|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Oct 5, 2010 20:19:39 GMT -5
All of this generally requires that we trust you. Something I'm not willing to do at this point. Chitter? Little Indian Girl: How does it require that you trust me? Chitter.... Little Indian Girl: I should expand here by stating my reason for not following the need to trust me is that my part in the whole thing is passive. How do my actions have anything to do with it?
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 5, 2010 20:36:40 GMT -5
wait. So because it would lead to a Scum wouldn't do that defense, then Scum wouldn't do that? Chitter... Little Indian Girl: I didn't say that... I said that it would bring suspicion on TG. So while it's possible, it was either not well thought out, or a bad idea.... if she is indeed scum being jailed by another scum. It's WiFoM.... we say "scum wouldn't do that"... but they would because that's what they know everyone is thinking... But after having spent all game saying "scum wouldn't do that" is a big mistake because yes they would, it would be a bad idea for them to follow a course of action assuming town would say "scum wouldn't do that". Look at the list of players.... this isn't Amateur Hour.... Anyone on scum side who thinks they could so easily pull the wool over the eyes of these players is playing like a fool. Which brings me back to the fact that this isn't Amateur Hour.... the players on the list who might be scum wouldn't expect such a basic scum ploy to really play out. But like I said.... it's all WiFoM... just as much as we can't take it as evidence of TG being Town.... we can't use it as evidence of her being scum either.... it's bunk.... useless info... but you're saying, basically, that it's not a viable Scum plot because it's not a viable Scum plot. They have nothing to gain, so they wouldn't do it.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 5, 2010 20:46:43 GMT -5
Chitter? Little Indian Girl: How does it require that you trust me? Chitter.... Little Indian Girl: I should expand here by stating my reason for not following the need to trust me is that my part in the whole thing is passive. How do my actions have anything to do with it? Scenario 1: Meeko/paul is Scum, Zedd is Scum a. Zedd reports on meeko/paul. M/P confirms Zedd's response b. Zedd reports on meeko/paul. M/P refutes Zedd and buses him for Townie Cred c. Zedd could report failure due to blockage/redirection Scenario 2: M/P is Scum, Zedd is Town a. Zedd reports on M/P. M/P confirms Zedd for Townie Cred when Zedd flips. b. Zedd reports on M/P. M/P refutes Zedd and has him killed claiming some sort of interference when Zedd flips Town c. Zedd could report failure due to blockage/redirection Scenario 3: M/P is Town, Zedd is Scum a. Zedd reports accurately on M/P because he is a Scum investigator. M/P confirms Zedd. b. Zedd reports on M/P, and M/P refutes him. (lord knows why Zedd would report if he wasn't sure of his answer) c. Zedd could report failure due to blockage/redirection Scenario 4: M/P is Town, Zedd is Town a. Zedd reports accurately on M/P. M/P confirms Zedd's information. b. Zedd won't report incorrectly unless M/P is a Miller of some sort. c. Zedd could report failure due to blockage/redirection Whew, let's have a look: 1a. M/P confirms Zedd results. Are they Town? we can't tell. 1b. Zedd is dead, baby. M/P has some cred for busing him 1c. We learned nothing. 2a. M/P confirms Zedd results. Are they Town? we can't tell. 2b. Unlikely 2c. We learn nothing 3a. M/P confirms Zedd results. Are they Town? we can't tell. 3b. Unlikely 3c. We learn nothing 4a. M/P confirms Zedd results. Are they Town? we can't tell. 4b. Unlikely 4c. We learn nothing. OK, so, show me any benefit to this interaction again.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Oct 5, 2010 21:23:55 GMT -5
chitter....
Little Indian Girl: It seems you glossed over the part of my suggestion that told you that while I can't reveal what my power is without claiming, it can be tested and will prove the information on my role accurate.
so... let's look at your points above...
1a. Our alignment doesn't matter the information will be confirmed. 1b. I won't be able to refute him if he is telling the truth, so again... the information will confirm itself. 1c. The watcher would be able to tell if he is blocked or redirected. (Again... how can an invisible power be redirected?)
2a. If you think this gives me TC fine... but the information will be confirmed, so I can't just lie and say he's right. 2b. Agreed... unlikely... especially when the information will be confirmed. 2c. see 1c
3a. This is possible... but the idea going on now by most players is to leave Zedd alone for now... and besides... if we are forcing him to continue to investigate in the fashion we want, either role or threat... than even if he is a scum investigator, he'll have to give us whatever info he gained. Besides which, what use is a scum investigator at this point, pretty much everyone has claimed. 3b. Agreed.... unlikely... 3c. see 1c.
4a. Yipee... the ideal situation... this is what is suspected. And while it won't prove our alignments, it will prove that Zedd is telling the truth. The information will be confirmed. 4b. I don't think this is likely... a miller in the sort that my power shows up differently? 4b. see 1c.... and 2c... and 3c....
I think he's lying... I'm just finding a way to call his bluff that won't cost town an investigation or worse... an entire investigator. If I recall correctly, it was one of the masons who suggested the original course of action to test Zedd by having him investigate the role of an unclaimed person. I just volunteered because the nature of my role provides proof that the investigation is accurate. Proof that doesn't require you taking my word for it. If we don't agree to this plan, than my vote is staying where it is and I think we should lynch him.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 5, 2010 21:33:12 GMT -5
chitter.... Little Indian Girl: It seems you glossed over the part of my suggestion that told you that while I can't reveal what my power is without claiming, it can be tested and will prove the information on my role accurate. so... let's look at your points above... 1a. Our alignment doesn't matter the information will be confirmed. 1b. I won't be able to refute him if he is telling the truth, so again... the information will confirm itself. 1c. The watcher would be able to tell if he is blocked or redirected. (Again... how can an invisible power be redirected?) 2a. If you think this gives me TC fine... but the information will be confirmed, so I can't just lie and say he's right. 2b. Agreed... unlikely... especially when the information will be confirmed. 2c. see 1c 3a. This is possible... but the idea going on now by most players is to leave Zedd alone for now... and besides... if we are forcing him to continue to investigate in the fashion we want, either role or threat... than even if he is a scum investigator, he'll have to give us whatever info he gained. Besides which, what use is a scum investigator at this point, pretty much everyone has claimed. 3b. Agreed.... unlikely... 3c. see 1c. 4a. Yipee... the ideal situation... this is what is suspected. And while it won't prove our alignments, it will prove that Zedd is telling the truth. The information will be confirmed. 4b. I don't think this is likely... a miller in the sort that my power shows up differently? 4b. see 1c.... and 2c... and 3c.... I think he's lying... I'm just finding a way to call his bluff that won't cost town an investigation or worse... an entire investigator. If I recall correctly, it was one of the masons who suggested the original course of action to test Zedd by having him investigate the role of an unclaimed person. I just volunteered because the nature of my role provides proof that the investigation is accurate. Proof that doesn't require you taking my word for it. If we don't agree to this plan, than my vote is staying where it is and I think we should lynch him. So, he can reveal your role and you can confirm it without us having to believe you? really? So if you confirm that he was accurate, you'll be able to prove it somehow without me having to believe you? And, if he claims something that was inaccurate you can prove it without me having to believe you?
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 5, 2010 21:34:57 GMT -5
it all seems to convenient.
We have to believe you, and the watcher must watch Zedd to make any of the 'c' situation mean anything. Along with full faith in the masons.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Oct 5, 2010 23:36:17 GMT -5
it all seems to convenient. We have to believe you, and the watcher must watch Zedd to make any of the 'c' situation mean anything. Along with full faith in the masons. chitter... Little Indian Girl: And this is all just an elaborate ruse right? In which one of the masons, myself, and zedd are all in cahoots to get town to do something terrible? In order to..... ? Accomplish what exactly? Not to mention that for that to be the case, all of the masons would have to be in on it... or for there to be at least one mason with a different alignment than the others. But you're right... it's more likely that than you just being overly paranoid.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Oct 5, 2010 23:37:22 GMT -5
chitter.... Little Indian Girl: It seems you glossed over the part of my suggestion that told you that while I can't reveal what my power is without claiming, it can be tested and will prove the information on my role accurate. so... let's look at your points above... 1a. Our alignment doesn't matter the information will be confirmed. 1b. I won't be able to refute him if he is telling the truth, so again... the information will confirm itself. 1c. The watcher would be able to tell if he is blocked or redirected. (Again... how can an invisible power be redirected?) 2a. If you think this gives me TC fine... but the information will be confirmed, so I can't just lie and say he's right. 2b. Agreed... unlikely... especially when the information will be confirmed. 2c. see 1c 3a. This is possible... but the idea going on now by most players is to leave Zedd alone for now... and besides... if we are forcing him to continue to investigate in the fashion we want, either role or threat... than even if he is a scum investigator, he'll have to give us whatever info he gained. Besides which, what use is a scum investigator at this point, pretty much everyone has claimed. 3b. Agreed.... unlikely... 3c. see 1c. 4a. Yipee... the ideal situation... this is what is suspected. And while it won't prove our alignments, it will prove that Zedd is telling the truth. The information will be confirmed. 4b. I don't think this is likely... a miller in the sort that my power shows up differently? 4b. see 1c.... and 2c... and 3c.... I think he's lying... I'm just finding a way to call his bluff that won't cost town an investigation or worse... an entire investigator. If I recall correctly, it was one of the masons who suggested the original course of action to test Zedd by having him investigate the role of an unclaimed person. I just volunteered because the nature of my role provides proof that the investigation is accurate. Proof that doesn't require you taking my word for it. If we don't agree to this plan, than my vote is staying where it is and I think we should lynch him. So, he can reveal your role and you can confirm it without us having to believe you? really? So if you confirm that he was accurate, you'll be able to prove it somehow without me having to believe you?And, if he claims something that was inaccurate you can prove it without me having to believe you? chitter! Little Indian Girl: Yes! DING DING DING!!! Tell the man what he's won!
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Natlaw on Oct 6, 2010 5:26:00 GMT -5
chitter.... Little Indian Girl: It seems you glossed over the part of my suggestion that told you that while I can't reveal what my power is without claiming, it can be tested and will prove the information on my role accurate. Sure it can but unless you believe that all scum are powerless, evidence that you have a power and that Zedd can investigate powers is pretty useless. A test of not-a-threat at least is useful is Zedd flips town. The power check is only useful if it returns Godfather but I doubt it will do that and perhaps list a secondary power if he has one.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Oct 6, 2010 5:51:07 GMT -5
As much as I wonder just what the scum were up to with their own kill if they chose to redirect Stay-Puft to you, I don't think it follows that his redirection implies other killers also targeted you (by redirection or otherwise). I don't follow why Galadriel being jailed as a scum ploy makes Gir the possible culprit, or how Story plays into this. Can you explain? I'm sure it makes sense in his head, but he's a bat -- the thing probably needs a good dusting. Mogora! I tend to go from A to C bypassing B quite a lot - and my warped logic is often right. So we have a town vig (puft), most probably a serial killer, and a scum killer - so there probably should have been 3 kills night 2. We had none. it would have been a reasonable assumption by the SK/scum that I would be protected or possibly watched, so going after me would have been a bad move. Blocks and investigations went through, so Puft ending up targeting me was not the result of a mass redirect or nexus. So a killer was redirected to me. But I lived. Eleanor could not have protected me, someone else did, But neither the scum or sk scored a kill either - so both their targets could not have been protected - unless we have 4 docs? unlikely. Gir and Galadriel were seen in the batcave - but deny being there. I trust the Masons - so Gir and Galadriel are liars. Why would they deny being there? docs or killers? with the lack of other deaths, it seems plausible, that all kills were directed to me. So I think Gir and Galadriel are quite possibly both killers. And one of the main reasons why I chose to investigate Galadriel. I still have my suspicions of Story, but since I cant vote Galadriel Unvote: story Vote: gir
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Oct 6, 2010 5:57:19 GMT -5
For what it's worth, I don't find your suspicious for any of this, simply because you always seem to have a bug up your butt about me when we play together, and look for reasons to vote for me if you possibly can. Keep trying; sooner or later you'll do it when I actually am Scum. It's not this time, though. You seem to leap to the "bug up your butt" defense when anyone focusses on you. I was spot on with you in mazalan, and I think I am right here too. Your response here does tell me one thing - you aren't scum. However, you ain't town either. I think you are 3rd party/pfk. In your claim, you stressed that your thought there was a non-town roleblocker, and non-town redirector. It seemed a strange way of putting it - why would you think that there would be non-town, non-scum roleblocker(s)/redirector(s) - why not just say that you thought that there were scum roleblocker(s)/redirector(s). The only conclusion is that you yourself are 3rd party/pfk - and I certainly don't believe that you made my investigation unstoppable.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Oct 6, 2010 6:10:13 GMT -5
Galadriel and Gir, like Puft, say they weren't in the batcave, but the Mason's say they were. Galadriel is jailed -- now why jail her, she ddnt claim anything - this smells more like a scum ploy; which leaves Gir as the possible culprit. So this boils down to do I believe Story, in which case Gir is most likely the killer. Or are they both full of it? Chitter? Little Indian Girl: Ok.... I don't understand the logical path leading to the last question.... Nor do I understand the logical path leading to a scum ploy where in TG was jailed by her fellow scum. Here's why I don't get it: 1. Why didn't they jail Eleanor again? 2. Why didn't they jail Batman? He was just watched, so the likelihood of him being watched again was reduced... 3. Jailing/maiming one of your fellow scum is SOOOO last year. 4. What gain do they get from it? With the amount of discussion already going around that it should never be assumed that "scum wouldn't do that" they can't really expect that much TC from it.... and should have even expected some doubt and suspicion about it... 5. I think they would have set it up better. It doesn't make sense as is.... too many gaps in logic leading up to the reason for her being jailed. 6. Because of 4 and 5, it makes sense to jail her if she isn't scum because she now has suspicion on her, and it doesn't make sense.... thus adding to the general confusion of everyone not in the know. the ole scum wouldn't do that coz scum wouldn't do that coz scum wouldnt do that defence. it would have been more logical for scum to jail me, elanor, raj, a mason, anyone who could do them damage. why jail someone who was seen to have been in the batcave, and not admitting it? scum thought she was a pfk killer? scum thought she was a doc? given i'm still alive it is unlikely that galadriel is a doc. So I cannot see a good reason for scum to jail her unless it is scum trying to gain town cred.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 6, 2010 6:45:20 GMT -5
it all seems to convenient. We have to believe you, and the watcher must watch Zedd to make any of the 'c' situation mean anything. Along with full faith in the masons. chitter... Little Indian Girl: And this is all just an elaborate ruse right? In which one of the masons, myself, and zedd are all in cahoots to get town to do something terrible? In order to..... ? Accomplish what exactly? Not to mention that for that to be the case, all of the masons would have to be in on it... or for there to be at least one mason with a different alignment than the others. But you're right... it's more likely that than you just being overly paranoid. No, just you has to be in on it. Because Zedd and the Masons can do as you say, be Town, and what you report will decide how we react. And I have no reason to trust you. Or Zedd could be Scum and you and the Masons could be Town, and I won't be able to tell Or the Masons could be Scum or 3rd party and you and Zedd could be Town and I wouldn't be able to tell. Or all of you could be Town and a 3rd party of Scum manipulation would make all of this moot. Or just about any combination.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Oct 6, 2010 6:45:48 GMT -5
May we have a vote count?
I've done, I think, my very best in explaining everything about my role, guys. I can not be expected to have answers for things I was not informed about in my role. I was not told my power would not be "seeable" or anything and I can't quote my PM about it.
Anyway, I want a vote count so I can see where things stand 2 1/2 days before the lynch. I don't want a ton of votes piling on me in a lazy way at the end.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 6, 2010 6:46:05 GMT -5
So, he can reveal your role and you can confirm it without us having to believe you? really? So if you confirm that he was accurate, you'll be able to prove it somehow without me having to believe you?And, if he claims something that was inaccurate you can prove it without me having to believe you? chitter! Little Indian Girl: Yes! DING DING DING!!! Tell the man what he's won! I find it difficult to believe that you can make me believe something without having to believe you.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 6, 2010 6:48:18 GMT -5
As much as I wonder just what the scum were up to with their own kill if they chose to redirect Stay-Puft to you, I don't think it follows that his redirection implies other killers also targeted you (by redirection or otherwise). I don't follow why Galadriel being jailed as a scum ploy makes Gir the possible culprit, or how Story plays into this. Can you explain? I'm sure it makes sense in his head, but he's a bat -- the thing probably needs a good dusting. Mogora! I tend to go from A to C bypassing B quite a lot - and my warped logic is often right. So we have a town vig (puft), most probably a serial killer, and a scum killer - so there probably should have been 3 kills night 2. We had none. it would have been a reasonable assumption by the SK/scum that I would be protected or possibly watched, so going after me would have been a bad move. Blocks and investigations went through, so Puft ending up targeting me was not the result of a mass redirect or nexus. So a killer was redirected to me. But I lived. Eleanor could not have protected me, someone else did, But neither the scum or sk scored a kill either - so both their targets could not have been protected - unless we have 4 docs? unlikely. Gir and Galadriel were seen in the batcave - but deny being there. I trust the Masons - so Gir and Galadriel are liars. Why would they deny being there? docs or killers? with the lack of other deaths, it seems plausible, that all kills were directed to me. So I think Gir and Galadriel are quite possibly both killers. And one of the main reasons why I chose to investigate Galadriel. I still have my suspicions of Story, but since I cant vote Galadriel Or there was some massive redirection going on and Gir and Galadriel thought they were visiting someone else and didn't get confirmation that their target was changed. Of course it could mean that one of them was a protector and one was a killer...or Maniac was a killer or just about a million other things.
|
|
|
Post by julie on Oct 6, 2010 8:32:21 GMT -5
As requested:
Current Vote Count
4 Zedd: Curious George (37), Raj (53), Meeko (63), Iskaral Pust (75)
1 Curious George: Marcel (27)
1 Iskaral Pust: Homicidal Maniac (145)
1 Gir: Batman (189)
Corrections always welcome.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Oct 6, 2010 8:46:24 GMT -5
You seem to leap to the "bug up your butt" defense when anyone focusses on you. Nope, just you. Because you do. I don't know if I pissed you off in another life or something, but it's incredibly obvious. You have no reasoning here; you just desperately want me to be a bad guy, so you're inventing reasons to believe I am. You were spot off in Mazalan. You kept telling my allies I couldn't be trusted; I was loyal to my allies through to the end. You made a decision in that game that me losing was more important to you than you winning, so you turned down every offer I made to work with you - all legit offers that I would have honored - and wound up losing explicitly because of it. Every single thing you thought about me (other than my status as a Member in Chains, which was something I volunteered freely to anyone who asked) was wrong. Honestly, your obsession is flattering, but it was the reason you lost in Mazalan and now it's leading you down the wrong road again. That's the biggest reach I've seen so far. I acknowledged the existence of third-party actors, which have been present in every game we've played so far and have been demonstrated to exist in this game, and that means I am one myself. Eh,. You decided on your conclusion long ago and will twist whatever you see in order to justify it. The fact that it's wrong is almost secondary. But I don't think you're Scum. I think you're probably a Town Detective. So I'm kind of wasting time and energy responding to your arguments, which basically amount to "I don't believe you because I don't believe you." If others buy into that reasoning, then we all deserve the outcome we'll get. I'm sure you're right. A wizard did it.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 6, 2010 10:19:00 GMT -5
SQUEEK? (I thought yesterDay the going theory was that there was a mass redirect to Batman. Has that thinking changed?)
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Oct 6, 2010 10:23:40 GMT -5
SQUEEK? (I thought yesterDay the going theory was that there was a mass redirect to Batman. Has that thinking changed?) Wouldn't a mass redirect have included role-blocking powers? We have at least one of them claimed, as I recall.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Oct 6, 2010 10:30:51 GMT -5
<font style="font-size: 12px;"> SQUEEK? (I thought yesterDay the going theory was that there was a mass redirect to Batman. Has that thinking changed?)
Wouldn't a mass redirect have included role-blocking powers? We have at least one of them claimed, as I recall. SQUEEK. *facepalm* (Yes, of course.)
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Oct 6, 2010 13:23:41 GMT -5
Nope, just you. Because you do. I don't know if I pissed you off in another life or something, but it's incredibly obvious. You have no reasoning here; you just desperately want me to be a bad guy, so you're inventing reasons to believe I am. You appear to be the one with the obsession. If you flip anything other than town in this game, I'll expect your apology with a very large slice of humble pie.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Oct 6, 2010 13:33:19 GMT -5
It's quiet. It's too quiet. I should break Galadriel out of jail. She talks. And other things, heehee.
I'm wondering if some of the recent discussion isn't going about things the wrong way. For example, I don't think there's any way to sort through the confusion regarding which of Gir, Galadriel, Homicidal Maniac, and Rorshach is scum or other variety of non-town based on reported actions and results alone. Somebody just needs to do the work to look at their posts and make some educated judgments. I've done this already as regards Homicidal Maniac, but I haven't put my thoughts on Rorshach into any kind of comprehensible order; and I haven't looked at Gir or Galadriel at all. I'll try to do some of that tomorrow, Hood willing and Seven Cities don't rise (again).
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on Oct 6, 2010 13:35:53 GMT -5
It's quiet. It's too quiet. I've made my case as to what my power is and so forth. I have little else to say right now since a lot of the accusations are at me. I hope people don't just jump in, say "me too" and pile votes on me.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 6, 2010 13:50:02 GMT -5
It's quiet. It's too quiet. I should break Galadriel out of jail. She talks. And other things, heehee. I'm wondering if some of the recent discussion isn't going about things the wrong way. For example, I don't think there's any way to sort through the confusion regarding which of Gir, Galadriel, Homicidal Maniac, and Rorshach is scum or other variety of non-town based on reported actions and results alone. Somebody just needs to do the work to look at their posts and make some educated judgments. I've done this already as regards Homicidal Maniac, but I haven't put my thoughts on Rorshach into any kind of comprehensible order; and I haven't looked at Gir or Galadriel at all. I'll try to do some of that tomorrow, Hood willing and Seven Cities don't rise (again). In regards to Rorshach, what jumps out at me is his comment that Total was jailed because of the thought that she was a roleblocker. With all the other undefined roles having been seen in the batcave, it seems odd that he singled her out with that specific role. Now, I haven't looked very deeply yet, but I do hope to when I get home. Despite having a student teacher, I do need to at least appear like I'm doing some work.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Oct 6, 2010 14:01:55 GMT -5
You appear to be the one with the obsession. Ah, the "I know you are but what am I" defense. An oldie but a goodie. But here, how about this: Give me one concrete reason why you are suspicious of me. "I don't believe the role claim" isn't valid unless it is followed by a reason for not believing it. I hope you're not holding your breath.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Oct 6, 2010 14:12:07 GMT -5
Aaaaand on second read, I'm being a dick.
Bill, I think your arguments are without merit. I can't respond to them in any way, since they really ought to be addressed to the moderator. I'm sorry you don't like my role, but it's what I've got and there's really nothing I can say or do about it to change the circumstances.
The other part of the conversation has no place in the game; I shouldn't have brought it up, apologize for doing so, and will let it drop if you'll do the same.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 6, 2010 16:45:31 GMT -5
I'd actually be willing to try PaulWhoIsMeeko's idea. I don't happen to share BillMcBat's visceral assertion that there is no way that a power could function as described.
|
|
timmy
Mome Rath
In the frozen land of Nador they were forced to eat Robin's minstrels. And there was much rejoicing
Posts: 189
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by timmy on Oct 6, 2010 17:03:37 GMT -5
In regards to Rorshach, what jumps out at me is his comment that Total was jailed because of the thought that she was a roleblocker. With all the other undefined roles having been seen in the batcave, it seems odd that he singled her out with that specific role. Now, I haven't looked very deeply yet, but I do hope to when I get home. Despite having a student teacher, I do need to at least appear like I'm doing some work. Apparently you have been overlooking what others are saying about Total Galadriel. Here is the first instance of speculation on Total's role toDay: It starts to look like the jailer is scum - first the claimed doctor and now someone who might have been a protector. Then I replied: Total hasn't claimed so don't know what she was doing. Then others spoke up about Total's unknown role: SQUEEK (Total hasn't claimed, but she did mention yesterday that she is able to "share someone's bed" for a night. What the hell that means in game terms, I have no clue.) Wasn't there similar color in Mahaloth's Wild West game where the character was a prostitute and doc? Oredigger(town) was a slut and could roleblock by distracting someone for the Night. Somone(I forget who) was a prostitute(scum team) and was also a roleblocker. Ah, well. That makes even more sense than a doc. Of course we already have a dead town roleblocker and two town roleblockers seem unusual.. Galadriel is jailed -- now why jail her, she ddnt claim anything Total talked about getting in bed with players. Which bring me to my comment regarding possibility of Total being a Roleblocker: With one Town Roleblocker dead, thought Total might be a backup or have a similar power that enables her to block players. Fits with the idea of having two investigative roles and two two Vig roles in the game. Think Scum jailed her to prevent being blocked, and NK'd claimed Roleblocker. At this point you asked me why I thought Total is a Roleblocker. Let me be clear. I don't know what Total's role is. I speculated she might be a Roleblocker based on what others were speculating, if she were Town. If she were Scum, she might be something else.
|
|
|
Post by special on Oct 6, 2010 17:21:27 GMT -5
@ Rorschach, OK, that makes sense.
|
|