|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 13:39:16 GMT -5
Post by Nanook on Feb 27, 2010 13:39:16 GMT -5
I see no reason to disbelieve Meeko's claim. Sure, it could be a cover role, but I doubt it. In the last SSB we weren't given cover roles at all, and just edited our actual roles slightly. Further, I doubt a scum would false claim Vig/Doc hybrid, instead going for something simpler like straight doc or straight vig. Further, in hindsight, his actions kinda fit someone overvaluing their own role. A word of advice Meeko. If you have that sort of power role, don't try and be a shy and retiring flower. The scum watch for that sort of thing.
Unvote: Meeko
Bill, I really don't understand your logic there. You list every possibility, but completely gloss over the one that is most damning to you(and from a pure statistical standpoint, the most likely). It really stinks of desperate opportunism.
Vote: first vote Bill
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 13:43:25 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 13:43:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:13:58 GMT -5
Post by shaggy on Feb 27, 2010 14:13:58 GMT -5
OMG Peeker that was way to funny. I loved it and I am definetly adding that to my favourite clips.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:15:22 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 27, 2010 14:15:22 GMT -5
Vote Count: Peeker 1. mentalguy Meeko 1. FCoD, 2., 3. Redskeezix 1. Meeko, 2., 3. Luvbfwc 1., 2. mentalguy, 3. Sister Coyote 1., 2. peekercpa, 3. Nanook 1. BillMC, 2., 3. Special Ed 1. BillMC, 2., 3. FCoD 1. Spec Ed, 2. Meeko, 3. Mentalguy 1. Meeko, 2., 3. Cookies 1. Spec Ed, 2., 3. BillMC 1. FCoD, 2. Ed. Shaggy 1. Drainbead, 2. Sister C, 3. MentalG Drainbead 1. peeker, 2. Redskeezix, 3. Shaggy
Meeko (8): (FCoD 2nd), (Mentalguy 1st), (Reddy 1st) Spec. (8): (FCoD 1st), (Cookies 1st), (BillMC 2nd) FCoD (6): (Meeko 1st), (BillMC 1st) BillMC (6): (Special Ed 1st), (Nanook 1st) Mentalguy (6): (luvbfwc 2nd), (peeker 1st), (Shaggy 3rd) peekercpa (5): (Sis Coyote 2nd), (Drainbead 1st) Drainbead (3): (Shaggy 1st) Sister C (2): (Shaggy 2nd) Redskeezix (2): (Drainbead 2nd) Shaggy (1): (Drainbead 1st)
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:33:33 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 14:33:33 GMT -5
so nine are on the block. wonderful.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:38:14 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 14:38:14 GMT -5
i really really think it would be in town's best interest to get rid of some of these 2 and 1 point votes. early on, it's ok to poke, prod or fos but at this point it provides too much leverage to scum.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:39:47 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 27, 2010 14:39:47 GMT -5
Ped, I unvoted meeko post 227.
Alright, onto drain:
1. you are voting for peeker for an inconsistency that doesn't seem to be very inconsistient, and has already been clarified I believe.
2. you forecasted your lurkerness.
3.you mischaracterized my comments regarding my suspicion of meeko. There's no contradiction there. Paul's swipe was scummy, meeko's me first attitude was scummy. Is it possible for scum to jab at each other? yes of course. Is it possible that one is scum behaving scummily and the other is town behaving just as scummily? yep that's a possibility. Is it possible that they're both town and behaving scummy? Yep. Do I believe that it was a scum fight? I believe that it is possible.
vote DrainBead (3 points)
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:41:55 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 27, 2010 14:41:55 GMT -5
NETA: Summary, drain appears to be drawing voting reasons from whole cloth.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:46:08 GMT -5
Post by special on Feb 27, 2010 14:46:08 GMT -5
i really really think it would be in town's best interest to get rid of some of these 2 and 1 point votes. early on, it's ok to poke, prod or fos but at this point it provides too much leverage to scum. What wonderful insight! If only someone had suggested this earlier in the Day!
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:52:38 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 14:52:38 GMT -5
Ped, I unvoted meeko post 227.Alright, onto drain: 1. you are voting for peeker for an inconsistency that doesn't seem to be very inconsistient, and has already been clarified I believe. 2. you forecasted your lurkerness. 3.you mischaracterized my comments regarding my suspicion of meeko. There's no contradiction there. Paul's swipe was scummy, meeko's me first attitude was scummy. Is it possible for scum to jab at each other? yes of course. Is it possible that one is scum behaving scummily and the other is town behaving just as scummily? yep that's a possibility. Is it possible that they're both town and behaving scummy? Yep. Do I believe that it was a scum fight? I believe that it is possible. vote DrainBead (3 points) this. i didn't want to seem like i was going down the omgys path. but now that someone not involved sees it as well i think i might reconsider. a me too vote on what has already been pointed out as a mischaracterization (snipped quote) seems odd. but i am not ready to switch my vote because of my previously stated skimming post. so drain could easily be falling into the me too trap of lynching my ass on Day 1 policy. hey guys (and this is generic) i am an easy Day 1 lynch. i acknowledge that. but fuck to get any votes because of a downright mis quote sucks. tends to make me want to switch back to sis.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:54:04 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 14:54:04 GMT -5
i really really think it would be in town's best interest to get rid of some of these 2 and 1 point votes. early on, it's ok to poke, prod or fos but at this point it provides too much leverage to scum. What wonderful insight! If only someone had suggested this earlier in the Day! god you are such a prick. grab that tutu and ditch the skivvies and let's do balet.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 14:58:02 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 14:58:02 GMT -5
and for the bystanders, apparently me and ed are getting ready to get into it.
so, close your eyes and put the blinders on.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 15:01:36 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 27, 2010 15:01:36 GMT -5
Ped, I unvoted meeko post 227.Alright, onto drain: 1. you are voting for peeker for an inconsistency that doesn't seem to be very inconsistient, and has already been clarified I believe. 2. you forecasted your lurkerness. 3.you mischaracterized my comments regarding my suspicion of meeko. There's no contradiction there. Paul's swipe was scummy, meeko's me first attitude was scummy. Is it possible for scum to jab at each other? yes of course. Is it possible that one is scum behaving scummily and the other is town behaving just as scummily? yep that's a possibility. Is it possible that they're both town and behaving scummy? Yep. Do I believe that it was a scum fight? I believe that it is possible. vote DrainBead (3 points) Would you rather me not mention at all that I'm going to be AFK? Telling the thread I have a RL obligation is now "forecasting lurkerness"? That's totally weak, and actually makes me a bit angry that you're using it as part of your reasoning to vote for me. Clearly I am not lurking anymore, because my RL obligation is now over. So I mentioned I might put a late vote down, and I said why, and two people are using that as basis for a reason to vote for me, one of whom completely misunderstood what I was saying. And you're not really answering my suspicion of your vote switch. In order for your switch to make sense, especially since you still had suspicions after the unvote, you'd have to think that scummy paul was making a swipe at scummy Meeko. Therefore, you'd have to think that it was a scumfight. Of course that's possible--we all know that. I want to know what your reasoning is for thinking it. Because it could also, as you said, be the reaction of a frustrated townie. I want to know why you think (or, well, thought, I guess) that that particular exchange was a scum/scum exchange.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 15:09:48 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 27, 2010 15:09:48 GMT -5
Ped, I unvoted meeko post 227. Peeker 1. mentalguy Meeko 1. FCoD, 2., 3. Redskeezix 1. Drainbead, 2., 3. Luvbfwc 1., 2. mentalguy, 3. Sister Coyote 1., 2. peekercpa, 3. Nanook 1. BillMC, 2., 3. Special Ed 1. BillMC, 2., 3. FCoD 1. Spec Ed, 2. Meeko, 3. Mentalguy 1. Meeko, 2., 3. Cookies 1. Spec Ed, 2., 3. BillMC 1. FCoD, 2. Ed. Shaggy 1. Drainbead, 2. Sister C, 3. MentalG Drainbead 1. peeker, 2. Redskeezix, 3. Shaggy Spec. (8): (FCoD 1st), (Cookies 1st), (BillMC 2nd) FCoD (6): (Meeko 1st), (BillMC 1st) BillMC (6): (Special Ed 1st), (Nanook 1st) Mentalguy (6): (luvbfwc 2nd), (peeker 1st), (Shaggy 3rd) Drainbead (6): (Shaggy 1st), (Reddy 1st) peekercpa (5): (Sis Coyote 2nd), (Drainbead 1st) Meeko (5): (FCoD 2nd), (Mentalguy 1st) Sister C (2): (Shaggy 2nd) Redskeezix (2): (Drainbead 2nd) Shaggy (1): (Drainbead 1st)
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 15:35:52 GMT -5
Post by Dirx on Feb 27, 2010 15:35:52 GMT -5
Red: You're right that I do tend to lurk when I'm scum, but holy crap that was a ton of discussion that took place on Friday. Anyone who plays with me regularly should probably know by now that I'm usually gone on Fridays.
It just took me three hours to catch up on everything, and I don't think it's all set in yet. I agree with peeker and whoever else jumped on mentalguy about "I don't think X is scum, but I'll vote them anyway for playing anti-town." I hate that kind of move.
Also, I feel a need to respond to this quote by Meeko:
Let's say you put a 2pt vote on Alice. You didn't see anyone scummier, so that's your only and final vote. Bob gets lynched, by one vote (Alice was in second place). Or maybe it was a tie between Bob and Alice, but the tiebreaker ended up stretching Bob's neck. Bob turns out to be town. You can be held responsible for Bob's lynch, because you didn't put your full vote strength onto Alice. It's possible that you and Alice are actually scum buddies, and you purposefully let Bob get lynched.
I'm not going to get into the rest of the arguments about accountability and using 3vs2 point votes--I think it's been hashed to death and I don't want to reopen it all again. I'm just giving an example of how a player can be partly responsible for the lynch of a player they didn't vote for.
By the way, by my count, I think this is what the votes should look like:
Special Ed (8) fcod(197), cookies(221), Bill[241] fcod (6) Meeko(228), Bill(241) mentalguy (6) -Meeko[105,161]-, luvbwfc[115], peeker(236), shaggy{249} drainbead (6) shaggy(249), red(276) BillMC (6) Ed(267), Nanook(270) peekercpa (5) SisC[134], -cookies(150,185)-, drainbead(257) meeko (2) -Nanook(136,270)-, -Ed(190,267)-, fcod[197], -mentalguy(203,251)-, -red(219,227)- Sister Coyote (2) -peeker[97,167]-, -peeker{182,236}-, shaggy[249] Red Skeezix (2) drainbead[260] shaggy (1) drainbead{257} Nanook (0) -Meeko(161,228)-, -peeker(182,236)- NAF1138 (0) -peeker[167,182]-, -peeker[182,236]- paulwhoisblah (0) -mentalguy(101,148)-, -red(112,219)-
(1st vote) = 3pts [2nd vote] = 2pts {3rd vote} = 1pt
Ed's case against Bill is interesting, and I'll take a second look at it. Same with the case on drainbead, but on first impression I'm not sure I fully agree with it.
Excuse me while I take a little break and come back to these bits later.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 16:01:55 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Feb 27, 2010 16:01:55 GMT -5
wow, but this game has taken off since I last checked in. On the plus side we have lots of arguments going. This should be of value later on when we know the alignments of some involved.
I don't see a staged conflict betweek Ed & meeko, but I have been wondering about the earlier argument between Meeko & Mental.
Am also slighlty suspicious of the Meeko role claim because of the name. Why Pichu instead of Pikachu? I would have expected the famous one to have featured. But on the other hand, if you were going to faje wouldn't you have used pikachu over pichu? Not sure with this one.
Already I need a re-read,but I am going to
unvote
vote 3 pt Mental vote 2 pt Meeko vote 1 pt Red skeezix I am not feeling the Ed lynch.
I am including skeezix in the mix, because he dropped a 3 pt vote on paul after the mental/meeko fake(to me) seeming argument. It looked like a diversion to me, but I know this could be nothing, hence the 1 pt vote.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 16:03:44 GMT -5
Post by luvbwfc on Feb 27, 2010 16:03:44 GMT -5
wow, but this game has taken off since I last checked in. On the plus side we have lots of arguments going. This should be of value later on when we know the alignments of some involved.
I don't see a staged conflict betweek Ed & meeko, but I have been wondering about the earlier argument between Meeko & Mental.
Am also slighlty suspicious of the Meeko role claim because of the name. Why Pichu instead of Pikachu? I would have expected the famous one to have featured. But on the other hand, if you were going to faje wouldn't you have used pikachu over pichu? Not sure with this one.
Already I need a re-read,but I am going to
unvote
vote 3 pt Mental vote 2 pt Meeko vote 1 pt Red skeezix I am not feeling the Ed lynch.
I am including skeezix in the mix, because he dropped a 3 pt vote on paul after the mental/meeko fake(to me) seeming argument. It looked like a diversion to me, but I know this could be nothing, hence the 1 pt vote.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 16:10:23 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Feb 27, 2010 16:10:23 GMT -5
Ped, I unvoted meeko post 227.Alright, onto drain: 1. you are voting for peeker for an inconsistency that doesn't seem to be very inconsistient, and has already been clarified I believe. 2. you forecasted your lurkerness. 3.you mischaracterized my comments regarding my suspicion of meeko. There's no contradiction there. Paul's swipe was scummy, meeko's me first attitude was scummy. Is it possible for scum to jab at each other? yes of course. Is it possible that one is scum behaving scummily and the other is town behaving just as scummily? yep that's a possibility. Is it possible that they're both town and behaving scummy? Yep. Do I believe that it was a scum fight? I believe that it is possible. vote DrainBead (3 points) Would you rather me not mention at all that I'm going to be AFK? Telling the thread I have a RL obligation is now "forecasting lurkerness"? That's totally weak, and actually makes me a bit angry that you're using it as part of your reasoning to vote for me. Clearly I am not lurking anymore, because my RL obligation is now over. So I mentioned I might put a late vote down, and I said why, and two people are using that as basis for a reason to vote for me, one of whom completely misunderstood what I was saying. The reason I ask is mainly because I'm finding it difficult to sink my teeth into this game, so I've been lurking a bit more than I'm normally accustomed to. Don't get angry, I should have been clearer with what I meant: This is what I meant. This is forecasting lurking by implying that you will be continuing to lurk. I see no mention of RL things, so I must assume that we are talking cross-purpose, unless I am missing something. And you're not really answering my suspicion of your vote switch. In order for your switch to make sense, especially since you still had suspicions after the unvote, you'd have to think that scummy paul was making a swipe at scummy Meeko. Therefore, you'd have to think that it was a scumfight. Of course that's possible--we all know that. I want to know what your reasoning is for thinking it. Because it could also, as you said, be the reaction of a frustrated townie. I want to know why you think (or, well, thought, I guess) that that particular exchange was a scum/scum exchange. That logic only makes sense if I believed without a doubt that I was 100% correct about paul and meeko both being scum. I suspected both of them, but I am tempered by the fact that I know that I've been wrong in the past, and will be wrong again in the future. If I was correct, then yes it will have been a scumfight. Is that significant? I guess I don't see how.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 16:23:04 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 27, 2010 16:23:04 GMT -5
Peeker 1. mentalguy Meeko 1. FCoD, 2., 3. Redskeezix 1. Drainbead, 2., 3. Luvbfwc 1. Mentalguy, 2. Meeko, 3. redskeezix Sister Coyote 1., 2. peekercpa, 3. Nanook 1. BillMC, 2., 3. Special Ed 1. BillMC, 2., 3. FCoD 1. Spec Ed, 2. Meeko, 3. Mentalguy 1. Meeko, 2., 3. Cookies 1. Spec Ed, 2., 3. BillMC 1. FCoD, 2. Ed. Shaggy 1. Drainbead, 2. Sister C, 3. MentalG Drainbead 1. peeker, 2. Redskeezix, 3. Shaggy
Spec. (8): (FCoD 1st), (Cookies 1st), (BillMC 2nd) Mentalguy (7): (luvbfwc 1st), (peeker 1st), (Shaggy 3rd) FCoD (6): (Meeko 1st), (BillMC 1st) BillMC (6): (Special Ed 1st), (Nanook 1st) Drainbead (6): (Shaggy 1st), (Reddy 1st) peekercpa (5): (Sis Coyote 2nd), (Drainbead 1st) Meeko (4): (FCoD 2nd), (luvbwfc 2nd) Redskeezix (3): (Drainbead 2nd), (luvbwfc 3rd) Sister C (2): (Shaggy 2nd) Shaggy (1): (Drainbead 3rd)
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 17:34:36 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Feb 27, 2010 17:34:36 GMT -5
There really aren't answers, but an analysis that basically states the 4 possibilities that exist for alignment of myself and FCOD. Of course, his analysis is cursory and weak, and, shall I say opportunistic? Let's break it down: 1. FCOD= Scum, Ed=Town, Bill states there's no reason for FCOD to make his comment. No reason? really? Maybe Scum wants to focus attention on the interaction? Maybe he wants to place 2 votes that will slide under the radr. Maybe he realizes he's pushing Meeko closer ot lynch while......wait for it.....taking on less accountability by voting him 2nd 2. FCOD=Scum, Ed= Scum. Bill mention that I started the Borda is Bad discussion (How is that relevant? Is it a Scummy thing to do?) and FCOD is trying to earn Town Cred by busing me. 3. FCOD=Town, Ed=Scum, Bill states that I am just re-staging my argument from C3 with Meeko. This ignores his won point that I'm playing the way I usually do, which is picking up on inconsistencies and possible Scum motivations and then investigating it to see what I think. 4.FCOD=Town, Ed=Town, Bill ignores this possibility. He ignores that maybe I am just plaiyng the way I usually do and FCOD saw the same things he appeared to in the interaction between Meeko and myself. At this point, though I'm a bit hesitant to believe Meeko's claim (especially since he easily could be a Vig toNight and I've gone after him pretty hard) I'm going to What do you want Ed? A bloody thesis on why the whole thing feels staged? I stated four possibilities then you state that i ignore one of the things I stated - talk about a bloody contradiction. Interesting that you pretty much gloss over fcod and cookies comments on you but decide to focus on mine, and as per "scum can manipulate the borda vote" oh look - if I remove my vote from you it puts me in the lynch position.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 17:36:54 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Feb 27, 2010 17:36:54 GMT -5
Bill, I really don't understand your logic there. You list every possibility, but completely gloss over the one that is most damning to you(and from a pure statistical standpoint, the most likely). It really stinks of desperate opportunism As per FCOD's comments - the whole thing feels staged. fuck it.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 17:42:11 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Feb 27, 2010 17:42:11 GMT -5
And before anyone says it - yes my vote on ed remains as it is now self preservation - nicely manipulated on the voting.
So sod it - lets see how self preservation plays out.
I'm Kirby - I inherit the powers of whoever I kill - I can choose to use that power, or kill again.
So Ed, lets make it black and white - if I don't get lynched - I'll be paying you a visit.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 17:53:19 GMT -5
Post by Drain Bead on Feb 27, 2010 17:53:19 GMT -5
What's your alignment?
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 18:14:46 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 18:14:46 GMT -5
because this is approaching a cluster fuck of historic proportions i'd like to hear from drain and sis if they intend to leave their votes where they are?
and mg i assume that bill is now in the crosshairs for playing for self preservation. 'course not that you did jack about paul.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 18:18:12 GMT -5
Post by special on Feb 27, 2010 18:18:12 GMT -5
What do you want Ed? A bloody thesis on why the whole thing feels staged? I stated four possibilities then you state that i ignore one of the things I stated - talk about a bloody contradiction. I said you ignored it because here is what you said: You made comments on all of the other possibilities, why no comment there? Additionally, this is the second time you've responded to me while ignoring my questions: and now you add, in response to Nanook: Bill, I really don't understand your logic there. You list every possibility, but completely gloss over the one that is most damning to you(and from a pure statistical standpoint, the most likely). It really stinks of desperate opportunism As per FCOD's comments - the whole thing feels staged. fuck it. What is staged again? Was it my interactions with Meeko as per FCOD? Is it FCOD's response to me? Why the sudden surge of emotions? And finally, you say: And before anyone says it - yes my vote on ed remains as it is now self preservation - nicely manipulated on the voting. So sod it - lets see how self preservation plays out. I'm Kirby - I inherit the powers of whoever I kill - I can choose to use that power, or kill again. So Ed, lets make it black and white - if I don't get lynched - I'll be paying you a visit. Why not a full role claim? Do you need time to change around your role PM to make it look more Town? So you're a Vig and a Power stealer? That really doesn't sound like a Town Power, and Meeko has also already claimed a half-time Vig. (Honestly your power sounds more like a Serial Killer) I still see a lot of inconsistency. At first, you agree with FCOD and say I'm playing like I usually do, Followed by a vote on FCOD and me. Then, you twice ignore my questions while responding to me. Then you seem to imply to Nanook that you're voting for FCOD for staging the argument between Meeko and myself (are you accusing all 3 of us of being Scum?) and finally, you change your mind and state that your vote on me is self-preservation. This implies that you might have changed your vote otherwise.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 18:22:43 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 27, 2010 18:22:43 GMT -5
and for those folks that have no votes down, shame on you all.
fuck, it's going to be a sunday finish that looks to be a horse race. any votes posted much later are going to get a heckalot of hmmmm from me.
seriously, this is about as pure as a scum set up vote as can be made.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 18:42:00 GMT -5
Post by Meeko on Feb 27, 2010 18:42:00 GMT -5
And before anyone says it - yes my vote on ed remains as it is now self preservation - nicely manipulated on the voting. So sod it - lets see how self preservation plays out. I'm Kirby - I inherit the powers of whoever I kill - I can choose to use that power, or kill again. So Ed, lets make it black and white - if I don't get lynched - I'll be paying you a visit. Ok. Apparently I have a LOT of reading to do.
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 18:49:02 GMT -5
Post by BillMc on Feb 27, 2010 18:49:02 GMT -5
"Why not a full role claim? Do you need time to change around your role PM to make it look more Town?"
Ah more fabricated BS - where the hell did I say I was town? And I'll be sure to let blackberry know that Ed requires them to enhance their brower to allow cut and paste between different threads.
So you're a Vig and a Power stealer? That really doesn't sound like a Town Power, and Meeko has also already claimed a half-time Vig. (Honestly your power sounds more like a Serial Killer)
As I said, where did I claim town?
I still see a lot of inconsistency.
And I see a lot of obfuscation.
At first, you agree with FCOD and say I'm playing like I usually do,
Followed by a vote on FCOD and me.
Then, you twice ignore my questions while responding to me.
Why waste my time responding to questions that I had already stated my opinion on prior?
Yes you are playing like you usually do BUT THAT DOES NOT MAKE YOU TOWN so quit trying to plead town with story.
As I said, I believe Meeko's claim - so your question is invalid.
Then you seem to imply to Nanook that you're voting for FCOD for staging the argument between Meeko and myself (are you accusing all 3 of us of being Scum?)
Whoa there tiger. As I said, I believe Meeko. You and FCOD i'm not sure about hence my vote. I thought that was obvious - votes on fcod and ed, no vote on meeko
jeez NO VOTE ON MEEKO COZ I THINK HE IS TOWN
Is that clear now?
and finally, you change your mind and state that your vote on me is self-preservation. This implies that you might have changed your vote otherwise.
OMG - what a mind blowing statement of implication -- of course no-one ever ever changes their mind in light of new evidence arguments.
of course I MAY have changed my vote depending on other evidence and arguments
|
|
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 19:01:18 GMT -5
Post by Nanook on Feb 27, 2010 19:01:18 GMT -5
Just so we're clear....you seem to be implying you're not Town? I assume you mean to say you're a PFK/SK type? And you expect us to not lynch you....why exactly?
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 1
Feb 27, 2010 19:02:37 GMT -5
Post by Meeko on Feb 27, 2010 19:02:37 GMT -5
Doubtful that Pede would answer questions on my role, as that would confirm me.
Suffice to say, I presented my Role verbatim as I got it.
Suffice to say, I was confused to.
I asked the same questions you guys are asking now.
1. I MUST act each night. 2. I can Heal OR I can Vig.
And in a question I asked Pede, as I saw mentioned in the game, at least in passing, but want to confirm :
Once I act on someone on one night, There is no further obligation on them from the following night.
That is, if I heal someone tonight, they will not die tomorrow simply because I heal them tonight.
3. I can not be Doc or Vig on consecutive nights. I must Alternate.
4. I thankfully get to pick which one I want to be tonight. From then on out, it is as most suspect, heads tails heads tails.
I WILL heal tonight. Or at least, attempt a Heal. While I have no information on a standard compulsory Vig in this game, I don't want my Vig in that mix. I believe the best option given my role is to heal on night 1.
Believe it or not, I do learn things from Mafia. You will not see a Night 1 Vigger from Meeko.
Further, this will give us [Town] the most time possible to plan my next move. As I said earlier, my full claim was [at the time] the best move I could do.
I know I am Half Compulsory Vig. I know there is Precedent for Town to lynch Full Compulsory Vigs.
|
|