|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 11, 2010 14:04:08 GMT -5
Pick a killer and victim again.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Aug 12, 2010 2:49:30 GMT -5
eek - it's quiet in here too.
i get the distinct feeling Kat knows Mitchy is a wolve
I may not be back on line till the weekend - so I am good with any decision.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 12, 2010 7:23:18 GMT -5
I think we need to give serious thought to the possibility of not killing at all toNight, or on any Night when we don't have an outed Wolf. I can't quite work out the details in my head, but... the risks associated with killing are quite significant. Three Detectives, all alive. All three could claim and then just coordinate their investigations, and there wouldn't be a damn thing we could do about it until they'd caught at least two more of us. And then there's the risk of hitting a Vampire. Ugh.
I don't know. If we think someone is suspicious of mitchy for strong reasons, we could just send mitchy out there toNight, but the whole thing makes me nervous.
I have more thoughts; I will send them in a bit.
|
|
|
Post by moodymitchy on Aug 12, 2010 13:52:05 GMT -5
I'm happy to go toNight as BillMc said... KAT seems to be on my case pretty hard even though I don't think my justifications have been too bad.... also someone else has said I'd get their vore over someone else so I might get looked at toNight and be outed in the morning..... If not outed I feel a train could grow on me. I too feel that a no kill is a good option but only when none of us are getting any heat.# On a side note BILL.... if you are off due to your glider flight... I hope it goes well for you )
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on Aug 12, 2010 16:42:48 GMT -5
None of us are ever not going to be getting any heat, I don't think, and none of us can be outed by the detective toNight. So I'm inclined to think that we might want to go with no kill, and that gets my vote. No kill, and see what happens.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Aug 13, 2010 2:02:55 GMT -5
If stanislaus was the seer - then kat's suspicion of mitch is without any hard evidence; if stanilaus wasn't and kat is - then that may be why she is trying to start a wagon on mitch .
tho i think no kill may be a good strategy -- tho it will make quiet days even quieter.
i'm good with with killing kat or no kill
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Aug 13, 2010 2:10:32 GMT -5
anyone think their is any mileage in any of us claming detective?
|
|
|
Post by Duvsie on Aug 13, 2010 4:01:03 GMT -5
I think you're possibly right. Kat is either the seer, a detective or the coroner. I'm inclined to believe her post of Day1 #79 and that rules out a non town role. There's a very slim chance that she's the other freemason, though I doubt it.
I'm flummoxed as to why there has only been 2 NK's every night. If there are 2 vampires why aren't they both attempting to kill.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 13, 2010 6:44:11 GMT -5
anyone think their is any mileage in any of us claming detective? Yes, I do, actually. There are a couple of ways we could go about it. But it only works under certain, specific circumstances. We could use it to generate an easy mislynch of virtually anyone, simply by claiming detective and fingering so-and-so as the killer of such-and-such. But unless we get extremely lucky and call out one of the Cabalists, the claimant will die the following Day. I think at the moment, we should avoid dying however we can. For toNight, I think there are two possibilities. One is that we could no kill. The other is that we could attack Kat. She's not likely to be protected. If she's the Seer, she is a very dangerous foe and worth eliminating quickly. Right at the moment there seems to be a strong sentiment toward no-killing, so I will place that as our order at around 1:00PM unless I have heard something different. I will be leaving work around 1:30, so once I've placed the order, there's not much chance I'll get back to change it. Everybody should give a solid idea what they think, here; we're not really giving this sufficient thought. I'd really, really like to be the first Scum team to win Conspiracy, but we're down two already and that's bad news.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 13, 2010 6:48:41 GMT -5
By the way, I think we may have misguessed when it comes to sachertorte. I think he might be the Coroner. Two reasons:
1. The first time sach played the Coroner, he stayed mum about his results until he felt they'd be useful. Whoever is playing the role is doing the same this time. Most players are usually super-eager to share whatever info they obtain, and by now, I'd expect most players - and definitely any newer players - to have made a reveal. sach is an outlier in that way, and the Silence of the Coroner is consistent with his past opinions on the role.
2. We were permitted to request specific roles, and sach's early theory about killing players who requested Scum roles in the past strongly suggests to me that sach got the role he requested, whatever it might be. If sach had requested a bunch of roles and gotten something else, his proposed strategy wouldn't have occurred to him. Sach has frequently said that playing the Coroner was one of his favorite Mafia experiences; I can't see why he wouldn't have asked to do it again.
Just thinking.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Aug 13, 2010 7:29:09 GMT -5
I would agree that Sach got the role he asked for - I was trying hard not to make that point while arguing with him on day 1
|
|
|
Post by moodymitchy on Aug 13, 2010 10:23:14 GMT -5
Well that would sort of make sense... I guess you are saying that SACH was putting out a bloody big crumb on Day 1...
I don't think Stanilas is a seer I just think they are trying to pre empt the train that KAT is trying to drive but I think the better option is a NO Kill.... if we don't kill I'm assuming that it means that one of us might not get outed... so even if KAT does start a case on me.. we can try to poo poo it or see if anyone makes a claim about me... if they do then at least it would be one less we have to find in the haystack...
What's the likelyhood of the vamps having targeted the same person both nights... or one of them targeting a protected player both nights... ?
My vote is for no kill
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Aug 13, 2010 13:05:37 GMT -5
OK.
Pleonast, we will not kill on Night Three.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 13, 2010 13:56:17 GMT -5
Okay, no Wolf kill on Night Three.
|
|