|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Sept 27, 2010 19:07:13 GMT -5
Alright. In the interest of semi full disclosure, and after discussing it with my masonic brethren. there are some things which have come to light. One of the masons got pm'd this morning that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground of who exactly visited Batman last night. Zedd's not on that list but Stay Puft is. Main reason for bringing this up, just in case there is a run on masons tonight we don't want to lose data. Raj, would you please dispose of one of them at your earliest convenience? Either someone is ling to the Masons, or you are lying to us. I 'visited' Batman on Night 1 (in that I tried to kill him), but not last Night. Can "one of the Masons" provide a bit more information? I'd like to know who's trying to frame me.
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 19:09:26 GMT -5
Alright. In the interest of semi full disclosure, and after discussing it with my masonic brethren. there are some things which have come to light. One of the masons got pm'd this morning that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground of who exactly visited Batman last night. Zedd's not on that list but Stay Puft is. Main reason for bringing this up, just in case there is a run on masons tonight we don't want to lose data. Raj, would you please dispose of one of them at your earliest convenience? I will certainly try
|
|
Hockey Monkey!
Borogrove
This is supposed to be a happy occasion. Let's not bicker over who killed who.
Posts: 371
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Hockey Monkey! on Sept 27, 2010 19:10:40 GMT -5
So you are saying you think Stay Puft tried to kill a claimed cop last night? And that Zedd who claims to have investigated Batman did not? OK, well this is getting interesting. Should we still believe Batman's claim that he investigated Buddy Christ and got scum? I'm more inclined to put my faith in masons than an unconfirmed claim. Personally, I feel today is a perfect day to put Batman's claim to the test. We lynch drain, and we'll know if Bat's is telling the truth. (Sorry Jesus, but once again you get shafted, so we can figure out what the fuck is going on.) I'm willing to put Batman to the test though, so a future revote is not out of the question.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:10:45 GMT -5
Alright. In the interest of semi full disclosure, and after discussing it with my masonic brethren. there are some things which have come to light. One of the masons got pm'd this morning that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground of who exactly visited Batman last night. Zedd's not on that list but Stay Puft is. Main reason for bringing this up, just in case there is a run on masons tonight we don't want to lose data. Raj, would you please dispose of one of them at your earliest convenience? I will certainly try just get your foot out of my ass and take a shot.
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 19:13:06 GMT -5
just get your foot out of my ass and take a shot. What is your general assessment of the reliability of your information? Also, are you certain that the information refers to Night 2 and not Night 1
|
|
|
Post by severe delays on Sept 27, 2010 19:13:38 GMT -5
Oh fer crying out loud. Took me ages to type that out on this molasses computer! However, second redundant post is secondarily redundant so nm. So Zedd is lying, that seems pretty clear. Now why would Stay Puft kill one of the claimed cops before there was time to prove or disprove their role? I'm feeling obliged to think SK. Which sort of leaves me thinking that it might be best to leave Buddy Christ til toMorrow. We know what he is and can disregard an investigation until we lynch him toMorrow. I think Stay Puft as an SK is more dangerous to Town than Buddy Christ is at present. Buddy ChristStay Puft
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Sept 27, 2010 19:22:23 GMT -5
Oh fer crying out loud. Took me ages to type that out on this molasses computer! However, second redundant post is secondarily redundant so nm. So Zedd is lying, that seems pretty clear. Now why would Stay Puft kill one of the claimed cops before there was time to prove or disprove their role? I'm feeling obliged to think SK. Which sort of leaves me thinking that it might be best to leave Buddy Christ til toMorrow. We know what he is and can disregard an investigation until we lynch him toMorrow. I think Stay Puft as an SK is more dangerous to Town than Buddy Christ is at present. Here's the deal though. We've got a claimed town roleblocker (Columbo) He could shut down Stay Puft for the evening. If Jesus is a Corrupter and it is what I think it is (makes people look like millers or is a recruiter (did blockey say no recruiting, I don't recall?)) then that is a very very powerful role, and should be expunged post haste. It also means that if scum has a roleblocker or if the jailer is theirs, then they have to weigh the option of our possible vig shooting into their ranks. That means our probable doctor and probable cop will have no problem producing more enlightening results for tomorrow. All in all, I'm in favor of the Jesus Lynch.
|
|
|
Post by severe delays on Sept 27, 2010 19:23:38 GMT -5
NETA: I mean also that we should be measuring up Zedd and quizzing him closely but right now to me it makes more sense to lynch someone who looks awfully like an SK. If Stay Puft is an SK and is left alive he kills and scum kill then we lose two people. If we lynch him then we don't really know what Zedd is but we know he's probably less dangerous of the two.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Sept 27, 2010 19:23:40 GMT -5
Oh fer crying out loud. Took me ages to type that out on this molasses computer! However, second redundant post is secondarily redundant so nm. So Zedd is lying, that seems pretty clear. Now why would Stay Puft kill one of the claimed cops before there was time to prove or disprove their role? I'm feeling obliged to think SK. Which sort of leaves me thinking that it might be best to leave Buddy Christ til toMorrow. We know what he is and can disregard an investigation until we lynch him toMorrow. I think Stay Puft as an SK is more dangerous to Town than Buddy Christ is at present. Buddy ChristStay PuftOr, just possibly, the information out Masons have is not legitimate. Which is why I asked for more details. So far, all we know is that " that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground". Ummm...how do we know who left it? How do we know the evidence is reliable? "Conclusive" does not necessarily imply "truthful".
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:24:37 GMT -5
just get your foot out of my ass and take a shot. What is your general assessment of the reliability of your information? Also, are you certain that the information refers to Night 2 and not Night 1 it was definitely Night 2.
|
|
|
Post by severe delays on Sept 27, 2010 19:28:56 GMT -5
Oh fer crying out loud. Took me ages to type that out on this molasses computer! However, second redundant post is secondarily redundant so nm. So Zedd is lying, that seems pretty clear. Now why would Stay Puft kill one of the claimed cops before there was time to prove or disprove their role? I'm feeling obliged to think SK. Which sort of leaves me thinking that it might be best to leave Buddy Christ til toMorrow. We know what he is and can disregard an investigation until we lynch him toMorrow. I think Stay Puft as an SK is more dangerous to Town than Buddy Christ is at present. Buddy ChristStay PuftOr, just possibly, the information out Masons have is not legitimate. Which is why I asked for more details. So far, all we know is that " that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground". Ummm...how do we know who left it? How do we know the evidence is reliable? "Conclusive" does not necessarily imply "truthful". Are you stating absolutely that you did not try to vig a claimed cop last Night?
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Sept 27, 2010 19:29:43 GMT -5
just get your foot out of my ass and take a shot. What is your general assessment of the reliability of your information? Also, are you certain that the information refers to Night 2 and not Night 1 The true reliability of the information can probably only be ascertained by putting some people in the ground. However, the information specifically refers to Night 2. And contains a shibboleth that leads me to believe that it was composed by the moderator.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:29:55 GMT -5
Oh fer crying out loud. Took me ages to type that out on this molasses computer! However, second redundant post is secondarily redundant so nm. So Zedd is lying, that seems pretty clear. Now why would Stay Puft kill one of the claimed cops before there was time to prove or disprove their role? I'm feeling obliged to think SK. Which sort of leaves me thinking that it might be best to leave Buddy Christ til toMorrow. We know what he is and can disregard an investigation until we lynch him toMorrow. I think Stay Puft as an SK is more dangerous to Town than Buddy Christ is at present. Buddy ChristStay PuftOr, just possibly, the information out Masons have is not legitimate. Which is why I asked for more details. So far, all we know is that " that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground". Ummm...how do we know who left it? How do we know the evidence is reliable? "Conclusive" does not necessarily imply "truthful". well if you can't trust the mods on the information that you received from them this is totally gastard. not what i signed up for. don't think so. you and zed are scum. if you would have come back with something along the lines of well i targeted so and so but i ended up on blah, maybe. marginally. but you definitely tried to kill batman last Night. not very cool.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:31:23 GMT -5
fucking cross posts.
at some point skeez and i will figure out this non knee jerk reaction to other folks' posts.
hee hee.
woot woot.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Sept 27, 2010 19:36:37 GMT -5
Or, just possibly, the information out Masons have is not legitimate. Which is why I asked for more details. So far, all we know is that " that someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground". Ummm...how do we know who left it? How do we know the evidence is reliable? "Conclusive" does not necessarily imply "truthful". well if you can't trust the mods on the information that you received from them this is totally gastard. not what i signed up for. don't think so. you and zed are scum. if you would have come back with something along the lines of well i targeted so and so but i ended up on blah, maybe. marginally. but you definitely tried to kill batman last Night. not very cool. I'm not saying you can't trust the information you got from the Mods. I'm saying that if all you got was "someone had left conclusive evidence on the ground", that you need to consider the possibility that the "conclusive evidence" may have been faked. Now, if you received more detail from the Mods, that may make a difference in the proper method of analysis, which is why I asked for more information. Not that it makes any difference, but I am stating absolutely that I did not target Batman last night, nor did I target any other person who had made a claim. There are still plenty of people in the 'unclaimed pool' who are acting scummy enough; I chose my target from among them. The "proof" that the Masons received was faked, either deliberately by the Mods or by Scum as part of game mechanics. Considering the amount of weirdness that has gone on in this game already, I am confident it is the latter.
|
|
Meeko
FGM
I raccoon it's time to play Mafia
Posts: 2,474
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Meeko on Sept 27, 2010 19:39:20 GMT -5
:::: Sighs silently and then looks at Zed, Batman, and Buddy Christ.... and then The Corinthian, Raj, and George ::::
What is the difference between Masons "Confirming" each other and scum confirming each other as masons?
Would Scum forgo a NK of town, to confirm three of their own as town?
We are on Day 3, but surely we have gained a Day, correct?
Batman and Zed have both essentially said that Buddy is Scum.
Corinithian, George and Raj are essentially all saying that Buddy is Town.
It would seem to me, the Lynch of Buddy would Net either Two or Three Scum.
In a game where we apparently will not have night actions or powers, what move is better than lynching someone for the trade of 2-3 scum ?
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 19:42:03 GMT -5
What is your general assessment of the reliability of your information? Also, are you certain that the information refers to Night 2 and not Night 1 The true reliability of the information can probably only be ascertained by putting some people in the ground. However, the information specifically refers to Night 2. And contains a shibboleth that leads me to believe that it was composed by the moderator. What of the possibility that the Scum redirected Stay Puft? Now might be the time for him to tell us who he targeted.
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Sept 27, 2010 19:42:57 GMT -5
:::: Sighs silently and then looks at Zed, Batman, and Buddy Christ.... and then The Corinthian, Raj, and George :::: What is the difference between Masons "Confirming" each other and scum confirming each other as masons? Would Scum forgo a NK of town, to confirm three of their own as town?We are on Day 3, but surely we have gained a Day, correct? Batman and Zed have both essentially said that Buddy is Scum. Corinithian, George and Raj are essentially all saying that Buddy is Town. It would seem to me, the Lynch of Buddy would Net either Two or Three Scum.In a game where we apparently will not have night actions or powers, what move is better than lynching someone for the trade of 2-3 scum ? Marcel: This is not true. The masons assert that Stay Puft and Zedd are lying. You'll note that the masons are voting for Buddy Jesus. In fact this will be the third time that I'm saying that we should lynch Buddy Jesus today. I don't know where you read that stuff, but it wasn't this thread.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:43:12 GMT -5
oh, fuck. bad news for scum.
have you ever gone dancing with a partner and it just flows? and then you dance with a partner that is unfamiliar? with the first you glide across the floor and with the second you step on each other's toes.
fuck skeez and i were made to be masons together. i haven't even checked our board in a while but shit we are on the same damn page.
the masons have done their job. we have given you two more certain scum lynches.
batman bring it home.
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 19:43:42 GMT -5
fucking cross posts. at some point skeez and i will figure out this non knee jerk reaction to other folks' posts. hee hee. woot woot. I seem to recall the 2 of you as masons destroying us as Scum in SSBM 2
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Sept 27, 2010 19:44:44 GMT -5
What of the possibility that the Scum redirected Stay Puft? Now might be the time for him to tell us who he targeted. I have no way of knowing the state of any possible redirections. I agree that more info > less info.
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 19:46:30 GMT -5
:::: Sighs silently and then looks at Zed, Batman, and Buddy Christ.... and then The Corinthian, Raj, and George :::: What is the difference between Masons "Confirming" each other and scum confirming each other as masons? Would Scum forgo a NK of town, to confirm three of their own as town?We are on Day 3, but surely we have gained a Day, correct? Batman and Zed have both essentially said that Buddy is Scum. Corinithian, George and Raj are essentially all saying that Buddy is Town. It would seem to me, the Lynch of Buddy would Net either Two or Three Scum.In a game where we apparently will not have night actions or powers, what move is better than lynching someone for the trade of 2-3 scum ? I can't speak for george or Corinth, but I will anyway. In no way did we say Buddy was anything but Scum. Additionally, first you wanted to kill any Vig despite you thought they were Town, now, with only 2 deaths into the game, you want to make a case against 3 claimed masons? I think the mime with severely broken fingers unable to type role might serve you better
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Sept 27, 2010 19:53:28 GMT -5
Yep, I'm Scum! And a big PBBBBBBT to Normal Phase. Know why you always think I'm Scummy? BECAUSE I'M ALWAYS EFFING SCUM, THAT'S WHY!
Seriously, in the next game, can I be Town? Pretty please? The last time I was Town, I died Night One. /cry
Just to let you guys know, I had a one-shot power, which I used last Night. I can make one person in the game a Miller. Who did I use it on? That's for me to know and for you to find out, foolz!
Oh, and my post restriction is over, and it was a punishment for editing my post.
Peace out, foolz! See you on the spoilered side.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 19:54:36 GMT -5
Corinithian, George and Raj are essentially all saying that Buddy is Town. <snipped> uh, where the fuck are you getting this from? put down the beer bong and move away from the sink.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 20:00:38 GMT -5
fucking cross posts. at some point skeez and i will figure out this non knee jerk reaction to other folks' posts. hee hee. woot woot. I seem to recall the 2 of you as masons destroying us as Scum in SSBM 2 the us doesn't really do a lot for you raj. lol. like i said earlier, we don't even hardly touch the mason board. except in this case where we have been trying to keep strangelove up to speed. we are scum's worst fucking nightmare. skeez is smart and i drink fruit smoothies. kind of fucking symbiotic.
|
|
|
Post by special on Sept 27, 2010 20:07:21 GMT -5
I seem to recall the 2 of you as masons destroying us as Scum in SSBM 2 the us doesn't really do a lot for you raj. lol. like i said earlier, we don't even hardly touch the mason board. except in this case where we have been trying to keep strangelove up to speed. we are scum's worst fucking nightmare. skeez is smart and i drink fruit smoothies. kind of fucking symbiotic. even you can't hold the fact that I was a Scum in a previous game against me. Wait, you probably could. Which is why my foot is staying firmly up your ass
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Sept 27, 2010 20:09:35 GMT -5
the us doesn't really do a lot for you raj. lol. like i said earlier, we don't even hardly touch the mason board. except in this case where we have been trying to keep strangelove up to speed. we are scum's worst fucking nightmare. skeez is smart and i drink fruit smoothies. kind of fucking symbiotic. even you can't hold the fact that I was a Scum in a previous game against me. Wait, you probably could. Which is why my foot is staying firmly up your ass I'd be careful. Those smoothies have ALOT of fiber.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 20:15:05 GMT -5
Are you stating absolutely that you did not try to vig a claimed cop last Night? <snipped> yeh, i kind of want to know this as well. c'mon puffy cough it up.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Sept 27, 2010 20:17:06 GMT -5
Am I the only one who thinks that a Masonry provided with ANY extra valid perfect information than they're already born with seems HUGELY over-powered?
That is to say, that I am most doubtful at this point that the intelligence is accurate, not (necessarily...yet) that it was ever received at all. My vote is staying on Buddy-on-cracker for now.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Sept 27, 2010 20:21:27 GMT -5
c'mon raj i am giving you a pass for about three lynches. that would be deep for you.
|
|