|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:12:57 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 26, 2009 19:12:57 GMT -5
Hey mods, can I get confirmation that the vote count is actually correct, and paulwhoisaghost has 6 votes against him despite only have one vote on him by KidV?
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:29:06 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 26, 2009 19:29:06 GMT -5
Hey mods, can I get confirmation that the vote count is actually correct, and paulwhoisaghost has 6 votes against him despite only have one vote on him by KidV? That is correct. The other three votes are Penalty Votes for editing benignly under extenuating circumstances.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:29:43 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 26, 2009 19:29:43 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | paulwhoisaghost | Nanook | Kat | crazypunker | Hoopy Frood | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | peekercpa | Nanook | Natlaw | | KidVermicious | crazypunker | Parzival | Nanook | Parzival | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | Kat | crazypunker | KidVermicious | crazypunker | KidVermicious | Nanook | crazypunker | molefan | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | peekercpa | shaggy | Nanook | Natlaw | roxis | | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Nanook | 13 (13) | paulwhoisaghost, Parzival | crazypunker, peekercpa, shaggy | KidVermicious | peekercpa | 12 (10) | molefan, shaggy | Hoopy Frood, KidVermicious, roxis | | crazypunker | 9 (8) | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost, Natlaw, crazypunker, shaggy | KidVermicious | 9 (7) | crazypunker | Natlaw, molefan | Hoopy Frood, Pollux Oil | Kat | 6 (5) | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | paulwhoisaghost | 6 (6) | KidVermicious | | | shaggy | 3 (3) | peekercpa | | | Parzival | 2 (2) | | Parzival | | Natlaw | 1 (1) | | | peekercpa | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | Parzival | molefan | 1 (1) | | | molefan |
Not Voting: Kat, Nanook
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:40:39 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 26, 2009 19:40:39 GMT -5
I really really dislike KidV's vote for paul. I've been leaning towards paul being Town since the middle of Night 2. On the other hand, I've gone back through your posts to Day 2, and haven't found any reason given for your suspicion of him. Here are the mentions I've found in your posts against paul: Day 2: Nothing Day 3: Nothing Day 4: This post, where you say "There's going to be at least one scum among Molefan, Crazy, and Paul, and since I'm already suspicious of two of them..." and vote for them. This post, where you vote for Hal, punker and paul with the comment "Hal is number one purely for self-defense reasons, the other two votes haven't changed." This post where you say "I too am bugged by punker, and I need to reread paul." Day 5: The post above where you vote for him and say "I was wavering about Paul, but I'm now putting up my tent in the "he's scum" camp, and I'm pretty sure Peekers in there with him." I'll note that I searched for your posts, then did a "find" on that page for paul's name (well, for paul, ghost, broken and tree). Perhaps you laid out your suspicions without actually saying his name? Putting him as your number one for using a vote strategy you don't care for, and for having been suspected by you for a couple of Days, but with no specified reasons is not a good thing. Especially since you keep mentioning your suspicions, but not your reasons. 1 Vote KidV
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:42:36 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 26, 2009 19:42:36 GMT -5
Sorry, I screwed up the coding. Here are the straight links: psychopathgame.proboards106.com/index.cgi?board=smashing&action=display&thread=768#41438This post, where you say "There's going to be at least one scum among Molefan, Crazy, and Paul, and since I'm already suspicious of two of them..." and vote for them. [url=http://psychopathgame.proboards106.com/index.cgi?board=smashing&action=display&thread=768#41544 [url=http://psychopathgame.proboards106.com/index.cgi?board=smashing&action=display&thread=771#41639
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 19:44:34 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 26, 2009 19:44:34 GMT -5
Third times the charm? herehereMods can edit. Fixed coding.
|
|
Gir!
FGM
EVIL Demon Goddess Mod
What? Kat is sweet and innocent!
Posts: 691
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 20:24:53 GMT -5
Post by Gir! on Feb 26, 2009 20:24:53 GMT -5
*gives pede a pony*
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 20:57:12 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Feb 26, 2009 20:57:12 GMT -5
Also, I don't think that there has been a very good case against me. The only thing that I have heard as an argument against me was that I was changing my voting strategy because it wasn't working out. I was for lynching the lurkers because we hadn't done that yet and it was something that might work better than what we were doing. At that point we had one scum and eight town dead and the dead scum was Ed. Of course I felt like a change was in order... But there was nothing wrong with what we were doing. We only had two mislynches by the time you made this statement, and one was the mason debacle, which had nothing to do with people's posting behaviors and everything to do with a scum being in the masons. Whether taking out the masons was a good idea or not will probably be unknown. And the other mislynch was based off of voting patterns, not discussion level. It's not your desire of changing the voting rationale that I find odd. It's that you seem to think the one mislynch we had outside of the mason thing was for bad reasons. Aubby's voting record honestly made no sense from a town perspective, particularly when compared to every other player's and the fact that Ed was scum. It looked like a scum slip. Just because it wasn't, doesn't change the fact that it wasn't a bad lynch given the information we had up to that point. I agree with you about Aubby. I voted her too. And I admit that I also agree my post was too hasty. I was getting a little bit frustrated when I was looking at the list of who was dead and who was alive. I should have thought it out a little bit more, but I still don't think it is as big of a deal as you say it is. 8-1 looks pretty bad. Especially since the one scum that we hit was guaranteed to be scum. We still haven't hit a scum with a well thought out lynch, although taking out the third party was definitely better than lynching another town. You can't really fault me for feeling how I felt looking at that list. I have never played before, so I don't know if it is as bad as it looked, but it seemed like we needed to lynch scum pretty desperately. So there you go. I agree that my post wasn't as well thought out as it could have been, but is that a scum indicator? I don't think so. I was just leading up to my vote and investigation by explaining why I was trying a different strategy. I wasn't even telling anyone else to panic and try something different. I was just explaining myself. Is it worth voting me? I definitely don't think it is deserving of a first or second place vote, maybe a third as a placeholder or FOS, but I don't think it was as big of a deal as you made it.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 21:32:04 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 26, 2009 21:32:04 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | paulwhoisaghost | Nanook | Kat | crazypunker | Hoopy Frood | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | Kat | KidVermicious | | | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | peekercpa | Nanook | Natlaw | | KidVermicious | crazypunker | Parzival | Nanook | Parzival | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | Kat | crazypunker | KidVermicious | crazypunker | KidVermicious | Nanook | crazypunker | molefan | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | peekercpa | shaggy | Nanook | Natlaw | roxis | | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Nanook | 13 (13) | paulwhoisaghost, Parzival | crazypunker, peekercpa, shaggy | KidVermicious | peekercpa | 12 (10) | molefan, shaggy | Hoopy Frood, KidVermicious, roxis | | KidVermicious | 12 (7) | Kat, crazypunker | Natlaw, molefan | Hoopy Frood, Pollux Oil | crazypunker | 9 (8) | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost, Natlaw, crazypunker, shaggy | paulwhoisaghost | 6 (6) | KidVermicious | | | Kat | 6 (5) | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | shaggy | 3 (3) | peekercpa | | | Parzival | 2 (2) | | Parzival | | Natlaw | 1 (1) | | | peekercpa | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | Parzival | molefan | 1 (1) | | | molefan |
Not Voting: Nanook
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 21:55:51 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 26, 2009 21:55:51 GMT -5
I definitely don't think it is deserving of a first or second place vote, maybe a third as a placeholder or FOS, but I don't think it was as big of a deal as you made it. It wasn't orginally. I believe I only voted you third place the first time I asked. I moved you up to second and later to first because you kept on not answering the question each time I asked. I'm most likely not going to finish the Day with you in my first slot now that you've finally answered, but had you explained yourself earlier, I would be less suspicious.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 21:59:52 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 26, 2009 21:59:52 GMT -5
Ok. This is it for me. You people are giving me a headache.
Blah blah blah Paul, Nook, nat and KidV.
Some of you want to lunch my townie butt. I think that that would be bad based on the repercussions but, Meh.
Seriously, we have dicked around with a whole bunch of scum issues and it feels like no one wants to pull the durn trigger. Lynch paul since his role sucks, lynch nook since he lied. FCS! How much clearer can it be. Sheesh.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 26, 2009 22:08:23 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Feb 26, 2009 22:08:23 GMT -5
I definitely don't think it is deserving of a first or second place vote, maybe a third as a placeholder or FOS, but I don't think it was as big of a deal as you made it. It wasn't orginally. I believe I only voted you third place the first time I asked. I moved you up to second and later to first because you kept on not answering the question each time I asked. I'm most likely not going to finish the Day with you in my first slot now that you've finally answered, but had you explained yourself earlier, I would be less suspicious. I didn't think that I had to answer at first because I didn't think it was a big deal then. Now I realize that it is, which is why I posted my last post.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 1:32:43 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 1:32:43 GMT -5
Ok. This is it for me. You people are giving me a headache. Blah blah blah Paul, Nook, nat and KidV. Some of you want to lunch my townie butt. I think that that would be bad based on the repercussions but, Meh. Seriously, we have dicked around with a whole bunch of scum issues and it feels like no one wants to pull the durn trigger. Lynch paul since his role sucks, lynch nook since he lied. FCS! How much clearer can it be. Sheesh. Not sure if that was partly directed at me, and if not then why my name is up there at all, but I'm not voting for you. I don't feel you should be lynched right now. I don't get any town vibes from you at all though. I think that we should be lynching Natlaw toDay, but since no one is going to vote for him, I guess Nanook is the next best thing. I even changed my votes to put him in the lead over you. So again... not exactly sure why I am included in that list... Oh well nice to be acknowledged I guess
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 1:43:57 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 1:43:57 GMT -5
I just want to point out the flawed logic behind telling me that my theory of Nanook not being Sheik is ridiculous, not wanting to lynch Natlaw, and then turning around and lynching Nanook. Bascially your saying, "We can't lynch Natlaw! The scum kill isn't worth the town power we would lose!" but do you not realize that you are essentially doing that by lynching Nanook? Not only that, but if you lynch Nanook, you give KidV an unknown to work with. So if we lynch Nanook and he has some kind of killing power, and KidV is the scum you all fear him to be, then we end up with one dead scum and two dead town. That is, of course, if Nanook is Sheik. Why you find this to be a better option than lynching Natlaw and giving KidV a protection from nightkills (which we dont really have anyway) is a mystery to me.
The only reason Nanook is my first vote is to avoid lynching Peeker. I don't feel the case against him is strong enough to warrant a possible mislynch. The bandwagon behind lynching him smells less like a wagon and more like a cart of manure to me.
So fine, Nanook gets lynched. If you are town KidV, and you do gain a killing power off of Nanook, be very careful who you use it on.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 1:47:52 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 1:47:52 GMT -5
Parzival, who do you plan on buffing tonight? I'd like to see what happens when I get a nine if the rest of us can decide on a viable target.
I'm curious because I hit Nanook with a 2 and the only thing that seemingly happened was he lost his ability to post. But then again, I've been told thats how he plays. I guess thats how he plays even when he's dangerously close to being lynched and the day is almost over.
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 6:25:31 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Feb 27, 2009 6:25:31 GMT -5
Regarding my Governor power, it stops: I think assisting paul is bad - we don't need extra kills, if a nine turns out to be that. And whoever said ties are unlikely in borda is definitely wrong . If Nanook comes in, he definitely can swing it around, so based on that I would vote Nanook to prevent that. However my main reason to lynch him now is to prevent him from doing something bad next Night - but if KidVermicious is SCUM, but truthful about his role, he'll backup him anyway Tonight. I don't believe both paul and KidV are town, as KidV should have noticed being blocked, even if he did not use a power (which I find odd). If KidV turns up town, paul is most likely SCUM, unless his block wouldn't be noticed (would you normally do that when you don't take an action? I guess not.). peeker last post pings me, but stillgiving him the benefit of the doubt. Note that does not imply it is best molefan to protect someone else, investigating, or whatever his third actions does might be better. So a complete strategic vote: Unvote all1. Triple vote for KidVermicious 2. Double vote for crazypunker 3. Single vote for NatlawLast should be peekercpa based on suspicion and we should definitely lynch us lovers Tomorrow (if KidV is not SCUM). Still subject to change.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 6:41:58 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 6:41:58 GMT -5
Regarding my Governor power, it stops: I think assisting paul is bad - we don't need extra kills, if a nine turns out to be that. And whoever said ties are unlikely in borda is definitely wrong . If Nanook comes in, he definitely can swing it around, so based on that I would vote Nanook to prevent that. However my main reason to lynch him now is to prevent him from doing something bad next Night - but if KidVermicious is SCUM, but truthful about his role, he'll backup him anyway Tonight. I don't believe both paul and KidV are town, as KidV should have noticed being blocked, even if he did not use a power (which I find odd). If KidV turns up town, paul is most likely SCUM, unless his block wouldn't be noticed (would you normally do that when you don't take an action? I guess not.). peeker last post pings me, but stillgiving him the benefit of the doubt. Note that does not imply it is best molefan to protect someone else, investigating, or whatever his third actions does might be better. So a complete strategic vote: Unvote all1. Triple vote for KidVermicious 2. Double vote for crazypunker 3. Single vote for NatlawLast should be peekercpa based on suspicion and we should definitely lynch us lovers Tomorrow (if KidV is not SCUM). Still subject to change. You are confusing me. So you or do you not believe Nanook is Sheik? Because your votes do not prevent him from being lynched tonight, but then you say that the lovers should be lynched tomorrow? Changing your votes only brought KidV up to 13 (8) the 8 is the number that would count if the ended right now. You realize this right?
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 7:02:51 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Feb 27, 2009 7:02:51 GMT -5
I brought him up to 13 (10), but yes, I'm thinking of switching to Nanook because the three-way tie is not good. So I'll probably change my vote later, but am at work now, so can't fully review the candidates. roxis and Nanook still have place their first vote as well. That Nanook isn't Sheik is a delusion only you're having .
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 7:24:51 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 7:24:51 GMT -5
I brought him up to 13 (10), but yes, I'm thinking of switching to Nanook because the three-way tie is not good. So I'll probably change my vote later, but am at work now, so can't fully review the candidates. roxis and Nanook still have place their first vote as well. That Nanook isn't Sheik is a delusion only you're having . So what did you mean by lynching the two of you tomorrow?
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 7:52:18 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Feb 27, 2009 7:52:18 GMT -5
Uhm, that we should lynch either Nanook or me Tomorrow (as in game Day Six).
Recap: -it allows me to use another protective flask Day Six; -Day Six is most likely the last Day we can safely mislynch. Our lynch is half a mislynch, which at a close LyLo would still be fatal. Say 5 town/ 4 scum and the next Day it would be 3/3 -> scum win). -down side is that Nanook also gets an extra Night to use powers
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 8:07:06 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 27, 2009 8:07:06 GMT -5
So I'm looking through Pollux's investigations, and I'm trying to figure out if the relevant notes mean anything related to our claims or the previous death reveals. I'm not getting much, but from what I understand:
Night 1:
Town Cop Lucas Insane. Would get opposite alignment and get random name and power description. Scrapped not because of being too cruel, but because there were too many investigators already, one of whom was only sorta an investigator.
Thoughts: Maybe with all the killers, blockers, and redirectors, they figured there was enough craziness and so didn't really need to add to it by creating yet another investigator who happened to be crazy.
Night 2:
SCUM Jester Wario: Needed to be lynched at some point in order to win with SCUM, lost otherwise. Upon lynching, would escape the game and render all Night actions that following Night mandatory. Had a staff which apparently the Town Empath could use. Had to be scrapped because some other mechanic wouldn't work with him there.
Thoughts: Maybe one of the roles couldn't be made mandatory.
Night 3:
SCUM Doctor Link Operated like standard doctor. Could only nightkill with trophy making equipment, and only if it was still available. Scrapped due to lack of vigs. After one or more vigs were added, still remained scrapped due to current SCUM lineup.
Thoughts: None at this time.
Night 4: Town White Mage ROB Half Doc/Half Vig Scrapped because role was sucky. Apparently the orginal was worse. And this role wasn't needed because of already there being some quantity of something. (Doctors? Vigs?)
Thoughts: None.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 8:14:43 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 8:14:43 GMT -5
Uhm, that we should lynch either Nanook or me Tomorrow (as in game Day Six). Recap: -it allows me to use another protective flask Day Six; -Day Six is most likely the last Day we can safely mislynch. Our lynch is half a mislynch, which at a close LyLo would still be fatal. Say 5 town/ 4 scum and the next Day it would be 3/3 -> scum win). -down side is that Nanook also gets an extra Night to use powers Oh I see now, your hoping that with the board in a near 3 way tie, that the votes will swing away from Nanook and you get to live one more day. Well, good luck with that. I imagine a lot will change while I am sleeping. Will check back in the morning to see if it worked out for ya. Oh, I would change my vote to suit your needs, but a lynch against you is only .5 mislynch toward LyLo.(Not that I think lynching Nanook is going to kill you. In fact, maybe we should just lynch you tomorrow, when Nanook is dead and we have no idea who the other half of you is.) And I don't feel confident enough that Peeker is scum to risk a full mislynch. I don't really see why you all think that KidV is scummy. Especially those of you who are suspicious of Punker as well. If they are both scum, then why would Punker try to cast suspicion on KidV? And between the two, I gotta say that KidV's RolePM is much more believable.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 8:21:39 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Feb 27, 2009 8:21:39 GMT -5
So I'm looking through Pollux's investigations, and I'm trying to figure out if the relevant notes mean anything related to our claims or the previous death reveals. I'm not getting much, but from what I understand: Night 1: Town Cop LucasInsane. Would get opposite alignment and get random name and power description. Scrapped not because of being too cruel, but because there were too many investigators already, one of whom was only sorta an investigator. Thoughts: Maybe with all the killers, blockers, and redirectors, they figured there was enough craziness and so didn't really need to add to it by creating yet another investigator who happened to be crazy. Night 2: SCUM Jester Wario:Needed to be lynched at some point in order to win with SCUM, lost otherwise. Upon lynching, would escape the game and render all Night actions that following Night mandatory. Had a staff which apparently the Town Empath could use. Had to be scrapped because some other mechanic wouldn't work with him there. Thoughts: Maybe one of the roles couldn't be made mandatory. Night 3: SCUM Doctor LinkOperated like standard doctor. Could only nightkill with trophy making equipment, and only if it was still available. Scrapped due to lack of vigs. After one or more vigs were added, still remained scrapped due to current SCUM lineup. Thoughts: None at this time. Night 4: Town White Mage ROBHalf Doc/Half Vig Scrapped because role was sucky. Apparently the orginal was worse. And this role wasn't needed because of already there being some quantity of something. (Doctors? Vigs?) Thoughts: None. Thanks for that insightful bit of info Hoopy. [/sarcasm] Got anything to say about the three way tie? Any ideas for ensuring that the wrong person doesnt get lynched because of said tie? Pretty cruddy that as a town we are divided three different ways.
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 9:17:22 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Feb 27, 2009 9:17:22 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | paulwhoisaghost | Nanook | Kat | crazypunker | Hoopy Frood | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | Kat | KidVermicious | | | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | peekercpa | Nanook | Natlaw | KidVermicious | crazypunker | Natlaw | Parzival | Nanook | Parzival | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | Kat | crazypunker | KidVermicious | crazypunker | KidVermicious | Nanook | crazypunker | molefan | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | peekercpa | shaggy | Nanook | Natlaw | roxis | | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Nanook | 13 (13) | paulwhoisaghost, Parzival | crazypunker, peekercpa, shaggy | KidVermicious | KidVermicious | 13 (10) | Kat, Natlaw, crazypunker | molefan | Hoopy Frood, Pollux Oil | peekercpa | 12 (10) | molefan, shaggy | Hoopy Frood, KidVermicious, roxis | | crazypunker | 10 (10) | Hoopy Frood | Natlaw, Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost, crazypunker, shaggy | paulwhoisaghost | 6 (6) | KidVermicious | | | Kat | 6 (5) | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | shaggy | 3 (3) | peekercpa | | | Natlaw | 2 (2) | | | Natlaw, peekercpa | Parzival | 2 (2) | | Parzival | | molefan | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | Parzival |
Not Voting: Nanook --FCOD
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 9:47:51 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 27, 2009 9:47:51 GMT -5
Thanks for that insightful bit of info Hoopy. [/sarcasm] It wasn't meant to be insightful. It was meant to put all the relevant parts of the investigations in one post and see if they indicated anything, rather than having to make people search around for them if they wanted to check. Actually, it's not cruddy. A divided vote is much more useful information-wise than a simultaneous one. If you haven't noticed, we haven't had a lot of datapoints in the early stages of this game to look at. But if it makes you feel any better--after all, I'm playing this game just to make you happy: unvote all
vote 1. Nanook vote 2. peekercpa vote 3. crazypunker[/blue]
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 9:49:00 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 27, 2009 9:49:00 GMT -5
Ugh...
unvote all
vote 1. Nanook vote 2. peekercpa vote 3. crazypunker[/color]
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 11:35:35 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 27, 2009 11:35:35 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | paulwhoisaghost | Nanook | Kat | crazypunker | Hoopy Frood | Nanook | peekercpa | crazypunker | Kat | KidVermicious | | | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | peekercpa | Nanook | Natlaw | KidVermicious | crazypunker | Natlaw | Parzival | Nanook | Parzival | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | Kat | crazypunker | KidVermicious | crazypunker | KidVermicious | Nanook | crazypunker | molefan | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | peekercpa | shaggy | Nanook | Natlaw | roxis | | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Nanook | 16 (16) | paulwhoisaghost, Hoopy Frood, Parzival | crazypunker, peekercpa, shaggy | KidVermicious | peekercpa | 12 (10) | molefan, shaggy | Hoopy Frood, KidVermicious, roxis | | KidVermicious | 12 (9) | Kat, Natlaw, crazypunker | molefan | Pollux Oil | crazypunker | 8 (8) | | Natlaw, Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost, Hoopy Frood, crazypunker, shaggy | paulwhoisaghost | 6 (6) | KidVermicious | | | Kat | 6 (5) | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | shaggy | 3 (3) | peekercpa | | | Natlaw | 2 (2) | | | Natlaw, peekercpa | Parzival | 2 (2) | | Parzival | | molefan | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | Parzival |
Not Voting: Nanook
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 11:44:37 GMT -5
Post by roxis on Feb 27, 2009 11:44:37 GMT -5
20 points to start the countdown? So it should be okay to
Vote #1 Nanook
|
|
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 11:46:08 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Feb 27, 2009 11:46:08 GMT -5
The Day ends in a little over 8 hours, so there wouldn't be a countdown at this point anyway. Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | paulwhoisaghost | Nanook | Kat | crazypunker | Hoopy Frood | Nanook | peekercpa | crazypunker | Kat | KidVermicious | | | KidVermicious | paulwhoisaghost | peekercpa | Nanook | Natlaw | KidVermicious | crazypunker | Natlaw | Parzival | Nanook | Parzival | Hoopy Frood | Pollux Oil | Kat | crazypunker | KidVermicious | crazypunker | KidVermicious | Nanook | crazypunker | molefan | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | peekercpa | shaggy | Nanook | Natlaw | roxis | Nanook | peekercpa | Kat | shaggy | peekercpa | Nanook | crazypunker |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Nanook | 19 (19) | paulwhoisaghost, Hoopy Frood, Parzival, roxis | crazypunker, peekercpa, shaggy | KidVermicious | peekercpa | 12 (12) | molefan, shaggy | Hoopy Frood, KidVermicious, roxis | | KidVermicious | 12 (9) | Kat, Natlaw, crazypunker | molefan | Pollux Oil | crazypunker | 8 (8) | | Natlaw, Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost, Hoopy Frood, crazypunker, shaggy | paulwhoisaghost | 6 (6) | KidVermicious | | | Kat | 6 (6) | Pollux Oil | paulwhoisaghost | roxis | shaggy | 3 (3) | peekercpa | | | Natlaw | 2 (2) | | | Natlaw, peekercpa | Parzival | 2 (2) | | Parzival | | molefan | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | Parzival |
Not Voting: Nanook --FCOD
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 5
Feb 27, 2009 14:02:55 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Feb 27, 2009 14:02:55 GMT -5
Parzival, who do you plan on buffing tonight? I'd like to see what happens when I get a nine if the rest of us can decide on a viable target. I'm not going to say in advance who I'm picking. With several scum left, it'll be pretty tough to get an unbiased public choice for a possible vig. About all I can say is it can't be molefan. The thing about KidV's power (if he's truthful) is that it must necessarily become less useful. It works best as a backup for town players, but we are always trying to lynch scum. That means the more scum we lynch, the less useful he is. In my opinion his power shouldn't be part of our thoughts on who to lynch, but a bonus in case we screw up. Not that I'm certain I believe he's not scum. I actually lean slightly towards him being scum. As for nanook, I find it possible that he had a hiding/redirecting power that was optional, which could explain why he may have been targetable.
|
|