RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 10:59:29 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 27, 2007 10:59:29 GMT -5
What the hell, Zuma? I go away for the holidays, and I come back to find you just dropping a vote on me? With NO questions, no reasonings, NOTHING. Just "the role seems unlikely". Which PART? the Medic role? Or the fact that I've got a goddamn bomb stuck to me??? Not Cool, dude. AND ON CHRISTMAS DAY! Fine. 2 Can play at that game. UnvoteVote Zumav2.0If you have any questions, why don't you ASK me about it. And i think trying to take out the last potential medic you've got is pretty damn suspicious, dude, especially without giving me a chance or ANYthing.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 11:06:54 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2007 11:06:54 GMT -5
Greetings all,
I'm finally back and so Merry Christmas and Happy new Year to all.
Time for a read and see what is going on
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 11:38:51 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2007 11:38:51 GMT -5
Right, more thoughts on Day 6.
episodeofblonde - I think you need to do some explaining as various people here would like to lynch you (myself included, even though my vote is not on you).
atarus: I can think of at least one other explanation for the no kill night. Frankly, I was expecting kassia to be attacked that night and had her down as the medic because of it. However, if as the speculator she has a method of stopping or controlling a replicant, that would also account for it. In fact I think it is more likely.
sinjin: don't think that just because a roleclaim came out of nowhere, that the scum would not do it. That is an assumption that I do not believe in. If it prevented the town doing anything for a Day and stopped all discussion, it would be worth it, especially if the town believed the roleclaim, giving the scum a free ride to the endgame. Remember, all claims should take into account the persons actions through the game.
roosh: I think I recognise the item around your leg or at least the reference: WEDLOCK. If true, you are effectively fucked because your buddy is dead and when the time limit expires, you can kiss your arse goodbye.
However, I just checked your reasoning for voting Cookies. She never interacted with episodeofblonde on Day 1, and first mentioned her on Day 5 as part of her case against Captain Klutz. Also, for your claim to be true, there would have to be a second anti-town party in the game, focusing directly on you. How does it feel to be special, eh? Of course, the question still remains - why would they pick on you.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 13:54:29 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2007 13:54:29 GMT -5
So, suggested night actions could be 1. Cookies would have protected someone (1 Medic) 2. Cookies was killed (1 Medic, 1 Nightkiller) 3. kassia was killed (1 Medic, 1 Nightkiller, 1 Replicant Kill) 4. Tragic was killed (1 Medic, 2 Nightkillers, 1 Replicant Kill and if you are telling me that kassia can shoot tragic several times in the spine and head while being drowned I'm calling bullshit. ) 5. Speculator Night Action kassia?? (1 Medic, 2 Nightkillers, 1 Replicant, 1 Speculator) So in other words on Night 5, I would hazard a guess that we had at least 5 Night Actions to be resolved. If Roosh is telling the truth, then we also need to include the following 6. Roosh's mysterious visitor (1 Medic, 2 Nightkillers, 1 Replicant, 1 Speculator, 1 Mad Bomber) 7. Roosh Protection (1 Medic, 2 Nightkillers, 1 Replicant, 1 Speculator, 1 Mad Bomber, 1 Partial Medic) That is seven Night actions to be resolved? So discounting atarus and sinjin, leaves 7 Night actions out of 13 people, or would leave over half the group with a night action. If we say that we have two hidden Masons minimum, that means we had 7 of at most 11 people on Night 5 that had a Night Action. If Roosh is telling the truth, I really must get out more at Night
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 15:00:44 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2007 15:00:44 GMT -5
Halloooooo, Is there anybody else out there
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 15:10:23 GMT -5
Post by episodeofblonde on Dec 27, 2007 15:10:23 GMT -5
I'm really sorry everyone that I haven't been able to get caught up yet. I see now the day has been extended - within the next day or so I will hopefully be able to have mnore than two minutes at a computer and get caught up. sorry again - hope everyone has had happy holidays.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 15:32:47 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Dec 27, 2007 15:32:47 GMT -5
Catinasuit: So the whole thing could have been planned as a distraction. Well it certainly seems to have worked as that. However, then we have to think about what we are being distracted from. The main contender for the chair toDay was episodeofblonde who got a pass yesterday because of her absence. She came back to say she was back and disappeared again. And, I see she is now back again with nothing. I am happy to stay with my vote on eob for the moment. However my FOS on Roosh stands and add one for zuma2.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 27, 2007 15:52:35 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 27, 2007 15:52:35 GMT -5
Catinasuit: So the whole thing could have been planned as a distraction. Well it certainly seems to have worked as that. However, then we have to think about what we are being distracted from. The main contender for the chair toDay was episodeofblonde who got a pass yesterday because of her absence. She came back to say she was back and disappeared again. And, I see she is now back again with nothing. I am happy to stay with my vote on eob for the moment. However my FOS on Roosh stands and add one for zuma2. Personally, I think the roleclaim came because I caught Roosh lying about his voting reasons and he doesn't want to be lynched. Also, it is as good as chance as any to try and setup a roleclaim which will see him through until the end. From watching the other games, as well as the scum trying to distract the town from something specific, it is the scum putting blocks in the way and generally muddying thinking, holding up analysis and trying to get people to react to something new instead of thinking and acting on what has already gone before.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 1:24:55 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 1:24:55 GMT -5
Good Grief, it is quiet in here, is everyone still on holiday??
Unofficial vote Count
episodeofblonde (3) - Captain Klutz, sinjin, Santo Rugger Roosh (2) - CatinaSuit v. 2.0, zuma v. 2.0 Zuma v 2.0 (2) - atarus, Roosh CatinaSuit v. 2.0 (1) - Death by Irony
Day ending in approx 2 1/2 days
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 1:29:11 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 1:29:11 GMT -5
So Roosh,
The deadline on your device passed last night. You dead yet ;D
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 1:31:12 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 1:31:12 GMT -5
On second thoughts, ignore the above, it's Day 7 at dusk, not Day 6.
Ho Hum.
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 2:51:17 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 28, 2007 2:51:17 GMT -5
roosh: I think I recognise the item around your leg or at least the reference: WEDLOCK. If true, you are effectively fucked because your buddy is dead and when the time limit expires, you can kiss your arse goodbye. However, I just checked your reasoning for voting Cookies. She never interacted with episodeofblonde on Day 1, and first mentioned her on Day 5 as part of her case against Captain Klutz. Also, for your claim to be true, there would have to be a second anti-town party in the game, focusing directly on you. How does it feel to be special, eh? Of course, the question still remains - why would they pick on you. Posts I've mentioned where Episode interacts with Cookies: Well gee... why don't you just look at my post #5.94&95? I stated it right there the interactions: 1.55 &1.91 Just because a person isn't MENTIONED by name does NOT make them not suspicious and NOT interacting with another player. I had stated the VERY thing I found suspicious about Cookies was the fact that she kept discussing ideas with Episode on Day 1 on governors and such, but then AFTERWARDS there was complete SILENCE from her towards Episode. She had even stated several times she felt a Pro-Town vibe from Episode, and still maintained a similar stance into the previous Day. So uh. I stated that I found it suspicious that Cookies and Episode interacted alot on Day 1, and then didn't. -You state Cookies first mentions Episode directly on Day 5. Way to twist my words around. Did you by any chance see how many times EPISODE interacted with COOKIES on Day 1? Just because Cookies didn't mention Episode, did NOT mean that Episode did not quote Cookies at least 2x on Day 1, and discussed ideas with her. Your whole "analysis" of the situation is just pitifully lacking at best, and just Scummy at worst. Since this Day began, you've been twisting my words around, and just presenting really crappy arguments towards me on your whole ideas of the supposed interactions and readings of what I've stated as a whole. -The most recent "Did you die yet?" post feels that way to me as well: 1. Most uncool that you're so eager to see me Die.... 2. You've already mis"read" my calculations, you've misread my post on when the hours are, and you've misread the whole Cookies vs. Episode interaction and then A LACK OF INTERACTIONS until Day 5 (which you so proudly then mention as you've discovered something new). What the heck is going on with you, CAIS? Normally you're a bit more well... prepared then this. This is just ridiculous, and I'm wondering how much of this is just deliberately you trying to muck around with me? 3. You suck. Why? See #1. ~~~~~~~ And Wedlock? Where the heck did THAT one come from? Lovers usually die together at the same time. -I've already stated, I've HAD this issue since the start of the game. I've known that there's been insinuations that there are people looking for me at the start of the Game.... So the whole lovers thing??? Outta left field, dude. Of course, the question still remains - why would they pick on you. :coughs: Uh... Are you a Medic with a device strapped to your leg because of a Role PM? No? Oh, okay, then why don't you just shut the hell up and let me wonder about WHY they would pick ME.... Gee... I wonder. A Medic.... With an unknown device stuck to his leg.... That has now been activated.... Hmmm.... So... if they wanted to get RID of a medic with an unknown device stuck to his leg.... Well. What if someone KNEW about said device? Hmm. Nope. I just can't figure this one out. But I'm getting real suspicious of the dude who keeps thinking he knows everything about it.... Wedlock...... Seriously Do you even READ my posts? ~~~~~~~~ And I really dislike your Post #63- Because your attempts to simplify the whole night actions REEKS of scumminess. You've left out several key factors. 1. How many scum do you think are left in the game? -That right there will fill up the 11 people you've stated as having night actions as "People who HAVE night actions" most likely. --You only stated 1 Replicant as having a night action in your scenario. How do you KNOW that? I personally think that maybe they could have abilities. Drainbead certainly seemed to have a night action. Is it really so hard to believe that there's ANOTHER replicant out there that has a night action perhaps? The fact that you don't consider this is most worrisome. -What action does the Speculator have? And This "Mad Bomber" role, you keep it independent of Replicants and the speculator.... -Why? Why do the replicants ONLY have 1 night action in your thoughts and NOT more even though we've SEEN that replicants CAN have night abilities ( Pleonast with Day and Night abilities, and Drainbead's abilities, and What was Tragic's Abilities? Was that found out?). My Scum list right now in No Order:Episode, Zuma2.0, and Now you CAIS2.0-I'm waiting to hear from Zuma on his drive by voting. Episode- You've got LOTS of 'splaining to do, I left you questions YesterDay as well, I'd like to hear from you as well. And CaiS... I've given you my thoughts on you in this post.... If you want to rebut any of these points, or explain WHY you're so careless in your posts, or seemingly ignoring my posts in the pasts while still smudging me, it'd be nice. And I'd like to hear from you more about these supposed "night actions". What are your thoughts in regards to Replicants and Night actions- Do they only have 1? And... Why the wanting me to die so bad... that'd be nice to know.... That was just spiteful your gleeful little penultimate post...
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 3:53:23 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 3:53:23 GMT -5
Oh dear Roosh, oh dear. Alright CaiS. Cookies was someone who supported Episode, unlike your interactions she felt Episode was acting quite townie. She also interacted with Episode on Day 1, but then afterwards, simply dropped the issue. She NEVER really talked about episode after that initial time period, until later into the game. You show me on Day 1 where Cookies interacted with Episodeofblonde. Not episodeofblonde interacted with Cookies. Your reasoning for your votes is pathetic and grasping and in general reeks of backpedalling. Let me explain a few other things: Wedlock: Amusing Sci-Fi B-Movie starring Rutger Hauer whereby the main gimmmick was that the prisoners in the move had a collar on with a blinking red light and a timer, linked to another prisoner. If they got too far away from their linked prisoner, or there linked prisoner was killed, there was a countdown and after a short period of time, the collar blew up removing their head. Sounds awfully similar to your current predicament. Of course, this could easily be solved by the following question. Storyteller, Did any of our Night Victims also have a Wedlock BraceletBut then, that would contradict your post where you said you had a visitor in the night. Me - I know everything about nothing, and not too much about that. As for my Night action list, nowhere does it say that the Replicants have one Night Action amongst them. All we have is one known Replicant kill (on kassia by Tragic). It is merely a list of the possible actions that took place on Night 5 As for the Mad bomber, if you are telling me that people can have multiple actions on the same Night, I will not believe you, hence why is is seperate. Number of rogue replicants in this game, I would guess 5: Do they have multiple night actions. I would be surprised if they didn't. Actions of the speculator: I would guess sensing a profit (hence the name) they are looking to control the Rogue replicants (from the colour). This is amusing because it means the Rogue Replicants can probably lose not from being lynched but by being totally controlled by the Speculator(s), if any remain. The downside is that is probably a town loss as well. As for why I want your immediate demise. Well it is because I think you are scum and the sooner you go the better.
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 10:37:20 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 28, 2007 10:37:20 GMT -5
Wedlock: Amusing Sci-Fi B-Movie starring Rutger Hauer whereby the main gimmmick was that the prisoners in the move had a collar on with a blinking red light and a timer, linked to another prisoner. If they got too far away from their linked prisoner, or there linked prisoner was killed, there was a countdown and after a short period of time, the collar blew up removing their head. Okay. That makes a bit more sense.... Actually sounds a bit like Battle Royal (one of my Fav. Japanese Movies/Manga Series/Books). I recommend it then. Though, I don't think that's what this thing on my leg is. As my PM did not indicate anything about trying to look out for a partner or such. But :shrug: whatever works, I'll be glad to hear from Story. As for interactions, Come on! Two people discussing ideas, and if ONE person quotes the other, is that not still interacting? To me that creates a link between two people. Even if only 1 person is talking, they're still linking themselves/associating themselves with the other person. Remember I focused the brunt of my activities on the Previous Day focusing on Episode, so when I see interactions between players it was obviously going to be MORE From Episodes sides. I found the Cookies/Episode link to be highly odd, because only on Day 1 does episode keep linking to and quoting Cookies, but then afterwards the line just goes dead and the two don't talk for a good while.... It was a definite change in behavior. That's what made them suspicious to me, and a reason I felt comfortable pressuring Cookies. I asked questions of them and I was satisfied with Cookie's role claim and I WOULD have unvoted her. It's just that I didn't get to the computer in time. And so now I'm stuck running around in circles answering these questions for you rather than focusing on trying to find scum. As for you thinking I'm Scum.... Well, I disagree. But then again, I also think YOU'RE Scum.So I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then on that point. Unless you also agree with me, Scum.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 11:44:43 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Dec 28, 2007 11:44:43 GMT -5
Roosh. Maybe you don't notice questions to you unless your name is bolded. So here. Roosh Roosh Roosh Roosh Roosh I have a question for you Roosh. I asked it once already and you didn't bother to reply to it. WHO DID YOU PROTECT THE NIGHT THERE WAS NO NIGHT-KILLS?
If you don't answer again, I'll have to assume you're pulling a whatthefrak and purposely ignoring questions about who you protected what Night because you didn't actually protect anyone.
On the other hand, CatinaSuit, I don't think it's that implausible that we'd have a full medic and a percentage medic like Roosh, especially if Replicants are resistant to night-kills. It would even the odds for the colonists to have more than one doctor, if every Replicant we're up against are resistant to dying at Night.
To me, if Roosh is to be believed, he was being hunted like River was in the Firefly game. I assume some scum was looking for the device, and if activated Roosh goes boom.
Also, CatinaSuit, in your "7 night action" simplification, if there were 2 nightkillers AND a Replicant kill last night, how do you explain only having one Nightkill for two Nights and no kills for one Night WITHOUT having a backup medic ala Roosh?
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 16:55:55 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 16:55:55 GMT -5
On the other hand, CatinaSuit, I don't think it's that implausible that we'd have a full medic and a percentage medic like Roosh, especially if Replicants are resistant to night-kills. It would even the odds for the colonists to have more than one doctor, if every Replicant we're up against are resistant to dying at Night. I have no problems with there being a backup medic in this game. However, I consider Roosh to be a rogue replicant from his actions. To me, if Roosh is to be believed, he was being hunted like River was in the Firefly game. I assume some scum was looking for the device, and if activated Roosh goes boom. This is of course, the important question. Who would carry out such an action. Do the replicants have something special up their sleeves or is there a fourth faction that we don't know about yet. If I said also that Roosh's roleclaim adds too many things to the mix for me to believe it. Also, CatinaSuit, in your "7 night action" simplification, if there were 2 nightkillers AND a Replicant kill last night, how do you explain only having one Nightkill for two Nights and no kills for one Night WITHOUT having a backup medic ala Roosh? For this, I haven't a clue. However, I would like someone to prove me wrong for Night 5, but I don't think its going to happen. Before this Night, I am betting that the Replicants were not using or were unable to use their full capabilities and that we have had Speculator intervention. My guess is that certain scum have the possibility of an extra kill on one night. I think we may also have a backup Vigilante/Blade Runner. Of course, another option is that a Speculator managed to control a Replicant and convince them to kill another Replicant. This, by now, would also not surprise me. And I am still not discounting, the possibility that Kat v.1 and Tragic were killed by the same person, and also that person may or may not be a scum trying to throw us off track. The possibilities are quite numerous.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 17:28:34 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 28, 2007 17:28:34 GMT -5
Okay. That makes a bit more sense.... Actually sounds a bit like Battle Royal (one of my Fav. Japanese Movies/Manga Series/Books). I recommend it then. Though, I don't think that's what this thing on my leg is. As my PM did not indicate anything about trying to look out for a partner or such. But :shrug: whatever works, I'll be glad to hear from Story. I've seen Battle Royale and it doesn't seem that close to it, but it's worth bearing in mind. As for interactions, Come on! Two people discussing ideas, and if ONE person quotes the other, is that not still interacting? To me that creates a link between two people. Even if only 1 person is talking, they're still linking themselves/associating themselves with the other person. Remember I focused the brunt of my activities on the Previous Day focusing on Episode, so when I see interactions between players it was obviously going to be MORE From Episodes sides. I found the Cookies/Episode link to be highly odd, because only on Day 1 does episode keep linking to and quoting Cookies, but then afterwards the line just goes dead and the two don't talk for a good while.... It was a definite change in behavior. That's what made them suspicious to me, and a reason I felt comfortable pressuring Cookies. I asked questions of them and I was satisfied with Cookie's role claim and I WOULD have unvoted her. It's just that I didn't get to the computer in time. And so now I'm stuck running around in circles answering these questions for you rather than focusing on trying to find scum. As for you thinking I'm Scum.... Well, I disagree. But then again, I also think YOU'RE Scum.So I guess we will just have to agree to disagree then on that point. Unless you also agree with me, Scum. One person referencing another with no reciprocation does not make for interaction. The two of them never talked, episodeofblonde referenced Cookies twice over the Guv'nor election. From this you have managed to determine that they are linked and so Cookies must be scum, because then there was no further interaction between them until Day 5, when Cookies said that she thinks episodeofblonde is pro-town. So just tell me how does your line of thinking possibly work?
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 18:01:50 GMT -5
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 28, 2007 18:01:50 GMT -5
Well, I lost my net connection for a few days, but it was pretty easy to catch up (everyone must still be enjoying their holiday...)
I still like my vote for episodeofblonde, but I'm not happy with zuma.v2's drive by vote.
We still don't know what abilities kassia and tragic had, so I'll ask again:
Storyteller, what were kassia's and tragic's abilities?
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 21:06:23 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Dec 28, 2007 21:06:23 GMT -5
Well, first and right off the bat:
1. I'd like to apologize to any and everyone (especially storyteller) for my lack of participation during this game 2. Since I (finally) acquired Internet for my home, I'll be more in touch from now on
That said, I'd like to roleclaim (out of nowhere, I know).
I'm a "mason" too. And in my role assignment I have one bit of interesting information: one of the Replicants has an "assassin mode" which makes him/her virtually unstoppable.
That said: I won't vote yet. I haven't read up on all the last Day's events and I will be using storyteller's "reprieve" to catch up and make some (snap?) judgments to vote.
Cheerio!
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 28, 2007 23:38:20 GMT -5
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 28, 2007 23:38:20 GMT -5
Diggit, any idea what "virtually unstoppable" means? Does it mean not Night killable, or a Night kill from the assassin can't be stopped, or something else?
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 2:04:12 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 29, 2007 2:04:12 GMT -5
Roosh. Maybe you don't notice questions to you unless your name is bolded. So here. Roosh Roosh Roosh Roosh Roosh I have a question for you Roosh. I asked it once already and you didn't bother to reply to it. WHO DID YOU PROTECT THE NIGHT THERE WAS NO NIGHT-KILLS? No what-the-frakking here.... I just didn't see this at all. In the future though, bolding is kinda nice. I protected Atarus that night. If you wanna know any of my earlier ones thats fine too. I don't mind sharing my PMs anymore because I feel I have bigger problems to worry about. And since my night action for tonight is pretty much resolved in my head.... But just ask and ye shall receive, dude.
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 2:10:06 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 29, 2007 2:10:06 GMT -5
From this you have managed to determine that they are linked and so Cookies must be scum, because then there was no further interaction between them until Day 5, when Cookies said that she thinks episodeofblonde is pro-town. So just tell me how does your line of thinking possibly work? I did not just assume that Cookies was scum. I felt she was scummy and had to answer a few questions. I did use my vote to pressure her in doing so. My vote was NOT meant to be set in stone because I was going back and forth on the trail here. And for that reason I didn't mind dropping the vote on Cookies at the time. I found her behavior SUSPICIOUS, not Proof that she was 100% scum, and I wanted to hear from her. -Again, I've stated this time and again, I just didn't get a chance to remove my vote at the end. Quit making it out to seem like I had something out for Cookies. I felt fine with pressuring Cookies because she was interacting with a suspicious person, and then stated she felt that someone I was very Suspicious of was Pro-Town. I felt that was enough information to merit further questioning and information from them. Is this REALLY that hard to see or are you just biased from all this tunnel vision?
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 4:01:04 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 29, 2007 4:01:04 GMT -5
Umm, where is everybody, we have a deadline tonight and it only seems like 4 people are playing.
Well, if Roosh protected atarus on that Night, that means either the Replicants were up to something else or the Speculator got in first.
Hmm.
Roosh: My problem with your vote is not that you didn't unvote but that you voted for her in the first place breaking a tie with someone you considered highly suspicious and who later turned out to be scum.
DiggitCamara: Well I guess atarus will be able to confirm/deny your mason status, but I guess it would be really dumb for a replicant to try this at this time.
episodeofblonde: You are currently leading the votes. Start talking or get lynched.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 10:53:12 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Dec 29, 2007 10:53:12 GMT -5
Diggit, any idea what "virtually unstoppable" means? Does it mean not Night killable, or a Night kill from the assassin can't be stopped, or something else? From the text I gather the assassin can't be stopped during that particular Night kill. I think it is a one-time ability, but it's more speculation on my part (the way it's phrased seems to indicate that).
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 13:23:11 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Dec 29, 2007 13:23:11 GMT -5
I forgot I was going to a family reunion today, so I won't get a chance to do the analysis I wanted to.
Anyway, I'm voting episodeofblonde. She seems to have tried to be too chummy to several people for no good reason, and hasn't really defended it at all.
vote episodeofblonde.
(If we are wrong about her I think it will be somewhat telling as well, especially with respect to Roosh, which is another reason in my mind to wait a day on him.)
My guess on "assassin mode" is that it's an unblockable kill. It might explain NAF's death since he was likely to be under some protection. Thing is, I remember someone mentioning the unstoppable kill before (was it you, diggitcamara?) which seems strange that they'd guess so correctly.
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 14:47:52 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Dec 29, 2007 14:47:52 GMT -5
Right now I'd like to unvote Zumav2.0 and go back to voting for my #1 suspect Episode of blonde.
I've given you the time, but you've said NOTHING. So... well... :shrug: I think you're one of the scummiest people around, and I feel my analysis has shown that. You yourself have not given any response to it even when I had given you 2 DAYS worth of time. At this point I'm gonna go with your intentions as not being so pure.
Vote Episode of Blonde.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 15:27:01 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 29, 2007 15:27:01 GMT -5
Here is my current Colony List. No Claimepisodeofblonde Death by Irony Kat v. 2.0 Parzival zuma v 2.0 ClaimsRoosh (Backup Medic) Captain Klutz (Code Runner) Semi-Confirmed Townatarus (mason) diggitcamara (mason) (pending atarus approval ) Santo Rugger (blue) sinjin (scientist) Definitely Town CatinaSuit v. 2.0 Out of the seven suspects left, I would reckon on maybe 3 Rogue Replicants left. This one could get tight depending on the number of nightkills for the scum.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 16:08:49 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Dec 29, 2007 16:08:49 GMT -5
My guess on "assassin mode" is that it's an unblockable kill. It might explain NAF's death since he was likely to be under some protection. Thing is, I remember someone mentioning the unstoppable kill before (was it you, diggitcamara?) which seems strange that they'd guess so correctly. I thought the same thing so went back and searched a lot and found this by Captain Klutz on Night Four:
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 16:27:16 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 29, 2007 16:27:16 GMT -5
Unknown Captain Klutz CatinaSuit v. 2.0 Death by Irony episodeofblonde Kat v. 2.0 Parzival Roosh zuma v 2.0
Dead Colonists zuma v. 1 CatinaSuit v.1 hockey monkey Diomedes mhaye zeriel
Live Colonists Santo Rugger
Town Power role Kat- The Neuromancer Pleonast - Rick Deckard, the Blade Runner NAF1138 - The Creator atarus - Mason diggitcamara - Mason sinjin - Scientist CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies - Medic kassia - Speculator
Replicant drainbead - (Pleasure Model) Tragic - (Labourer)
Of course, if storyteller is going to be true to canon, I would expect a combat model, a labourer, an assassin dancer and a pleasure model. Of course that only makes four of them.
Hmm.
|
|
|
Day Six
Dec 29, 2007 16:32:32 GMT -5
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 29, 2007 16:32:32 GMT -5
My guess on "assassin mode" is that it's an unblockable kill. It might explain NAF's death since he was likely to be under some protection. Thing is, I remember someone mentioning the unstoppable kill before (was it you, diggitcamara?) which seems strange that they'd guess so correctly. I thought the same thing so went back and searched a lot and found this by Captain Klutz on Night Four:Ouch, that is going to take some explaining from Captain Klutz, that is just a little too accurate. Good spot sinjin
|
|