|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 11, 2010 14:06:24 GMT -5
Choose someone to block.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 11, 2010 21:45:30 GMT -5
So should we block toNight?
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Aug 12, 2010 7:49:14 GMT -5
Let me think. Maybe.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 10:32:30 GMT -5
Gee, Day Four...and a huge lot of time, thus far, for someone to have tried the Freemason sign with BuffTabby...but yet, no word. I'm telling you, she's not to be trusted. With every Day that goes by where she's still living and not confirmed by any other Freemasons, it makes my suspicions grow.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 10:34:33 GMT -5
Oh, and I assume dead Cabalists are never spoiled...because if Stan knew who was who, that'd give him a pretty major bias on who to block.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Aug 12, 2010 13:11:47 GMT -5
Haha, yeah.
I'm still torn on Bufftabby. I mean, on the one hand, why should the hypothetical third freemason claim? You get two outed town for the wolves to shoot at, and for what? Yet said freemason has *got* to be getting antsy by now that they might wind up dead and never get the chance.
And on the other hand (how many am I up to?) why would someone who'd outed her hold back? I know there have been wolves up for lynch the last two days, but bufftabby could be Undead, and Undead lynches have the potential to be of more immediate use to town than wolf lynches are. I tend to think most freemasons with a liar on the hook would have revealed by now, and if they don't do so by morning I'm going to have to doubt it's going to happen at all, whatever my instincts say about her.
Want to block Mr Blockey again?
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 15:33:01 GMT -5
It doesn't matter..if BT is still alive tomorrow, I'm voting for her and going after her hard. Her and MG (if he's somehow still alive). I mean, hey, I'm scum too. I'd gladly go after a claimed Town power role even if I believed him. I guess. I really don't see what good blocking anyone else would do unless we knew, somehow, they were coming to kill us. But the wolves and vamps could kill a witch, so we definitely need killing roles, unblocked, in the game. Seems best thing to do would be (if we didn't suspect anyone was going to kill us) to block whoever we think the Seer is. MisterBlockey is as good as any. If MG is dead tomorrow, my two most suspected people will be BuffTabby and Sach.
|
|
|
Post by stanislaus on Aug 12, 2010 15:51:03 GMT -5
Someone needs to make the case that we should talk more during Days. It seems pretty sweet to keep lynching non-town and otherwise saying nothing, but there's an argument that doing so is letting Undead cruise to victory. Any death that's not theirs is a good death for them; unless town bring down the number of killers the Vicar's job is rapidly going to become impossible; killing Wolves does nothing to bring down the NK total. So town need to find Undead in order to stop the Zombie count mounting up.
In fact, which faction is closes to WinCon right now?
Wolves are bleeding pack-members but town are dying off too. Undead are slowly building Zombies but still need a lot more deaths, at limited risk of NK and so far avoiding lynch intention; We're a man down, a Witch down, doing well at bringing Wolves to 0 but nowhere on Undead; Town are losing players, nowhere on Undead, doing relatively well against Wolves.
I was thinking about blocking sach, but we may as well keep blocking Mr B. I think we have to consider trying to kill an Undead rather than a Witch though.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 15:51:49 GMT -5
I have a problem....please check my most recent post in the summary thread, both of you. The numbers/roles aren't matching up and I need to know what I'm missing.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 15:56:37 GMT -5
Oh, nevermind, I see my mistake now. I was still saying TWO vamps were in the game among the people left when I had taken Sach off the list as an accused vamp.
If we take him off the list as a vamp, only one more vamp is in the people still left, making only SEVEN scum roles out of TWELVE..
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 16:05:15 GMT -5
I agree, Stan....I also think Ed shouldn't be totally discounted just because he was a Wolf. Sach has been pinging me all game, even before his accusation. I strongly suspect Sach really is a Vamp....but that's just me.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 12, 2010 17:35:35 GMT -5
I really hope MHaye wasn't a Freemason, by the way. I hope like hell he was the Coroner... ..because if he was the second Freemason, that means everyone will suddenly know there's only one left, leaving the door open for a possible real (or false) counterclaim against BuffTabby's. And then we'd all have a "Who to lynch?" Day which would be FINE if we had immediate results...but as it is, we could lynch the wrong one and not know it for two MORE whole days.
So please, God, don't let MHaye be a Freemason. Because if I were scum and saw that he was, I'd be willing to tie the Days up by false claiming Freemason and saying BT was a liar. OR....BT could already be a liar and the real Freemason, upon seeing MHaye being one, would be stirred to action knowing they're the last (real) one left.
EITHER WAY.......it would spawn a huge clusterfuck of not knowing who was lying and not being able to find out anytime soon.
Even as scum this hurts my brain and I'm hoping it's avoided.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Aug 13, 2010 7:52:00 GMT -5
I think Sachertorte is Undead, too. Inner Stickler's post really clarifies the wolves' thinking on the Undead, and that in turn raises the likelihood that Ed wasn't just blowing it out his ear as regards Sachertorte, that they really do know something (or at least strongly suspect). @ Idle, I could live with it if such a situation was avoided by the Seer claiming (and not being counterclaimed), to back up one of the claimants. That would be fun. As I've said before, no one will knowingly kill the last witch, except us. So if we targeted Sachertorte with a vig disguise (and if we were right), we'd be hurting the Undead but also hurting ourselves. With sachertorte a likely lynch target anyway, I don't think it's worth it.
|
|
|
Post by Renata on Aug 13, 2010 8:34:57 GMT -5
My grandmother is very sick. I don't know when I'll be back.
Pleo, let my teammates proxy my secret power use, if they think it's right and that's allowed. If not, fuck it.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 13, 2010 9:27:12 GMT -5
Pleo, let my teammates proxy my secret power use, if they think it's right and that's allowed. If not, fuck it. It's not quite kosher, but I don't think it upsets the balance any, so I'll allow it.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 13, 2010 9:45:24 GMT -5
Hope your grandmother is okay.
So you have a secret power on top of our secret power?
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 13, 2010 10:04:49 GMT -5
Just the same one. Only one secret power per faction, remember.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 13, 2010 11:18:04 GMT -5
So if Stan and I decide to use it, will you say Nphase was it in any circumstance?
Like, say we agreed to use it to change nphase into a vamp and try to kill BillMC...suppose it works and a detective investigates. Will they be given the killer as nphase or Idle Thoughts/Stan?
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 13, 2010 12:02:24 GMT -5
Proxy use of the power, not transfer of it. nphase has not used her power. Because of exigent circumstances, I'm allowing her teammates to direct the use of her power by her.
|
|
|
Post by Pleonast on Aug 13, 2010 13:55:02 GMT -5
The closest thing I see to a consensus is blocking Mister Blockey.
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on Aug 13, 2010 14:00:52 GMT -5
I'm for it and nphase is for it. I don't think stan said anything either way...so here's hoping that's the "Not saying anything implies consent" thing, haha.
|
|