|
Post by Chameleon on Oct 21, 2013 19:10:56 GMT -5
Chameleon, are you vanilla? Or a mason(the "bretheren" portion)? I am vanilla.
|
|
|
Post by Chameleon on Oct 21, 2013 19:33:05 GMT -5
Unvote: Patricia
Clearly many of you think my actions are anti-Town so I will unvote Patricia for now because getting myself lynched is also anti-Town. Plus there are a few counters to my ideas that I think have some merit. I'm still leaning towards the fact that I'm right, but less certain.
|
|
|
Post by Chameleon on Oct 21, 2013 20:23:10 GMT -5
OMG, my posts scared everyone away! So of course I make another post
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 1:55:40 GMT -5
Chameleon, are you vanilla? Or a mason(the "bretheren" portion)? Another person to out themselves as not Vanilla Town! This is only good for Town if you are scum. I have re-read all Mahaloth's posts and there is a whole lot of.....nothing. Vote: MahalothWow, if that is true, you got screwed big time, lastdays. It's too lame to believe, though. Vote lastdaysThis is one post that pinged me, why would he worry about TLD being screwed? Surely he wants scum lynched?
|
|
|
Post by Chameleon on Oct 22, 2013 2:01:00 GMT -5
Because he didn't know TLD was Scum until after he was lynched - remember TLD claimed to be 3rd party.
I do agree with your evaluation that Mahaloth's posts contain a "whole lot of....nothing" though.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 5:21:52 GMT -5
Because he didn't know TLD was Scum until after he was lynched - remember TLD claimed to be 3rd party. I do agree with your evaluation that Mahaloth's posts contain a "whole lot of....nothing" though. Now, I rather think he did know that TLD was scum before he was lynched.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Oct 22, 2013 8:32:24 GMT -5
catching up. good to see TLD was scum. glad to be wrong. one kill last Night. it does seem that there isn't a vig or PFK. since this isn't a particularly large game, that seems right. Last night I decided to track Plankton - mostly because I didn't like how he was picking apart Pleo claim and pushing that somehow Colby knew about Pleo Role it all seems like he was looking for a reason cover his vote. Anyway, last night Plankton visited Chameleon It's a pity we can't get a result from SP. YesterDay I was sure there was something funny about Chameleon but when he started delving into things last Night, I sort of changed my mind. Now that I know I wasn't the only one to think there was something suspicious about him I don't know what to think anymore. what was funny about Chameleon?Anyway, last night Plankton visited Chameleon Well isn't that interesting? Are you trying to infer simply that Plankton found me suspicious or are you planning to try and build some kind of case to say I killed him? Very convenient since I've been quite vocal about finding you suspicious. Here's what I think - I'm right about you being Scum (tracker or not) and you're panicking so need to make me appear suspicious. What's really awesome is that if this is your intention and you're actually successful in getting Town to lynch me then, when I flip Town, you are suspect numero uno. Here's my role PM: You are a Quadling. Like all your brethren, you have a propensity toward wearing red, and your home is in the South of Oz. In the Emerald City, you wear Green, of course -- Oz culture is fairly big on sartorial conformity. Town wins when all threats to Town have been eliminated. If Town want to lynch me to find out whether I'm lying or not then I completely understand, although it's in Town's best interest, and my own, to preserve my life. I have no other power than my vote (which I believe is significant). My last theory was that those who voted for TLD and Fruit are more likely to be Town than those who voted for TLD only (potentially to buy Town credibility by sacrificing a fellow Scum, who's power, I believe, was used up, and not having votes on a player they were poisoning and knew would flip Town). This theory worked at least in regards to Suburban Plankton, who voted for both and flipped Town. Based on this I also think that SilverJan and Pleonast are more likely Town than Scum. I'm a little more wary of Pleonast as he had, and then removed, a vote on Patricia, but that could just be coincidence. Vote: Patricia - for my previous suspicions of her and for her trying to make me appear suspicious because of my suspicions of her. Also because I'm still thinking Town seems investigative-type role heavy ( Fruit and SP) and that a Scum tracker could be a balancing feature. And she only voted for TLD. Vote: Dizzymrslizzy - for being so defensive of Patricia and supporting her lead in making me appear suspicious - and my voting theory (she also only voted for TLD). it seems you are overreacting. patricia just stated her results. Chameleon, are you vanilla? Or a mason(the "bretheren" portion)? Another person to out themselves as not Vanilla Town! This is only good for Town if you are scum. I have re-read all Mahaloth's posts and there is a whole lot of.....nothing. Vote: MahalothWow, if that is true, you got screwed big time, lastdays. It's too lame to believe, though. Vote lastdaysThis is one post that pinged me, why would he worry about TLD being screwed? Surely he wants scum lynched? TLD would be screwed if his role was true. the wincon seemed difficult to achieve. Because he didn't know TLD was Scum until after he was lynched - remember TLD claimed to be 3rd party. I do agree with your evaluation that Mahaloth's posts contain a "whole lot of....nothing" though. Now, I rather think he did know that TLD was scum before he was lynched. why do you think that? ------------------------------------------------ you two are pinging me. i think at least one of you are scum. Vote: Chameleon Vote: silverjan
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 10:09:32 GMT -5
gnarlycharlie, if you had caught up on all the posts properly then you would have known what I was talking about, instead, you walk in and throw down a couple of votes and it looks as if you haven't even read eveything. Skimming is a scum tell
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Oct 22, 2013 10:10:55 GMT -5
Chameleon, are you vanilla? Or a mason(the "bretheren" portion)? And another player soft-claims that they are not vanilla. Since you're likely near the top of the scum hit-list, please let us know sooner rather than later any useful information you may have. As for your first point - I corrected myself here (before anyone said anything about it) because in re-reading I realized that I was forgetting half of what I wanted to say. I actually think Fruit was more likely killed by Scum and that all of Scum knew he was going to die. I addressed this correction in my responses to Bill. So your first point for voting for me is based on not reading or not remembering all my comments and not acknowledging my correction. I read and remembered your "correction", but it did not change my assessment of your earlier post. The fact that you yourself saw how suspicious your post was and responded to it before anyone does not mitigate its suspiciousness. As for your other points - fair enough. I really do believe that TLD was martyred and I accept that no one agrees with me. I do think Lizzy is still suspicious for accusing me of leaving something out of my role PM when she clearly didn't compare it to the sample in the rules. Soft claiming to be not vanilla is not suspicious in itself, even if it was inadvertent. This is one post that pinged me, why would he worry about TLD being screwed? Surely he wants scum lynched? I generally don't like the "skimming is a scum tell" tell, but this post really strikes me as scum looking for something "suspicious" while completely missing the context. vote silverjan for skimming and smudging all at once.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Oct 22, 2013 10:12:06 GMT -5
gnarlycharlie, if you had caught up on all the posts properly then you would have known what I was talking about, instead, you walk in and throw down a couple of votes and it looks as if you haven't even read eveything. Skimming is a scum tell Pot, meet kettle.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 10:20:59 GMT -5
gnarlycharlie, if you had caught up on all the posts properly then you would have known what I was talking about, instead, you walk in and throw down a couple of votes and it looks as if you haven't even read eveything. Skimming is a scum tell Pot, meet kettle. Ack!!! That wasn't my only reason, haven't you noticed he hasn't said anything of significance the whole game. Didn't that particular post that I quoted ping you at all? AND it was not a smudge, it was a VOTE!
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 22, 2013 10:24:58 GMT -5
Chameleon (3,3): dizzymrslizzy [7]; Pleonast [18]; gnarlycharlie [36]
dizzymrslizzy (2,2): Chameleon [6]; silverjan [17] Mahaloth (2,2): Pleonast [18]; silverjan [33] Meeko (2,2): Pleonast [18]; Mahaloth [24] silverjan (2,2): gnarlycharlie [36]; Pleonast [38]
xarchangelx (1,1): Pleonast [18] BillMc (1,1): Pleonast [18]
patricia (0,1): Chameleon [6,31]
With these votes, Chameleon will be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Oct 22, 2013 11:18:12 GMT -5
Ack!!! That wasn't my only reason, haven't you noticed he hasn't said anything of significance the whole game. Didn't that particular post that I quoted ping you at all? AND it was not a smudge, it was a VOTE!I'm already voting Mahaloth, based on their late vote on Last, so yes I find them to be suspicious. But no, I do not find "Wow, if that is true, you got screwed big time, lastdays. It's too lame to believe, though." to be suspicious at all. It pretty much echoed my sentiments. Your comment about it though, completely missed the context of that statement. That skimming on your part, combined with the accusation based on it, looks very suspicious to me. I'll concede that my suspicion of you is barely enough to warrant a vote, and I may drop it later depending on how the Day goes.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 12:07:52 GMT -5
Pleo, I wasn't actually skimming, I was reading all Mahaloth's posts by themselves i.e. everything that he had posted in the game so I could have taken it out of context but I was by no means skimming, just reading one persons posts.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Oct 22, 2013 12:16:17 GMT -5
vote silverjan for skimming and smudging all at once. Okay, then, I'll rephrase: unvote silverjanvote silverjan for making an accusation while taking a post out of context.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 22, 2013 13:00:28 GMT -5
vote silverjan for skimming and smudging all at once. Okay, then, I'll rephrase: unvote silverjanvote silverjan for making an accusation while taking a post out of context. Whatever
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Oct 22, 2013 18:39:35 GMT -5
gnarlycharlie, if you had caught up on all the posts properly then you would have known what I was talking about, instead, you walk in and throw down a couple of votes and it looks as if you haven't even read eveything. Skimming is a scum tell then explain what i missed. 'skimming is a scum tell' really is outdated. thanks for the smudge.
|
|
|
Post by Chameleon on Oct 22, 2013 19:10:41 GMT -5
I think a hell of a lot of people are skimming, or else I don't write in English, because I feel like a lot of what I've been trying to say has been overlooked or misunderstood. I've spent a good amount of time explaining things and responding to concerns yet only bits of what I've been saying are being cherry picked for convenience.
Many of you believed my role PM and believe I'm Town, yet, here I am as the top lynch candidate. I don't care if this is OMGUS but I'm positive that at least one of those voting for me is Scum (but probably more), so:
Vote: Pleonast Vote: Gnarlycharlie
And yup, that's because you're voting for Town. A Town I believe has figured out more than you're comfortable with. A Town who bowed to peer pressure and took her vote off of a supposed Town Power, just in case.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on Oct 22, 2013 19:35:28 GMT -5
I'm throwing a vote out early. Vote Meeko for his pointless post about not having a read. Pressure to speak, perhaps? So you want me to participate less? Thus making less pressure on you? Vote: MahaAt the intersection of OMGUS Smudge and Opportunism are we?
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Oct 22, 2013 20:30:20 GMT -5
I'm throwing a vote out early. Vote Meeko for his pointless post about not having a read. Pressure to speak, perhaps? So you want me to participate less? Thus making less pressure on you? Vote: MahaAt the intersection of OMGUS Smudge and Opportunism are we? Nope. Still, your reaction makes me suspect your further. My vote is staying for now.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Oct 22, 2013 20:30:41 GMT -5
Chameleon, are you vanilla? Or a mason(the "bretheren" portion)? I am vanilla. I believe you.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Oct 22, 2013 20:35:55 GMT -5
Vote dizzy Vote Pleo Vote gnarly
I believe Chameleon's claim and therefore, can support killing anyone voting for her.
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Oct 23, 2013 0:29:11 GMT -5
Vote dizzy Vote Pleo Vote gnarly
I believe Chameleon's claim and therefore, can support killing anyone voting for her. Just because a person is voting for someone that you believe is vanilla town as they claim does not mean that they are wrong. Heck, everyone could think that someone is town, and turn up scum. Voting for people because of their vote alone is not justification for a vote, unless their reasoning sucks.... Which you don't even cover. You just vote them because they are voting for person A. Vote: Mahaloth And if Mahaloth flips scum, I'm taking a hard look at Chameleon.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Oct 23, 2013 1:14:15 GMT -5
gnarlycharlie, if you had caught up on all the posts properly then you would have known what I was talking about, instead, you walk in and throw down a couple of votes and it looks as if you haven't even read eveything. Skimming is a scum tell then explain what i missed. 'skimming is a scum tell' really is outdated. thanks for the smudge. I did put a smiley face at the end to show I was joking about the skimming is scum bit, apparently that was too subtle. I just felt that Chameleon's votes on Patricia were very strange seeing as there was/is a good chance that Patricia really is a Town Power role. However, Chameleon has put an awful lot of work into this game and she has come up with some good points and I believe her to be Town. You placed votes on someone I think is Town and someone I know is Town and it didn't sit well with me at the time.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on Oct 23, 2013 6:48:52 GMT -5
Vote dizzy Vote Pleo Vote gnarly
I believe Chameleon's claim and therefore, can support killing anyone voting for her. This takes away from your "case" on me, don't you think?
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 23, 2013 6:52:23 GMT -5
Vote dizzy Vote Pleo Vote gnarly
I believe Chameleon's claim and therefore, can support killing anyone voting for her. I'm with Colby, this vote is way too easy and opportunistic, and makes no sense. We're talking about a claimed vanilla, not a claimed power role. You may be right and Chameleon may be plain Vanilla Town, but I don't like their play, and don't think they've been very anti-town. Vote: Mahaloth
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 23, 2013 6:57:58 GMT -5
And /OOG- I have the culmination of all of my work for my fundraiser dinner happening between today and tomorrow with the dinner being tomorrow night. I'll probably not be able to check in until Friday afternoon at best.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Oct 23, 2013 9:34:32 GMT -5
Vote dizzy Vote Pleo Vote gnarly
I believe Chameleon's claim and therefore, can support killing anyone voting for her. It's a little odd that you use the term "killing" when the rest of us are lynching. But at least your list is accurate this time.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 23, 2013 10:21:39 GMT -5
Good Morning and Chocolate Chai Tea is the best thing EVAR Vote Count:
Mahaloth (6,6): Pleonast [18]; Mahaloth [24]; silverjan [33]; Meeko [48]; Colby11 [52]; dizzymrslizzy [55]
dizzymrslizzy (3,3): Chameleon [6]; silverjan [17]; Mahaloth [51] Chameleon (3,3): dizzymrslizzy [7]; Pleonast [18]; gnarlycharlie [36]
silverjan (2,2): gnarlycharlie [36]; Pleonast [38,44,44] Pleonast (2,2): Chameleon [47]; Mahaloth [51] gnarlycharlie (2,2): Chameleon [47]; Mahaloth [51]
xarchangelx (1,1): Pleonast [18] BillMc (1,1): Pleonast [18] Meeko (1,1): Pleonast [18]
patricia (0,1): Chameleon [6,31]
With these votes, Mahaloth will be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Oct 23, 2013 11:55:25 GMT -5
Anyone else find it odd that no one was poisoned today? Was that a one time kill? Was that TLD unstoppable kill he claimed? Was someone Poisoned but hasn't spoken up? Is the poisoner dead? Seems odd to me that fruit was poisoned - no one claimed they could nor did anyone cure him - so that would seem more fair if the poison was a one time shot or a unstoppable kill?
I don't like how Mahaloth is throwing votes down on anyone voting for someone he thinks is town - I would like to see him voting on people he thinks are scum. This is either lazy or a scum looking for a safe vote. Saying you believe Chameleon claim is fine as I believe it as well but voting for everyone voting for her is a sure way to the gallows.
|
|