RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 28, 2007 23:50:40 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Aug 28, 2007 23:50:40 GMT -5
Oh. And by townie, I mean Vanilla. I'm no doctor. (though I was debating at the start of the day trying to fake claim doctor, just to see if anyone would claim too, and then unclaim being the doctor, and seeing if anyone else also claimed to be the doctor (in hopes that maybe the REAL doctor would be indignant to seeing a false person claim, while the scummy doctors wouldn't claim because a townie was already doing it, and felt no need to get involved).
But that was too complicated. Stupid. And just Crazy in a Winston Smith sorta way. And i'd waste the town's time then by going up to like #1 on the lynch list and then just plain losing the game for all of us. =(
But yeah, I think that Pygmy is more likely to be the doctor than Diggit, Capy. Based on Diggit's craziness of playing the game as the "Doctor" i think its just implausible.
And i'm sorry about my long ranting/explaining post. I'm not very good at posting unless very organized. But i'm really excited over this game, and my ideas, and the whole fact that noone else said anything (though its nice to see others are also saying it much more succinctly than i am)
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 28, 2007 23:54:44 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 28, 2007 23:54:44 GMT -5
This has got to be the most interesting and suspenseful Day so far.
Fifteen hours left, everyone.
Remember, Day is extended 24 hours if there's a tie...but just ONCE.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 28, 2007 23:55:47 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 28, 2007 23:55:47 GMT -5
OK, I have, I guess, been duly chastised for pursuing Blaster Master at excessive length. I will therefore be the very soul of brevity in this, my post explaining why I will be voting for Roosh at its end.
1. Roosh has had wildly pinballing opinions: He agreed with the proposition that lynching one of the three true unknowns was best, then turned around quickly and voted for one of the Doctor claimants. This seems to me to be a good way of seeming to support (what I consider to be) a pro-town move, while getting his actual vote in another place. If today's vote had come down to me or Blaster, Roosh wouldn't have backed either horse - useful in the event that both of us turn out to be town.
2. Roosh's stated reason for changing course and voting diggit is specious, and he knows it: The reason Roosh became so certain that diggit was scum? diggit's linguistic slip. The same brand of "scum tell" that Roosh just used to help hound dotchan to her death.
3. Roosh mischaracterized my and Blaster's posting: Please see my reply #86 on page 3 of toDay's thread for a detailed explanation of how. He seems quite interested in promulgating a Blaster / storyteller dichotomy, even at the expense of the truth.
4. Roosh out and out lied about diggit's role in the JSexton / Malacandra lynch wagon of Day 3: I went and checked. diggit's vote for JSexton actually broke a tie, it did not create one as Roosh claimed in toDay's reply #56. Further, Roosh had said in that same post that diggit "could have hammered" Malacandra, which is also untrue - diggit's vote for JSexton was the third vote on him, breaking a 2-2 tie, and three votes were cast for one of those two players before the deadline. In no sense could diggit's vote have hammered anyone or anything.
This is in addition to a bunch of other mischaracterizations, shadings of the truth, and so on and so forth.
Roosh, way the hell back on Day 2, I said that I was pretty confident that one of the first three voters for drainbead (they were you, me, and MadtheBacon) was scum. I had since forgotten about this belief as other matters seemed more pressing, but at the moment - as a cool British dude once said - I'd like to test that theory.
vote Roosh
PLEASE NOTE: My suspicions of Blaster Master haven't evaporated entirely, of course, but Roosh seems interested enough in promoting the argument between Blaster and myself that I am compelled to take a step back and consider the possibility that our disagreement is being used by real scum as a distraction.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 28, 2007 23:59:08 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 28, 2007 23:59:08 GMT -5
diggitcamara (2) - pygmyrugger, Roosh Roosh (2) - diggitcamara, storyteller0910
FOUR of SEVEN people have voted. Fourteen hours and 59 minutes left. ;D
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 0:08:51 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 0:08:51 GMT -5
diggitcamara (2) - pygmyrugger, Roosh Roosh (2) - diggitcamara, storyteller0910 FOUR of SEVEN people have voted. Fourteen hours and 59 minutes left. ;D You know what? Crap. I didn't notice that diggit had voted for Roosh. I'm not exactly comfy having two votes on any player without a town-wide consensus on a target, because I could definitely be wrong about Roosh and I don't want scum vote manipulation to be the way this game ends. I can't do a thing about the two votes for diggit, but I can unvote Rooshfor now.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 0:13:44 GMT -5
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 29, 2007 0:13:44 GMT -5
diggitcamara (2) - pygmyrugger, Roosh Roosh (1) - diggitcamara
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 3:41:21 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Aug 29, 2007 3:41:21 GMT -5
So wait, Storyteller, Same question. Why am I scummier to Diggit than Pygmy?
Why are we not trying to listen to EITHER doctor in this case again? Can you explain the 1:3 voting being a "safer" vote than the 1 in 2?
|
|
RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 3:50:44 GMT -5
Post by RoOsh on Aug 29, 2007 3:50:44 GMT -5
1. Roosh has had wildly pinballing opinions: He agreed with the proposition that lynching one of the three true unknowns was best, then turned around quickly and voted for one of the Doctor claimants. This seems to me to be a good way of seeming to support (what I consider to be) a pro-town move, while getting his actual vote in another place. 2. Roosh's stated reason for changing course and voting diggit is specious, and he knows it: The reason Roosh became so certain that diggit was scum? diggit's linguistic slip. The same brand of "scum tell" that Roosh just used to help hound dotchan to her death. 3. Roosh mischaracterized my and Blaster's posting: Please see my reply #86 on page 3 of toDay's thread for a detailed explanation of how. He seems quite interested in promulgating a Blaster / storyteller dichotomy, even at the expense of the truth. 4. Roosh out and out lied about diggit's role in the JSexton / Malacandra lynch wagon of Day 3: I went and checked. diggit's vote for JSexton actually broke a tie, it did not create one as Roosh claimed in toDay's reply #56. Further, Roosh had said in that same post that diggit "could have hammered" Malacandra, which is also untrue - diggit's vote for JSexton was the third vote on him, breaking a 2-2 tie, and three votes were cast for one of those two players before the deadline. In no sense could diggit's vote have hammered anyone or anything. I will address your points. #4. Yes, this was a mistake on my part. For the Diggit-Malacandra thing, I only looked back at those lists of voting posts that we've had (the Green/Red/Orange coded ones). I did not actually go back and look it up. That is a mistake on my part, and I did mess up there. However, It is not one of the major reasons why I'm so suspicious of Diggit currently (Please see my uber long post). #3. Well, I call it as I saw it. I see you and BM, on different sides. Both of you slinging words at each other, but not really the votes. Perhaps its all fine and dandy for you, but for me that's a little odd. Sorry if I misinterpreted your views, but this is what I'm seeing from my side of things. I did admit that you guys hadn't been at it as much as I may have said (back when you pointed out you each only had 1 major post at each other), but it just seems like your names come up in each other posts alot, but never in Blue or anything. Just... Catty fighting leading no where I feel. #2. Reason I think Diggit is scum, is NOT the slip-up (it is what made me look at him closer, and put pressure on him, yes). However, it is his VOTING currently, and pro-anti-town ideas that makes me think he's scummy. (See uber long post). #1. I do pinball. That's because I am not set in my ways. If I see an idea that's good for the town, I'll explain it. But then if i see flaws in the idea, I'll point it out, and I'm willing to change my ideas. I am now really doubtful of my 1 in 3 idea. Please explain to me how it is "Pro-Town" in anyway shape or form? It's one of those ideas that "Seems good in concept" but in actually reality, it's REALLY REALLY Flawed. 2 out of 3/1 out of 3 is just as bad as 50-50, no? Or am I the only one who is seeing the fuzzy math being exploited here?
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 8:28:30 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 8:28:30 GMT -5
So wait, Storyteller, Same question. Why am I scummier to Diggit than Pygmy? Well, I'm not sure that diggit is actually claiming that you are scummier than pygmy. But at this stage of the game, it behooves us all (well, those of us who are pro-town) to agree on a general course of action (eg, vote for one of the Doctors or don't), and then all follow it. If everyone else in the entire town is voting for either you, me, or Blaster, a vote for pygmy by diggit is purposeless. I'll try, but I've done it before, and I don't know what else to say. In simple terms: There are two possible cases: three remaining scum, or two. If there are three, then two of the true unknowns (Roosh, Blaster Master, storyteller0910) are scum. The odds of hitting one of them correctly at random is not one in three, it's two in three - better than 1 in 2, yes? And of course, it's even easier for me. I'm not completely sure what I think about diggit or pygmy, but if there are three scum I am utterly certain what I think of you and Blaster. In such a case, certainty is better than uncertainty. Now it's true, sooner or later we're going to have to make that Doc determination. But as long as the fake Doctor is alive, the real Doctor will not be nightkilled. This gives the Doctor a one in two chance of effecting a successful block toNight, and - assuming the game is still on at that point - a one in two chance of effecting a successful block on the following Night. In other words, a one in four chance of extending the game by one additional Day. So if there are three scum, it is better odds statistically and better play strategically to go after one of the unknown three. I get that this logic has not convinced you, nor capy, evidently, but I believe it and frankly don't understand the arguments against it. --------- Now the other possibility is that there are two scum remaining. In such a case, we have a mislynch to play with, but poorer odds of guessing right if we aim for the unknown three. If there are two scum, then statistically the right play in the short-term is to lynch a Doctor claimant toDay (50% chance of success vs. 33% chance fishing in the pool of unknowns). If there are two scum left, and we manage to lynch the one posing as the Doctor toDay, we would then stand a two in three chance of winning the game. ----------- So I guess it comes down to: how many scum do you think are left. If you think there are 3, vote for me, BM, or Roosh; if you think there are 2, vote for pygmy or diggit. If you have no idea which... well, that's the situation we're in, isn't it?
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 9:49:58 GMT -5
Post by capybara on Aug 29, 2007 9:49:58 GMT -5
I didn't notice that diggit had voted for Roosh. I'm not exactly comfy having two votes on any player without a town-wide consensus on a target, because I could definitely be wrong about Roosh and I don't want scum vote manipulation to be the way this game ends. I can't do a thing about the two votes for diggit, but I can You should have acutely noticed that Diggit voted for Roosh, because he DIDN'T vote for Pygmy. Unless we are to believe he trusts stats more than facts. But I need to continue catching up.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:07:36 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 10:07:36 GMT -5
I didn't notice that diggit had voted for Roosh. I'm not exactly comfy having two votes on any player without a town-wide consensus on a target, because I could definitely be wrong about Roosh and I don't want scum vote manipulation to be the way this game ends. I can't do a thing about the two votes for diggit, but I can You should have acutely noticed that Diggit voted for Roosh, because he DIDN'T vote for Pygmy. Unless we are to believe he trusts stats more than facts. OK, but... I didn't notice it until I saw Idle's vote count. I'm not sure how you'd like me to respond to this.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:08:54 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:08:54 GMT -5
Wow, I didn't expect anyone to actually bother thinking seriously about that theory. Assuming I have the gist of it, it is an interesting theory, but it leaves me with a few questions. Assuming it is true, what does this mean about the doctor? Does this mean you think either Roosh or I am the doctor and we're laying low not sure what to do? Yes, that's what I was suggesting-- you've read the theory correctly. In this theory (just a theory, ala Kansas Evolution) you or Roosh would have been doctor. If so, what should we do, as for testing the theory? No idea. But I gotta go to sleep-- sorry I haven't been keeping up well but it was a harsh day IRL. Meanwhile I'm tempted (knowing my cockamamie theory is largely untestable and likely to look loony) to vote again for Diggit for inconsistency and strange decisions within today's play. How many scum DO you think there are, D? Why aren't you voting for Pygmy, Dig? You know he's scum, right? Shouldn't you be arguing for this certain thing? The thing is, capybara, that I was voting for pygmy. But the other thing is, capybara, that during these games I have been trying the other players point of view (which, incidentally, helped me to guess your kooky theory). So let's try to see my thought process together: 1. Neutral townies see two Doctor's claiming. They can't be certain of any of them 2. Arguably, the worst case scenario during this Day (for Town) would be the mislynch of the Doctor 3. Like storyteller explained, if there are three psychos, point 2 would not be bad. It would be catastrophic 4. On the other hand, if there are three psychos, two of them would be hidden among the non-claimants 5. The benefit of 4 would not only be the better percentage, but in the event of a mis-lynch you'd guarantee the Doctor's survival. And that would give the Town a slim chance to survive the Night Therefore, I concluded that for town the best route to go would be to vote for one of those three. And I acted in that sense. Yes, I know pygmy is a psycho. But if I can't prove it to the rest of the Town, my vote on him would be fruitless.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:15:08 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:15:08 GMT -5
I didn't notice that diggit had voted for Roosh. I'm not exactly comfy having two votes on any player without a town-wide consensus on a target, because I could definitely be wrong about Roosh and I don't want scum vote manipulation to be the way this game ends. I can't do a thing about the two votes for diggit, but I can You should have acutely noticed that Diggit voted for Roosh, because he DIDN'T vote for Pygmy. Unless we are to believe he trusts stats more than facts. But I need to continue catching up. Again, capybara, read my previous post! I had my vote on pygmy, as soon as I claimed! I moved it because I thought it was best for town! Still, I'll unvote roosh now. But again: 1. We need the Doctor to survive toDay or else 1. A mislynch toDay will lose the game to town!
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:17:11 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 10:17:11 GMT -5
But again: 1. We need the Doctor to survive toDay or else 1. A mislynch toDay will lose the game to town! Well, unless there are only two scum left. Right?
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:17:27 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:17:27 GMT -5
Last but not least: your kooky theory, capybara, is invalid for a simple reason:
If there was a third Doctor claim toDay, we'd have a guaranteed 66% chance of lynching psycho among those three.
And we'd only have a 33% chance of lynching the Doctor. Those odds would definitely be against the psychos.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:19:13 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:19:13 GMT -5
But again: 1. We need the Doctor to survive toDay or else 1. A mislynch toDay will lose the game to town! Well, unless there are only two scum left. Right? Correct. And in that case there's no problem: lynch me! It's what I said yesterday: if the town is still in play toMorrow, I'd have no problem getting lynched then.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:33:49 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 10:33:49 GMT -5
I have a feeling we are in very big trouble. The vote "leader" right now is diggitcamara, with one vote. The deadline is four and a half hours away and we haven't achieved a consensus on whether we should pick out of Group A or Group B, let alone on who we should target. I don't know what else to say.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:39:36 GMT -5
Post by capybara on Aug 29, 2007 10:39:36 GMT -5
Ok, now that our potential third doctors have checked in, I drop the Krazy Konspiracy idea, which I'm surprised got as much traction as it did. My problem now is that I don't know whether there are 2 or 3 scum. And also I have not had a strong scum tell on any of the three not-doktor candidates. Of the early Drain-wagon I was really suspecting Mad, but he had been becoming TOO mad lately.
Story-- the reason I've started to become suspicious of you is because I've been burned before by someone playing very rationally and very pro-town who was a pirate captain. Because I've seen eye to eye with you over the entire game is, unfortunately, the entire reason I'm suspicious of you now, but your voting record largely absolves you in my eyes. Roosh's voting record is just allover the place, and I'm not sure what to make of it.If he's scum he puts on a good show of being swayed by arguments, sometimes. Blaster's voting record doesn't look too hot.
But I'll have to continue this train of thought a bit later. I've been working with the premise that there are 3 scum left, and it IS certain that at least 1 of you three is scum. I don't know about 2/3. That's probable but not absolutely certain.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:53:26 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:53:26 GMT -5
I have a feeling we are in very big trouble. The vote "leader" right now is diggitcamara, with one vote. The deadline is four and a half hours away and we haven't achieved a consensus on whether we should pick out of Group A or Group B, let alone on who we should target. I don't know what else to say. I agree: we should have some kind of consensus. So: I have voiced both my thought that there should be a vote for one of the "three". I also have said I would vote (for now) for roosh (this is not a vote). Please post both your vote preference (doctors/one of the "three") and/or vote outright.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 10:53:56 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 10:53:56 GMT -5
Ok, now that our potential third doctors have checked in, I drop the Krazy Konspiracy idea, which I'm surprised got as much traction as it did. My problem now is that I don't know whether there are 2 or 3 scum. And also I have not had a strong scum tell on any of the three not-doktor candidates. Of the early Drain-wagon I was really suspecting Mad, but he had been becoming TOO mad lately. Story-- the reason I've started to become suspicious of you is because I've been burned before by someone playing very rationally and very pro-town who was a pirate captain. Because I've seen eye to eye with you over the entire game is, unfortunately, the entire reason I'm suspicious of you now, but your voting record largely absolves you in my eyes. Roosh's voting record is just allover the place, and I'm not sure what to make of it.If he's scum he puts on a good show of being swayed by arguments, sometimes. Blaster's voting record doesn't look too hot. But I'll have to continue this train of thought a bit later. I've been working with the premise that there are 3 scum left, and it IS certain that at least 1 of you three is scum. I don't know about 2/3. That's probable but not absolutely certain. ... who are you talking to? Yourself?
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 11:00:10 GMT -5
Post by capybara on Aug 29, 2007 11:00:10 GMT -5
... who are you talking to? Yourself? Thinking out loud, Mister Bellicose.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 11:07:47 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 11:07:47 GMT -5
... who are you talking to? Yourself? Thinking out loud, Mister Bellicose. Sorry that came out too strong. Actually, your talking out loud is rather fitting for this town, isn't it? And since I am the Doctor: pulls out notepad Settles down on his chair [paternally]And how do you feel when you're overheard while musing to yourself?[/paternally]
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 11:12:29 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 11:12:29 GMT -5
I have a feeling we are in very big trouble. The vote "leader" right now is diggitcamara, with one vote. The deadline is four and a half hours away and we haven't achieved a consensus on whether we should pick out of Group A or Group B, let alone on who we should target. I don't know what else to say. I agree: we should have some kind of consensus. So: I have voiced both my thought that there should be a vote for one of the "three". I also have said I would vote (for now) for roosh (this is not a vote). Please post both your vote preference (doctors/one of the "three") and/or vote outright. Not that this is any kind of secret or surprise, but: I think we should leave the Doctor claimants alone for toDay. As for the rest: it's funny. Two days ago, driving home from work, all I could think about was how sure I was that Blaster Master was scum. Last night, driving home from auditions, all I could think about was how sure I was that Roosh was scum. This morning, I was leaning Blaster Master again. This waffling is pointless, I know, but I fear I will never get any closer to certainty than I am now. I will vote for either candidate.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 11:54:28 GMT -5
Post by nesta on Aug 29, 2007 11:54:28 GMT -5
I guess it's time to do this, for better or worse: Vote Blaster Master.
It's in any true townie's best interest to follow suit. I'm not trying to bully anyone, but this is where my vote is going to be Today, and capy has said the same on the genius board. Neither of us feels very confident about this, but at least personally I feel even less confident about voting for storyteller or Roosh.
If there are three scum left and and we split our votes the scum will be able to lynch a townie and it will be game over. I'm willing to entertain the idea of voting for someone else, but I doubt I will at this point.
|
|
Blaster Master
Mome Rath
The player formerly know as BLAM!
Now 34.788% less repellant to Sharks! :( [on:I WANT TO DIE!][of:I WANT TO LIVE!]
Posts: 0
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:03:52 GMT -5
Post by Blaster Master on Aug 29, 2007 12:03:52 GMT -5
Okay, I think I've made it clear that my intentions are to vote between Roosh and Storyteller. My preference at this point would be to vote for Storyteller, because, as I've pointed out in my long diatribes, he's been steadily and consistently twisting facts ever so slightly in his favor. I've had a townie read on Roosh most of the game which is why I've been hesitant to vote for him because I was guessing, prior to the doctor debacle, that if there were three scum, they were Pygmy, Diggit, and Storyteller.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:05:44 GMT -5
Post by diggitcamara on Aug 29, 2007 12:05:44 GMT -5
I guess it's time to do this, for better or worse: Vote Blaster Master. It's in any true townie's best interest to follow suit. I'm not trying to bully anyone, but this is where my vote is going to be Today, and capy has said the same on the genius board. Neither of us feels very confident about this, but at least personally I feel even less confident about voting for storyteller or Roosh. If there are three scum left and and we split our votes the scum will be able to lynch a townie and it will be game over. I'm willing to entertain the idea of voting for someone else, but I doubt I will at this point. Ok. I'll follow suit, like I said before, and vote Blaster Master
|
|
Blaster Master
Mome Rath
The player formerly know as BLAM!
Now 34.788% less repellant to Sharks! :( [on:I WANT TO DIE!][of:I WANT TO LIVE!]
Posts: 0
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:09:30 GMT -5
Post by Blaster Master on Aug 29, 2007 12:09:30 GMT -5
I guess it's time to do this, for better or worse: Vote Blaster Master. It's in any true townie's best interest to follow suit. I'm not trying to bully anyone, but this is where my vote is going to be Today, and capy has said the same on the genius board. Neither of us feels very confident about this, but at least personally I feel even less confident about voting for storyteller or Roosh. If there are three scum left and and we split our votes the scum will be able to lynch a townie and it will be game over. I'm willing to entertain the idea of voting for someone else, but I doubt I will at this point. Well nesta, obviously, I am certain you are wrong, but because you provide no reasoning, I'm not sure how I can convince you of that fact.
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:09:38 GMT -5
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 29, 2007 12:09:38 GMT -5
Okay, I think I've made it clear that my intentions are to vote between Roosh and Storyteller. My preference at this point would be to vote for Storyteller, because, as I've pointed out in my long diatribes, he's been steadily and consistently twisting facts ever so slightly in his favor. You have done no such thing. You've pointed out places where there is potential for disagreement over interpretation of facts. You have not pointed out any "twisting of facts" at all, let alone a consistent record of same. Oh, to heck with it. vote Blaster Master
|
|
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:18:11 GMT -5
Post by nesta on Aug 29, 2007 12:18:11 GMT -5
Well nesta, obviously, I am certain you are wrong, but because you provide no reasoning, I'm not sure how I can convince you of that fact. See storyteller's case against you. You've already defended yourself so I didn't feel the need to bring up the same points again. What could possibly convince me is if you built a strong case against storyteller, but honestly I'm not sure it would be worth your effort because it's so close to the deadline. If you are town and there are three scum then I guess I get to bear much of the responsibility for the final decision that cost the town the game, but a decision had to be made and you seem just a little more scummy to me than storyteller.
|
|
Blaster Master
Mome Rath
The player formerly know as BLAM!
Now 34.788% less repellant to Sharks! :( [on:I WANT TO DIE!][of:I WANT TO LIVE!]
Posts: 0
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Six
Aug 29, 2007 12:20:35 GMT -5
Post by Blaster Master on Aug 29, 2007 12:20:35 GMT -5
You have done no such thing. You've pointed out places where there is potential for disagreement over interpretation of facts. You have not pointed out any "twisting of facts" at all, let alone a consistent record of same. Oh, to heck with it. vote Blaster Master This is just infuriating! I pointed it out SEVERAL times, such as stating that NAF was the first to FOS me, neglecting your very OWN FOS that prompted him, and after it STILL gained no traction, you BOTH dropped it for the rest of the Day, but you claimed you didn't. Or the whole point about me voting for Drainbead with the "intention" of moving it off, when I voted with good reason, and your vote was specifically stated that you have "little confidence" in the vote and over her smudges seeming "weird". Take a look for yourself! In the first case, you initiate the tractionless FOS, but you try to shrug it off on NAF. In the second case, you voted for Drainbead with the obvious caveat that you would change it, but then find a way to blame ME for it, when I was simply being specific about my suspicions AND why I'm not voting there.
|
|