|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 21:43:39 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 21:43:39 GMT -5
Seriously, PO c'mon dude you are now officially trapped. We've got a chance. Let's see what nonsense Po comes up with. I have no clue what your agenda is other than to remove town of their protective abilities. Wonder why that would be?
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 21:47:38 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 21:47:38 GMT -5
And pede I just want to quote you directly. You can even come in afterwards and either confirm or deny the accuracy of my response.
Fair enough.
Woot Woot on the river. Caught a bluffer and want to cash the chips.
And, moley, you can still kiss my grits.
I told you I was playing this a touch differently. If you want the rambler you are going to have to wait a second.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:03:57 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 2, 2009 22:03:57 GMT -5
Will I get mod killed if I paraphrase your response to my last question via PM? You may paraphrase or quote directly. But, as always, no timestamps, I will not vouch for the veracity of your statements, and the town is within their rights to lynch you for doing so.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:06:14 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Mar 2, 2009 22:06:14 GMT -5
Soooo... before I reveal which of KidV and Punker I investigated as scum last night, any comments from either of you? How about "I told you so"? Good response actually. If you're scum (and I'm leaning "almost certainly not" right now, which is something I didn't think I'd be saying this game) then that's pretty frikkin' smooth. Plainly I know exactly what Crazypunker is; I just couldn't be certain about you. And FTR, following Hoopy's mantra of increasing the pool of confirmeds, I investigated the guy I thought wasn't scum. Obviously I was wrong. Crazypunker is scum. I still say take out Peeker first though. I mean, this response: does not inspire me into thinking he's innocent. I'll grant you one thing though Peeker - I was evidently wrong about you giving up.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:12:56 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 2, 2009 22:12:56 GMT -5
So peeker, if you're innocent, why don't you just post your full out role PM.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:14:01 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 2, 2009 22:14:01 GMT -5
NETA: Nevermind. I forgot that you say you lost it. Though, that still seems a bit weird since role PM's are stored in the board database, not on your blackberry.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:17:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 22:17:25 GMT -5
Ok. Fuck it. pede said that PO would have to ask the question about roles and names.
How 'bout it PO ask the question.
I freacking double dog dare you.
Bluck, bluck, bluckity bluck bluck bluck.
Help any Moley?
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:32:12 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 22:32:12 GMT -5
NETA: Nevermind. I forgot that you say you lost it. Though, that still seems a bit weird since role PM's are stored in the board database, not on your blackberry. Ok, shag junior. I typically take everythin off of anything and copy it to a subdirectory inside outlook. Something about my retentive nature about trying to keep my message bins clean. Ok. I have learned that this is not the best behavior for a game of this nature. I'm going to tell you a true story. When I was starting up in my current position I used to send an e-mail to someone, then I would follow up with a voice mail and then walk over to their office and suggest that they listen to their voice mail. Hey, I've learned. I really thought that the best back up against any data failure would be to keep the information local. Boy, was I wrong, apparently. If the remaining town wants to squiff it because of ignorance on my part, then I really don't have any control of that. It just seems like a darn shame that we are getting close to having it be neck and neck and it will potentially be decided on hardware ignorance on my part. Especially since PO can ask the question and then get an answer. Fry my ass today and then let's move on. Meh, my two cents. And I will remove my vote on moi before the end of the day because that feels like giving up. And I am not about that.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:36:30 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Mar 2, 2009 22:36:30 GMT -5
Ok. Fuck it. pede said that PO would have to ask the question about roles and names. How 'bout it PO ask the question. I freacking double dog dare you. Bluck, bluck, bluckity bluck bluck bluck. Help any Moley? What? I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to double dare me into. It's amusing though, this is more of what I expected your reaction would be. Unfortunately, you got caught by the wrong guy. I don't really respond to dares, unless they come from someone with boobs. (I have a weakness, what can I say.) And you growing a pair at this point would be...uh, a little weird and I think against most laws of nature. So tough noogie. Oh and... Woot Woot on the river. Caught a bluffer and want to cash the chips. Ask Roosh how I play poker. I don't bluff. --- Molefan, did you get anything besides "crazypunker is scum"? I think we really need to take out the person with the trophy gun toDay because from the Link role PM, it seems that the trophy gun can be made unavailable and I assume it's from a role dying. My guess is peeker's the one with the trophy gun since his fake role was trying really hard to make him indisposable to town, so maybe they were trying to keep him around as long as possible to get the multiple kills. 2. Vote crazypunker
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 22:56:58 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 22:56:58 GMT -5
Ok, triple dog dare you. Is my name in play or not? If so then you are a liar about you role.
Drawing against the nuts my friend.
But if you have any stones you'll call and be busted.
Pede already told me that you have to be the one to ask for whether Master Hand is in the game.
Just ask the question and let's put this misery to rest.
Peace.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 23:04:49 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 2, 2009 23:04:49 GMT -5
Silence assumes consent.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 2, 2009 23:05:29 GMT -5
Post by KidVermicious on Mar 2, 2009 23:05:29 GMT -5
Ok, shag junior. I typically take everythin off of anything and copy it to a subdirectory inside outlook. Something about my retentive nature about trying to keep my message bins clean. Ok. I have learned that this is not the best behavior for a game of this nature. Peek - I guess you play by email, somehow. If your blackberry doesn't have a browser, you'll have to find a computer that does. Go to psychopathgame.proboards106.com/ and log in with your username and password. At the top of your screen, you'll see "Hey, peekercpa, you have x messages, y are new." Click on that, it'll take you to your PM screen. In there will be your role PM. If you've never deleted any PMs from the board, then in there will be all the PMs you've ever recieved on the board.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 0:42:45 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Mar 3, 2009 0:42:45 GMT -5
How about "I told you so"? Good response actually. If you're scum (and I'm leaning "almost certainly not" right now, which is something I didn't think I'd be saying this game) then that's pretty frikkin' smooth. Plainly I know exactly what Crazypunker is; I just couldn't be certain about you. And FTR, following Hoopy's mantra of increasing the pool of confirmeds, I investigated the guy I thought wasn't scum. Obviously I was wrong. Crazypunker is scum. I still say take out Peeker first though. I mean, this response: does not inspire me into thinking he's innocent. I'll grant you one thing though Peeker - I was evidently wrong about you giving up. Hmm...? Strange since I am not scum. I would have never thought you were scum Moley, but I guess since you are protecting KidV then I guess that makes you scum too... Vote 1 KidV
Vote 2 Molefan
Vote 3 Peeker
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 1:01:00 GMT -5
Post by KidVermicious on Mar 3, 2009 1:01:00 GMT -5
Hmm...? Strange since I am not scum. I would have never thought you were scum Moley, but I guess since you are protecting KidV then I guess that makes you scum too... Vote 1 KidV
Vote 2 Molefan
Vote 3 Peeker*blink* ... you'd have us believe that Molefan is lying about your alignment, and this proves that I'm scum? I don't get it. If he's lying, then he or Peeker oughta be on top of your list.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 1:33:25 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Mar 3, 2009 1:33:25 GMT -5
I already had strong suspicions you were scum. People were saying if I wasn't then you were and vice versa. Me and you had been going at it for a while. The only reason for Molefan to lie about my alignment would be if he was trying to protect you. If Molefan "investigated" me as scum then since I know I am town I know he was trying to protect you. Maybe it's because you are an important member in scum or else the scum realize they are in a desperate spot and can't afford for you to be lynched. Either way, if Molefan is scum and if he is risking himself to protect you then that means that he has decided that your role is important to keep alive.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 2:51:14 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Mar 3, 2009 2:51:14 GMT -5
I am going to change my votes because I think that town should all vote together. That way we can stop the scum from swinging the vote. If it was up to me I would get KidV first, Molefan second, and Peeker third, but since I think that they are all scum and it is in our best interests to act together...
Vote Peeker 1 Vote KidV 2 Vote Molefan 3
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 4:07:50 GMT -5
Post by Holy Moley! on Mar 3, 2009 4:07:50 GMT -5
Molefan, did you get anything besides "crazypunker is scum"? Nope, I only got his alignment with my four Pikmin. No role, name, or night target info. I didn't want to waste the one other Pikmin I had (a purple guy) when it's effectively worth 50% protection instead of 25% at night. BTW, Parzival, that leaves me with enough for a 100% protect tonight, but unless I get really lucky and draw a third purple guy, I'll be one short tomorrow, assuming I'm still alive then. Can you do me a favour and juice me up tonight? (Damn, that sounded wrong.) I'm hoping the scum can't redirect, or if they can then they have more pressing issues to worry about than one extra Pikmin. Punker, nice try. KidV isn't the lynch target, Peeker is. You expect us to believe that you'd think I would protect either of them? Peek was my top unconfirmed suspect days before Nanook was lynched, and I've been at loggerheads with KidV from the start. Everyone else, don't be tempted to switch votes off Peeker. Right now the one thing the scum needs more than anything is for the town to divide our voting. Let's not hand them that one. Vote 1 (three votes): Peekerpca. Vote 2 (two votes): Crazypunker. Vote 3 (one vote): Kat.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 4:17:23 GMT -5
Post by harmless little bunny on Mar 3, 2009 4:17:23 GMT -5
Don't do it Parzival! He is scum!
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 4:34:20 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 4:34:20 GMT -5
Ya know. This looks to be the first "election" I will win in a landslide. Now I know how Clinton must have felt when he faced Bob Dole. I still don't get why PO won't ask. Guess the answer will screw him and his team.
On another note:
Fourscore and twenty years....
Just kidding, just kidding.
Ain't cluttering the thread with anything except game related.
And, fuck, can the rest of you guys take it into the back room. It sure is sounding contrived at this point.
Sheesh.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 7:36:21 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 3, 2009 7:36:21 GMT -5
Nope, I only got his alignment with my four Pikmin. No role, name, or night target info. I didn't want to waste the one other Pikmin I had (a purple guy) when it's effectively worth 50% protection instead of 25% at night. BTW, Parzival, that leaves me with enough for a 100% protect tonight, but unless I get really lucky and draw a third purple guy, I'll be one short tomorrow, assuming I'm still alive then. Can you do me a favour and juice me up tonight? (Damn, that sounded wrong.) I'm hoping the scum can't redirect, or if they can then they have more pressing issues to worry about than one extra Pikmin. While Parzival juicing you up wouldn't be a bad thing anyway, don't worry about having to protect yourself toNight. You already are since Natlaw gave you a flask yesterDay. He mentions it here: psychopathgame.proboards106.com/index.cgi?board=smashing&action=display&thread=772&page=7#41901So investigate away. Or bank the pikmin. Or protect someone else. But don't waste them on yourself.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 8:58:32 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 8:58:32 GMT -5
Ok, shag junior. I typically take everythin off of anything and copy it to a subdirectory inside outlook. Something about my retentive nature about trying to keep my message bins clean. Ok. I have learned that this is not the best behavior for a game of this nature. Peek - I guess you play by email, somehow. If your blackberry doesn't have a browser, you'll have to find a computer that does. Go to psychopathgame.proboards106.com/ and log in with your username and password. At the top of your screen, you'll see "Hey, peekercpa, you have x messages, y are new." Click on that, it'll take you to your PM screen. In there will be your role PM. If you've never deleted any PMs from the board, then in there will be all the PMs you've ever recieved on the board. Last time and then can we move on. I typically delete messages after I read them. Unless they seem to important. In which case I copy and paste into an e-mail in outlook. That's what I did with my role PM for this game. Hoky crap if I kept all PM's saved it would take down the internet (slight exageration). For example story and I had an entire conversation about my miller role in Skrull. There were literally in the low 30's to 40's about different aspects. Having said that, I still have pede's response to my question (having learned a lesson). I just think PO is blowing smoke and knows that if he asks the question about my name that he is busted. And if he actually is believing his own B.S. That's one thing, the fact that the rest of you are buying it is what ultimately unsettling.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 9:19:52 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 3, 2009 9:19:52 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | crazypunker | peekercpa | KidVermicious | molefan | Hoopy Frood | peekercpa | | | Kat | peekercpa | | | KidVermicious | peekercpa | crazypunker | | molefan | peekercpa | crazypunker | Kat | peekercpa | molefan | shaggy | peekercpa | Pollux Oil | peekercpa | crazypunker | |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | peekercpa | 19 (7) | crazypunker, Hoopy Frood, Kat, KidVermicious, molefan, Pollux Oil | | peekercpa | crazypunker | 6 (2) | | KidVermicious, molefan, Pollux Oil | | molefan | 4 (4) | peekercpa | | crazypunker | shaggy | 2 (2) | | peekercpa | | KidVermicious | 2 (2) | | crazypunker | | Kat | 1 (1) | | | molefan |
Not Voting: Parzival, shaggy
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 9:26:15 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 9:26:15 GMT -5
Oh and a warning. I am having another root canal this morning and will be extremely incoherent (it's an e, right, not an a?) later. Expect my best stuff of the game, thus far, at that time.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 9:55:16 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 9:55:16 GMT -5
I will not answer this question in public, as it would unduly alter the gamestate. That's pede's PM to me. So I guess I don't understand why PO continues to refuse to answer the question. "Unduly alter the game state" sures seems like PO is nailed and with it a host of others. PO got caught in a lie and now he be toast because he knows that if he posits then he is screwed. Now he may still have enough team mates to swing the vote anti town. But I also know that because I am not yet docced that there is at least one protective town role alive. If we can stay away from me today that gives a whole lot of WIFOM for scum tonight. At least we could make it till tomorrow with some sort of protective role.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 10:44:39 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 3, 2009 10:44:39 GMT -5
That's one thing, the fact that the rest of you are buying it is what ultimately unsettling. Okay, this bugs me. Honestly, if you are town, this is a ridiculous statement. Almost as ridiculous as the "scum are laughing their asses off" (another statement you made and which I will now briefly tangent to). I've played true scum once, and a PFK scum once. You were scum with me the time I played true scum. We never laughed our asses off at town. While we did enjoy the mistakes town made because it furthered our win condition, we didn't mock them or laugh at them. Because, not only is a bit rude from a metagaming perspective, cockiness at one's position is a good way to lose it. Almost every time I've seen someone talk about "scum laughing their asses off" at town's disagreements, that person is almost always scum who has come under heat for some reason. I can't offhand recall a townie doing it, but I remember Sinjin doing it in SMB when I essentially outed her by confirming all other townies still alive, and you, who has been outed by another player. I've also seen scum do it other games. Personally, I've gotten to view it as the new "third vote" tell. Anyway, back to your other statement. Why shouldn't we buy it? Because right now it's your word vs. his. You really haven't given us any good reason why Pollux's conclusion that you are scum is wrong. You can say Pollux should ask ped the question about a name showing up both unused and in use, but so what? It will still come down to him vs. you unless you are both town and Pedescribe actually confirms that a name can show up multiple times. However, I will say this. Yours is the only name that this has happened to. None of the other autopsied bodies has shown up anywhere else. And really, if I were scum in Pollux's position, there would be other townies with stronger powers I'd be trying to get rid of. Particularly those who are quasi-confirmed. After all, you were under heat anyway. It would be odd for a scum to cause town to mislynch someone who was already taking votes. Furthermore, your role is a bit ridiculous. Even with the number of protections town has had this has been a very bloody game. I can't see ped putting in a pro-town role that will remove town's protections should it be taken out. That would cripple us balance-wise. Your role as described is the swingiest thing I've ever seen. Plus, to tie that mechanic to the lynch, a pro-town mechanic and the single best power town has, is pure Gastardness. And the only Daykillers we've seen have been town. And we've seen no Daykills come out. To further punish a Daykilling town on town kill by rendering all town protections moot is also Gastardness. I'm not buying it. I'm not drinking your Kool-Ade. Your going to have to come up with a reason why Pollux would be doing what he's doing. Your protestations without any real evidence aren't going to cut it.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 11:32:11 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 11:32:11 GMT -5
Hey, hoop I'll take this in bits. Scum laughing their asses off is a eupamism, FCS. Do I really think that the scummers are posting to their board about what a bunch of clueless town and yukking it up at our expense. Seriously doubtful in my opinion. That's about as feeble an accusation that I have yet to encounter. I have no clue, but if I were them I would suggest that they just keep their heads down and let us townies finish the job for them.
Back in a bit. The Novacaine is set and the drilling commences.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 13:21:36 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 3, 2009 13:21:36 GMT -5
Hey, hoop I'll take this in bits. Scum laughing their asses off is a eupamism, FCS. Do I really think that the scummers are posting to their board about what a bunch of clueless town and yukking it up at our expense. Seriously doubtful in my opinion. Of course, but.... Not really. While I'm not going to search every game out there to support the argument, I've seen the euphamism employed much more by scum than town. It's a pointless thing to bring up, because Mafia is not won by appeals to emotion, and that statement is nothing more than a fluffy appeal to emotion. I've never understood why people post use that turn of phrase, but they do. There's no pro-town reason to do it.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 13:47:06 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 13:47:06 GMT -5
Ok, Hoop that's the worst I have seen from you. Ahhhh, let it pass since you are under the swoon.
Sheep doodle PO can end this immediately. The fact that some of the more vociferous types are reluctant to demand this accountability is making me circumspect.
Phuq, how hard is it PO? For fucks sake, ask the question and let's get on. Mother of Og. Then we can determine whether you are a liar or not. Shit, then town can decide what we do with a lying sack of scum trying to game this bad boy.
|
|
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 14:17:14 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 3, 2009 14:17:14 GMT -5
Hey, hoop I'll take this in bits. Scum laughing their asses off is a eupamism, FCS. Do I really think that the scummers are posting to their board about what a bunch of clueless town and yukking it up at our expense. Seriously doubtful in my opinion. Of course, but.... Not really. While I'm not going to search every game out there to support the argument, I've seen the euphamism employed much more by scum than town. It's a pointless thing to bring up, because Mafia is not won by appeals to emotion, and that statement is nothing more than a fluffy appeal to emotion. I've never understood why people post use that turn of phrase, but they do. There's no pro-town reason to do it. Skimmer. Youbetcha. Scum would never do that. Woot Woot. Good catch. Maybe you and shag can have some conversations about stuff that did not or has not occurred. Or better yet, just re-write reality. I am pretty sure you are town, but MG your trailer is showing. I have no clue why PO would make something up and not ask a question that would either confirm or deny his role. That seems to be a PO issue. Already posted pede response on "whether he is telling the truth" or not. I already have explained why I was under the radar and now have decided that it would be different strategy at this time. Does anyone even care that Po won't come clean? Sheesh, he is dead to rights and still town wants to eliminate any protective powers. Makes no sense. I guess Paul was correct. Sorry, dude, I truly thought you anti-town. Peace P.s. Let's see a show of hands that wants to see if PO is a liar or not. I know that there is a certain subset that seems to feel that this is not important. I just think it might be helpful, if we have a on go forward basis, if any, who actually is telling the truth.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 6
Mar 3, 2009 14:22:02 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Mar 3, 2009 14:22:02 GMT -5
I would love to try and help, molefan, although with an open plan the scum may well try and stop it.
Right now I feel crazypunker's more likely to be scum than peeker, but they both seem like pretty safe bets to me.
Crazypunker, even if you are innocent and molefan is actually scum, it makes absolutely no sense for KidV to be scum as well. They'd be potentially trading two of theirs for your one death. As a smart play, it'd be better to gain a townie KidV's trust if molefan is scum. Your reaction just doesn't hold water.
|
|