Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Gir! on Oct 2, 2008 22:33:25 GMT -5
Incidentally, with 21 people left alive, it takes 11 to start the Countdown.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 2, 2008 22:34:26 GMT -5
And for the nay sayers I think I'm going to get two fivers sandwiched aroundbuffer.
Think this means that everone has to buy a drink to the players left.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 2, 2008 22:36:45 GMT -5
And for or friends across the pond. Mornington Crescent.
And for our friends down under. Vegemite sandwich.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Oct 2, 2008 22:41:08 GMT -5
sigh, I have no idea where to go with this right now, and of course I'm putting everything together for the mini-mafia.
I will say this (although canon hasn't been terribly helpful) toad is a bit of a follower, but not an apocalypse level follower, if I had to guess, I'd say toad's probably town.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 2, 2008 22:52:26 GMT -5
sigh, I have no idea where to go with this right now, and of course I'm putting everything together for the mini-mafia. I will say this (although canon hasn't been terribly helpful) toad is a bit of a follower, but not an apocalypse level follower, if I had to guess, I'd say toad's probably town. Idle quit the mini game about the same time he quit this one. Does it have anything to do with Cecilia?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 2, 2008 22:56:32 GMT -5
If the Ogs have linked two games then this is important. If not, then why not? That would be a hell of a play.
|
|
|
Post by bufftabby on Oct 2, 2008 23:04:20 GMT -5
And for the nay sayers I think I'm going to get two fivers sandwiched around buffer. I don't know what that means, but I'm gonna go ahead and assume that it somehow insults my virtue. Which is sacrosanct, dontyaknow.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Oct 2, 2008 23:30:12 GMT -5
Toad (Mortimer Toynbee) is a Marvel Comics supervillain, an enemy of the X-Men. (still only halfway caught up, just wanted to say:) Toad isn't really a supervillain. He's about as unsuper as you can get without fully crossing the line into henchman status.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Oct 2, 2008 23:37:54 GMT -5
And now I'm somewhat fully caught up. It seems, so far, that this day has given us the knowledge that bufftabby and Santo make squicky noises with each other, Sarah Palin can only say 'nuclear' one out of four times, and AH and peeks are looking scummy.
I'm buying rookie mistake for AH. peeks' roleclaim... well... it's just about as scummy looking as sinjin's. I mean, he could be telling the truth... but I think it's likely he isn't.
[/b]vote: peekerpa[/b]
|
|
|
Post by bufftabby on Oct 2, 2008 23:49:07 GMT -5
Toad (Mortimer Toynbee) is a Marvel Comics supervillain, an enemy of the X-Men. (still only halfway caught up, just wanted to say:) Toad isn't really a supervillain. He's about as unsuper as you can get without fully crossing the line into henchman status. Copied and pasted from my source. :shrug: I got distracted by the prehensile tongue.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Oct 2, 2008 23:55:54 GMT -5
Copied and pasted from my source. :shrug: I got distracted by the prehensile tongue. My father always told me that the first thing to do when meeting a young lady that I wanted to impress was to quickly lick my eyebrows, just to make sure I'm presentable.
|
|
|
Post by KidVermicious on Oct 3, 2008 0:03:46 GMT -5
Squid don't have tongues, liar.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Oct 3, 2008 0:15:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Oct 3, 2008 0:31:45 GMT -5
you want to lick your eye with that?
|
|
|
Post by bufftabby on Oct 3, 2008 0:51:11 GMT -5
Finally, someone who knows how to talk dirty[/i]. Do you kiss your mother with that radula, young man? I nominate peeker to soap out squidohol mcboozalicious' mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Greedy Smurf on Oct 3, 2008 1:45:15 GMT -5
I'm not seeing the scumtell from Almost Human.
A newbie mistake, partly coming from I think a misunderstanding of how the Jester works. Hell I went and doublechecked the normal mechanic for a jester after it was floated.
That's not to say I think AH is definitely town or anything remotely like that. just that his 'slip' is more newness than scuminess IMO.
Peeker? I haven't got the foggiest. If this is how you normaly play the game Peek, I have no idea how anyone gets a decent read on you.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Oct 3, 2008 1:56:59 GMT -5
mods are we subbing out/modkilling non-participating players?
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 3, 2008 2:23:25 GMT -5
Hey, squiddy don't like the role claim or just being obtuse?
|
|
|
Post by Almost Human on Oct 3, 2008 2:30:29 GMT -5
Sorry for not posting sooner - real life, work and several drinks caught up with me yesterday. I didn't read my role pm properly and made a mistake. I understand some of you find that odd and will be keeping an eye on me. Fair enough. I don't think there's anything else I can add though other than that I'm town (blonde town but still town From what I've read toDay Chucara seems to be a watcher of sorts and says that Apolcalypse and Toad are in the game. I don't see any reason to disbelieve him at this point. It seems likely that Apocalypse would be in the game due to the opening colour. I hadn't heard of Toad till I looked him up (he could lick more than just his eyebrows!). I'd be happier with his claim if the people he'd been watching could confirm it but it sounds reasonable. Nanook's role also sounds believable to me now I've read her pm. Peeker's role pm sounded believable too. I just can't get a read on his style of posting. It's fun trying to figure it out though. Having such a valuable role but also being a miller pretty much sucks. If he's telling the truth then there's presumably someone out there who can also infect people so I'd hate to lynch him and leave us unprotected. Have to get to work now but I'll be more active when I get home.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 3, 2008 2:37:12 GMT -5
And for the nay sayers I think I'm going to get two fivers sandwiched around buffer. I don't know what that means, but I'm gonna go ahead and assume that it somehow insults my virtue. Which is sacrosanct, dontyaknow. Shoot no, kiddo. You'll always be sancrosanct in my book. It was a stupid reference back to a stupid reference about five posts in a row. Man, has everyone lost their sense of humor and subtlety over here? Cripes, open up the breeding pool just a wee bit. And now I know how Andy Kaufmann felt singing 100 bottles of beer on the wall. And if I have to explain the above, then Og help me. I will, of course, but GD it's going to make me feel old.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Oct 3, 2008 4:01:33 GMT -5
Hey, squiddy don't like the role claim or just being obtuse? What is it about that you don't understand?
|
|
|
Post by Zeriel on Oct 3, 2008 9:38:00 GMT -5
I'm curious as to what's necessarily scummy about a miller claim--it is a pretty good strategy for a miller who has actions to claim it up front and then offer to prove it by blocking someone if they have a block.
That it's good strategy for a scum roleblocker too goes without saying, but on its face peeker's made a reasonable claim.
Now granted, I agree that most millers are going to end up dead eventually BECAUSE it's such a WIFOM role. However, I think there are other people out there who are worth talking about and investigating as well.
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 3, 2008 9:45:19 GMT -5
peeks' roleclaim... well... it's just about as scummy looking as sinjin's. I mean, he could be telling the truth... but I think it's likely he isn't. In all likelihood, though, Sinjin was telling the truth with her first roleclaim. I don't know why she claimed it (my first thought was that she going to try to convince town how she could be useful to us, but she didn't do that), but it made sense within the context of Rogue's canonical powers, and the death reveal showed she was 3rd Party Special. I'd say a glorified Mad-Bomber role fits the 3rd Party Special designation fairly well. So I don't follow how they are equally scummy looking. Sinjin's looked scummy because it was (if your definition of scum means any non-town element). Peeker's possibly scummy claim doesn't arise because it's anti-town. The only reason it could look scummy is if you think he's lying.
|
|
|
Post by The Real FCOD on Oct 3, 2008 9:46:20 GMT -5
Well, there are some interesting new developments since I last read the thread. peekercpa: Now that I've had a chance to read your role PM and night action PMs, I believe your claim. It seems quite reasonable and fits in with your behavior, (even the erratic weirdness, for which you've shown a propensity ). As of right now, you're off my suspicion list. Nanook: I believe the powers part of your claim, but I don't find any compelling evidence that you is aligned with Town. I'm not saying I think you aren't, just that I don't know and will be keeping an eye on you. Chucara: I'd like to see your full role details (name, etc), minus anything you think might give an advantage to scum. Finally, I still have not found anyone more suspicious than Almost Human, so I'll keep my vote there for the time being. --FCOD
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 3, 2008 9:47:28 GMT -5
NETA: And I guess you could also say that since peeker's a miller he's literally "scummy-looking". But that still doesn't connect it with Sinjin's claim in any way.
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Oct 3, 2008 9:47:40 GMT -5
So yesterday peeker said that he only has a 25% chance of protecting somebody from the Legacy Virus. His role PM toDay makes it quite clear that his ability will not fail -- it's the Legacy Virus that has the failure rate. I'm honestly not sure if peeker was confused about his ability or if he's lying.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Oct 3, 2008 11:38:14 GMT -5
And now I'm somewhat fully caught up. It seems, so far, that this day has given us the knowledge that bufftabby and Santo make squicky noises with each other, Sarah Palin can only say 'nuclear' one out of four times, and AH and peeks are looking scummy. I'm buying rookie mistake for AH. peeks' roleclaim... well... it's just about as scummy looking as sinjin's. I mean, he could be telling the truth... but I think it's likely he isn't. [/b] vote: peekerpa[/b][/quote] Bleached. Re: Peekers claim Boozy. Why?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Oct 3, 2008 11:58:35 GMT -5
Also:
Rugger, Chucara, Nanook, MisterBlocky, Rysto & Darth. I would like you to all go on record toDay regarding your opinion of AH's possible slip yersterDay. Mostly becuase I want people to be on the record about something that has real implications for later in the game and I think that the AH thing, becuase it was brought up by confirmed town is a good device.
Sooner would be good, but that's me being selfish and wanting to start the data analysis while I have time today.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 3, 2008 12:10:53 GMT -5
[record]I already stated Yesterday that I thought the reply was more damning than the slip. I also came out of the gate this Morning with a vote because of it.[/record]
|
|
|
Post by Zeriel on Oct 3, 2008 12:19:43 GMT -5
So yesterday peeker said that he only has a 25% chance of protecting somebody from the Legacy Virus. His role PM toDay makes it quite clear that his ability will not fail -- it's the Legacy Virus that has the failure rate. I'm honestly not sure if peeker was confused about his ability or if he's lying. It seemed pretty clear to me that peeker's discussion of the 25% chance was entirely based on someone saying that the Legacy virus in canon affects 25% of mutants who are exposed to it, or something similar to that.
|
|