #283, 13:04, KyrieEleison votes FlyingCowOfDoom (2) #298, 13:42, IdleThoughts votes KyrieEleison (1) #311, 14:27, ArizonaTeach votes KyrieEleison (2) #318, 14:53, MHaye votes FlyingCowOfDoom (3) #326, 15:56, MHaye unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (2) #329, 18:28, HockeyMonkey votes MHaye (4) #330, 19:03, Cowgirl votes FlyingCowOfDoom (3) Jun 1 #360, 11:34, HalBriston votes HockeyMonkey (4) #368, 12:27, DiggitCamara votes FlyingCowOfDoom (4) #371, 12:39, Autolycus votes FlyingCowOfDoom (5) #372, 12:43, Autolycus unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (4) #376, 12:53, Pleonast unvotes Auntbeast (1) #376, 12:53, Pleonast votes MHaye (5) #380, 12:57, MHaye votes FlyingCowOfDoom (5) #383, 13:00, Tirial votes NAF1138 (2) #384, 13:00, Autolycus votes HockeyMonkey (5) -- regulation time over: 3-way tie at 5 votes -- #393, 13:52, HockeyMonkey unvotes MHaye (4) #393, 13:52, HockeyMonkey votes PanamaJack (1) #396, 14:28, ArizonaTeach unvotes KyrieEleison (1) #396, 14:28, ArizonaTeach votes MHaye (5) #399, 14:40, DiggitCamara unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (4) #407, 15:15, NAF1138 unvotes HockeyMonkey (4) #407, 15:15, NAF1138 votes Tirial (1) #418, 15:59, DiggitCamara votes HockeyMonkey (5) #424, 16:25, IdleThoughts unvotes KyrieEleison (0) #424, 16:25, IdleThoughts votes HockeyMonkey (6) #435, 17:04, HalBriston unvotes HockeyMonkey (5) #450, 20:39, Gadarene unvotes MHaye (4) #450, 20:39, Gadarene votes FlyingCowOfDoom (5) #456, 21:03, ArizonaTeach unvotes MHaye (3) #456, 21:03, ArizonaTeach votes HockeyMonkey (6) #467, 21:41, Capybara unvotes MadTheSwine (0) #467, 21:41, Capybara votes FlyingCowOfDoom (6) #474, 21:50, Capybara unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (5) #474, 21:50, Capybara votes MadTheSwine (1) #476, 21:52, Gadarene unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (4) #476, 21:52, Gadarene votes MHaye (5) #480, 21:53, ArizonaTeach unvotes HockeyMonkey (5) #480, 21:53, ArizonaTeach votes MHaye (6) #482, 21:55, KyrieEleison unvotes FlyingCowOfDoom (3) #490, 22:01, HockeyMonkey unvotes PanamaJack (0) #490, 22:01, HockeyMonkey votes MHaye (7) #501, 22:07, KyrieEleison votes MHaye (8)
|
|
|
Post by diggitcamara on Jun 4, 2007 16:26:54 GMT -5
... from the timetable I have to wonder: why didn't ArizonaTeacher vote one of the two other candidates just before time expired?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 4, 2007 16:33:14 GMT -5
... from the timetable I have to wonder: why didn't ArizonaTeacher vote one of the two other candidates just before time expired? He did. He voted for MHaye a couple of minutes before time ran out.
|
|
|
Post by diggitcamara on Jun 4, 2007 16:34:51 GMT -5
... from the timetable I have to wonder: why didn't ArizonaTeacher vote one of the two other candidates just before time expired? He did. He voted for MHaye a couple of minutes before time ran out. Regulation time.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jun 4, 2007 16:54:00 GMT -5
Since we know that MHaye is Crew and presuming that FlyingCow is as well, I'm trying to see what we can learn about HockeyMonkey's scumminess. Like tactical votes to protect him or hinder one of the others. Nothing really stands out to me on first look-through.
Maybe someone else can find an incriminating vote or two.
|
|
|
Post by capybara on Jun 4, 2007 17:07:44 GMT -5
Since we know that MHaye is Crew and presuming that FlyingCow is as well, I'm trying to see what we can learn about HockeyMonkey's scumminess. Like tactical votes to protect him or hinder one of the others. Nothing really stands out to me on first look-through. Maybe someone else can find an incriminating vote or two. In the interest of full disclosure, what one might immediately find is that (as already noted) I voted FCOD to tie it up again with AZ's Hockeymonkeyvote as I was not convinced that Hockeymonkeywas scum (and at that time, recall, we knew nothing about the status of the others). I'm still not convinced that HM is scum, for what it's worth, and I think it very well may have been a three-crewmember conundrum, and pirates may have been minimally involved.
|
|
|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 4, 2007 17:59:07 GMT -5
... from the timetable I have to wonder: why didn't ArizonaTeacher vote one of the two other candidates just before time expired? I don't understand the question here. I had a vote for hockey monkey, which I wasn't sure about (notice how I only voted for her to break the tie away from FCOD and to see if anyone else would try to recreate the tie). Then, with another vote for FCOD by capy, I couldn't switch my vote to mhaye because it would have either put FCOD in the lead, or after there were a couple more votes for mhaye, would put it in another tie. The second FCOD was in the clear, I changed my vote. Look back over my posts...I explained all this in desperation at the very end there. Capybara, are you saying that noticing when people voted is some sort of meta-gaming? I don't see that at all. I think it's entirely likely that scum would try to manipulate the vote in that way. That said, I tend to agree with your most recent post there, that we were screwed either way.
|
|
|
Post by diggitcamara on Jun 4, 2007 18:03:26 GMT -5
(snip) I don't understand the question here. I had a vote for hockey monkey, which I wasn't sure about (notice how I only voted for her to break the tie away from FCOD and to see if anyone else would try to recreate the tie). Then, with another vote for FCOD by capy, I couldn't switch my vote to mhaye because it would have either put FCOD in the lead, or after there were a couple more votes for mhaye, would put it in another tie. The second FCOD was in the clear, I changed my vote. (snip) Again: I was referring to the time before regulation time expired. Your vote was on Kyrie Eleison around then.
|
|
|
Post by capybara on Jun 4, 2007 18:09:26 GMT -5
Capybara, are you saying that noticing when people voted is some sort of meta-gaming? Whoah, where'd I suggest that? If I did sound like that, I did not mean to. If it's about earlier when I was asking about login times, that was a different issue, and not about voting.
|
|
|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 4, 2007 18:15:25 GMT -5
Whoah, where'd I suggest that? If I did sound like that, I did not mean to. If it's about earlier when I was asking about login times, that was a different issue, and not about voting. Ah, then apologies.
|
|
|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 4, 2007 18:22:17 GMT -5
Again: I was referring to the time before regulation time expired. Your vote was on Kyrie Eleison around then. Remember, I'm at a school where any webpage with the word "game" on it is firewalled. When I left earlier FCOD was still in the clear. Note that FCOD thought that, too. The second I got home, thinking I was still in time, I noticed several sudden FCOD votes, so I changed my vote before I read all the way through. Since hte board wasn't locked, I figured it was still Day. Then, still perusing the posts, I saw I was too late, but the Day was still going. That's when I seriously started getting suspicious and pretty much stayed online staring at the votes for the next several hours.
|
|
|
Post by autolycus on Jun 4, 2007 18:29:39 GMT -5
It be me turn to swab the decks, (be back later tonight). So far t'day my only thoughts be thee: Nobody's behavior seems blatantly scummy. The whole blasted situation stinks more o' confusion to this sailor. I read the crew log on this page, and I for one cant make heads or tails of it. Yarrr....
|
|
|
Post by diggitcamara on Jun 4, 2007 18:32:56 GMT -5
Remember, I'm at a school where any webpage with the word "game" on it is firewalled. When I left earlier FCOD was still in the clear. Note that FCOD thought that, too. The second I got home, thinking I was still in time, I noticed several sudden FCOD votes, so I changed my vote before I read all the way through. Actually, I didn't remember you were the one who had potential firewall trouble. It's all explained by bad luck, then.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jun 4, 2007 19:01:37 GMT -5
It be me turn to swab the decks, (be back later tonight). So far t'day my only thoughts be thee: Nobody's behavior seems blatantly scummy. The whole blasted situation stinks more o' confusion to this sailor. I read the crew log on this page, and I for one cant make heads or tails of it. Yarrr.... Auto, I really hope you come in and post something sustantive today. I like the color you provide, but please contibute to the game! Nobody wants to see you bite it for not posting. I'll happily see you swing for piratey-ness. Be you pirate or be you crew, get your arse up out of your rack and up to the deck and get to work!
|
|
|
Post by ArizonaTeach on Jun 4, 2007 19:43:25 GMT -5
Actually, I didn't remember you were the one who had potential firewall trouble. It's all explained by bad luck, then. Well, that was oddly...passive-aggresive...
|
|
|
Post by autolycus on Jun 4, 2007 21:02:38 GMT -5
While I mightn't be a nautical Einstein, I've posted a few tidbits to ponder. But, ye got a point that we cant be goin' around with a crew of slackin' landlubbers.
Thar be two approaches to keepin' us all from enterin' Davy Jones locker. The best way of course bein' to catch the yellow-bellied dogs that be guttin' our crew. Yes, yes, but like I said before, these not be yer average sons of biscuit eaters, no sir. Port Cecil is well known for it's wily sailors. Yarrrrrgh.
We ain't caught nobody in a net of lies yet, so what other behaviors kin' we look for? Well, a pirate would want ta sew dissent in the crew, savvy? This can be done by "smudging" people and generally voting and unvoting frequently. Thar be the possibility that teh crewmate is overzealous or lackin 'is wits, but me gut dont 'tink so.
Nay, an honest crewman would settle for a target and push him into slippin' up. Am I right eh? So, for t'day's list of suspects, we should start by lookin' at those caught up in all tha shitstorm yesterday.
Thankee to Lakai for his list, these be the crewmates' vote activity count:
(Vote and Unvote count as 1)
Honky Monky: 9 Pleonast: 5 Gadarene: 5 Capybara: 5 NAF: 5 Zuma: 3 Autolycus: 3 Mhaye: 3 Diggit Camera: 3 FCOD: 3 Hal Briston: 1 Panama Jack: 1
So, as ye can see, Hockey Monkey is all over the place. Yo ho ho, HM, ye gave me some advice and now I'll return the favor. Stop bein' so paranoid and focus your efforts. Watch who your finger be pointin' at or you might soon lose it, savvy?
In fact, I'm not s' sure if you're bein' sincere or not with your vote fest, so I'll get tha ball rollin'
Avast ye! Vote Hockey Monkey[/b].
|
|
|
Post by capybara on Jun 4, 2007 21:44:27 GMT -5
To complete Auto's count (why a selective cast, by the way?)
This is total activity-- all votes and unvotes counted (if an unvote and vote count as 1 in your system, why am I up at 5? I haven't checked all of your numbers-- everyone can check their own math)
AZ Teach 7 Mad 5 Idle Thoughts 3 Lakai 1 Tiral 1 Cowgirl 1 BM 1
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jun 4, 2007 21:46:12 GMT -5
While I mightn't be a nautical Einstein, I've posted a few tidbits to ponder. But, ye got a point that we cant be goin' around with a crew of slackin' landlubbers. Thar be two approaches to keepin' us all from enterin' Davy Jones locker. The best way of course bein' to catch the yellow-bellied dogs that be guttin' our crew. Yes, yes, but like I said before, these not be yer average sons of biscuit eaters, no sir. Port Cecil is well known for it's wily sailors. Yarrrrrgh. We ain't caught nobody in a net of lies yet, so what other behaviors kin' we look for? Well, a pirate would want ta sew dissent in the crew, savvy? This can be done by "smudging" people and generally voting and unvoting frequently. Thar be the possibility that teh crewmate is overzealous or lackin 'is wits, but me gut dont 'tink so. Nay, an honest crewman would settle for a target and push him into slippin' up. Am I right eh? So, for t'day's list of suspects, we should start by lookin' at those caught up in all tha shitstorm yesterday. Thankee to Lakai for his list, these be the crewmates' vote activity count: (Vote and Unvote count as 1) Honky Monky: 9 Pleonast: 5 Gadarene: 5 Capybara: 5 NAF: 5 Zuma: 3 Autolycus: 3 Mhaye: 3 Diggit Camera: 3 FCOD: 3 Hal Briston: 1 Panama Jack: 1 So, as ye can see, Hockey Monkey is all over the place. Yo ho ho, HM, ye gave me some advice and now I'll return the favor. Stop bein' so paranoid and focus your efforts. Watch who your finger be pointin' at or you might soon lose it, savvy? In fact, I'm not s' sure if you're bein' sincere or not with your vote fest, so I'll get tha ball rollin' Avast ye! Vote Hockey Monkey [/b]. [/quote] First of all, Auto, thank you for stepping it up. I appreciate the analysis. Yep, I have made 9 total votes over the course of the game. Three on Day One, which isn't unusual. Up until the first deadling on Day Two, I had made three more. Again, I don't find it that unusual. Then the extension because of the tie made me re-examine my vote for Mhaye. I unvoted him, voted Panama Jack, then revoted Mhaye. Then today, I started out with my previous vote for Panama Jack. Since I was in the middle of the clusterfuck that ended Day Two, I still really don't think it's all that strange. When did you get a list from Lakai? I don't remember him posting a voting record. Pleonast did, but it didn't include Day One. I haven't gone back to examine the rest of your list for accuracy yet. Just wanted to make sure you got mine right. I'm trying to find pirates, not create confusion. Maybe that does make one look paranoid. Ack! I'm done defending. You guys have had a microscope on me for a while now. I would like to put some more people under it to see what we can find. Auntbeast, can I borrow those asbestos panties?
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jun 4, 2007 21:52:24 GMT -5
And to combine capy's question with mine...
Why did you use an incomplete crew manifest attributed to Lakai? Am I just not reading something right? First thought that occured was that Auto got his list from the pirate board. Maybe that's just me being paranoid though. ;D
|
|
|
Post by capybara on Jun 4, 2007 21:54:17 GMT -5
Well, he DID say "these be the crewmates' vote activity count"
Har har.
|
|