|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 11:34:41 GMT -5
Oh, in that case:
unvote story
vote Hockey Monkey
Just to make our mods life a bit easier.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Jun 24, 2008 13:02:41 GMT -5
Vote CountBlaster Master (1): Rysto storyteller (1): hockeymonkey hockeymonkey (1): NAF1138 No Lynch (1): Survivor Smurf Not Voting: 9 Atarus - If someone is protected in this game, say by Nanook or some other "generic" Doctor-like power are they protected from all and sundry kill attempts, or only one kill attempt per protection. (barring special abilities) I am not at liberty to say.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 13:09:34 GMT -5
Ugh, that vote count sucks. And I know I'm one of the delinquent nine. But good Lord, we are giving the scum free license to manipulate our lynches now. Ugh.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 13:22:11 GMT -5
well if you've backed off of no-lynch story, then I'm going to go ahead and Vote HockeyMonkey.
I'm 97% sure she's lying about being a martyr, which leads me to believe she's scum. (3% reserved for gastard moddity)
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 13:27:04 GMT -5
But on balance, I am disinclined to vote for BLAM toDay, as the evidence is lacking. Of course it's lacking, up to toDay the guy has barely posted outside of the last 12 hours of the Day. As the Kison lynch shows, that's useless to the Town. Well, OK, but lack of evidence does not constitute evidence, is the point I'm trying to make. And voting for BLAM for reduced participation would be quite odd if others get a free pass for a like level of participation, especially since BLAM's posts tend to be long and involved. OK, so on to the next role claim, NAF's, which intrigues me in a few ways.
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Jun 24, 2008 13:27:44 GMT -5
I'm 100% sure our mod is 100% Gastard.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 13:38:09 GMT -5
Here's NAF's claim:
Well, this is interesting, in that it ties together with misterblockey's claim. If at any point it comes out that blockey is anything at all other than a Redirector / Bus Driver, then as far as I'm concerned the above paragraph is reason enough to lynch NAF, yes?
Well, so here's the problem. Rysto has soft-claimed a power role, and one with knowledge of Horsemen. You have claimed to have blocked him, but he has claimed that he was not blocked. Now, these things are not necessarily incompatible, because Rysto could have a role with no Night actions or have chosen not to use any last Night. It's just a point worth mentioning.
All in all, NAF's claim is not particularly compelling in either direction.
Auck, I don't know. This game is fucking hard.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 13:45:36 GMT -5
By the way I'm really sick of Blam not talking.
For the record I am not at all asking if/what you did last night Blam, I just want to know what (if anything) was done to you.
|
|
|
Post by Nanook on Jun 24, 2008 13:46:21 GMT -5
One thing I do know Story is that this... I'm 100% sure our mod is 100% Gastard. is a completely unacceptable response to the various questions that have been posed. In light of that, I'm going to place my vote now. Vote HockeyMonkey[/color]
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 13:46:39 GMT -5
Here's NAF's claim: Well, this is interesting, in that it ties together with misterblockey's claim. If at any point it comes out that blockey is anything at all other than a Redirector / Bus Driver, then as far as I'm concerned the above paragraph is reason enough to lynch NAF, yes? Sounds fair to me.
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Jun 24, 2008 13:50:27 GMT -5
The only thing that I've said about this is that I have not received anything from atarus indicating that I slept badly last night, because that's what NAF asked me.
I am not prepared to discuss any powers I may or may not have, whether or not I used a power last Night or whether any powers I may have used last Night were blocked.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 13:53:11 GMT -5
The only thing that I've said about this is that I have not received anything from atarus indicating that I slept badly last night, because that's what NAF asked me. I am not prepared to discuss any powers I may or may not have, whether or not I used a power last Night or whether any powers I may have used last Night were blocked. But you absolutely did not have bad dreams?
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Jun 24, 2008 13:56:23 GMT -5
Well, OK, but lack of evidence does not constitute evidence, is the point I'm trying to make. And my point is that it does constitute evidence when the poster in question is specifically doing his best to deny the town evidence. I only have one vote, unfortunately. And BLaM's lurking is so blatantly scummy that my vote will be for him until he justifies it.
|
|
|
Post by Nanook on Jun 24, 2008 13:57:46 GMT -5
I am not prepared to discuss any powers I may or may not have, whether or not I used a power last Night or whether any powers I may have used last Night were blocked. Why not? It seems to me that we have got to be close to losing this game, maybe 1-3 mislynches away from oblivion. What exactly are you waiting for?
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Jun 24, 2008 13:58:43 GMT -5
But you absolutely did not have bad dreams? I did not have bad dreams. If you did something to me last night I was not informed of it.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 13:59:48 GMT -5
The only thing that I've said about this is that I have not received anything from atarus indicating that I slept badly last night, because that's what NAF asked me. I am not prepared to discuss any powers I may or may not have, whether or not I used a power last Night or whether any powers I may have used last Night were blocked. Interesting. So if you have a power, attempted to use it last Night and were successful (ie, not role-blocked), you'd have pretty strong evidence that NAF is lying and probably scum. Similarly, if you were role-blocked last Night, you'd have pretty good evidence that NAF is being truthful about his power, at least. And now I am suspicious of Rysto, because there comes a point where jealously guarding the information you have goes from an excess of caution to an active impediment in the investigative process. Saying, "yes, I have an active power and was not role blocked last Night," or "no, I have no active power," or whatever provides very little value to the scum beyond what you've already revealed - that you have a power role - but it would provide value to the Town.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:01:00 GMT -5
I am not prepared to discuss any powers I may or may not have, whether or not I used a power last Night or whether any powers I may have used last Night were blocked. Why not? It seems to me that we have got to be close to losing this game, maybe 1-3 mislynches away from oblivion. What exactly are you waiting for? Ditto. And where the fuck are the Masons? Seriously, I don't know. This whole Town is hanging back, keeping its secrets, and a fat lot of good it's going to do anyone if we mislynch toDay and the game ends. Gah!
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 14:01:33 GMT -5
I did not target Rysto last night, if you're curious about that NAF
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:02:12 GMT -5
Well, OK, but lack of evidence does not constitute evidence, is the point I'm trying to make. And my point is that it does constitute evidence when the poster in question is specifically doing his best to deny the town evidence. Rysto, for someone who is currently doing his level best to actively deny the Town evidence, that is a dangerous point to make.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:02:54 GMT -5
In point of fact, for that critical inconsistency:
vote Rysto
And off to do a bit more reading on him.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 14:03:23 GMT -5
I did not target Rysto last night, if you're curious about that NAFDid you target me? I didn't have dreams either, but it's possible our mod just forgot to tell me that they backfired.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 14:03:54 GMT -5
I did not target Rysto in part because I'm 90% sure he's a horseman, if anyone cares to know.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 14:04:36 GMT -5
I did not target Rysto in part because I'm 90% sure he's a horseman, if anyone cares to know. Do tell. You mentioned this before, but didn't say why. Do you want to say why now?
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:06:09 GMT -5
(PS - I'd vote hockeymonkey too toDay. I'm not thrilled with her empty reasoning in attacking me early in this Day. And honestly, I'm not at all sure that we shouldn't be lynching misterblockey, upon whose true identity seems to rest an awful lot of other claims and possibilities [if he's being truthful, that's a point in favor of NAF and against hockeymonkey, for instance]).
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:07:24 GMT -5
This is getting entertaining now. For God's sake, people, don't let this conversation die off like the last three. Let's try to get some momentum. I'm about ready to call Blaster Master scum just for his sig file, so he'll start yelling at me and we can have some dialogue in here.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Jun 24, 2008 14:10:49 GMT -5
This is getting entertaining now. For God's sake, people, don't let this conversation die off like the last three. Let's try to get some momentum. I'm about ready to call Blaster Master scum just for his sig file, so he'll start yelling at me and we can have some dialogue in here. I was going to go out to lunch today, but I think I am running downstairs and eating at my desk instead. I so want to figure out what has been going on. So at least I will be around.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 14:13:43 GMT -5
I'm 90% sure he's a horseman because if my portfolio is any indication of the other(s) than we just don't seem anti-town enough to merit a pro-town horseman hunter, not only that but in my role pm it's suggested we try to get the other horsemen lynched. I for one, can not win if any other horsemen are still alive, and I doubt it's any different for another horseman.
Also this isn't a no-vanilla game, so it just seems to me it's far more likely he's just another horseman, rather than having another role position taken up by a pro-town horseman hunter when the horsemen (or myself at least) aren't terribly anti-town.
Occams razor, KISS whatever you want to call it, it just seems far more simple and/or likely that he's a horseman, rather than some complicated reactionary role.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:14:54 GMT -5
Can I just say this:
misterblockey, if you turn out to be a Demon, and this whole thing is an elaborate hoax, I will fly to wherever it is that you live just to shake your hand, because at this point you've basically got the whole Town operating according to your word, and you've confessed to being our enemy.
Weird game. Weird, weird game.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Jun 24, 2008 14:17:06 GMT -5
also NAF I'm confused as to how I could have messed with your night actions by targeting you without targeting your actual target rysto.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Jun 24, 2008 14:20:33 GMT -5
also NAF I'm confused as to how I could have messed with your night actions by targeting you without targeting your actual target rysto. I know you're probably about ready to kill people for asking this over and over, but the exact nature of the power you have claimed is still confusing me. You target two players: let's call them DIOMEDES and IDLE THOUGHTS. Which of the following is true: 1. Any action that targets IDLE instead targets DIO, and vice versa? 2. Any action taken by DIO targets IDLE, rather than DIO's intended target? 3. Vice versa? I don't really get it.
|
|