|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 3:52:55 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 3:52:55 GMT -5
Can Total Lost still be voted for though?? This is an odd question.... why wouldn't we be able to vote for her? I don't think this is an odd question being as stated that this is the first game I have played in and am not up to speed on all the rules yet.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 3:54:49 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 3:54:49 GMT -5
Total.... whether I find you sexyness overwhelming or not is I think not a matter for this game )
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 3:58:51 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 3:58:51 GMT -5
Vote: FCOD [/color]
Pure gut on this so far... he quickly jumped on the vote Paul thing for thinking out loud.... His vote was right in Day 1 was correct. And lastly and my most thin assumption. He wasn't very active in the night one thread. OK this is VERY thin and I know I didn't post much either but so far none of us have much to go on so I shall leave it at this .
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:00:16 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Apr 10, 2009 4:00:16 GMT -5
Total.... whether I find you sexyness overwhelming or not is I think not a matter for this game ) Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't introduce myself to you I try to play seriously in mafia - but once in a while I can't help my self and I start to fluff and joke a bit - I just love the fun part of life. I'll try to keep it down a bit
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:02:58 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:02:58 GMT -5
Why?
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:06:00 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 4:06:00 GMT -5
Total.... whether I find you sexyness overwhelming or not is I think not a matter for this game ) Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't introduce myself to you I try to play seriously in mafia - but once in a while I can't help my self and I start to fluff and joke a bit - I just love the fun part of life. I'll try to keep it down a bit Ha Ha as a newbie I'm finding the fluff easier to handle
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:07:29 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:07:29 GMT -5
OMG you didnt...... did you really just edit a post? Better start praying and begging for your life now Moody... And play the newb card hard man... play it hard...
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:08:49 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:08:49 GMT -5
If it matters at all the original post before edit was just a vote for FCOD with no explanation... nothing else just the words "VOTE FCOD" in the proper formatting.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:10:31 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Apr 10, 2009 4:10:31 GMT -5
If it matters at all the original post before edit was just a vote for FCOD with no explanation... nothing else just the words "VOTE FCOD" in the proper formatting. I saw that too - he only added to the post
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:16:03 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:16:03 GMT -5
Moody... as a general rule.... you are NEVER allowed to edit while playing a mafia game.
|
|
Chucara
Borogrove
Idleboard's Elite Coder Club
2009 Winner of Best Person in the Universe
Posts: 287
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:17:12 GMT -5
Post by Chucara on Apr 10, 2009 4:17:12 GMT -5
I still don't know what to make of the bandwagon. I know all paul voters can't be scum, but the timing of it strikes me as a bit odd. A reread when I have the time might cause me to cast a vote in that direction.
Otherwise, I might still look at some of the less active players.
Only thing is, with this being easter, I don't really know how much I can be online until tuesday. I know that I won't be back until tomorrow, and I expect that will be the last of my absense - just a warning.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:17:26 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:17:26 GMT -5
Ground rules for the game: 1) No strategy discussion at Night. Fluff only. 2) No quoting of your role PMs. 3) Vote in blue and (preferably) bold. Votes not in blue will not count. 4) Unvote in red and (preferably) bold. Unvotes not in red will not count. Any subsequent votes will not count until you've unvoted. 5) Ask questions via PM or by using green, bold text in-thread. 6) No post editing. 7) No communication offboard about the game unless stated in your role PM, and then only in the designated forums for that communication. 8) If less than 25% of eligible voters have placed a vote by Dusk, no lynch will occur. (Example: With 20 eligible voters, at least 5 votes must be placed (together or split) for a lynch to occur.) 9) There will be a minimum number of votes on the highest vote-getter for a lynch to occur. This threshold will be announced in the Dawn post. If no one gets the minimum number, no lynch will occur. If there is a tie, the player who received the high number first will be lynched. 10) (a) Day ends immediately when deadline is reached. (b) If a mod is not present to close the Day thread, you may continue posting fluff, but no strategy discussion and no voting/unvoting. 11) (a) Day ends immediately if all eligible voters other than the leading lynch candidate are voting for one person. (b) See (b) above. 12) (a) A 12 hour countdown will begin if 75% of eligible voters are voting for one person. Day will end immediately at the end of the countdown. If the number of votes on the leading lynch candidate drops below 75%, the countdown will pause. (b) See (b) above. 13) Official Day and Night ending times will be posted in the opening post of the thread, using the posting mod's timezone. We may also add it to the news fader and/or add other timezones as a courtesy, however, if any of these are incorrect, even if it the mod's fault, it is your sole responsibility to follow the Official Ending Time. 14) Please title your PMs for Night Actions informatively (e.g. Rolename's Night 1 Choice) and send it to both mods. 15) No substitutions. Anyone needing to leave the game will be modkilled. Questions? Comments? Death threats? See rule 6
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:19:16 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 4:19:16 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not .
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:24:01 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 4:24:01 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not . It's not an issue of getting voted for it... it's that you broke a game rule... usually the mods don't take kindly to that... but maybe they'll go easy on you.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:26:24 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 4:26:24 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not . It's not an issue of getting voted for it... it's that you broke a game rule... usually the mods don't take kindly to that... but maybe they'll go easy on you. I'll just have to wait now then ... off to take my Mum shopping hope I'm still in the game when I get back.
|
|
Total Ullz
Administrator
You can take the girl out of mafia - but you can't take mafia out of the girl
Posts: 2,029
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 4:27:02 GMT -5
Post by Total Ullz on Apr 10, 2009 4:27:02 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not . I don't think anyone will vote for you based on that. But the Mods might have some sort of restriction for you. I hope NAF *wink wink* won't be too harsh!
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 7:10:29 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Apr 10, 2009 7:10:29 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not . I kinda agree voting you would be to me like stepping on the MOD'S toes. It is our job to work as a team and win as a team, not be the MOD and possibly peanalize players for breaking rules. So if there is consequences, I would leave that to the MOD'S of this game, not the players. Plus look at the trouble I had with this board, during mario, I should be last to vote for that kinda reason.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 7:51:15 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Apr 10, 2009 7:51:15 GMT -5
I don't understand the question, and I'm not going to respond to it. How much could a banana cost, $10? It's from Southpark.... The joke is... Fishsticks. Fish dicks. So if you say you like fishdicks then you must be a gay fish. Dude...you're not supposed to explain it... [/color] Pure gut on this so far... he quickly jumped on the vote Paul thing for thinking out loud.... His vote was right in Day 1 was correct. And lastly and my most thin assumption. He wasn't very active in the night one thread. OK this is VERY thin and I know I didn't post much either but so far none of us have much to go on so I shall leave it at this .[/quote]Ooooohh someone's gonna get modslapped You wouldn't know this since you've never played in a game with me before, but I like to vote early in the Day for the person I find to be the most suspicious. This does not mean I think for sure that they are scum, just that they are the most suspicious. Basically, the best way the town can gain information is by analyzing voting patterns. So I believe that everyone should vote early and vote often. Sometimes people forget that you can change your vote. By voting early, we avoid situations where everyone piles on to the Doctor in the last hour of the Day and he doesn't have a chance to claim before he's lynched. Because Paul said something suspicious, I voted for him right away. I seem to have started a little Paulwagon, but you can't really blame me for the actions of others. I will move my vote as I find others to be more suspicious. And the night thread thing? I'm not really sure what that has to do with being scum or not. I generally participate less in fluffy nights. YMMV. And yes, I still think Paul is the most suspicious person toDay. --FCOD
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 9:14:41 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Apr 10, 2009 9:14:41 GMT -5
Vote: Nanook
I'm still suspicious of his attempts to stifle discussion, and his decrees of what counts or doesn't count as a useful topic.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 9:43:16 GMT -5
Post by bufftabby on Apr 10, 2009 9:43:16 GMT -5
So, I re-read Day One, and toDay so far. I actually found some pretty interesting stuff in there. Please forgive me for not actually linking to these posts.
We've had some discussion toDay on Paul's post (2.3):
Paul later (2.38) explained:
I found that very interesting, because at the end of yesterDay (1.256), Paul explained to total lost:
It seems strange that at the end of yesterDay, Paul had a firm grip on what a body count would look like if idle's power led to his own death. What's also strange is that total lost clearly knew as well, having already had that conversation with Paul above. But toDay (2.34) she claims
Even after reviewing each of Paul's posts (2.40), she says:
Total still doesn't seem to "notice" that Paul is claiming to have been confused about the very thing he explained to her and that she quoted. I'm seeing this as very selective failure to notice an apparent contradiction. I also think she analyzed his posts and cast a facile bit of suspicion his way to put some distance on all the snuggling she'd been laying on him.
Then we see Paul (2.53) seem to pull a similar move back at Total:
After that, they return to their flirty back and forth, not discussing Paul's allegation/vote at all after Total's initial "I calls 'em like I sees 'em"-type explanation.
I think paul and Total are scumbuddies. Paul was under too much fire, so total defended him a bit, but they want to appear just barely suspicious of one another. I also think their conversation yesterDay about how the body count would look if idle failed was way too conveniently "forgotten" by both of them.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 10:09:32 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 10:09:32 GMT -5
Anyone any idea how long it might be before the mods get in touch with me And FCOD I did say that I didn't have much to go on and it was a lot of gut feeling..... Paul said due to my modifying post..... I should play the newbie card hard so being a NEWBIE I wouldn't know your voting patterns at the moment FCOD haha
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 10:11:05 GMT -5
Post by moodymitchy on Apr 10, 2009 10:11:05 GMT -5
ok you guys noticed. If you want to vote on that basis then fine. I wanted to see that I'd done the formatting of the vote part right but I pressed post instead of preview. As soon as I pressed modify I remembered back in the mists of time some rule about modding posts was not allowed but by then it was too late. If I get a vote for this then fine if not then fine too. Thanks to Paul and Total for being quick to point out the small changes I had made I'm sure people would much prefer a reason for someones vote than not . I don't think anyone will vote for you based on that. But the Mods might have some sort of restriction for you. I hope NAF *wink wink* won't be too harsh! You're back on the fluff again aren't you
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 10:18:19 GMT -5
Post by Merestil Haye on Apr 10, 2009 10:18:19 GMT -5
Anyone any idea how long it might be before the mods get in touch with me Not really, but it doesn't matter. Until you are told otherwise, just keep playing like you normally would. Post your analysis and votes, and don't worry whether you get modkilled or not. NAF may not be at work, as it's Good Friday. Even if he is, he'll just be arrivign there (he's a Californian iirc). Also, his online time gets spotty at weekends (he's recently married, for one thing). Kat, on the other hand, may well be at work, in which case she won't be around for another 8 hours or so (about 6, Central Daylight time). I'll add my voice to the call for mercy, since you're a new player.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 10:56:07 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Apr 10, 2009 10:56:07 GMT -5
Until you are told otherwise, just keep playing like you normally would. Post your analysis and votes, and don't worry whether you get modkilled or not. NAF may not be at work, as it's Good Friday. Even if he is, he'll just be arrivign there (he's a Californian iirc). Also, his online time gets spotty at weekends (he's recently married, for one thing). Kat, on the other hand, may well be at work, in which case she won't be around for another 8 hours or so (about 6, Central Daylight time). I'll add my voice to the call for mercy, since you're a new player. Although I am not in any capacity an official mod, just a spoiled nosy observor, I will say that: 1) Kat was indeed on the spoiler boards early this morning (before I even checked them out) raising the issue and asking for others opinions on it. She hasn't been back, but that's because she is most likely at work as has been said. 2) There will most likely not be a modkill. (In fact, I would say there won't be based on what Kat said, but I'm not going to speak for the mods.) So don't worry about that. There will be a punishment, though.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 10:57:36 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Apr 10, 2009 10:57:36 GMT -5
"Everybody gets one."
--FCOD
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 11:05:07 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Apr 10, 2009 11:05:07 GMT -5
Until you are told otherwise, just keep playing like you normally would. Post your analysis and votes, and don't worry whether you get modkilled or not. NAF may not be at work, as it's Good Friday. Even if he is, he'll just be arrivign there (he's a Californian iirc). Also, his online time gets spotty at weekends (he's recently married, for one thing). Kat, on the other hand, may well be at work, in which case she won't be around for another 8 hours or so (about 6, Central Daylight time). I'll add my voice to the call for mercy, since you're a new player. Although I am not in any capacity an official mod, just a spoiled nosy observor, I will say that: 1) Kat was indeed on the spoiler boards early this morning (before I even checked them out) raising the issue and asking for others opinions on it. She hasn't been back, but that's because she is most likely at work as has been said. 2) There will most likely not be a modkill. (In fact, I would say there won't be based on what Kat said, but I'm not going to speak for the mods.) So don't worry about that. There will be a punishment, though. Well, that's good to hear. I've never been a fan of the insta-modkill for editing anyway.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 11:27:55 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 10, 2009 11:27:55 GMT -5
So, I re-read Day One, and toDay so far. I actually found some pretty interesting stuff in there. Please forgive me for not actually linking to these posts. We've had some discussion toDay on Paul's post (2.3): Paul later (2.38) explained: I found that very interesting, because at the end of yesterDay (1.256), Paul explained to total lost: It seems strange that at the end of yesterDay, Paul had a firm grip on what a body count would look like if idle's power led to his own death. What's also strange is that total lost clearly knew as well, having already had that conversation with Paul above. But toDay (2.34) she claims Even after reviewing each of Paul's posts (2.40), she says: Total still doesn't seem to "notice" that Paul is claiming to have been confused about the very thing he explained to her and that she quoted. I'm seeing this as very selective failure to notice an apparent contradiction. I also think she analyzed his posts and cast a facile bit of suspicion his way to put some distance on all the snuggling she'd been laying on him. Then we see Paul (2.53) seem to pull a similar move back at Total: After that, they return to their flirty back and forth, not discussing Paul's allegation/vote at all after Total's initial "I calls 'em like I sees 'em"-type explanation. I think paul and Total are scumbuddies. Paul was under too much fire, so total defended him a bit, but they want to appear just barely suspicious of one another. I also think their conversation yesterDay about how the body count would look if idle failed was way too conveniently "forgotten" by both of them. Call it what you want, when it comes down to it I made a mistake in logic when trying to follow the events of dawn. Doesn't make me scum. I am town and have no way to defend myself other than to say that I made a mistake. I can say this however. My vote against TotalLost is genuine and not scum posturing. Since I am the one most likely to be lynched toDay, you can at least take that as an honest opinion.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 11:55:27 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Apr 10, 2009 11:55:27 GMT -5
I don't really get the Paul case.
He made a joke, and messed up analyzing the deaths this Morning. It just doesn't seem scummy to me.
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 12:05:12 GMT -5
Post by NAF1138 on Apr 10, 2009 12:05:12 GMT -5
[/color] Pure gut on this so far... he quickly jumped on the vote Paul thing for thinking out loud.... His vote was right in Day 1 was correct. And lastly and my most thin assumption. He wasn't very active in the night one thread. OK this is VERY thin and I know I didn't post much either but so far none of us have much to go on so I shall leave it at this .[/quote] You caught me on a day when I am feeling a bit lenient. I should kill you, I really almost did kill you, but this is your first game. Since it is your first game, you get a one time pass. You get 50% of the votes needed to start the countdown as a penalty. Next time ANYONE edits, for ANY reason they are dead. (Unless death is their goal, in which case I am willing to get...creative) I am not as nice as this normally. 6 penalty votes for moody
|
|
|
Day Two
Apr 10, 2009 12:20:41 GMT -5
Post by Hawkmod on Apr 10, 2009 12:20:41 GMT -5
Why are we assuming Idle caused his own death? If you are a pro-town Vig and someone else claims Vig what do you do? You kill them right? I think the most likely scenario is that Pollux caused Idle's death. Whether that in turn caused Pollux I don't know. Remember Idle wasn't town, he could have been lying about how his role worked.
The case against Paul is meh. I guess he might of showed a little extra knowledge, but I'm far from convinced. The bandwagon grew a bit too quickly for my comfort.
I don't really have another candidate yet. We will need to vote together though to stop a Moody lynch.
|
|