|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:33:52 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 16:33:52 GMT -5
paul, do you have any reason to believe we might not get Inner's death information?
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:42:49 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 7, 2010 16:42:49 GMT -5
Bowser (Paranoid Doc/Avenger) When you first boarded this ship, you fully intended to use violence to further this group's aim. You're the King of the Koopas, and whoever stands in your way should cower in your shadow! But that was before. Before you saw the love of your life, Princess Peach. It was only a moment, as the two of you were swept through the crowd, but it seemed like an eternity. Now, violence would be foolish. If you attacked, you would run the risk of hurting your love, and that is a risk nothing is worth. So instead, you will guard. If you guard someone, your bulk and general intimidating figure will ensure no-one can attack them. But...anyone you guard will cower in fear as well. The intended effect, but rather annoying when you are trying to help. Summary: Each Night, you may guard someone. That person won't be attacked, but he also won't be able to do anythign that Night. FALCON PUNCH!paul wound up, and took Inner Stickler completely by surprise with a Falcon Punch. IS flew up, at which point he was intercepted by a Knee of Justice, which caused him to fly off the boat and even off the television screen, at which point he disappeared. It seemed to be a victory for the town, until they double-checked his residence...and he appeared to be exactly who he said he was. Inner Stickler (Bowser), a Town Paranoid Doc/Avenger, is dead.One among them took the news particularly hard. It is said that, in the mushroom kingdom, a cycle exists, bound by eternity. A cycle of kidnapping and rescuing, of attack and defense, of heroism and villainy. What happens when this cycle is broken? Now we know. fluiddruid (Peach), a Town Weak Doc/Lover, is dead
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:43:05 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 16:43:05 GMT -5
I'm not moving my vote off of Inner until I get confirmation that he's really dead.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:43:18 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 16:43:18 GMT -5
paul, do you have any reason to believe we might not get Inner's death information? No... it wasn't made clear when we would get a death reveal. I assumed that it would be instant as Day Vigs are usually instant. I think Pede just isn't around to process the kill right now.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:44:18 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 16:44:18 GMT -5
Shit
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:44:49 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 16:44:49 GMT -5
yeah..um...That wasn't designed
and holy shit, Fluid was Inner's lover?
and I guess (Town blah blah) isn't standard.
and crap.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:46:03 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 7, 2010 16:46:03 GMT -5
I'm not moving my vote off of Inner until I get confirmation that he's really dead. Man I'm good! Also, FTR: an avenger is similar to a lover role, except, instead of dying, the avenger has to kill the killer of his other half.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:46:31 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 16:46:31 GMT -5
I don't want to offend you Pede, but I take issue with the fact that Town role PMs weren't standardized. It gives scum a huge advantage by making false claims incredibly easy to pull off.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:47:24 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 16:47:24 GMT -5
ok. ed you want metagame, here it is.
i always look forward to the start of these games. one of the first posts on the mason board i made was my pm. skeez followed up real durn quick. total took a little bit of time. so have i gotten something from pede that says categorically that skeez is town - nope.
but when you read the spoiled mason board you will see that skeez and i have been working overtime to ensure a town victory. it's longer than some of the durn scum threads that i have been involved with for goodness sakes.
and if the fucker was able to concoct his pm and change the details to convince me that he is town and then behave like he has on the mason board and in the main thread he deserves the durn win because that would be brilliant (i don't put it past his abilities just that is not my read).
i don't want to take away from the suspense but if you guys want and skeez would allow i'd post the whole thread with some stuff redacted.
crap, some of you folks would be probably get a big head about what we say about you in private.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:48:38 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 16:48:38 GMT -5
on refresh. fuck.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:51:34 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 16:51:34 GMT -5
ok. ed you want metagame, here it is. i always look forward to the start of these games. one of the first posts on the mason board i made was my pm. skeez followed up real durn quick. total took a little bit of time. so have i gotten something from pede that says categorically that skeez is town - nope. but when you read the spoiled mason board you will see that skeez and i have been working overtime to ensure a town victory. it's longer than some of the durn scum threads that i have been involved with for goodness sakes. and if the fucker was able to concoct his pm and change the details to convince me that he is town and then behave like he has on the mason board and in the main thread he deserves the durn win because that would be brilliant (i don't put it past his abilities just that is not my read). i don't want to take away from the suspense but if you guys want and skeez would allow i'd post the whole thread with some stuff redacted. crap, some of you folks would be probably get a big head about what we say about you in private. OK, that's about as good as we can expect for now. Thanks.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:52:07 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 7, 2010 16:52:07 GMT -5
Drainbead: 1. , 2. paul, 3. Meeko: 1. Sister Coyote, 2., 3. Sis Coyote: 1. Dirx, 2. Shaggy, 3. Meeko paulwhois: 1. Sister Coyote , 2., 3. Shaggy: 1. SisC, 2., 3. peekercpa: 1. Drainbead, 2., 3. Dirx: 1. SisC, 2., 3. Sinjin: 1. Sister Coyote, 2., 3. nanook: 1. Sis Coyote, 2., 3. Redskeezix: 1. Sister Coyote, 2. drainbead, 3. peekercpa: 1. Drainbead, 2., 3.
Sis Coyote (21): (Shaggy 1st), (Dirx 1st), (Meeko 1st), (sinjin 1st), (nanook 1st), (Redskeezix 1st), (paulwhoisaghost 1st) Dirx (3): (Sis Coyote 1st) Drainbead (2): (redskeezix 2nd) Paulwhoisaghost (2): (drainbead 2nd) Shaggy (2): (Sis Coyote 2nd) Meeko (1): (Sis Coyote 3rd)
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:53:28 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 7, 2010 16:53:28 GMT -5
I don't want to offend you Pede, but I take issue with the fact that Town role PMs weren't standardized. It gives scum a huge advantage by making false claims incredibly easy to pull off. One could argue that, since false claims are necessary in a game with many (or possibly all) power roles, not standardizing them simply levels the playing field.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 16:58:03 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 16:58:03 GMT -5
ok. my votes are apparently not counting.
color=red]unvote all[/color][/b]
VOTE DRAIN THREE POINTS
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:00:05 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Mar 7, 2010 17:00:05 GMT -5
ok. my votes are apparently not counting. color=red]unvote all[/color][/b] VOTE DRAIN THREE POINTS
[/quote] You already are, it's right in the votecount. Wait... Uh... Drainbead: 1. , 2. paul, 3. Meeko: 1. Sister Coyote, 2., 3. Sis Coyote: 1. Dirx, 2. Shaggy, 3. Meeko paulwhois: 1. Sister Coyote , 2., 3. Shaggy: 1. SisC, 2., 3. peekercpa: 1. Drainbead, 2., 3. Dirx: 1. SisC, 2., 3. Sinjin: 1. Sister Coyote, 2., 3. nanook: 1. Sis Coyote, 2., 3. Redskeezix: 1. Sister Coyote, 2. drainbead, 3. peekercpa: 1. Drainbead, 2., 3. Sis Coyote (21): (Shaggy 1st), (Dirx 1st), (Meeko 1st), (sinjin 1st), (nanook 1st), (Redskeezix 1st), (paulwhoisaghost 1st) Drainbead (5): (redskeezix 2nd), (peekercpa 1st) Dirx (3): (Sis Coyote 1st) Paulwhoisaghost (2): (drainbead 2nd) Shaggy (2): (Sis Coyote 2nd) Meeko (1): (Sis Coyote 3rd) Well, it was in half the votecount, anyway.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:00:12 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Mar 7, 2010 17:00:12 GMT -5
Red, do you have independent verification from the Mod that peeker is Town? Did either of you have any indication from the Mod that Total was not Town? 1: Maybe, but I'm not going to clarify this much further. I have independent indication that this is the case, but not verification from the mod. I also have subjective verification about peeker's claim in the mason thread. I do have verification (prior to total's death) from that mod that peeker and total are/were not shills. 2: Yes, the mod couched all answers to questions about Total's powers in a disclaimer.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:02:22 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 17:02:22 GMT -5
oh for fuck's sake.
unvote all
VOTE DRAIN THREE POINTS
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:03:28 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 17:03:28 GMT -5
Well... that removes my suspicion of SisC then.... I thought they had been in cahoots and reviewed each others false claims to verify they were good to go and missed the Town part.... seeing as how that's obviously not what happened....
Unvote: SisC
Vote: Drain Something is off about him. I don't really have time to go back and read all of Day 1 and Today to build a proper case against him or anyone else for that matter so I'm voting from the gut because I don't think a SisC lynch is a good idea at this point.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:05:21 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 17:05:21 GMT -5
My Vote: should be for three points against Drain.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:06:38 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Mar 7, 2010 17:06:38 GMT -5
Pede: You said you'd explain the roles so what is a "weak doc"
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:07:40 GMT -5
Post by Red Skeezix on Mar 7, 2010 17:07:40 GMT -5
Unvote: all
Sister C's claim doesn't seem as spurious, now.
Vote: vote drain 3pts
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:10:33 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 17:10:33 GMT -5
Red, do you have independent verification from the Mod that peeker is Town? Did either of you have any indication from the Mod that Total was not Town? 1: Maybe, but I'm not going to clarify this much further. I have independent indication that this is the case, but not verification from the mod. I also have subjective verification about peeker's claim in the mason thread. I do have verification (prior to total's death) from that mod that peeker and total are/were not shills. 2: Yes, the mod couched all answers to questions about Total's powers in a disclaimer. OK, I'm sorry for harping on it, but when it comes to Masons, I've learned to never trust pede. I'm actually satisfied about your Towniness at this point. So it's only a shadow of a doubt for now.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:12:19 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 17:12:19 GMT -5
Well... that removes my suspicion of SisC then.... I thought they had been in cahoots and reviewed each others false claims to verify they were good to go and missed the Town part.... seeing as how that's obviously not what happened.... Unvote: SisC [/color] Vote: Drain [/color] Something is off about him. I don't really have time to go back and read all of Day 1 and Today to build a proper case against him or anyone else for that matter so I'm voting from the gut because I don't think a SisC lynch is a good idea at this point. [/quote] and i am always wrong so take this with a grain of salt. paul can do what he says he can. this is either self serving scum or enlightened townie. i think we should lynch drain.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:15:05 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 17:15:05 GMT -5
Ed, are you aware that you no longer have a vote in place?
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:16:06 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 17:16:06 GMT -5
Merlon (Investigator) Since the beginning of time, you have used all of your considerable powers to prevent apocalypses, which, for one who can read the future, are surprisingly common. You're too frail to go out and save the world yourself, but you have found the hero many a time, and given him what he needs to succeed. And here you are again, out to prevent a monstrous disaster. Fortunately, you can use your abilities to seek and destroy these villains. You can look into another world, to discover their identity, provided you have enough strenth. Summary: Each Night, you can look into a player's future, and see what their death reveal will be. There's still something left out here. "provided you have enough strength?" and yet there seems to be no limitation on her power. Maybe it's innocuous. Maybe she left something out to keep the Scum wondering. Otherwise, it's a basic Investigative role, learning role name and alignment, but with a twist to fit the character name.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:16:49 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 17:16:49 GMT -5
SisC:15 Drain:9 by my count
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:17:04 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 17:17:04 GMT -5
Ed, are you aware that you no longer have a vote in place? Yes, I was looking back at Sister's claim, now I'm going to review the case against drain.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:18:26 GMT -5
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Mar 7, 2010 17:18:26 GMT -5
Merlon (Investigator) Since the beginning of time, you have used all of your considerable powers to prevent apocalypses, which, for one who can read the future, are surprisingly common. You're too frail to go out and save the world yourself, but you have found the hero many a time, and given him what he needs to succeed. And here you are again, out to prevent a monstrous disaster. Fortunately, you can use your abilities to seek and destroy these villains. You can look into another world, to discover their identity, provided you have enough strenth. Summary: Each Night, you can look into a player's future, and see what their death reveal will be. There's still something left out here. "provided you have enough strength?" and yet there seems to be no limitation on her power. Maybe it's innocuous. Maybe she left something out to keep the Scum wondering. Otherwise, it's a basic Investigative role, learning role name and alignment, but with a twist to fit the character name. I saw that too... but I chalk it up to a weakening point in her role she doesn't want scum to be able to use against her.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:23:35 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Mar 7, 2010 17:23:35 GMT -5
Ed, are you aware that you no longer have a vote in place? Yes, I was looking back at Sister's claim, now I'm going to review the case against drain. hurry hurry, we are getting up against the clock.
|
|
|
Day 2
Mar 7, 2010 17:24:44 GMT -5
Post by special on Mar 7, 2010 17:24:44 GMT -5
I realize there are less than 2 hours in the Day, and I see the case against drain. But I also see the case against Sister, especially with her most recent reasoning in voting: Well, although I'm not a mason, I'm looking kind of slantwise at Dirx at the moment. You're usually a low post-count poster, which I'm not one to comment about since I can swing either way. But toDay's posts have consisted of fluff about paul's roleclaim, then a whole bunch of back-and-forth with paul about his role (and, yeah, checking motivations makes sense for the game, but something about the interaction just feels off to me), and a question to Shaggy about his #1 vote candidate from yesterDay. And I don't even remember what you posted yesterDay. Vote: Dirx -- 3 points [/color] Also, Vote: Shaggy -- 2 points [/color] because the Bill/drainbead lack of clarity is just weird. and Vote: Meeko - 1 point [/color] for consistently giving no explanation for his reasons for voting. If it's all lynch the lurker, then say so. If it's because sinjin subbed in for NAF and you're operating on the theory that it's more likely a Scum would be subbed than modkilled, then for god's sake say that! Town can't move forward without motivations, as dirx said.[/quote] Did she ever explain the vote for dirx?
|
|