|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 20:21:04 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 24, 2009 20:21:04 GMT -5
Couple of musings and then onto the show. This is the second game in a row on this board that I've been handed a crud role. In skrull I was a miller and now this nomsense. For those of you who have played with me you uinderstand that I am the most lucid soul in the universe. Always posting witty yet concise and accurate analysis. Just kidding. I suck at this game and merely provide comic relief until my chatter gets me offed in most cases.
I am Master Hand (I swear I don't believe Pede's random.org assertion - just joshing)
I am the Chief of Staff.
I don't know where Hal got "high tier" from but it feels like it from where I sit.
Basically I don't do dick except to try and escape "day kills". That was the part of my PM that stood out. Not necessarily a lynch but a day kill.
If I am "day killed" then all town protective roles lose their power.
When I inquired upon our Mods what a protective role could encompass I was assured that it was along the lines of a traditional Doc type role, not a blocker or redirector.
My one power was that if all "docs" were killed was that I would become a fully functioning doc. I am not there so there has to be some still in play.
For those of you have played with me at all you have probably noticed that my play style is markedly different than other games. I so did not want to get lynched and hurt our cause that I submarined. But I tried to keep up my participation at night in the hope that some baddie would kill me then and not handcuff the town. So I lurked, but I did it trying to help town.
So help me, if I don't get a normal role in the next game or so I am haunting the Ogs' dreams.
So, I sure as hell hope that there is not a day killer non aligned town out there or we be soap. But I am hopeful based on our mods comments that that part of the game is behind us.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 20:47:12 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 24, 2009 20:47:12 GMT -5
NETA:
And bt that part of the game I meant to mean, without being mean. That there would be month roles left that would fit that condition.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 20:48:15 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 24, 2009 20:48:15 GMT -5
On the one hand, I'm confused as to why paulwhoisaghost's action didn't fail by Nanook.
On the other hand, I'm reminded of bufftabby's play in the Gastard mod game. I made the assumption that bufftabby was unnightkillable when I tried to kill her, and she ran with it and pretended she was one of the fake deities that didn't actually exist and couldn't be killed at Night.
So we had several people claim they tried to target Nanook on Night 3, notably Parzival, Kat, and molefan. Parzival and Kat both mentioned that they had trouble targeting someone but molefan was the first who mentioned Nanook by name, claiming he investigated Nanook and failed.
But let's take a convoluted theory. Let's say molefan is scum and actually dug a hole and protected Nanook on Night 3 and that's why Kat and Parzival couldn't find him. We don't even know what happened if anybody targeted Hoopy/roxis on their protected Nights. Back to the theory, Nanook then runs with the "I'm a ninja" theory to get people to not target him anymore at Night. Now molefan can protect somebody else, say himself or another scum buddy. Or use his Pikmin for something more nefarious.
What I still don't understand is why Parzival wandered around and pumped up somebody else, while Kat just didn't work.
Parzival, a quick question: you can sidekick anyone, right? If you accidentally sidekick a scum, they'll get a boost?
For the record, this is a very convoluted theory, and it assumes paul, Kat, and Parzival are all town. I don't particularly believe that's the case, and I don't really subscribe to this but I'm putting this out there as a possible explanation besides "Nanook isn't really Sheik."
Not sure what I make of crazypunker and peeker's claims. I'll have to chew on them.
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 20:49:27 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 24, 2009 20:49:27 GMT -5
Month roles?
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:17:57 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 24, 2009 21:17:57 GMT -5
So I thought about this a bit more and I think I'll take a different approach at the Natlaw/Nanook thing So. Assuming that Natlaw is Town and is Zelda, then he would be telling the truth about being tied to another player through a lovers role. That player appears to be scum. I still don't think that it is Nanook, but seeing as how the rest of you are convinced it is, I propose the following. We lynch Natlaw. This gives KidV the protection power for tomorrow, and it will kill a scum in the process. Granted we lose a town also, but if I am right and Nanook{/b] is not Sheik then we also know who Roxis should use her powers on. So if everything goes down the way that I suspect it will, then we get two dead scum at the cost of one town, with the added benefit of not losing that townies power for an extra day. If I am wrong, and Nanook is indeed Sheik, then we get one dead Scum at the expense of one dead Town, but we still get the bonus of not losing that town power for an additional day. After considering this, I have come to the conclusion that we should not lynch Nanook{/b] but Natlaw Natlaw instead. I'm curious to see what you all think of this, but because my ability to check the pages and post replies is restricted as it goes through my wife and sent via html code in an email to me, I am going to vote now. UNVOTE ALL Vote #1 Natlaw Vote #2 Peeker Vote #3 CrzyPunk
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:21:08 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 24, 2009 21:21:08 GMT -5
So I thought about this a bit more and I think I'll take a different approach at the Natlaw/Nanook thing So. Assuming that Natlaw is Town and is Zelda, then he would be telling the truth about being tied to another player through a lovers role. That player appears to be scum. I still don't think that it is Nanook, but seeing as how the rest of you are convinced it is, I propose the following. We lynch Natlaw. This gives KidV the protection power for tomorrow, and it will kill a scum in the process. Granted we lose a town also, but if I am right and Nanook{/b] is not Sheik then we also know who Roxis should use her powers on. So if everything goes down the way that I suspect it will, then we get two dead scum at the cost of one town, with the added benefit of not losing that townies power for an extra day. If I am wrong, and Nanook is indeed Sheik, then we get one dead Scum at the expense of one dead Town, but we still get the bonus of not losing that town power for an additional day. After considering this, I have come to the conclusion that we should not lynch Nanook{/b] but Natlaw Natlaw instead. I'm curious to see what you all think of this, but because my ability to check the pages and post replies is restricted as it goes through my wife and sent via html code in an email to me, I am going to vote now. UNVOTE ALL Vote #1 Natlaw Vote #2 Peeker Vote #3 CrzyPunk
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:26:10 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 24, 2009 21:26:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:40:28 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 24, 2009 21:40:28 GMT -5
That leads me to infer that there's no proscum doctor. Why would you turn around now and cast doubt on a claimed doctor? I inferred the same thing, that there's likely no scum doctor. But at the same time, I also thought there's a possibility a scum has a multiple-power role that has a doc option. It's unlikely, but plausible. To be honest, I was just trying to float a possible idea as to why paul's action wasn't redirected or he didn't get a notification of failure. It's a very out-there theory.
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:44:28 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 24, 2009 21:44:28 GMT -5
Very very out there.
To be honest, the phrase "to be honest" is starting to make me cringe.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 21:45:45 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Feb 24, 2009 21:45:45 GMT -5
Couple of musings and then onto the show. This is the second game in a row on this board that I've been handed a crud role. In skrull I was a miller and now this nomsense. For those of you who have played with me you uinderstand that I am the most lucid soul in the universe. Always posting witty yet concise and accurate analysis. Just kidding. I suck at this game and merely provide comic relief until my chatter gets me offed in most cases. I am Master Hand (I swear I don't believe Pede's random.org assertion - just joshing) I am the Chief of Staff. I don't know where Hal got "high tier" from but it feels like it from where I sit. Basically I don't do dick except to try and escape "day kills". That was the part of my PM that stood out. Not necessarily a lynch but a day kill. If I am "day killed" then all town protective roles lose their power. When I inquired upon our Mods what a protective role could encompass I was assured that it was along the lines of a traditional Doc type role, not a blocker or redirector. My one power was that if all "docs" were killed was that I would become a fully functioning doc. I am not there so there has to be some still in play. For those of you have played with me at all you have probably noticed that my play style is markedly different than other games. I so did not want to get lynched and hurt our cause that I submarined. But I tried to keep up my participation at night in the hope that some baddie would kill me then and not handcuff the town. So I lurked, but I did it trying to help town. So help me, if I don't get a normal role in the next game or so I am haunting the Ogs' dreams. So, I sure as hell hope that there is not a day killer non aligned town out there or we be soap. But I am hopeful based on our mods comments that that part of the game is behind us. Interesting that it is a cole's notes for your role as a possed to a PM...Now I know you did say this: I am all for a mass role claim. It's just that you won't get a quoted PM, which I had difficulty doing in the past and will have to be a paraphrase. Sorry guys/gals I am not going to request a backup to pre upgrade info merely for purposes of this game. Which I have to say why is it hard or impossible to quote the PM? After all remember me last game with the coding of this board touble, yet I found no difficulty in cut and pasting it, in order to post my PM for this game. You high light it, cut it, go to the thread post it and add the quote tags before and after. Even players such as roxis which this is her first game on the board and yet she had no trouble. Makes me wonder and yes you can call this a smudge if you want and I am sorry if it is, but makes me wonder if this is geniune trouble in posting it or a way to avoid posting that there is no PM to really post in the first place. And as I said I am sorry if this is a smudge, I just find it really hard to grasp that a player, that has played multiple games on here, can still have that much trouble with the coding.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 22:17:54 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 24, 2009 22:17:54 GMT -5
Sorry about the double post. I am playing through my wife via emails and she has both missed a couple of posts that I sent her, and isn't as familiar with message boards as I am. I recieved a PM back from Pedescribe confirming that I did indeed hit Nanook. Here it is:
So, I stand by my theory. Now, to Peeker I apologize. I must have missed your bird in hand post. And I didn't realize that you were saying we should set Nanook aside and go after the next best thing. I still find it both sad and funny that you think the next best thing is my horrible slightly anti-town power. But whatever, I'm not convinced you are town either so it could just be you planting seeds of doubt.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 22:20:10 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 24, 2009 22:20:10 GMT -5
I am so glad that you are an expert on access to my company's site.
Can you call my I M director tomorrow and explain to him how access is as you describe it in order that I violate HIPPA.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that talk. He's ex CIA and hasn't shit for what I can tell to be two decades.
Hey, the BB WAN farm did a consolidate. All messages from more than twenty days were archived. If you think that I am requesting those messages for your guys amusement you are wrong. Sorry, shaggy
Vote 1 shag
Can someone really justify a potential vote because of an individual access/archive issue?
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 22:29:52 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 24, 2009 22:29:52 GMT -5
So what, are we waiting on Nanook now for the mass claim? For some reason I doubt he's going to help us out here. Molefan and shaggy have already posted their full PMs, right?
I think Kat should go ahead and do hers....you're the last one of the completely unclaimed. Then I can go ahead and post my other roles tonight before I go to bed. Otherwise I'll have to wait until tomorrow evening to post them.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 22:35:14 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Feb 24, 2009 22:35:14 GMT -5
I am so glad that you are an expert on access to my company's site. Can you call my I M director tomorrow and explain to him how access is as you describe it in order that I violate HIPPA. I'd love to be a fly on the wall for that talk. He's ex CIA and hasn't shit for what I can tell to be two decades. Hey, the BB WAN farm did a consolidate. All messages from more than twenty days were archived. If you think that I am requesting those messages for your guys amusement you are wrong. Sorry, shaggyVote 1 shagCan someone really justify a potential vote because of an individual access/archive issue? So let me get this straight, your company can access your personal account on web sites and delete personal messages? I can understand not being alloud onto web sites at work, after all I am not alloud onto FB at work, cause it is blocked. But to say they can log onto closed access web sites, such as this, dude that is a violation of personal privacy rights. Cause those PM's are not stored on your computer but unless you delete them, they are stored here on cyber space, through the server that hosts this web site. So as I said ulness they access your personal account and delete them, then I do not understand how you could be missing them. But as i said access a personal closed access account, is againt the law. Also, on the off chance that deos happen, you really think the MOD can not send it to you again? I bet they still have the PM and can forward it to you again.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 22:48:55 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Feb 24, 2009 22:48:55 GMT -5
Hey, the BB WAN farm did a consolidate. All messages from more than twenty days were archived. If you think that I am requesting those messages for your guys amusement you are wrong. Sorry, shaggyVote 1 shagCan someone really justify a potential vote because of an individual access/archive issue? And yet you've made an actual vote. You do know that you never need to delete PMs on the board, right? There's no reason for you to have lost access to it. To answer your question, Pollux -- yes, I'm pretty sure that I can boost scum if I target them by accident, since there's nothing that says otherwise. On the whole, though, I expect that the scum powers are less powerful than the town ones. It is indeed a danger, which is why I said my power's kind of crappy. As for today, the only thing we have definite knowledge on is that Nanook lied, and the only person with reason to lie is scum. Everything else is speculation based on possible roles and could maybe be wrong. (In short, I intend to vote for Nanook.)
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 23:01:13 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Feb 24, 2009 23:01:13 GMT -5
So now I am going to vote:
VOTE # 1 peek VOTE #2 nanook VOTE #3 crazy
peek are for my reason's in 4.134 and also for the fact that to me the whole my boss went in and deleted off this web site my Pm's to me...this just sound's like the most rediculous thing. As far as I know, the only way they can be deleted is by you or idle , so I just am not buying that they were deleted by him. Claiming someone else logged onto your person account and deleted your personal messages...I am sorry but I am so calling BS on that one. Not to mention on your post yesterday said nothing about it being deleted, it said cause you have trouble quoting it. Since it can not be both which is it? your first explanation that you have trouble quoting it or your seconed explanation now that they are deleted? Well which one is it?
nanook this is cause of the event's of yesterday and last night. I am sure I do not need to go into details here.
crazy This is cause I see the point's that hoopy has raised but for the moment, this is more of a FOS vote then anything else. Since I think there are others obviously deserving a higher vote number.
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 23:25:42 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 24, 2009 23:25:42 GMT -5
I think Kat should go ahead and do hers....you're the last one of the completely unclaimed. Then I can go ahead and post my other roles tonight before I go to bed. Otherwise I'll have to wait until tomorrow evening to post them. I have no problem with this. I am going to edit out a couple of spots, but will repost it unedited if there's a call for it: Dark Samus (Town Bus Driver) On planet Aether, you had only one goal. Kill the one who was your impostor. It was the only thing that gave you any reason to exist. You cornered Samus Aran as Dark Aether was exploding, and were ready to kill her. Unfortunately, your plans went wildly off course. It's probably a good thing she and you were sucked into this gladiatorial combat sport, considering how the battle was going, though. Once here you couldn't make overt attacks without being restrained, and Master Hand was careful never to pair you and Samus up. You probably would have gone on a killing spree had Captain Falcon not taught you humanity and given you a steady supply of phazon. Using a bit of excess phazon, you have some influence in the form of the announcer. Each day, you can try to influence him to switch two of the player announcements. That way, anyone looking for the first player will find the second, and vice versa. 1. Every night, you may attempt to switch 2 players. This switch has a <deleted> success rate. Anyone using an action on player X will hit player Y, and vice versa, unless they would hit themselves. In such an event, the action would go through successfully. 2. If you choose not to perform a switch, <deleted> Note: The PM I received to indicate a failed switch read: You attempted to exert your influence on the Announcer, but it failed. He was not fooled tonight. Ah well. Perhaps next time. This happened last Night, and Night 1.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 23:29:26 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Feb 24, 2009 23:29:26 GMT -5
So in the failed switch it said the announcer wasn't fooled, but when you targeted Nanook it said something different.
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 24, 2009 23:34:02 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 24, 2009 23:34:02 GMT -5
Uh, yes. I posted the PM I got regarding Nanook, but here it is again: You spent your night trying to find Nanook and his place on the record boards, but were unable to. You know your power was working, but something about Nanook prevented you from using it.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 1:04:20 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 25, 2009 1:04:20 GMT -5
So I had theorized that the scum had a redirect role. I also thought that at least one of the unclaimed was scum. But out of the three, I had thought that Punker and Peeker were the most suspicious. I now think that Kat and Peeker are the most suspicious.
Kat!, who did you target night 2,3, and 4? I find it curious that you have a redirect ability, and Nanook was no where to be found that night. It might be a crazy conspiracy theory, but Kat's role (as a scum power) would support my crazy theory.
I still believe that voting Natlaw today would be our best move. I know we sacrifice him, and I'm sorry for that. But it is for the greater good. Especially with the advantage we gained with the no kill last night. You might think Peeker is scum, and I have a feeling that he is, but voting for him without evidence is ridiculous. Especially when your evidence is some complex ( although possibly made up) story about Blackberry and a company conspiracy to access his account. (I don't think that's what he was trying to say but I thought it was funny).
In any case, voting for any one person that you think is scum leaves a chance of killing town instead. So either you get a dead scum, or a dead town and the scum grow one step closer to winning. On the other hand, if we vote for Natlaw we guarantee ourselves a dead scum tonight and gain a protection power for tomorrow. Plus, if I am right and Nanook is not the scum with the lover role, then not only do we get a guarantee dead scum and a protection power for tomorrow, but we also line up our lynch for tomorrow and can spend the Day figuring out who to lynch the following day.
If you skipped my paragraph above, please stop skimming and read it. I know I have made some mistakes and quick judgements this game, but the logic in my argument makes sense. I've had a lot of time to think about this. ( I get really bored when I'm out to sea).
UNVOTE ALL
Vote #1 Natlaw Vote #2 Kat! Vote #3 Peeker
Natlaw, What do you think about lynching you tonight? I know it sucks, but you mentioned it before and I feel like it is the bet move right now.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 3:31:36 GMT -5
Post by roxis on Feb 25, 2009 3:31:36 GMT -5
Does anyone else get the distinct impression that peeker's role is a little too convenient? I'd like to see his PM, though it seems we won't get the chance.
I also find it odd that both Kat and peeker woke up with headaches and they're two people I now believe to be scum.
I'm also down with a Natlaw lynch since it will allow KidV to use Zelda's protective powers.
Vote 1 Natlaw Vote 2 peekercpa Vote 3 Kat
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 6:36:09 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Feb 25, 2009 6:36:09 GMT -5
I think peeker is trying to say he plays by using the thread/PM notification e-mails and his company deleted his e-mail backlog. Anyway, I assume he (and everyone else) tells the truth about real-life things that affect the game, so this is no reason to vote for him, imo. Basically I don't do dick except to try and escape "day kills". That was the part of my PM that stood out. Not necessarily a lynch but a day kill. If I am "day killed" then all town protective roles lose their power. peekercpa, do you have any powers to escape Day kills? Each day, you can try to influence him to switch two of the player announcements. That way, anyone looking for the first player will find the second, and vice versa. 1. Every night, you may attempt to switch 2 players. Is the underlined Day/Night conflict pedescribe's fault or yours, Kat?
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 7:23:06 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 25, 2009 7:23:06 GMT -5
Sorry about the double post. I am playing through my wife via emails and she has both missed a couple of posts that I sent her, and isn't as familiar with message boards as I am. Did you remind her not to edit your posts?
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 7:50:45 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 25, 2009 7:50:45 GMT -5
Plus, if I am right and Nanook is not the scum with the lover role What was his fascination with Zelda, then? He simulposted a long post with Natlaw where Zelda called out Nanook at the same time Nanook called out Zelda for the second time. Granted that was 12 minutes after Natlaw first brings up Zelda, but that was a pretty long post for only a 12 minute window. I acknowledge the possibility of Nanook not being Sheik, but it seems that SCUM would have had to have decided that they were going to set this up ahead of time with Nanook being the first to call out Zelda back on Day 1.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 10:05:33 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Feb 25, 2009 10:05:33 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | Hoopy Frood | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | Natlaw | Kat | peekercpa | peekercpa | shaggy | | | roxis | Natlaw | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | peekercpa | 8 (8) | shaggy | Hoopy Frood, roxis | paulwhoisaghost | Natlaw | 6 (6) | paulwhoisaghost, roxis | | | crazypunker | 4 (4) | Hoopy Frood | | shaggy | shaggy | 3 (0) | peekercpa | | | Kat | 3 (3) | | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | Nanook | 2 (2) | | shaggy | | KidVermicious | 1 (1) | | | Hoopy Frood |
Not Voting: Kat, KidVermicious, Nanook, Natlaw, Parzival, Pollux Oil, crazypunker, molefan --FCOD
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 10:43:31 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 25, 2009 10:43:31 GMT -5
Sorry about the double post. I am playing through my wife via emails and she has both missed a couple of posts that I sent her, and isn't as familiar with message boards as I am. I recieved a PM back from Pedescribe confirming that I did indeed hit Nanook. Here it is: So, I stand by my theory. Now, to Peeker I apologize. I must have missed your bird in hand post. And I didn't realize that you were saying we should set Nanook aside and go after the next best thing. I still find it both sad and funny that you think the next best thing is my horrible slightly anti-town power. But whatever, I'm not convinced you are town either so it could just be you planting seeds of doubt. You are NOT ALLOWED to edit. Due to the unique circumstances of your ability to post, I'm not going to modkill you. But, I would like to see the original, unedited post.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 11:36:40 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 25, 2009 11:36:40 GMT -5
Due to the unique circumstances of your ability to post, I'm not going to modkill you. But, I would like to see the original, unedited post. I saw it. Believe me that the change contained no situational-relevant information that I can recall. The reason I noticed the edit is something had changed in the post when I read it this morning vs. what I saw when he posted it last night. I then saw the "edit" field underneath it. I can PM you the change as I remember it if you want, but right now I won't say any more publicly because he may have changed more than just what I saw, and it's important that he state his case before I give him any ideas to explain what he did, in case there is more to it than I think. But for now, we should consider the edit innocuous since that's what it appeared. And I'm saying this as a metagame player, not as a character. I don't know paul's alignment, and from a metagame perspective I don't want to see a modkill enter into this, especially since the actual edit wasn't a big deal, though the action of doing it is.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 17:19:33 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 25, 2009 17:19:33 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | Hoopy Frood | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | Natlaw | Kat | peekercpa | peekercpa | shaggy | | | roxis | Natlaw | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | peekercpa | 8 (8) | shaggy | Hoopy Frood, roxis | paulwhoisaghost | Natlaw | 6 (6) | paulwhoisaghost, roxis | | | crazypunker | 4 (4) | Hoopy Frood | | shaggy | shaggy | 3 (0) | peekercpa | | | Kat | 3 (3) | | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | paulwhoisaghost | 3 (3) |   |   |   | Nanook | 2 (2) | | shaggy | | KidVermicious | 1 (1) | | | Hoopy Frood |
Not Voting: Kat, KidVermicious, Nanook, Natlaw, Parzival, Pollux Oil, crazypunker, molefan The 3 points on paulwhoisaghost are only present as a penalty for EDITING, as a reminder that it is strictly not allowed, and as a much preferable alternative to something drastic, like a modkill.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 18:17:02 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Feb 25, 2009 18:17:02 GMT -5
I think peeker is trying to say he plays by using the thread/PM notification e-mails and his company deleted his e-mail backlog. Anyway, I assume he (and everyone else) tells the truth about real-life things that affect the game, so this is no reason to vote for him, imo. But here is the thing I am having trouble with, even if he was getting the email notification's, wouldn't the PM'S still be here stored on the board? I never have used the email notification so I could be wrong but I assumed that you simply get a email notifying you that you have a PM, but the pm it's self would be here on the board. So even deleting those email's would not delete the PM. The only way to delete the PM'S would be from access on this board it's self. Now as I said I could be wrong but that is my thinking by the fact that it is called PM email notification not PM email forwarding. If someone could clarify and if it is that the PM'S are not here but through the email, then I see your point and I am sorry. However if they are stored here but emailed as well, then my argument would hold water atleast a little. Especially when combined with what I pointed out, that he first said he would not because he had trouble with the coding then when pressed why the trouble he changed his story to they are deleted.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 25, 2009 18:44:13 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 25, 2009 18:44:13 GMT -5
Plus, if I am right and Nanook is not the scum with the lover role What was his fascination with Zelda, then? He simulposted a long post with Natlaw where Zelda called out Nanook at the same time Nanook called out Zelda for the second time. Granted that was 12 minutes after Natlaw first brings up Zelda, but that was a pretty long post for only a 12 minute window. I acknowledge the possibility of Nanook not being Sheik, but it seems that SCUM would have had to have decided that they were going to set this up ahead of time with Nanook being the first to call out Zelda back on Day 1. If the scum new that one of them was Sheik and that they had a lovers role with one of the non scum, why would they not call out to Zelda? It doesn't inherently call them out as being scum. And it wasn't just Nanook calling out to Zelda. Ed called out to her as well. You may have written that off, but I don't think that one calling out to Zelda is further evidence for him being Sheik, and the other calling out was just spam. The scum would need to call find out who Zelda was or risk killing her, and through the lovers role they would accidentally kill one of themselves too. Now, if you were scum, and Nanook was Sheik, would you think it wise for him to call out? Or would you have other members of the scum try to call out in an effort to find who Zelda was without giving away which of the scum Sheik is? It doesn't really matter if I am right or not, it's just how I would play it if I was scum. Especially if I was Sheik. I wouldn't say anything about the situation, I would stay as neutral about the Zelda/Sheik thing as is possible. and... since peeker is in the lead and I would rather have Natlaw lynched, Unvote PeekerVote #3 CrzyPunkr[/b]
|
|