Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 23, 2008 21:21:45 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Oct 23, 2008 21:21:45 GMT -5
You could bother to read the next post you know. Since everyone is going to trust an admitted 3rd party, I might as well. By that logic, diggit is the scum out of the pair of two. Pollux could be, but since everyone is trusting the magic lists, he obviously isn't based on night three. That leaves the possibility of him being a 3rd party. He's not a horseman based on Night 3. That doesn't mean he couldn't be Mr. Sinister. Or do you know something you're not telling us? I don't know anything, except that he's lying. But since nobody is stepping back and looking at the possibility that he or NAF are lying, it seems to be a lost cause.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 23, 2008 21:34:52 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 23, 2008 21:34:52 GMT -5
M'kay. As I said earlier it was a trial balloon and I am not at all averse to the leading candidate.
Vote Darth
You better hope for your signature line that this is not some sort of foreshadowing.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 23, 2008 21:36:33 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 23, 2008 21:36:33 GMT -5
He's not a horseman based on Night 3. That doesn't mean he couldn't be Mr. Sinister. Or do you know something you're not telling us? I don't know anything, except that he's lying. But since nobody is stepping back and looking at the possibility that he or NAF are lying, it seems to be a lost cause. Oh, it's quite possible he's lying. I mean, the odds of him getting successful reads 4 out of 5 nights is 32 to 5 against. But he's got the better case against you than you have against him. His investigation of NAF was shown to be true. So, I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 2:27:50 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 24, 2008 2:27:50 GMT -5
The player list ... Rugger in purple just because I figured we needed more colors and he writes such entertaining night fluff... Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was going to ask you to do that once your lists started getting colorful, but I figured people would say, "oh, Rugger wants to be a different color so he's not black like the rest of the suspicious people". I'm just catching up, I won't be around much this weekend, and I'm still hearing "Off to never never land!" over and over in my ears; I just got back from a Metallica concert. Fucking. Awesome. I don't want the countdown to start, but I don't know how much I'll be around this weekend after I go to bed, so depending on when I'm caught up I'm going to either vote Darth or leave an FOS on him and not end up voting (if we're too close to the countdown). Sorry in advance, but I don't think it'll present a problem since Today will probably look quite a bit like Day 2.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 2:30:59 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 24, 2008 2:30:59 GMT -5
I'll give you that. Him AND NAF would have to be lying. AND. Not OR. I thought you were going to school for CS? Aren't those guys pretty good at Boolean expressions?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 7:32:03 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Oct 24, 2008 7:32:03 GMT -5
Rugger wants to be a different color so he's not black like the rest of the suspicious peopleBuffly bolded. Who knew Rugger was a racist bastard?! I am hesitant to trust the NAF lists, but it seems as though he and pollux would have to be in collusion somehow for pollux to be scum, and I just don't see how that would happen, so I'm willing to take pollux at his word for now. (And he's right, I'm Town. Just in case you were wondering. )
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 8:07:16 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 8:07:16 GMT -5
Rugger wants to be a different color so he's not black like the rest of the suspicious peopleBuffly bolded. Who knew Rugger was a racist bastard?! Now, now, bufftabby. Some of his friends are black. And no doubt some of his fellow Ruggers as well.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 9:45:01 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 24, 2008 9:45:01 GMT -5
Rugger wants to be a different color so he's not black like the rest of the suspicious peopleBuffly bolded. Who knew Rugger was a racist bastard?! I am hesitant to trust the NAF lists, but it seems as though he and pollux would have to be in collusion somehow for pollux to be scum, and I just don't see how that would happen, so I'm willing to take pollux at his word for now. (And he's right, I'm Town. Just in case you were wondering. ) Hey! Quote me in context, now. Note that I said, "so people won't say". (dodged a bullet on that one!) But, no, NAF didn't say you were town. NAF said you weren't a Horseman.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 9:59:26 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 9:59:26 GMT -5
Buffly bolded. Who knew Rugger was a racist bastard?! I am hesitant to trust the NAF lists, but it seems as though he and pollux would have to be in collusion somehow for pollux to be scum, and I just don't see how that would happen, so I'm willing to take pollux at his word for now. (And he's right, I'm Town. Just in case you were wondering. ) Hey! Quote me in context, now. Note that I said, "so people won't say". (dodged a bullet on that one!) But, no, NAF didn't say you were town. NAF said you weren't a Horseman. She was referring to Pollux, who said she was town.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 12:56:01 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 24, 2008 12:56:01 GMT -5
Ahh, right. I do a better job of posting drunk than I do of posting hungover.
|
|
Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:17:50 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Oct 24, 2008 13:17:50 GMT -5
I'll give you that. Him AND NAF would have to be lying. AND. Not OR. I thought you were going to school for CS? Aren't those guys pretty good at Boolean expressions? :::Shudder::: no comp sci for me. I'm getting out of engineering this next week. I liked my only programming class, but that was due to a good teacher. And for me to be scum, only Pollux needs to be lying. If we are trusting the admitted liar third party, then either I or diggit are scum. Now, as we know that I'm not - that leaves diggit as scum, and Pollux as a damn dirty liar. If NAF is lying, then the town is screwed, as you all are resting far too much on him.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:33:39 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 13:33:39 GMT -5
And for me to be scum, only Pollux needs to be lying. If we are trusting the admitted liar third party, then either I or diggit are scum. Now, as we know that I'm not - that leaves diggit as scum, and Pollux as a damn dirty liar. If NAF is lying, then the town is screwed, as you all are resting far too much on him. Quite possibly, but his track record has been good so far. Nothing he nor Pollux have said conflict in any way. He outed a horseman. He knew he was going to be leaving the game, so he didn't really have any apparent reason to lie to insure his victory or anything. He even asked for a modkill, which essentially means he loses as he's a 3rd party. What would be his reason for lying? To mess with town? Seems like a lot of effort for a little sadistic payoff. He really doesn't seem like the type. At least if you look at it from a truth-telling standard, by throwing out the info he did, even with him knowing he was going to have to leave, he can at least watch and realize that he had a hand in Town's performance. The other option would have been just to say nothing, but that might have hurt whoever could have subbed in for him (since at the time I don't think he knew if he could be subbed out or not), since it was likely NAF was going to get lynched if he wasn't useful to town. So while I can see motivation for Pollux being a liar, since he's in the game, and no one has any confirmation on him, I can't really see it from NAF's end. If you have any to provide, feel free. The more info for town the better. And even if NAF is lying, we'll find out soon enough. And as far as town relying on NAF too much, you haven't given us anyone else to pursue at this point other than Pollux and him, and right now, they look better than you do. So if you think we shouldn't rely on them, do you have any better ideas?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:38:23 GMT -5
Post by Mister Blockey on Oct 24, 2008 13:38:23 GMT -5
Here's the thing Darth.
The totally pro town way for you to be acting would be to simply accept the lynch. Why? Because you know that if we accept the lynch and you're town, then pollux and diggit are on the chopping block next, and we're pretty much good. The only exception would be if you were insanely powerful game breaking town, and I sincerely doubt story put a role like that in the game.
All of that matters not though, because I was going to Vote Darth anyway, I just hadn't gotten around to it yet.
Oh and on a side note, those of you arguing about the statistics of pollux's investigation, you don't understand probability terribly well.
It's not terribly likely that pollux would succeed 6 out of 7 times, for example, however, given success 5 out of 6 times, he still has a 50% chance on the 7th try. It's not intuitive, our brains aren't wired to accept that, but it's true.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:39:26 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 13:39:26 GMT -5
And about that Storm thing, assuming Chucara's telling the truth (and there hasn't been any indication otherwise), does anyone have any idea why no one's claimed her?
After all, the horseman didn't need fake names, since any of us could be horseman just by name. (Heck, my character was a horseman at one point in the canon, and my description in the game also has me as a former horseman, as many others were at one point.) And Chucara saw NAF as Apocalypse, not Cyclops/Scott Summers, so we know Chucara can see the actual role, not the cover role.
So by that, Storm is actually out there as a role, not as a cover for Mr. Sinister or someone else who would be instantly recognizable as an enemy. Yet someone either chose a different name for whatever reason, or Hawkeyeop is lying.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:43:22 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 13:43:22 GMT -5
It's not terribly likely that pollux would succeed 6 out of 7 times, for example, however, given success 5 out of 6 times, he still has a 50% chance on the 7th try. It's not intuitive, our brains aren't wired to accept that, but it's true. For any given flip that's true. But if you flip a coin 500 times and it comes up heads 500 times, I'll bet my entire life fortune (which, is not all that impressive at this point, but anyway....) that it comes up heads again, because clearly that coin is rigged.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 13:48:39 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 24, 2008 13:48:39 GMT -5
NETA: And now you've given me flashbacks of my web services class where we studied Poisson arrival process and distribution classes.
I hated that class with a blazing passion of 1000 suns.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 14:04:16 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Oct 24, 2008 14:04:16 GMT -5
UATU SAYS, Y'ALL WORK QUICKLY
VOTE COUNT:
Darth Sensitive (8) - Pollux Oil, FDr.HoD, hawkeyeop, Hoopy Frood, diggitcamara, bufftabby, peekercpa, misterblockey diggitcamara (1) - Darth Sensitive
INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH, WITH THE DEATH OF KID VERMICIOUS YOU ALL FIND YOURSELF SOMEWHAT LESS BLOODTHIRSTY THAN YOU ONCE WERE. A 12-HOUR COUNTDOWN HAS NOT BEGUN; A COUNTDOWN WILL BEGIN IF AND WHEN ANY CANDIDATE RECEIVES A TOTAL OF 10 VOTES.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 14:39:16 GMT -5
Post by Santo Rugger on Oct 24, 2008 14:39:16 GMT -5
Here's the deal: I'm leaving for my college homecoming (and picking up a keg for the youngins on my way out of Santa Fe at SFBC, aren't I a good alum?), and I won't be back till Monday or Tuesday. I probably won't get a Night action in, but it's not really a big deal. So, I'm not going to place my vote because we're so close to the countdown and I won't be able to remove it if something crazy happens. I'm sure you guys understand. My ears are still ringing like a mother fucker, and I get to hang out with the Pygmies this weekend. Life doesn't get much better!
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 14:42:03 GMT -5
Post by Almost Human on Oct 24, 2008 14:42:03 GMT -5
So I want to vote Darth but it's a bit early to start the countdown so I'm going to hold off till everyone's ready. I know it still takes two more votes but I've been wondering weather my making the 9th vote might make it too easy for the scum to end the Day sooner before we've had a chance to discuss anything else.
I think Hoopy made a good point about the possibility that Sinister could have a separate win condition. It may well be worth looking for him and third parties before trying to get the last horseman. If we're trusting Pollux then we can rule out Bufftabby and Peeker from the list already and Hoopy and Blocky are confirmed plus Pollux may get a correct read again toNight making the pool smaller.
We've got alive (copied and pasted from Hoopy's list - apologies for lack of colour):
4. Hoopy Frood - Mikhail Rasputin - Mason/Special 5. mhaye - Wolverine - No Claimed Power, Bub 6. Almost Human (replaces Roosh) - Gambit - No Claimed Power 7. Pollux Oil - Toad - 100% accurate/50% miss chance Alignment cop 8. chucara - Shadowcat - Watcher 9. bufftabby - Multiple Man - No Claimed Power 10. Darth Sensitive - Scarlet Witch - No Claimed Power 11. peekercpa - Archangel - Miller/Legacy Virus blocker and curer 12. misterblockey - Magik - Mason/Special 13. diggitcamara - Jean Grey - No Claimed Power 16. hawkeyeop - not Storm - No Claimed Power 17. Santo Rugger - Persuasion - Redirector 18. FlyingDeadCowofGOB, Esq. - Longshot - No Claimed Power
Out of those the only ones who could be Sinister or pfk are (assuming Pollux and NAF's lists are accurate):
5. mhaye - Wolverine - No Claimed Power, Bub 6. Almost Human (replaces Roosh) - Gambit - No Claimed Power 7. Pollux Oil - Toad - 100% accurate/50% miss chance Alignment cop 8. chucara - Shadowcat - Watcher 13. diggitcamara - Jean Grey - No Claimed Power 16. hawkeyeop - not Storm - No Claimed Power 17. Santo Rugger - Persuasion - Redirector 18. FlyingDeadCowofGOB, Esq. - Longshot - No Claimed Power
Though one of the following could potentially be a horseman:
16. hawkeyeop - not Storm - No Claimed Power 17. Santo Rugger - Persuasion - Redirector 18. FlyingDeadCowofGOB, Esq. - Longshot - No Claimed Power
So if we wanted to avoid lynching the last horseman we'd have to avoid those. Someone better at math would have to figure out if this was a viable plan or not.
Does anyone who's played with multiple pfk roles before have a rough idea how many are likely in this sort of game because I haven't a clue?
|
|
Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 14:43:08 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Oct 24, 2008 14:43:08 GMT -5
Here's the thing Darth. The totally pro town way for you to be acting would be to simply accept the lynch. Why? Because you know that if we accept the lynch and you're town, then pollux and diggit are on the chopping block next, and we're pretty much good. The only exception would be if you were insanely powerful game breaking town, and I sincerely doubt story put a role like that in the game. All of that matters not though, because I was going to Vote Darth anyway, I just hadn't gotten around to it yet. Oh and on a side note, those of you arguing about the statistics of pollux's investigation, you don't understand probability terribly well. It's not terribly likely that pollux would succeed 6 out of 7 times, for example, however, given success 5 out of 6 times, he still has a 50% chance on the 7th try. It's not intuitive, our brains aren't wired to accept that, but it's true. Oh, I fully expect that I am going to get lynched. I'm not game breaking for town, but if you did pick diggit to lynch, you wouldn't have to worry about Pollux doing anything crazy at night. I am the town's roleblocker who isn't a combined with some other role, so go ahead and lynch away. I know I'm not that useful, especially as my power essentially has to charge for a full chance of success. Since I did nothing last night - I'm at 100% for today. It just sucks to get lynched when I am positive who else actually is scum, yaknow? I lean towards NAF not lying, but I feel like he wasn't revealing everything - most likely win condition, but maybe something more - I never got a sense of what his second power set was about. I can't give the town any other leads really, so that's that.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 14:48:37 GMT -5
Post by Hawkmod on Oct 24, 2008 14:48:37 GMT -5
So you are a role blocker Darth? You aren't by chance Storm are you?
|
|
Darth Sensitive
Mome Rath
With great power comes great responsibility / That's the catchphrase of Old Uncle Ben
Posts: 18
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 15:13:28 GMT -5
Post by Darth Sensitive on Oct 24, 2008 15:13:28 GMT -5
No - I'm the Scarlet Witch. Powers based on concentrated manipulation of magic. If I haven't focused the night before, I have a 50% chance of the block succeeding - if I have, it's 100%.
And have you bothered to claim yet? Yeah. Thought so.
I'm leaving for a weekend with the girlfriend. Should be back Sunday afternoon. But here are my actions.
Night 1 - Charged Night 2 - Blocked peeker Night 3 - Failed to block FCoD Night 4 - Failed to block FCoD Night 5 - Charged
I'm wondering if Longshot's powers had anything to do with the dual failures. I still don't trust the guy, it just feels like he's been pushing lynches over the top all game.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 15:32:10 GMT -5
Post by Hawkmod on Oct 24, 2008 15:32:10 GMT -5
No - I'm the Scarlet Witch. Powers based on concentrated manipulation of magic. If I haven't focused the night before, I have a 50% chance of the block succeeding - if I have, it's 100%. That is pretty weak power you got there. Why? Am I by chance disrupting your plans? So you failed twice when you had a 100% likelyhood of success. Does this seem credible to you? But yeah I'm sure it was all Longshot's fault
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 15:44:21 GMT -5
Post by Merestil Haye on Oct 24, 2008 15:44:21 GMT -5
Night 1 - Charged Night 2 - Blocked peeker Night 3 - Failed to block FCoD Night 4 - Failed to block FCoD Night 5 - Charged So you failed twice when you had a 100% likelyhood of success. Does this seem credible to you? But yeah I'm sure it was all Longshot's fault No, his claim is that he failed twice with a 50% success chance. He claims a 100% success chance if he charged up the Night before. The only Nights he claimed to charge up were 1 and 5; therefore the only Nights he'd have a 100% chance of success were 2, and Tonight. But that one's not going to work if we hang him first.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 15:48:30 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Oct 24, 2008 15:48:30 GMT -5
Darth's claimed power (about which I believe he is telling the truth) could easily be either town or scum.
Why don't you post your full PM, Darth?
(not like it matters, you're still going to hang...)
--FCOD
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 17:11:34 GMT -5
Post by Merestil Haye on Oct 24, 2008 17:11:34 GMT -5
Having read through Today, my overwhelming impression of Darth's posts is that he keeps calling NAF a liar, but never identifies what NAF lied to us about. I'm certainly left with the feeling he's trying to discredit his main accuser but without much evidence.
Off the top of my head I can think of four things that NAF has told us that we know the truth and falsity of. Only one of those things turned out to be a lie, and that has such a reasonable justification attached to it that even I didn't blink when NAF admitted the truth.
That's hardly the sort of record one looks at and concludes that NAF is a serial liar. It's no wonder that Darth's attempts to cast NAF as a known fibber haven't managed much traction, is it?
There are some other things NAF has told us; specifically that the leader of the scum is Mister Sinister and that the remaining Horsemen fall into two discrete groups of players. The truth of these is under investigation. NAF also claimed a convoluted win condition, which I will confess to being sceptical of; but NAF having resigned from the game (for understandable reasons) what he said about his win condition is really no longer relevant.
The question before us right now is, is the Toad trustworthy?
... honestly, who would have expected to ask that question at the start of this game? The Toad was, in the early days of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, a spotty, slimy creep who tattled on the other Evil Mutants just to get Magneto's s favour. He was a slime. You know, if we'd known what the Toad did on Day 3, BS PI might well have sold us on a teleporter being an investigator. The Toad - who's only mutant power was to jump around - makes a much less likely investigator. But I digress.
The problem for a nonTown player serving up someone in the way that Pollux has is that if its false, the Town's wrath is very likely to fall on their head the following Day. The best way to avoid this is to sell out a real scum, and worm ones way into the Town's trust.
The later the play happens, of course, the more likely it is that the sellout is in fact a deliberate mislynch designed to undermine the Town's position one way or another and put the falsely claiming player's group into the ascendancy. I don't think we're at the point yet where a scummy PO could expect to put the mafia into an unassailable position by selling out a Townie Darth. While if PO is a PFK, he's surely working alone; in such a case, getting himself killed would put paid to any hope he had of winning.
Consequently, I am seriously thinking of voting Darth right now, even though it puts us one vote from starting a countdown. I won't vote now, but may well do so tomorrow.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 24, 2008 20:16:59 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 24, 2008 20:16:59 GMT -5
Here's the thing Darth. The totally pro town way for you to be acting would be to simply accept the lynch. Why? Because you know that if we accept the lynch and you're town, then pollux and diggit are on the chopping block next, and we're pretty much good. The only exception would be if you were insanely powerful game breaking town, and I sincerely doubt story put a role like that in the game. All of that matters not though, because I was going to Vote Darth anyway, I just hadn't gotten around to it yet. Oh and on a side note, those of you arguing about the statistics of pollux's investigation, you don't understand probability terribly well. It's not terribly likely that pollux would succeed 6 out of 7 times, for example, however, given success 5 out of 6 times, he still has a 50% chance on the 7th try. It's not intuitive, our brains aren't wired to accept that, but it's true. This is kind of correct based on the limited amount of game theory that I have been involved in. Regardless of previous outcomes the pending outcome is just as statistically valid as other outcomes. This of, course, assumes true randomness and fairness. So regardless of the coin toss the previous five times there is no influence on the sixth. Consider the following bets. I will toss a coin six times and you need to have heads hit on the sixth time to win. Sounds reasonable. Other bet, I will toss a coin six times. For you to win the first five needs to be heads and then it's fifty/fifty on the sixth. This is where gamblers get in a hoo pot of trouble. Each event is unique. There is no cumulative effect because you are betting on a specific outcome not a cumlative set of outcomes. Trust me on this one. I went to school when the only option for TV was Black and White and you had to put foil on the rabbit ears to ensure reception. Additionally, some poor soul was always relegated to standing by the toob and constantly fucking with the durn antennae so that you could hear Carol Burnett screwing with Tim Conway. Better yet was Red Skelton. At least he didn't talk so you didn't have to worry about audio. Can we just lynch DS and get on with it? Otherwise, it's the weekend, and my prime time for prattle. And if we get to the red/white corn cob/Sears catalogue discussion we are certainly at the bottom of the barrel.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 25, 2008 5:18:59 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 25, 2008 5:18:59 GMT -5
Does anyone still make drop biscuits?
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 25, 2008 9:55:54 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Oct 25, 2008 9:55:54 GMT -5
Ya know, anyone can kill a night but it takes a real MAN to kill a day.
I was talking to this lady that reports to a report of mine and she shared that this generation did something called "booty" (sp?) calls. I was not only taken aback but was also rather fundamentally shaken. Does this shit really happen or is it just Snopes? If it's true how in the hell do I peel about thirty years off of the old bod to experience this. I mean, I'm happily married and all that but shoot before that it was bars and dancing kind of shit. Where would I have gotten on the list for a random phone call of "I'd like to come over and fuck with no kissing or the attendant preening BS".
Yipers, must be why there are so many ********* these days.
And by last count I'm up to three.
P.S. Don't go all epilectic, it's a joke.
Explanation: At times during the travails of life there are times when a "humorous" comment is prudent. The definition of "humorous" is fairly broad. That's why B & R makes 31 flavors.
|
|
|
Day Six
Oct 25, 2008 9:57:47 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Oct 25, 2008 9:57:47 GMT -5
Does anyone still make drop biscuits? I vaguely recall my mom making them once. But those were drop cookies. Unless your referring to the British term "biscuit" which is cookies in the States. But then, I didn't think you Texans used British terms for things.
|
|