|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 29, 2014 16:40:07 GMT -5
So it seems that we have a dilemma with the 'competing' claims from dizzymrslizzy and patricia. And it seems that we have collectively chosen to believe dizzy. I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but I do wonder why. dizzy claimed Tracker earlier today under no particular pressure, revealing at the same time that Meeko visited no-one last Night. She later offered up the fact that Meeko was her personal target. This was just after swammerdami repeated his request that all Townies name their targets. And then in response to Captain Klutz's investigation (which he freely admitted is of questionable value at this point in time), she posted her full PM, naming 'Filip Shenk' as her target. patricia made a full claim Today in Post 71, one post after Silver Jan voted her for lack of participation. patricia whotes Meeko's FOS on everyone voting for him, and gives her full PM, also naming 'Filip Shenk' as her target, and claims Town "Protector" dizzy tracked SisC on Night 1; SisC turned up dead in the morning, so we have no way of validating her results. She tracked Meeko on Night 2, with the rather confusing result she gave in Post 27 Well, you may have hit a dud last night, but tonight you know that not only does your target have something to hide, you're certain he'll be out and about tonight. Moreover, whoever he chooses to target will be very valuable information to have when more things come to light. Which is why it's so frustrating when he doesn't even move outside his "room" once! You have determined that Meeko visited no-one. patricia protected Colby on Night 1, and gnarlycharlie on Night 2. Unfortunately, her protection is rather unusual Each night, you may select a player. If that player is targeted with any other actions that night by a player or players not aligned with the town, those actions will fail. However, your ability will NOT stop the mafia's kill, or any killing actions from any other alignments. So it would not have protected Colby from a Town-aligned Block on Night 1, and it wouldn't have protected gnarly from a Scum kill on Night 2...and I'm not sure if it would have protected him from a Third-Party kill nor not... I can't really see any good reason for either of them to have faked their claim. Neither was under any particular pressure; indeed, I don't see any reason that either of them needed to claim anything at all. patricia's claim in particular doesn't make a lot of sense as a fake claim; certainly she would have expected reactions pretty much exactly like what she's received. But at the same time, while I could see a Scum dizzy faking a Tracker claim, I don't know why wshe would have volunteered it at that point, and I really can't figure out why she would fake having Meeko as a target. That would run the risk of having someone 'counter-claim' her target, as indeed happened. Of course, it's worked out pretty well for dizzy so far, as it seems the town as a whole has decided to believe her. Whether this is simply because she claimed first, or if it's because her claimed role is more 'mainstream, I'm not sure. But I can't find anything that strongly points to either of them being more likely to be telling the truth. And of course, it's possible that they are both being truthful. Maybe they both do need Meeko dead. Right now, we've got about 30+ hours until EoD. It seems like we had some good discussion going up until patricia's claim, then there was a quick flurry of votes on patricia, and then a whole lot of silence. I don't know what to make of the sudden lull. By my count, the vote is currently patricia (4): Silver Jan (71), dizzymrslizzy (80), Captain Klutz (83), swammerdami (84) Colby11 (2): Meeko (43), Suburban Plankton (78) storyteller0910 (1): BillMc (3), Pleonast (46-46)BillMc (1): storyteller0910 (5) Meeko (1): Colby11 (12-81), Paranoia (13), patricia (16), Meeko (-44) Silver Jan (1): Pleonast (66) dizzymrslizzy (0): swammerdami (22-30), Pleonast (46-66)Suburban Plankton (0): swammerdami (30-84)Pleonast (-1): Silver Jan (57-71), Captain Klutz (61-83), swammerdami (-65) I'm leaving my vote on Colby for now.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jan 29, 2014 16:42:48 GMT -5
And that's what I get for not reading the whole thread before responding. I also like Chameleon's accusations towards Patricia..... If you are a "protector" then why didn't you protect Colby against the block on N1? Vote: PatriciaFor the reasons of: 1) Claiming to be a protector but then doesn't protect the Soft Claimed Doc from a Roleblocker 2) Claiming to have the same target as me. 3) I don't believe your Role PM at all Thank you, lizzy, for actually writing out your reasons for voting. Especially because I'm very much skimming this game. I'm not sure how incriminating your points 2 and 3 are, but 1 is convicting. patricia's claimed power is Each night, you may select a player. If that player is targeted with any other actions that night by a player or players not aligned with the town, those actions will fail. However, your ability will NOT stop the mafia's kill, or any killing actions from any other alignments. You are a town-aligned protector. And claimed action is Night one I protected Colby But yet Colby11 claimed: Well, I should have checked my own messages..... "You gather what limited equipment you have, intent on ensuring that no harm comes to yourself this night. You slip quietly out of your room– and wake up hours later with a slight pain in your neck and a POUNDING headache. Either you got bitten by the world's largest underground mosquito and fainted from fright, or someone got the drop on you with a syringe full of God-knows-what. You have been roleblocked" If patrica is telling the truth, Colby could not've been blocked. It's extremely likely that one of them is lying. The only way they could both be telling the truth is if patricia was blocked, but either didn't know it, or forgot to tell us. unvote Silver Jan because this game had weird rules. vote patricia for lying about their power. If patricia flips town, Colby needs to be eliminated.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on Jan 30, 2014 2:11:04 GMT -5
I think Patricia's claim came at a very convenient time. I find it a bit strange that her target is the same as Dizzy's and it's a person that has already been investigated so there is a bit of information known there. It also puzzles me that Patricia didn't query this after Dizzy said who her target was. If that had been me I would have been jumping up and down and accusing Dizzy of lying, especially as we don't have other players having the same personal target, or if we do then they haven't said so. She didn't even mention that she and Dizzy had the same target. As other people have pointed out, according to her role, Colby should not have been blocked, he could have been killed but not blocked. I am fairly certain we have found scum here.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Jan 30, 2014 8:45:43 GMT -5
To me, it seems there was some form of mass block on N1. As I have previously stated, I was also blocked on N1.
My PM states that there is a belief that the West German is a defector, and that my town wincon needs the west german dead.
Now if it is indeed, town on town between Story and I, then having the town tear itself apart killing each other would seem to make it far too easy for a scum win.
Part of me is wondering whether we actually have a scum team at all, is it just town and third parties?
Story's reaction to my vote was uncharacteristic of him - so either genuine shock, or disgust at being caught. More interesting is the number of folk who immediately wrote it off as town on town - which seems to suggest they have additional information they aren't sharing.
Fruit seems to have gone to great lengths to keep everything in colour - the day/night colour, the investigation results or fails all have detailed colour.
Yet, the one thing that is glaringly not in color is Klutz's claim - kill the jack of all trades and explicitly stating that this says nothing about their alignment - this seems out of character compared to everything else.
Similarly, the colour refers to the scum as commies or soviets - not "the mafia" - yet both klutz and patricia's claims state "the mafia" - collaborative fail in faking claims?
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jan 30, 2014 8:46:38 GMT -5
If patrica is telling the truth, Colby could not've been blocked. It's extremely likely that one of them is lying. The only way they could both be telling the truth is if patricia was blocked, but either didn't know it, or forgot to tell us. unvote Silver Jan because this game had weird rules. vote patricia for lying about their power. If patricia flips town, Colby needs to be eliminated. ...what if the person who blocked Colby on Night One was Town, or harmless third party? Why would a Town player block Colby, you ask? Two possible reasons: 1. They think he's lying; or 2. They are a paranoid doctor who can protect a player at the cost of role blocking them. Certainly a common enough role. (Or, actually, a combination of the two - a paranoid doc who thinks Colby might be lying because if he's not, that's two protective roles, so blocktecting him helps a lot). And it seems to me this possibility would cover the most troublesome issue of all, which is: if Colby is Town and has been blocked by Scum as he claims, why is he not yet dead? Meeko, it would be tremendously helpful if you would reveal who you role blocked on Day One. If that person can confirm having been role blocked, then that helps demonstrate that you didn't block Mahaloth or Colby, which would be a useful piece of the puzzle for the rest of us if true.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jan 30, 2014 12:27:33 GMT -5
Fruit seems to have gone to great lengths to keep everything in colour - the day/night colour, the investigation results or fails all have detailed colour. Yet, the one thing that is glaringly not in color is Klutz's claim - kill the jack of all trades and explicitly stating that this says nothing about their alignment - this seems out of character compared to everything else. Similarly, the colour refers to the scum as commies or soviets - not "the mafia" - yet both klutz and patricia's claims state "the mafia" - collaborative fail in faking claims? I'm going to work from principle that color is not actionable. That means I'm not buying your case against story, and I'm not buying Klutz's defense of lizzy. ...what if the person who blocked Colby on Night One was Town, or harmless third party? Why would a Town player block Colby, you ask? Two possible reasons: 1. They think he's lying; or 2. They are a paranoid doctor who can protect a player at the cost of role blocking them. Certainly a common enough role. (Or, actually, a combination of the two - a paranoid doc who thinks Colby might be lying because if he's not, that's two protective roles, so blocktecting him helps a lot). And it seems to me this possibility would cover the most troublesome issue of all, which is: if Colby is Town and has been blocked by Scum as he claims, why is he not yet dead? Meeko, it would be tremendously helpful if you would reveal who you role blocked on Day One. If that person can confirm having been role blocked, then that helps demonstrate that you didn't block Mahaloth or Colby, which would be a useful piece of the puzzle for the rest of us if true. That is a good point. Also Bill's idea that there was a mass block on Night One. Meeko, will you tell us who you blocked on Night One?
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 30, 2014 13:29:47 GMT -5
I haven't been sure if I've been posting vote counts too often and cluttering the thread, so I decided to wait until asked this time. I'll probably do it every other IRL day next game day; that seems like a pretty good balance. I'm also going to unlock the previous days' threads so people can correctly quote from them. I assumed this forum, like others I've played on, allowed quoting from locked threads but prevented replying. Guess not!
Votes: patricia [5]: Silver Jan (71), dizzymrslizzy (80), Captain Klutz (83), Swammerdami (84), Pleonast (91) Colby11 [2]: Meeko (43), Suburban Plankton (76) Meeko [1]: Colby11 (12), Paranoia (13), patricia (16), Meeko (-44) storyteller0910 [1]: BillMc (3), Pleonast (46) BillMc [1]: storyteller0910 (5) Silver Jan [0]: Pleonast (66) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (22), Pleonast (46) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (30) Pleonast [-1]: Silver Jan (57), Captain Klutz (61), Swammerdami (-65)
Investigations: storyteller0910 [2]: Paranoia (13), patricia (16) Suburban Plankton [1]: Captain Klutz (83) Colby11 [1]: Swammerdami (84) patricia [0]: Captain Klutz (61) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (22) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (30)
With these votes, patricia will be lynched and storyteller0910 will be investigated. Day 3 ends in 9 hours.[/b]
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Jan 30, 2014 13:51:20 GMT -5
Well I didn't expect you all to see my claim as you have to me it seems the best way to help town get what little information I had - I didn't find it at all surprising the dizzy and I had the same target as our 2nd win con - It just made sense to me if most of town needs a 2nd person dead. Town would go out of their way kill each other off and scum could just sit back and watch that happen. I was very surprised to see that if "dizzy" needs Meeko dead why hasn't she vote for him? Not like he is acting at all townie - he didn't want to be investigated won't say who he blocked - not a very townie player if you ask me. But she is ready to jump on me because I have the same target? Seems she not concerned about meeting her win con only with getting rid of the person that may make someone else look harder at her claim. Well I have my vote on the person I feel is scum and that is meeko. I also know that I'm not scum so I will Unvote: Patricia
If I'm lynched today I still have a great shot at winning the game as Meeko rarely makes it to end game and with how he is playing in this one it doesn't look good for him. I don't have a good case to make on a scum but Meeko is my top choice for win stealing 3rd party - which would also be a good reason to have his role be the mark of two other players.
|
|
|
Post by swammerdami on Jan 30, 2014 14:13:04 GMT -5
The charges against Patricia really are weak. If she's Lynched and flips Town we'll have a Day without a useful vote record. I think I'll try a gambit. Unvote: PatriciaVote: MeekoUnantivote: PleonastAntivote: PatriciaBlame me if this backfires. But, with help, it should make the vote record more interesting.
|
|
|
Post by swammerdami on Jan 30, 2014 15:30:11 GMT -5
My gambit was met with silence. Astonished disbelief? Or just boredom?
I'll back off slightly and go to bed. Unantivote: Patricia
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jan 30, 2014 15:46:28 GMT -5
I'm beginning to have doubts about patricia being scum, but they're a lot more suspicious than Colby11 or Meeko. I'd change my vote to Silver Jan or dizzymrslizzy, but no else sees them as suspicious. I'm half-hoping I get Night-killed just to put more pressure on them.
Gah, I'm starting to sound like pizzaguy trying to trade for votes.
|
|
|
Post by Chameleon on Jan 30, 2014 15:46:43 GMT -5
Patricia, what are your thoughts about Colby being blocked Night 1? You claim to have protected him which, according to your role PM, means that you would have prevented him from being blocked (unless it was Town that blocked him)?
I think either Patricia or Colby must be lying and am also rather surprised that Colby is still alive after being blocked both nights. Also, what are the chances that there are 2 Town protectors? I wish I could vote for both of you. But since I can't and I find you equally suspicious I will go alphabetically.
Vote: Colby Investigate: Patricia
For the record I know that Colby was blocked on Night 1 and not by Town. If I must explain further I will, however I'm choosing not to at the moment to avoid placing an important pro-Town player at risk of being night killed.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Jan 30, 2014 15:47:12 GMT -5
Swammer you get a side eye glance from me?
Patricia claims that she protected Colby on N1 by her "PM" means that he couldn't be blocked, or have any actions taken on him aside from a kill....
N1 Colby was blocked.
Something doesn't add up. Add that with her anti-town play that she's voting Meeko just because he's her extra target? and then calls me out because I'm NOT. Guess what Patricia. I'm leaning Town on Meeko, Town isn't going to win if we eliminate everyone's extra targets ahead of scum hunting....So yeah I need Meeko Dead, and I almost didn't reveal my result on Meeko, but it was in Town's best interest for me to reveal it instead....and for ME to go for the Town play over the selfish me play at this point in time.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Jan 30, 2014 15:47:25 GMT -5
Swammer you get a side eye glance from me?
Patricia claims that she protected Colby on N1 by her "PM" means that he couldn't be blocked, or have any actions taken on him aside from a kill....
N1 Colby was blocked.
Something doesn't add up. Add that with her anti-town play that she's voting Meeko just because he's her extra target? and then calls me out because I'm NOT. Guess what Patricia. I'm leaning Town on Meeko, Town isn't going to win if we eliminate everyone's extra targets ahead of scum hunting....So yeah I need Meeko Dead, and I almost didn't reveal my result on Meeko, but it was in Town's best interest for me to reveal it instead....and for ME to go for the Town play over the selfish me play at this point in time.
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Jan 30, 2014 16:35:22 GMT -5
Patricia, what are your thoughts about Colby being blocked Night 1? You claim to have protected him which, according to your role PM, means that you would have prevented him from being blocked (unless it was Town that blocked him)? I think either Patricia or Colby must be lying and am also rather surprised that Colby is still alive after being blocked both nights. Also, what are the chances that there are 2 Town protectors? I wish I could vote for both of you. But since I can't and I find you equally suspicious I will go alphabetically. Vote: ColbyInvestigate: PatriciaFor the record I know that Colby was blocked on Night 1 and not by Town. If I must explain further I will, however I'm choosing not to at the moment to avoid placing an important pro-Town player at risk of being night killed. I guess it is possible that Colby has been blocked two nights in row, as claim doc you would think the scum would want him dead instead. I think at least a investigation is in order but for tonight I would rather be investigated than mislynched I think I did this wrong before antivote Patricia investigate Patricia
|
|
|
Post by patricia on Jan 30, 2014 16:37:11 GMT -5
Swammer you get a side eye glance from me? Patricia claims that she protected Colby on N1 by her "PM" means that he couldn't be blocked, or have any actions taken on him aside from a kill.... N1 Colby was blocked. Something doesn't add up. Add that with her anti-town play that she's voting Meeko just because he's her extra target? and then calls me out because I'm NOT. Guess what Patricia. I'm leaning Town on Meeko, Town isn't going to win if we eliminate everyone's extra targets ahead of scum hunting....So yeah I need Meeko Dead, and I almost didn't reveal my result on Meeko, but it was in Town's best interest for me to reveal it instead....and for ME to go for the Town play over the selfish me play at this point in time. Can you explain why you are leaning town on Meeko?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 30, 2014 16:55:36 GMT -5
1. To me, it seems there was some form of mass block on N1. As I have previously stated, I was also blocked on N1. 2. My PM states that there is a belief that the West German is a defector, and that my town wincon needs the west german dead. Now if it is indeed, town on town between Story and I, then having the town tear itself apart killing each other would seem to make it far too easy for a scum win. Part of me is wondering whether we actually have a scum team at all, is it just town and third parties? 3. Story's reaction to my vote was uncharacteristic of him - so either genuine shock, or disgust at being caught. More interesting is the number of folk who immediately wrote it off as town on town - which seems to suggest they have additional information they aren't sharing. Fruit seems to have gone to great lengths to keep everything in colour - the day/night colour, the investigation results or fails all have detailed colour. Yet, the one thing that is glaringly not in color is Klutz's claim - kill the jack of all trades and explicitly stating that this says nothing about their alignment - this seems out of character compared to everything else. 4. Similarly, the colour refers to the scum as commies or soviets - not "the mafia" - yet both klutz and patricia's claims state "the mafia" - collaborative fail in faking claims? (numbers added) 1. There was no mass block on Night 1, as I did get a result (although it was wrong) 2. Are you voting storyteller because you think he is scum, or because he is your extra wincon? 3. This extra wincon business certainly looks to be town on town, as has been discussed many times (I can say with confidence that Klutz/Mahaloth was town on town). So this looks like another one. 4. My investigation result refers the "the mafia". I was a bit surprised to see this as it didn't really seem to fit. However, notice the reveal for guiri on Night 1: it says "If certain conditions had been met, he would have aligned with the mafia..."
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 30, 2014 17:10:12 GMT -5
Votes: Colby11 [3]: Meeko (43), Suburban Plankton (76), Chameleon (101) Meeko [2]: Colby11 (12), Paranoia (13), patricia (16), Meeko (-44), Swammerdami (98) patricia [2]: Silver Jan (71), dizzymrslizzy (80), Captain Klutz (83), Swammerdami (84), Pleonast (91), patricia (-97), Swammerdami (98), patricia (-104) storyteller0910 [1]: BillMc (3), Pleonast (46) BillMc [1]: storyteller0910 (5) Silver Jan [0]: Pleonast (66) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (22), Pleonast (46) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (30) Pleonast [0]: Silver Jan (57), Captain Klutz (61), Swammerdami (-65)
Investigations: patricia [2]: Captain Klutz (61), Chameleon (101), patricia (104) storyteller0910 [1]: Paranoia (13), patricia (16) Suburban Plankton [1]: Captain Klutz (83) Colby11 [1]: Swammerdami (84) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (22) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (30)
With these votes, Colby11 will be lynched and patricia will be investigated. Day 3 ends in 6 hours.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 30, 2014 17:11:56 GMT -5
Patricia, what are your thoughts about Colby being blocked Night 1? You claim to have protected him which, according to your role PM, means that you would have prevented him from being blocked (unless it was Town that blocked him)? I think either Patricia or Colby must be lying and am also rather surprised that Colby is still alive after being blocked both nights. Also, what are the chances that there are 2 Town protectors? I wish I could vote for both of you. But since I can't and I find you equally suspicious I will go alphabetically. Vote: ColbyInvestigate: PatriciaFor the record I know that Colby was blocked on Night 1 and not by Town. If I must explain further I will, however I'm choosing not to at the moment to avoid placing an important pro-Town player at risk of being night killed. (bleached) You know that Colby was blocked on Night 1 and not by town. In that case, in that case, I don't understand why you are voting for him (you think a scum roleblocker targeted scum Colby?) Or perhaps the rolebocker was third party. In which case, patricia's power should have stopped it, as she claims to block non town actions. So there looks to be a contradiction between you and patricia. Yet you choose to vote Colby?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 30, 2014 17:16:24 GMT -5
Votes: Meeko [3]: Colby11 (12), Paranoia (13), patricia (16), Meeko (-44), Swammerdami (98) Colby11 [3]: Meeko (43), Suburban Plankton (76), Chameleon (101) patricia [2]: Silver Jan (71), dizzymrslizzy (80), Captain Klutz (83), Swammerdami (84), Pleonast (91), patricia (-97), Swammerdami (98), patricia (-104) storyteller0910 [1]: BillMc (3), Pleonast (46) BillMc [1]: storyteller0910 (5) Silver Jan [0]: Pleonast (66) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (22), Pleonast (46) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (30) Pleonast [0]: Silver Jan (57), Captain Klutz (61), Swammerdami (-65)
Investigations: storyteller0910 [2]: Paranoia (13), patricia (16) patricia [2]: Captain Klutz (61), Chameleon (101), patricia (104) Suburban Plankton [1]: Captain Klutz (83) Colby11 [1]: Swammerdami (84) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (22) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (30)
With these votes, no player will be lynched and no player will be investigated. Day 3 ends in 6 hours. You have patricia antivoting herself twice
P.S. I would prefer at least one vote count per real life day (one per every other real life day is too infrequent)
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 30, 2014 17:16:57 GMT -5
Patricia, what are your thoughts about Colby being blocked Night 1? You claim to have protected him which, according to your role PM, means that you would have prevented him from being blocked (unless it was Town that blocked him)? I think either Patricia or Colby must be lying and am also rather surprised that Colby is still alive after being blocked both nights. Also, what are the chances that there are 2 Town protectors? I wish I could vote for both of you. But since I can't and I find you equally suspicious I will go alphabetically. Vote: ColbyInvestigate: PatriciaFor the record I know that Colby was blocked on Night 1 and not by Town. If I must explain further I will, however I'm choosing not to at the moment to avoid placing an important pro-Town player at risk of being night killed. You're claiming to know that Colby was blocked, and that his blocker was non-Town? And you're also voting for Colby? I assume that means you think he's Scum, so you think that his blocker was Third-Party?
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Jan 30, 2014 17:29:19 GMT -5
I make it that we have Meeko, Colby, and patricia tied with 3 Lynch votes, and story and patricia tied with 2 Investigation votes.
Investigate patricia
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Jan 30, 2014 17:52:20 GMT -5
To help break up the log jam for lynching: antivote Meeko for being the least suspicious of the three.
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 30, 2014 18:11:43 GMT -5
You have patricia antivoting herself twice
P.S. I would prefer at least one vote count per real life day (one per every other real life day is too infrequent) You are correct, and your preferences are noted. Barring any objections, I'll do it once a day.
Votes: Colby11 [3]: Meeko (43), Suburban Plankton (76), Chameleon (101) patricia [3]: Silver Jan (71), dizzymrslizzy (80), Captain Klutz (83), Swammerdami (84), Pleonast (91), patricia (-97), Swammerdami (98) Meeko [1]: Colby11 (12), Paranoia (13), patricia (16), Meeko (-44), Swammerdami (98), Pleonast (-112) storyteller0910 [1]: BillMc (3), Pleonast (46) BillMc [1]: storyteller0910 (5) Silver Jan [0]: Pleonast (66) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (22), Pleonast (46) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (30) Pleonast [0]: Silver Jan (57), Captain Klutz (61), Swammerdami (-65)
Investigations: patricia [3]: Captain Klutz (61), Chameleon (101), patricia (104), Suburban Plankton (111) storyteller0910 [1]: Paranoia (13), patricia (16) Suburban Plankton [1]: Captain Klutz (83) Colby11 [1]: Swammerdami (84) Suburban Plankton [0]: Swammerdami (22) dizzymrslizzy [0]: Swammerdami (30)
With these votes, no player will be lynched and patricia will be investigated. Day 3 ends in 5 hours.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Jan 30, 2014 21:02:24 GMT -5
Antivote Colby Investigate Storyteller0910
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Jan 30, 2014 21:17:34 GMT -5
Patricia is in the lead, by one vote. Patricia is my preferred lynch toDay, so I'm happy with that.
However, patricia is also in the lead for an investigation, which is a bit of a waste. So people, please decide who you would like to investigate.
Silver Jan, are you around? Your investigate vote would be particularly welcome.
|
|
|
Post by swammerdami on Jan 30, 2014 22:18:33 GMT -5
Unvote: Meeko Vote: Patricia Uninvestigate: Colby11 Investigate: Storyteller0910 Antinvestigate: Patricia
Ties are bad. Investigating Lynchee is bad.
|
|
|
Post by FruitAndGarbage on Jan 30, 2014 23:13:36 GMT -5
Day has ended. Lynch, flavor, and night thread to come.
|
|