|
Post by Paranoia on Oct 28, 2011 21:07:15 GMT -5
Oh look a vote total (again):
Texcat (3): Honest Moley, Moodymitchy, Lightfoot JustBeingGinger (1): InnerStickler Pollux Oil (1): JustBeingGinger Paulwhoisaghost (1): Deon Lightfoot (1): Drain Bead Moodymitchy (1): Silver Jan
Abstaining: Paulwhoisaghost, Mr. Special Ed, Peekercpa, Gnarlycharlie, BillMC, Texcat, Pollux Oil, and someone else the name will ccome to me any minute now.
With these votes Texcat would be lynched.
Deadline is tonight at 10:00 pm CDT. With these votes Moodymitchy would be lynched.
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Oct 28, 2011 21:07:26 GMT -5
Correct. Thought it would be more useful at this point to have that piece of info out there, though. It's not like hiding the Doc is much of a concern.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Oct 28, 2011 21:10:10 GMT -5
Ugh. That's a lot of non-voters!
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:10:36 GMT -5
Vote TexCat
Less than an hour to end of day, I wonder where the abstainers are?
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 28, 2011 21:11:59 GMT -5
Vote TexCatLess than an hour to end of day, I wonder where the abstainers are? Any reason why Texcat?
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:12:57 GMT -5
Oh look a vote total (again):Texcat (3): Honest Moley, Moodymitchy, Lightfoot JustBeingGinger (1): InnerStickler Pollux Oil (1): JustBeingGinger Paulwhoisaghost (1): Deon Lightfoot (1): Drain Bead Moodymitchy (1): Silver Jan Abstaining: Paulwhoisaghost, Mr. Special Ed, Peekercpa, Gnarlycharlie, BillMC, Texcat, Pollux Oil, and someone else the name will ccome to me any minute now.
With these votes Texcat would be lynched.
Deadline is tonight at 10:00 pm CDT. With these votes Moodymitchy would be lynched. Thanks... "someone else"...
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Oct 28, 2011 21:14:16 GMT -5
What do you think about one of the low posters like Deon or Bill (never thought I would say that) Just throwing out ideas. There's bound to be at least one scum lying low, but I would only go after them if you truly think they're suspicious and scummy. Myself, I have no idea who to vote for. I'm not feeling a texcat lynch. Paul strikes me as a maybe, Lightfoot I have absolutely no read on. I feel like the stronger players (Ed, peeker, Bill) aren't performing as well as they usually do. Is it because they're scum and are phoning it in, letting town run around with their heads cut off? I'm also slightly suspicious of Moley. But I'm always confused with him because he always makes a big deal about suspecting me, so I tend to overlook him because I don't want to come across as OMGUS. What to do, what to do.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Oct 28, 2011 21:19:12 GMT -5
Ugh. That's a lot of non-voters. I may as well claim: You are Darlene Harris, housewife and chairman of Civilians Against Crime.
Your organization patrols the streets to keep them safe. You have the Day watch, and mostly only have sore feet to show for it.
You are the town Day protector. You can protect any player, except yourself, from a Day kill.
You win when all threats to the town are eliminated or otherwise removed from play.
vote: lightfoot This is part OMGUS vote. I didn't like her vote on me. I don't think I was trying to turn the conversation to Drain. I was trying to turn the conversation to moody. And her drive-by smudge of Inner in the same post, also struck me as odd. Inner has hardly posted at all toDay. I don't think you can claim he's tried to move the conversation.
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:22:47 GMT -5
Vote TexCatLess than an hour to end of day, I wonder where the abstainers are? Any reason why Texcat? Yeah mostly because she was second on my list after you. She was one of the ones that went after Moody and Lightfoot for their mistrust of Drainbead's claim. Plus she did really good tag along votes on Drain, then Scat and then sinjin. Lastly, because she missed that Ed was still gunning for you, which I thougth was odd since that's mostly what he says when he posts.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Oct 28, 2011 21:23:46 GMT -5
Ugh. That's a lot of non-voters. I may as well claim: You are Darlene Harris, housewife and chairman of Civilians Against Crime. Your organization patrols the streets to keep them safe. You have the Day watch, and mostly only have sore feet to show for it. You are the town Day protector. You can protect any player, except yourself, from a Day kill. You win when all threats to the town are eliminated or otherwise removed from play. vote: lightfoot This is part OMGUS vote. I didn't like her vote on me. I don't think I was trying to turn the conversation to Drain. I was trying to turn the conversation to moody. And her drive-by smudge of Inner in the same post, also struck me as odd. Inner has hardly posted at all toDay. I don't think you can claim he's tried to move the conversation. protector and a doc? interesting. NO ONE 'likes' a vote on them. I read what you wrote and made my comments. Drive by smudge? really the player makes what? 2 posts and the entire content is in defense of another. I smell a late swing here and I don't like it OF course.
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:25:28 GMT -5
Ugh. That's a lot of non-voters. I may as well claim: You are Darlene Harris, housewife and chairman of Civilians Against Crime. Your organization patrols the streets to keep them safe. You have the Day watch, and mostly only have sore feet to show for it. You are the town Day protector. You can protect any player, except yourself, from a Day kill. You win when all threats to the town are eliminated or otherwise removed from play. vote: lightfoot This is part OMGUS vote. I didn't like her vote on me. I don't think I was trying to turn the conversation to Drain. I was trying to turn the conversation to moody. And her drive-by smudge of Inner in the same post, also struck me as odd. Inner has hardly posted at all toDay. I don't think you can claim he's tried to move the conversation. REALLY!?!?!?!??!?! I think I am going to bang my head against the wall for a little while. Unvote TexCat
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Oct 28, 2011 21:26:54 GMT -5
NETA with all these protector roles why are so many Town's DEAD?
Can you elaborate on your "protected" players?
And why go to bat for DB and Inner?
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:27:29 GMT -5
Blah!!!!!!
Unvote TexCat
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:29:11 GMT -5
Ok guys, I am unable to process all this information this quickly... I am seriously stumped.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 28, 2011 21:29:17 GMT -5
I actually agree with you there but we haven't got a scum yet. I understand your vote but.... We need to get rid of scum and your vote is interesting but not helpful. I agree with what you say but why not try and get rid of a scummier person that has already been voted for? This post pings me a lot! It is the last sentence. "why not get rid of a scummier person that has already been voted for?" It sounds like she is giving bandwagon advice.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Oct 28, 2011 21:32:26 GMT -5
On night 0 and night 1, I protected peeker. He's always an early lynch victim. After that I have protected Drain, cause I mostly believe her claim.
I did PM Paranoia to ask about whether Day kill meant lynch, and received a no comment reply.
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:35:10 GMT -5
On night 0 and night 1, I protected peeker. He's always an early lynch victim. After that I have protected Drain, cause I mostly believe her claim. I did PM Paranoia to ask about whether Day kill meant lynch, and received a no comment reply. Well in light of J BG's claim it makes sense you would protect her target not the lynch target.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 28, 2011 21:36:09 GMT -5
Unvote Pollux Vote Silver Jan
This is because of a gut instinct on this one. She also gave advice to Deni about posting more and I brushed it off as their relationship, but maybe I should not of.
|
|
|
Post by texcat on Oct 28, 2011 21:37:20 GMT -5
Yes, so I am inclined to believe Ginger's claim. Although, I am still not sure if my power would also work against lynches.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 28, 2011 21:37:20 GMT -5
Well that did not go well...
vote SilverJan
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:38:35 GMT -5
I actually agree with you there but we haven't got a scum yet. I understand your vote but.... We need to get rid of scum and your vote is interesting but not helpful. I agree with what you say but why not try and get rid of a scummier person that has already been voted for? This post pings me a lot! It is the last sentence. "why not get rid of a scummier person that has already been voted for?" It sounds like she is giving bandwagon advice. The part of the post that pinged me was "we haven't got scum yet and your vote is interesting but not helpful" how does she know that paulwiag isn't scum.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Oct 28, 2011 21:40:14 GMT -5
On night 0 and night 1, I protected peeker. He's always an early lynch victim. After that I have protected Drain, cause I mostly believe her claim. I did PM Paranoia to ask about whether Day kill meant lynch, and received a no comment reply. Okay, here's what I don't get: Five vanilla town. Four claims: A Tracker, A Night-Doc, A Day-Doc, and A Day-Remorseful Vig. Of these claims, what claim sticks out the most? The tracker. Why? Because 7 out of the 8 other people (if we take the other claims at face value) are absolutely useless for a tracker. The only reason a tracker is in a game is if it would be useful for town. And right now, 7/21 means that there's at least 1/3 of the game that makes a tracker useless, and probably more so. That, combined with the fact that we've lost 5 vanilla town, leads me to believe that one of the three claims toDay are lying. We managed to hit three power roles with majority vote toDay and managed to lose five vanilla town to death? Really? What kind of odds are that? But what's weird is that, in the context of the game, toDay's claims are more plausible than drainbead. Damn. This is just me thinking out loud. Hm-dee-hm.
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:40:17 GMT -5
Yes, so I am inclined to believe Ginger's claim. Although, I am still not sure if my power would also work against lynches. Well we could go back to lynching you and see if it works. j/k I would think that paranoia didn't answer you was because it would have given you information that we had a Day vig.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 28, 2011 21:41:31 GMT -5
Interesting that if the "online"/"offline" thing beside the players name is an actual indication of them being around.... textcat appears to be online but is keeping very quite.. Don't go there. Many of us log in and leave our computers on whilst away. I do it often i kind of hate this meta shit. i think i have been logged in for about a month (an exageration, no doubt but still). and oh noes they are posting on another board but not here is about shit. my opionion of course. i use meta to see prior behavior and see if it fits with current conditons. but this kind of meta is crap of the worst kind. vote moodythis is crap. and to be honest it kind of pisses me off. this is typical scum that got caught with their hand in the cookie jar obfuscation. my two cents, of course. and moody i like you. please don'd do this shit again.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 28, 2011 21:42:20 GMT -5
This post pings me a lot! It is the last sentence. "why not get rid of a scummier person that has already been voted for?" It sounds like she is giving bandwagon advice. The part of the post that pinged me was "we haven't got scum yet and your vote is interesting but not helpful" how does she know that paulwiag isn't scum. Exactly. Another thing that comes to mind about SilverJan is she made a comment when we were trying to figure out why SisC died, she commented that maybe she was a vig that turned town when she killed or something like that. It was very similar to my role outcome if I killed and made me think maybe she is the scum version of me. I am rambling here... I am tired.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Oct 28, 2011 21:42:38 GMT -5
Well in light of J BG's claim it makes sense you would protect her target not the lynch target. But that doesn't make sense. If Ginger targets town, she dies instead of the town. Texcat's day doc power, then, would only be protecting scum from death by Ginger. Which means the day doc power would only be useful for scum, not town.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Oct 28, 2011 21:43:41 GMT -5
i kind of hate this meta shit. i think i have been logged in for about a month (an exageration, no doubt but still). and oh noes they are posting on another board but not here is about shit. my opionion of course. i use meta to see prior behavior and see if it fits with current conditons. but this kind of meta is crap of the worst kind. vote moodythis is crap. and to be honest it kind of pisses me off. this is typical scum that got caught with their hand in the cookie jar obfuscation. my two cents, of course. and moody i like you. please don'd do this shit again. Wait for it....
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:46:21 GMT -5
Well in light of J BG's claim it makes sense you would protect her target not the lynch target. But that doesn't make sense. If Ginger targets town, she dies instead of the town. Texcat's day doc power, then, would only be protecting scum from death by Ginger. Which means the day doc power would only be useful for scum, not town. I am trying to hard to think logically quickly and not doing a very good job apparently. You are right it doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by Deni on Oct 28, 2011 21:48:13 GMT -5
Don't go there. Many of us log in and leave our computers on whilst away. I do it often i kind of hate this meta shit. i think i have been logged in for about a month (an exageration, no doubt but still). and oh noes they are posting on another board but not here is about shit. my opionion of course. i use meta to see prior behavior and see if it fits with current conditons. but this kind of meta is crap of the worst kind. vote moodythis is crap. and to be honest it kind of pisses me off. this is typical scum that got caught with their hand in the cookie jar obfuscation. my two cents, of course. and moody i like you. please don'd do this shit again. argghhh... seriously peeker you couldn't do better than that...
|
|
|
Post by Holy Moley! on Oct 28, 2011 21:50:32 GMT -5
Ugh. That's a lot of non-voters. I may as well claim: You are Darlene Harris, housewife and chairman of Civilians Against Crime. Your organization patrols the streets to keep them safe. You have the Day watch, and mostly only have sore feet to show for it. You are the town Day protector. You can protect any player, except yourself, from a Day kill. You win when all threats to the town are eliminated or otherwise removed from play. vote: lightfoot This is part OMGUS vote. I didn't like her vote on me. I don't think I was trying to turn the conversation to Drain. I was trying to turn the conversation to moody. And her drive-by smudge of Inner in the same post, also struck me as odd. Inner has hardly posted at all toDay. I don't think you can claim he's tried to move the conversation. OH FUCK ME. Just got in two hours ago, a lot more sober than I want to be, and found this waiting for me. It's four in the freaking morning. I should be having sex or something, but no. Not happening. Doesn't often these days it seems like. Ok... so I gather Moody, Ginger, Tex and DrainBead, if we're to believe all their claims, are town. It's fourteen minutes until the end of the day at the time of writing this. God knows who's scum right now but I don't have time to sort this out. Unvote: Texcat.Vote: Silver Jan.
|
|