|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:06:55 GMT -5
Ok, I just took this from the rules. Even if Peeker claims he could still be a witch, unless he has a holy role and then he shouldn't claim. See, it's confusing already. You can't trust any claim. By claim, I meant peeker needs to claim a Type, because as you say, a Character claim is next to useless. peeker's statements imply they are not a Basic Vanilla. So let's look at the options: 1. Holy Villager: Witches already know now that peeker is Holy, <snipped> ok, i am just probably not up to speed for this endeavor anymore. but how do you reach this conclusion?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:18:36 GMT -5
well, as usual i put my foot in it and what appears to be a lynch brigade has formed. i am in fact holy. i find it highly unlikely that i will be killed toNight if i survive the Day.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:24:56 GMT -5
I am happy leaving my vote on peeker, even more now that he has disappeared. sorry to be rude but this is chickenshit. i've probably got more posts on this Day than you do. and do you really think that i would go awol after stating that my number one scum tell is going awol once you get heat unless i really had some major carp come up? so, i think you are fool of poo (sorry tex i like you so you don't get the total reaming).
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:28:48 GMT -5
ah yes, i do. 34 to 5. i guess based on your fucking logic you should vote for yourself instead, right? maybe seven times in a row just to make it even, right? or are you just pulling stuff out of your ear (remember i like you)?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:43:24 GMT -5
and this is a public service announcement. most of my fb friends know that my wife and i are really engaged with fostering dogs. we had our first set of 9 puppies and mama about three months ago (one pup sadly died after about three days). they were about 2 or 3 days old when we got them. but all of them have found their forever families (5 in new hampshire, go figure). it only took twelve weeks. they were swimming on saturday in san antonio and on wednesday in new hampshire they had two feet of snow to experience. we've got two new ones that leave on saturday for rhode island. and we pick up 9 more puppies and their mama on sunday that are about a week old. this really is a great service if you care for strays. most rescue groups are real good about helping find permanent homes. the only effort is feeding, cleaning and playing. think about it my friends. i'm not as bad of sonofabitch asshole as you folks might think.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 17:47:46 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Sai on Apr 29, 2013 17:49:22 GMT -5
Do we have enough time to force a CC? If so, Peeker should claim NUN/BISHOP or ACOLYE/PRIEST.
|
|
|
Post by Sai on Apr 29, 2013 17:52:53 GMT -5
I am confused about hammers and deadline voting. If peeker reaches 13 before EOD, is that the EOD? If peeker does not reach 13 before EOD does that mean no one is lynched? Is there no longer a way to deadline vote, i.e. vote without hammering? Yes. Yes. No.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 18:46:30 GMT -5
Do we have enough time to force a CC? If so, Peeker should claim NUN/BISHOP or ACOLYE/PRIEST. crimminy i don't know if it's the board set up or time warner (my most likely suspect) but carp it takes forever to load a durn page. i don't know about timing but i do know one other person. and as i stated earlier i think i be cool toNight. might need some help the next Night, however.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Apr 29, 2013 19:30:02 GMT -5
With no death reveal, I don't even know what to do with claims in general. Even if peeker claims a specific role and we get a counter claim, do we get any evidence of who was right when one of them dies?
This seems like a total crap-shoot.
I'm willing to lynch silverjan like my second(non-counting, mind you) vote says, but I'm not sure what do do. May we have a vote count?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 21:02:18 GMT -5
With no death reveal, I don't even know what to do with claims in general. Even if peeker claims a specific role and we get a counter claim, do we get any evidence of who was right when one of them dies? This seems like a total crap-shoot. I'm willing to lynch silverjan like my second(non-counting, mind you) vote says, but I'm not sure what do do. May we have a vote count? well at least i can confirm one other. but you are kind of right in the fact that without death reveals you kind of have to put your bet or red or black, so to speak. hey, i didn't read the rules that closely and kind of stuck my foot in it. i just read the part about 10 basic villagers and kind of figured they were nillers. my bad, apparently. especially if town and scum coordinate to lynch a town power role i will owe the rest of town my apologies. and once again this is what chaps my ass about the way this game is played on this board. i talk a lot and obviously leave myself open to lots of shenanigans by baddies. fuck, texcat goobered me for being awol although i have 7 times the amount of posts. that's the kind of carp that irks me to no end. lynch the loud. let the silent get a pass. that's fucked.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 21:07:10 GMT -5
and i don't give a rat's ass but one person i will not vote to lynch is pleo. shit, at least he's making comments.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 21:26:47 GMT -5
I am happy leaving my vote on peeker, even more now that he has disappeared. sorry to be rude but this is chickenshit. i've probably got more posts on this Day than you do. and do you really think that i would go awol after stating that my number one scum tell is going awol once you get heat unless i really had some major carp come up? so, i think you are fool of poo (sorry tex i like you so you don't get the total reaming). quoting myself but .... ok, this one is making my hackles rise on re read. a vote for an obvious false reason that is a pile on. youbetcha, got one. unvote allvote tex
|
|
|
Post by Sai on Apr 29, 2013 21:28:27 GMT -5
With no death reveal, I don't even know what to do with claims in general. Even if peeker claims a specific role and we get a counter claim, do we get any evidence of who was right when one of them dies? This seems like a total crap-shoot. I'm willing to lynch silverjan like my second(non-counting, mind you) vote says, but I'm not sure what do do. May we have a vote count? If he doesn't get CCed but gets hit, it means that role cannot be claimed later, which is still useful information.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 21:31:32 GMT -5
and are we still doing the red and blue vote thingy? because some of them come across like turquoise or purple or some odd shit. or is it just the new board? or have we change the fucking colors since i last played?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Apr 29, 2013 21:32:33 GMT -5
change = changed. gosh drat it.
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on Apr 29, 2013 21:39:02 GMT -5
I am happy leaving my vote on peeker, even more now that he has disappeared. @ crys, what on earth is that bear supposed to be doing? I am confused about hammers and deadline voting. If peeker reaches 13 before EOD, is that the EOD? If peeker does not reach 13 before EOD does that mean no one is lynched? Is there no longer a way to deadline vote, i.e. vote without hammering? If someone does not reach 13 votes before deadline there will be no lynch. I personally will still count deadline votes as I'm the one keeping track of votes.
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Apr 29, 2013 21:54:37 GMT -5
Do we have a vote count? as day ends in 10 mins correct?
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Apr 29, 2013 21:55:53 GMT -5
Vote Peeker How do you do the color on the new boards???
|
|
|
Post by Paranoia on Apr 29, 2013 22:13:53 GMT -5
End Of Day Votals
Peeker (13): dizzymrslizzy, Pleo, Texcat, Guiri, Swammerdami, Mahaloth, Cookies, JBG, scathach, sario, lauriern, Colby11, Patricia Sai (2): crys, Silverjan silverjan (2): Sai, Gnarlycharlie Texcat (1): Peeker
Abstaining (9): Idle Thoughts, Wombat, lauriern, BillMC, Colby, JBG, Pollux, Hal
WITH THESE VOTES, PEEKER HAS BEEN LYNCHED. PLEASE STAND BY FOR NIGHT.
|
|
|
Post by crys on Apr 30, 2013 10:56:42 GMT -5
I am happy leaving my vote on peeker, even more now that he has disappeared. @ crys, what on earth is that bear supposed to be doing? I am confused about hammers and deadline voting. If peeker reaches 13 before EOD, is that the EOD? If peeker does not reach 13 before EOD does that mean no one is lynched? Is there no longer a way to deadline vote, i.e. vote without hammering? Honestly I'm not sure I just thought it was funny lol
|
|