|
Post by Renata on May 11, 2011 10:15:18 GMT -5
Heh.
Well it does match, so that's good, right?
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on May 11, 2011 10:22:06 GMT -5
Hopefully this will match with what Renata comes up with: Current vote count: Captain Pinkies (4,4)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161] Archangel (3,3): CatInaSuit [26], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Fluiddruid (1,1): Archangel [30,203]Paranoia (1,1): colby11 [176] Special Ed (1,1): Suburban Plankton [198] gnarlycharlie (1,1): Archangel [203] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88]With these votes, Captain Pinkies will be lynched. Ok, well that's that theory out the window. Suburban Plankton cannot vote for Captain Pinkies, but can vote for Special Ed. Fluiddruid does have an extra vote from somewhere Archangel looks to be able to vote normally. That looks suspiciously like some kind of vote protection that Pinkies has there.
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 10:25:08 GMT -5
So you are assuming that Captain's vote was bought by the Scum? Interesting. Any reason for that assumption? If I were a Town Politician, Captain's vote might be the one I would buy, since there's no guarantee he'll actually show up and post a vote. Yeah, I'm trying desperately to catch up - bad, bad week here at work - but actually, the weirdest disconnect here is that if one assumes Captain Pinkies' vote was bought by Scum, then that would (in my opinion) mitigate strongly against a "scummish" Archangel. Actually, the WiFoM alone is enough for me to not be able to tell. A Scum politician might very well have someone vote for a Scum early on in the game just for credibility for Archangel if the politican were to flip at some point. That said, there is nothing that leads me to assume that there is a Scum politician. it could very easily be a Town or 3rd party/PFK politician, or Captain could be faking having his vote bought.
|
|
|
Post by metallicsquink on May 11, 2011 10:41:23 GMT -5
Hopefully this will match with what Renata comes up with: Current vote count: Captain Pinkies (4,4)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161] Archangel (3,3): CatInaSuit [26], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Fluiddruid (1,1): Archangel [30,203]Paranoia (1,1): colby11 [176] Special Ed (1,1): Suburban Plankton [198] gnarlycharlie (1,1): Archangel [203] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88]With these votes, Captain Pinkies will be lynched. Ok, well that's that theory out the window. Suburban Plankton cannot vote for Captain Pinkies, but can vote for Special Ed. Fluiddruid does have an extra vote from somewhere Archangel looks to be able to vote normally. That looks suspiciously like some kind of vote protection that Pinkies has there. That is a twist I have not seen before (Player A cannot vote for Player B). Or is it possible that SP can only vote for Ed? Maybe SP should vote for one other player just to be sure.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on May 11, 2011 10:46:06 GMT -5
I am really behind, y'all. I'm trying to catch up, but in the meanwhile, if a very kind and helpful soul could briefly summarize what we've learned today related to voting, I would find it tremendously useful in attempting to participate usefully toDay.
|
|
|
Post by Sister Coyote on May 11, 2011 10:48:28 GMT -5
Current vote count:
Captain Pinkies (5,5)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198,209], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161] Archangel (3,3): CatInaSuit [26], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Paranoia (1,1): colby11 [176] gnarlycharlie (1,1): Archangel [203] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88] Fluiddruid (1,1): Archangel [30,203] Special Ed (0,1): Suburban Plankton [198,209]
With these votes, Captain Pinkies will be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 10:51:41 GMT -5
I am really behind, y'all. I'm trying to catch up, but in the meanwhile, if a very kind and helpful soul could briefly summarize what we've learned today related to voting, I would find it tremendously useful in attempting to participate usefully toDay. 1. Fluiddruid has claimed a 3rd party non-exclusive power related to vote tampering. Power unused and unverified. 2. Captain Pinkies has claimed to have has his vote controlled and placed a vote on Archangel. He claims there is a penalty/consequence for moving his vote, but hasn't indicated what it is. 3. Fluiddruid appears to have an extra invisible vote. Some think it may be a mod penalty, but I see no indication of that. 4. Suburban Plankton is unable to vote for Captian, but able to vote for Special Ed.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on May 11, 2011 10:51:00 GMT -5
Current vote count: Captain Pinkies (5,5)*: Special Ed [4], Suburban Plankton [47,198,209], septimus [88], Meeko [156], LightFoot [161] Archangel (3,3): CatInaSuit [26], metallicsquink [37], Captain Pinkies [90] Paranoia (1,1): colby11 [176] gnarlycharlie (1,1): Archangel [203] CatInaSuit (0,1): septimus [60,88]Fluiddruid (1,1): Archangel [30,203]Special Ed (0,1): Suburban Plankton [198,209]With these votes, Captain Pinkies will be lynched. Seriously WTF? ? So now, SP's vote counts against Pinkies? When did this turn gastardly?
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 10:53:23 GMT -5
wait, hold it. Suburban's vote for Captain now seems to count.
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 10:54:11 GMT -5
Suburban unvote him if you're around. Let's see what the vote count says. We may have a day acting power among us.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on May 11, 2011 11:13:01 GMT -5
Would it be worth everyone placing a vote, preferably with a good reason, just to see what happens next?
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 11:20:30 GMT -5
OK, time for a partial claim...
I know why my first vote on Captain Pinkies Today did not count. It was a penalty for my breaking my voting restriction. What follows is a portion of my Role PM:
When I voted for Pinkies early Today, it was still during the first 24 hours of the Day. I had completely forgotten about my restriction at the time I placed that vote.
When I voted for Ed, and then revoted Pinkies just a bit ago, I knew that my votes would count, and I knew that would likely cause confusion and consternation among the Town. To keep the confusion to a minimum, I'm making this partial reveal now, because otherwise we're going to waste the rest of Today trying to figure out what's going on with the votes instead of using the time in a more constructive manner.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 11:21:14 GMT -5
NETA: And despite my claim, I'm not changing my avatar
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 11:26:36 GMT -5
I'm growing increasingly suspicious of fluiddruid's claim. It was made perfectly clear in my PM that I would receive a penalty vote for failure to comply with the restrictions of my role. Captain Pinkies has told us it was clear to him that he would receive a penalty for non-compliance as well. It seems odd that fluiddruid would receive a 'phantom' penalty, and that she would not question the Mod about it when it happened.
For the moment I'm not moving my vote because I think Pinkies still has a lot of explaining to do, but I have a strong feeling that fluiddruid is not being completely honest with us.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 11:28:10 GMT -5
NETA: 'penalty vote' in the last post should simply read 'penalty'. Or, if you prefer a move verbose version, 'penalty, and possibly a penalty vote for continued non-compliance'.
It's all there in the PM.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on May 11, 2011 12:13:04 GMT -5
I am really behind, y'all. I'm trying to catch up, but in the meanwhile, if a very kind and helpful soul could briefly summarize what we've learned today related to voting, I would find it tremendously useful in attempting to participate usefully toDay. 1. Fluiddruid has claimed a 3rd party non-exclusive power related to vote tampering. Power unused and unverified. 2. Captain Pinkies has claimed to have has his vote controlled and placed a vote on Archangel. He claims there is a penalty/consequence for moving his vote, but hasn't indicated what it is. 3. Fluiddruid appears to have an extra invisible vote. Some think it may be a mod penalty, but I see no indication of that. 4. Suburban Plankton is unable to vote for Captian, but able to vote for Special Ed. Is there a reason that Captain Pinkies hasn't just explained precisely what he has been told and what the consequence will be of noncompliance?
|
|
|
Post by metallicsquink on May 11, 2011 12:46:02 GMT -5
Is there a reason that Captain Pinkies hasn't just explained precisely what he has been told and what the consequence will be of noncompliance? I cannot see any reason for it and he hasn't given one.
|
|
|
Post by gnarlycharlie on May 11, 2011 13:03:22 GMT -5
it's quite odd that so many are claiming without being threatened with a lynching. i don't quite know what to make of it. seems a number of us aren't comfortable with voting shenanigans.
for now i'll
Vote FluidDruid
she's a self proclaimed 3rd party and it seems she's holding some information back. i'm not comfortable with her role. i'd rather err on the side of caution.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on May 11, 2011 13:03:24 GMT -5
Trying to catch up on the events of the Day here.
Vote Captain Pinkies
It appears that he is holding back information that could be helpful to TOWN. So until he reveals his PM with the forced vote and or claims. This will be my vote.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on May 11, 2011 13:06:17 GMT -5
it's quite odd that so many are claiming without being threatened with a lynching. i don't quite know what to make of it. seems a number of us aren't comfortable with voting shenanigans. for now i'll Vote FluidDruidshe's a self proclaimed 3rd party and it seems she's holding some information back. i'm not comfortable with her role. i'd rather err on the side of caution. With the claims and the voting shenanigans, it is hard to get my mind around what could be to what might not be, to what is... This is confusing...
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 13:25:56 GMT -5
it's quite odd that so many are claiming without being threatened with a lynching. i don't quite know what to make of it. seems a number of us aren't comfortable with voting shenanigans. Normally I am very reluctant to claim anything about my role so early in the game unless I am under lynch pressure, but in my case I felt that I needed to make the partial claim I did in order to reduce the amount of confusion that I had caused by my own actions.
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 13:30:26 GMT -5
NETA: And despite my claim, I'm not changing my avatar I don't feel you anymore
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 13:31:11 GMT -5
1. Fluiddruid has claimed a 3rd party non-exclusive power related to vote tampering. Power unused and unverified. 2. Captain Pinkies has claimed to have has his vote controlled and placed a vote on Archangel. He claims there is a penalty/consequence for moving his vote, but hasn't indicated what it is. 3. Fluiddruid appears to have an extra invisible vote. Some think it may be a mod penalty, but I see no indication of that. 4. Suburban Plankton is unable to vote for Captian, but able to vote for Special Ed. Is there a reason that Captain Pinkies hasn't just explained precisely what he has been told and what the consequence will be of noncompliance? He hasn't given one yet
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 13:32:25 GMT -5
it's quite odd that so many are claiming without being threatened with a lynching. i don't quite know what to make of it. seems a number of us aren't comfortable with voting shenanigans. for now i'll Vote FluidDruidshe's a self proclaimed 3rd party and it seems she's holding some information back. i'm not comfortable with her role. i'd rather err on the side of caution. what do you think was her motivation for claiming then?
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on May 11, 2011 13:47:35 GMT -5
NETA: And despite my claim, I'm not changing my avatar I don't feel you anymore I feel compelled to make it perfectly clear to anyone who may be concerned that the above is a song lyric, and not a commentary on any personal relationship between Ed and myself.
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 11, 2011 14:04:27 GMT -5
As for myself thinking that SCUM is controlling Cap, I have absolutely no idea. The Politician role just sounds like a SCUM power to me (though it could be used on anyone)
So, there goes the whole "Cap is controlled and therefore is protected" idea that I just had....
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 14:05:06 GMT -5
I feel compelled to make it perfectly clear to anyone who may be concerned that the above is a song lyric, and not a commentary on any personal relationship between Ed and myself. don't do me like that
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 11, 2011 14:06:14 GMT -5
It appears we have atleast 2 that have not posted a thing toDay (other factions MAY be in play?) you appear to be championing Cap We do have a Silencer role, as well as the Jack of All Trades. It could be possible that either one of those who are quiet have been silenced. (EDITTED ONLY TO CORRECT THE QUOTE)
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on May 11, 2011 14:11:32 GMT -5
Lots to digest... Here are my thoughts I think voting for Captain is a mistake. Clearly his vote is being controlled, therefore lynching him would only help SCUM. Archangel does seem somewhat scummish, but I want to reread Day 1 again... I plan to do that tomorrow after my finals If you guys want to argue about inactivity, Paranoia hasn't responded at all today... So go after him, and not Captain. So, for the moment, Vote: Paranoia [/color] due to inactivity.[/quote] So you are assuming that Captain's vote was bought by the Scum? Interesting. Any reason for that assumption? If I were a Town Politician, Captain's vote might be the one I would buy, since there's no guarantee he'll actually show up and post a vote.[/quote] You got a point there....
|
|
|
Post by special on May 11, 2011 14:12:59 GMT -5
(EDITTED ONLY TO CORRECT THE QUOTE) eeep!! You probably should have just asked the moderator to fix it....
|
|