|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 22, 2014 22:31:13 GMT -5
Gnarly, you still haven't denied visiting Colby.
Did you visit him?
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 22, 2014 22:32:46 GMT -5
The visitors to Colby arrived in a specific order and Gnarly was last. After some not so illuminating discussion with the mod, I am assuming that the order of visitors corresponds with the order in which actions are resolved. Therefore, I think that the roleblocker and the death foiler were the first two visitors and that Gnarly was the scum killer. That seems like a rather large assumption to make based on "some not so illuminating discussion".
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 22:36:12 GMT -5
And yet you are sharing nothing? i'm not the one under pressure. Suburban, we need to share. quid quo pro abd all that. anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 22:37:19 GMT -5
Gnarly, you still haven't denied visiting Colby. Did you visit him? i haven't denied because it's true. i can also say that he has been truthful.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 22, 2014 22:37:44 GMT -5
Yep, I agree, it is a big assumption. And I'm not even sure of the order in which actions are resolved. But I assume roleblocks and protections have to come before kills.
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 22, 2014 22:40:42 GMT -5
Votes: Mahaloth [4]: texcat (76), Captain Klutz (95), colby11 (101), Paranoia (102), Suburban Plankton (139) texcat [2]: gnarlycharlie (26), gnarlycharlie (40), Silver Jan (42), dizzymrslizzy (45), Chameleon (-78), patricia (98), storyteller0910 (124), Paranoia (-130), texcat (-133), Suburban Plankton (136) gnarlycharlie [1]: Paranoia (24), texcat (37), patricia (48), Chameleon (78) Silver Jan [1]: Pleonast (51), Pleonast (59) Swammerdami [1]: Pleonast (51), Suburban Plankton (52) Suburban Plankton [1]: Swammerdami (58) Paranoia [0]: Swammerdami (16), gnarlycharlie (25) Chameleon [0]: gnarlycharlie (30) Meeko: [0] Pleonast (51) storyteller0910 [-1]: texcat (17), Swammerdami (-35)
Investigations: Meeko [8]: Captain Klutz (9), Meeko (-11), Silver Jan (12), Swammerdami (16), texcat (17), patricia (18), dizzymrslizzy (20), Paranoia (24), Chameleon (29), Mahaloth (33), Swammerdami (-35), storyteller0910 (46), Suburban Plankton (55) Paranoia [2]: gnarlycharlie (25), Swammerdami (35) Captain Klutz [1]: Meeko (11) Silver Jan [0]: Chameleon (13)
With these votes, Mahaloth will be lynched and Meeko will be investigated. Day two ends in twenty minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 22, 2014 22:44:15 GMT -5
And yet you are sharing nothing? i'm not the one under pressure. Suburban, we need to share. quid quo pro abd all that. anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too. Er, what? Who needs to share what? I certainly have no plans to share anything at the moment; why should I? I'll share when I have something useful to talk about, which I don't at this time. As for the last sentence there, I assume 'wr' is a typo for 'we', but that makes the sentence "anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too" Are you calling for a mass claim?
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 22:47:16 GMT -5
i'm not the one under pressure. Suburban, we need to share. quid quo pro abd all that. anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too. Er, what? Who needs to share what? I certainly have no plans to share anything at the moment; why should I? I'll share when I have something useful to talk about, which I don't at this time. As for the last sentence there, I assume 'wr' is a typo for 'we', but that makes the sentence "anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too" Are you calling for a mass claim? it was sarcasm. she won't share and is asking why i won't. well i can't affect the result. wonder why Klutz hasn't voted.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 22, 2014 22:52:51 GMT -5
Yes, no vote yet.
I don't want to lynch Texcat, and I don't feel comfortable voting for Mahaloth.
I am intrigued that Mahaloth has not antivoted himelf, nor put up much defence.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 22, 2014 22:53:25 GMT -5
Er, what? Who needs to share what? I certainly have no plans to share anything at the moment; why should I? I'll share when I have something useful to talk about, which I don't at this time. As for the last sentence there, I assume 'wr' is a typo for 'we', but that makes the sentence "anyone who reads this, wr need to claim too" Are you calling for a mass claim? it was sarcasm. she won't share and is asking why i won't. well i can't affect the result. wonder why Klutz hasn't voted. Oh. [Emily Litella] Never mind. [/EL] It bothers me too that Klutz hasn't voted. It may be because he's also a PFK, and now knows that Mahaloth must be also, so if Mahaloth gets killed then he's next on the block. Of course, the flip side is that he's Town, and now knows that Mahaloth is as well, and is therefore conflicted. I'm hoping that's not the case.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 22, 2014 22:55:45 GMT -5
Huh? The flip side is that he's scum, and knows ...
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 22:56:44 GMT -5
well five minutes. can you actually cause a Texcat lynch? seems your vote can't.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 22, 2014 22:57:33 GMT -5
NE: How would a townie Klutz know that Mahaloth is townie? Or that I am townie for that matter?
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Jan 22, 2014 22:59:16 GMT -5
Why do you want to lynch me, Gnarly? You know that my role as watcher is correct. Why are you defending Mahaloth?
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 22:59:19 GMT -5
if Klutz us truthful about his additional wincon i'm giving them a town lean.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 23:01:08 GMT -5
Why do you want to lynch me, Gnarly? You know that my role as watcher is correct. Why are you defending Mahaloth? i was merely saying that all his hesitation won't change the result. Mahaloth is going. as for wanting you lynched i have said why.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on Jan 22, 2014 23:02:41 GMT -5
looks like his time is up. he reaches one wincon without laying a vote...if he's truthful.
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 22, 2014 23:07:29 GMT -5
Day has ended. Lynch, flavor, and night thread to come.
|
|