|
Post by guiri on May 28, 2012 16:41:23 GMT -5
Sorry wombat, I thought you were scum trying to save Lianne... Vote TexcatIt's good to be alive! bleached Any chance for a reason on this? A reason on the apology to wombat? Lianne was scum, Wombat's last minute vote switch saved her from the lynch, I suspected it was intentional. Or a reason for the vote on your buddy? Is it not clear that I'm obsessed? I've commented on Texcat here, here, here, and here. Or are you asking for a reason why it's good to be alive? I just giggle at the thought that you guys probably took a shot at me on N1, managed to kill me last Night and are going to try again toNight or sometime soon, and if Idle's still short of subs, I may be invited back again, and again, and again.
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on May 28, 2012 17:25:32 GMT -5
bleached Any chance for a reason on this? A reason on the apology to wombat? Lianne was scum, Wombat's last minute vote switch saved her from the lynch, I suspected it was intentional. Or a reason for the vote on your buddy? Is it not clear that I'm obsessed? I've commented on Texcat here, here, here, and here. Or are you asking for a reason why it's good to be alive? I just giggle at the thought that you guys probably took a shot at me on N1, managed to kill me last Night and are going to try again toNight or sometime soon, and if Idle's still short of subs, I may be invited back again, and again, and again. Sorry, I should have specified the reason for your vote. The mantra around here is give reasons for your vote. I was not aware that it was up to me to go through all of your past posts to figure out your previously given reasons. I guess I suffer from my inability to remember what everyone has said in the past 1600 plus posts. As for my "buddy," as near as I can figure, there are no "buddies" in Mafia Games. From my vast experience of Three plus Days of playing Mafia Games, I understand it is appropriate to thank you for the smudge, though I am at a loss for the reason for it. Thanks for answering the question.
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 28, 2012 17:32:14 GMT -5
Great, our Crazy Town just killed a mason. Comments like this are exactly why I asked for opinions, how do we know who is a mason or town, it was a stab in the dark
|
|
|
Post by crys on May 28, 2012 17:34:46 GMT -5
My dates changed cause I extended the trip. I got engaged and we are picking out our house! Congratulations. I hope you find exactly what you are looking for in a house. Sent from my SCH-I405 using ProBoards
|
|
|
Post by Idle Thoughts on May 28, 2012 19:01:21 GMT -5
Busy weekend for me, sorry, everyone. Regular schedule starting tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Suits101 on May 28, 2012 19:50:09 GMT -5
Suits, have you read ANY of my posts? over 500 of them. any particular one I should read?
|
|
|
Post by Suits101 on May 28, 2012 19:54:14 GMT -5
I do not suspect texcat at this time, i misunderstand on the first readthrough and could not edit my post. I posted directly beneath my original question of her wording and we cleared it up. Not sure it was cleared up at all.
|
|
|
Post by Silver Jan on May 29, 2012 1:25:08 GMT -5
Great, our Crazy Town just killed a mason. Comments like this are exactly why I asked for opinions, how do we know who is a mason or town, it was a stab in the dark I am really glad that you did ask for an opinion, we managed to get rid of 2 scum in one Day. I feel as if I am just waiting for Idle to confirm that ascime was a Mason which is a bit silly. Texcat was really good as a PFK in one game but I don't get a scum read on her in this game. I understood her when she said both of you as she was talking to Mahaloth and me. I hadn't even considered a protection until she brought it up.
|
|
|
Post by septimus on May 29, 2012 6:28:19 GMT -5
Comments like this are exactly why I asked for opinions, how do we know who is a mason or town, it was a stab in the dark Maybe colby11 will be allowed to rescind the action and kill a different player. (Normally Day actions can be rescinded any time before end-of-Day, Night actions before end-of-Night.)
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 29, 2012 6:33:36 GMT -5
Comments like this are exactly why I asked for opinions, how do we know who is a mason or town, it was a stab in the dark Maybe colby11 will be allowed to rescind the action and kill a different player. (Normally Day actions can be rescinded any time before end-of-Day, Night actions before end-of-Night.) I didn't get that feeling, I was just told to send him a name then asked after a bit if I could just post it on here which as we all know can be done. But he gave it a shot and that's all any of us could do
|
|
|
Post by Susan K Murphy on May 29, 2012 9:06:54 GMT -5
Just catching up My dates changed cause I extended the trip. I got engaged and we are picking out our house! Congrats!!
|
|
|
Post by Susan K Murphy on May 29, 2012 9:55:55 GMT -5
Wombat99, Town, is dead. Colby11, Town, and a CRAZY TOWNIE, is close to death.guiri, a SERIAL KILLER PFK, who wanted to kill everyone so he could steal the win all for himself, is dead. Another crazy townie and a serial killer on the loose! If this is a 'simple' mafia game I don't think I'm up to a complicated one! wombat99 V1 a townie does surprise me, that last minute switch of vote on Day 2 which saved lianne had me convinced So, sorry for wrongly suspecting you wombat99 V1 , but I now suspect wombat99 V2! Silver Jan has hit the nail on the head here: These posts are pinging me. *Is* there a separate Mason discussion board? It was mentioned that *sometimes* Masons have their own board. As was discussed a bit at the end of Day3 - we really don't have confirmation yet that Mahaloth and Silver Jan are masons. This post just irritates me, smudging 2 living Masons with a 3rd, now dead, Mason that acknowledged them is a bit much. Yes I was glad to be alive, I suspected that either Mahaloth or I would be killed and I was about ready to ask for spoilers so it was a nice surprise. Scum making a Mason claim has been done before and they got away with it because there were no "real" Masons in the game. In this game we know there are Masons and for scum to try and claim would be really risky, not to say idiotic, of them. As I have mentioned before, the game did start with more than 3 Masons and I have no intention of telling you who they are, that is up to them. In this particular game the Masons do not have a separate board, we do know each other though. A bit much indeed. vote: wombat99Would like to hear what you have to say about this wombat99. And Meeko you are still on my radar. If we didn't already know it couldn't be the case from the setup, I'd think that Meeko had a special role who had to try and cast suspicion on anyone who was semi-confirmed as town. ...yep, Recall the first Day, when CIAS, BillMc and Meeko -- all experienced players -- started a bandwagon on Pleonast, which was finally staved off by other experienced players led by Gadarene, who we now know was Town. As Inner Stickler pointed out, the bandwagon against Pleo likely had Scum support. CIAS' initial vote was a joke (he wasn't even aware Pleo had claimed town Power), and I doubt Scum would be so casual. CIAS' further contributions seem Townish. BillMc flipped Town of course, so my suspicion (like that of Septimus #1) falls on Meeko. And Meeko has continued to smudge players on poor grounds, even claiming our Masons may be untruthful. (Surely real Masons would have counterclaimed by now, if only to prevent Doctors from wasting their Power.) Vote: Meeko [/color][/quote] ...yep, Vote MeekoBusted, buddy. You are trying to shift suspicion to just about anybody at this point. I think it is you. ...and yep. I'm convinced.
|
|
|
Post by supermel on May 29, 2012 11:05:45 GMT -5
Hopefully Idle will be on more today and chime in about whether or not the crazy vote can be changed.
|
|
|
Post by Hal Briston on May 29, 2012 11:17:04 GMT -5
Even though it hurts town, in the interest of fairness I gotta say that Colby11's crazy townie pick should not be allowed to be changed. Town had ample opportunity to chime in on the issue, and just because we don't like the result doesn't mean we should get a pass.
This is really no different from my revealing last night's investigation. Sure, I could've confirmed someone as town, thereby removing them from Colby11's list of possible targets, but I didn't. If Colby11 had then targeted the one I had investigated, well, too bad for me and for them. I'd have had my opportunity to speak up, and I didn't.
In this case, the other masons had their opportunity to speak up, and they didn't. It sucks, but fair's fair.
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on May 29, 2012 11:43:50 GMT -5
So, sorry for wrongly suspecting you wombat99 V1 , but I now suspect wombat99 V2! Silver Jan has hit the nail on the head here: A bit much indeed. vote: wombat99Would like to hear what you have to say about this wombat99. Assuming that ascime is revealed to be a mason, then, yes, that confirms Silver Jan and Mahaloth as masons also, and obviously they aren't scum. Before that, though, I was just pointing out that we did not have confirmation of the mason claims. Here are the reasons why Silver Jan's claim did not ring true with me and why I brought it up: 1) panicked response when the two-account question was first brought up 2) soft-claiming mason on Day3 when it didn't seem to me that there was a need to claim at all; then asking to wait until the Day was over to answer questions; then unclaiming mason; then claiming again 3) Referring to a Gadarene breadcrumb which would confirm her as mason but not pointing it out even when explicitly asked. I went back and looked, and could only find one place where Gadarene mentioned Silver Jan, and posted it, but no one commented on it so apparently this was not a breadcrumb. 4) allowing Archangel to believe there was a secret mason board and that was the reason for the two accounts, when she said later that there is not a secret board. *shrug* So, yes, I was suspicous, but not anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Mahaloth on May 29, 2012 13:35:13 GMT -5
Even though it hurts town, in the interest of fairness I gotta say that Colby11's crazy townie pick should not be allowed to be changed. Town had ample opportunity to chime in on the issue, and just because we don't like the result doesn't mean we should get a pass. I agree entirely, and I'm one of the masons.
|
|
|
Post by septimus on May 29, 2012 13:46:44 GMT -5
Is it not clear that I'm obsessed? I've commented on Texcat here, here, here, and here. Reading this case, it seems much better than a case against Meeko. Unvote: Meeko Vote: TexCat
|
|
Merestil Haye
FGM
Grudge Keeper
[on:Slumming it in the Middle-Earth][of:In the halls of Manw
Posts: 1,077
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Merestil Haye on May 29, 2012 15:59:22 GMT -5
Even though it hurts town, in the interest of fairness I gotta say that Colby11's crazy townie pick should not be allowed to be changed. Town had ample opportunity to chime in on the issue, and just because we don't like the result doesn't mean we should get a pass. This is really no different from my revealing last night's investigation. Sure, I could've confirmed someone as town, thereby removing them from Colby11's list of possible targets, but I didn't. If Colby11 had then targeted the one I had investigated, well, too bad for me and for them. I'd have had my opportunity to speak up, and I didn't. I have to agree with this as well.
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 29, 2012 16:45:05 GMT -5
Wasn't a living dead LOL can't remember the name suppose to give us info on the protection they used in their first life or did I msis it?
|
|
|
Post by septimus on May 29, 2012 17:17:14 GMT -5
Wasn't a living dead LOL can't remember the name suppose to give us info on the protection they used in their first life or did I msis it? Are you referring to septimus #1, the dead Town Doctor? I think Idle Thoughts has confirmed that I'm allowed to reveal those Protectees, even though the information would normally have died with septimus #1. I'll reveal if there seems to be a Town consensus that I should. But I worry about downside with little upside.
|
|
|
Post by cathi on May 29, 2012 19:11:46 GMT -5
Hello again, everyone! Hope you all (in the U.S.) had a fun & safe Memorial Day weekend.
Back to business: based on what I've read today, I like dizzymrslizzy & Silver Jan's cases. I find it interesting that one of their reasonings is lack of posting, then she shows up less than 12 hours later in self-defense, so: Vote: LadyRogue
And Meeko, I just don't know what to make of you, although I find your posts entertaining.
P.S. I hope to be on more regularly now, and I feel great relief at the reduced numbers of pages to read. Hooray!
|
|
|
Post by LadyRogue-II on May 29, 2012 19:58:14 GMT -5
Hello again, everyone! Hope you all (in the U.S.) had a fun & safe Memorial Day weekend. Back to business: based on what I've read today, I like dizzymrslizzy & Silver Jan's cases. I find it interesting that one of their reasonings is lack of posting, then she shows up less than 12 hours later in self-defense, so: Vote: LadyRogue [/color] And Meeko, I just don't know what to make of you, although I find your posts entertaining. P.S. I hope to be on more regularly now, and I feel great relief at the reduced numbers of pages to read. Hooray![/quote] Actually dizzymrslizzy has been trying to direct attention any direction but hers, but I have posted and explained about the voting. If you feel we can afford to lynch another townie then jump on her lynchwagon.
|
|
|
Post by LadyRogue-II on May 29, 2012 20:03:46 GMT -5
oh yeah and dizzymrslizzy
|
|
|
Post by wombat99 on May 29, 2012 20:23:00 GMT -5
A reason on the apology to wombat? Lianne was scum, Wombat's last minute vote switch saved her from the lynch, I suspected it was intentional. Or a reason for the vote on your buddy? Is it not clear that I'm obsessed? I've commented on Texcat here, here, here, and here. Or are you asking for a reason why it's good to be alive? I just giggle at the thought that you guys probably took a shot at me on N1, managed to kill me last Night and are going to try again toNight or sometime soon, and if Idle's still short of subs, I may be invited back again, and again, and again. Sorry, I should have specified the reason for your vote. The mantra around here is give reasons for your vote. I was not aware that it was up to me to go through all of your past posts to figure out your previously given reasons. I guess I suffer from my inability to remember what everyone has said in the past 1600 plus posts. As for my "buddy," as near as I can figure, there are no "buddies" in Mafia Games. From my vast experience of Three plus Days of playing Mafia Games, I understand it is appropriate to thank you for the smudge, though I am at a loss for the reason for it. Thanks for answering the question. @ guiri - why the smudge on richbeckman? Just curious if you see something I don't.
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on May 29, 2012 20:23:13 GMT -5
LadyRogue You haven't addressed why you have contributed nothing in the last four DAYS. You say other people have said what you think, but you haven't shared at any point what you think. How are we supposed to get any kind of read on you if you won't share your thoughts?
You are obviously here and around, share with us. Until then the only logical explanation is that you are scum trying to hide and not post.
Also where have I been diverting attention off myself.....again if you are going to claim I'm trying divert attention away from myself, please point me in the direction of where any attention on me is?
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 29, 2012 22:24:16 GMT -5
quipped
Are you referring to septimus #1, the dead Town Doctor? I think Idle Thoughts has confirmed that I'm allowed to reveal those Protectees, even though the information would normally have died with septimus #1.
I'll reveal if there seems to be a Town consensus that I should. But I worry about downside with little upside.[/quote]
Yes, I was hoping for some help, but don't want to do anything that will hinder either. So as you know what you know LOL, I'll trust in your judgement. I just thought I read where you said you would the next day?
|
|
|
Post by michelehunter on May 29, 2012 22:25:39 GMT -5
poop I messed that up sorry
|
|
|
Post by Rich Beckman on May 29, 2012 22:35:44 GMT -5
Unofficial current vote totals:
Texcat 4 Lady Rogue 2 Meeko 2 Pleonast 1 Wombat99 1 dizzymrslizzy 1
|
|
|
Post by cathi on May 29, 2012 22:48:27 GMT -5
@ladyrogue- I myself voted for dizzymrslizzy on Day1. Since that time, my opinion regarding her "scumminess" has changed; I think that her defensiveness at that time was due to getting early votes and being new to the game. I'm not sure that I would have reacted differently.
Thank you for proving my point by jumping in right away and responding to my vote on you. And the OMGUS vote on dizzymrslizzy isn't helping to change my mind about you. For now at least, my vote stands.
|
|
|
Post by LadyRogue-II on May 29, 2012 23:07:13 GMT -5
@ladyrogue- I myself voted for dizzymrslizzy on Day1. Since that time, my opinion regarding her "scumminess" has changed; I think that her defensiveness at that time was due to getting early votes and being new to the game. I'm not sure that I would have reacted differently. Thank you for proving my point by jumping in right away and responding to my vote on you. And the OMGUS vote on dizzymrslizzy isn't helping to change my mind about you. For now at least, my vote stands. As my vote stands on her because there are lots of players that aren't posting on here and she has singled me out from day one. I joined this game because of the scavenger hunt on packrat, so I am playing as best as I can seeing as this is my first game. I just find her behavior kind of scummy because of the single-mindedness of her smudging me.
|
|