|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:00:35 GMT -5
e is for egg. it goes with d dontchaknow. over easy but not nervous please.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:01:39 GMT -5
f is for french fries. damn they good with a juicy burger. catsup please, although i will take some chili and cheese if that's on the menu.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:03:37 GMT -5
g is for goose, as in foie gras. buttery and so damn right when cooked correctly. sucks if overcooked. then it just tastes like overcooked foie gras.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:05:13 GMT -5
h is for hominy. sorry non southerners. but shoot this is a belly stuffer and if you don't like it snowboard down for some foie gras.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:06:05 GMT -5
i is for iron. my doc says i could get more of this if i ate more liver. i'd rather lick a building before i eat that shit.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:07:57 GMT -5
j could be for jelly but i prefer jam. sorry but b could also be for biscuit which when coupled with e makes a nice way to start the day. i prefer blackberry or strawberry. but to each his or her own.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:08:38 GMT -5
k is for me and my wife and kids. it's the first letter of our last name. nuff said.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:10:59 GMT -5
l is for, ok i had a tough one on this. my knee jerk reaction is lamb. but i also like the loufa. i mean a really good chunk of baaahhhhh baaahhhh seared to medium rare or a long hot shower scrubbing off the dirt of the day. carp it's kind of a push.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:13:20 GMT -5
m. m & ms of course. shoot they come with peanuts or chunks of almond. crud all of your food groups are represented. you've got vegetable oil, a dairy, a protein and chocolate. all major food groups are represented. woot woot.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:15:08 GMT -5
n is for nancy. first girl i ever kissed. we both had braces and were concerned about the whole braces getting interlocked and then having to go to the doctor thing. so we just kind of pecked. strangely erotic if i recall correctly.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:16:47 GMT -5
and after n i figure you pervs would kind of guess what o stands for. sorry, but we get some oranges around here this time of year that our so farking delicious that it makes me wonder why i went back to gin and tonic as opposed to screwdrivers.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 19, 2012 23:17:53 GMT -5
p. oh lordy. of course, it's peekercpa.
back tomorrow with the second half.
|
|
|
Post by Suburban Plankton on Oct 19, 2012 23:23:00 GMT -5
Gaah!
I hate cliffhangers!!!
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Oct 20, 2012 1:55:04 GMT -5
I have no clue how or why I "showed up" in your room Peekers. All I know is that I tracked you night 1 and was told you were in your room. That's the beginning and end of it. Anything else only Pollux can answer Ok, THIS is fishy. As a watcher, Meeko would see everyone who comes in, not just who killed Peeker. While yes, you may not have killed him, this makes me suspicious... I haven't decided whether we should allow you to live or not, but for now, I will happily vote for you Vote DizzyLizzyQuoting my own post to answer the question of why I find Dizzy fishy. I don't see how you wouldn't be seen tracking, since Meeko watched your target. In other words, it's like me watching a plate of apples, and I see my dad grab one. While he got the apple, I would see him. Same instance applies to this case. What I find fishy is that you expected to not be seen while you were tracking Peeker. I do have a question- was it your choice to track Peeker or not?
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Oct 20, 2012 1:55:50 GMT -5
Seriously, Peeker!
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Oct 20, 2012 2:01:55 GMT -5
My fingers are falling apart. Thanks, thinset mortar, I didn't need skin there. Pizza has carpet-bombed us with a lot to digest. I have to admit that Dizzy makes a good point, that all of the people that Pizza & Co have apparently cleared, including me, are reported as 'nonhostile' to Town, so we're going to see any of those people stepping up to counter that information. But, the circumstantial evidence against Dizzy is pretty darn strong, and she has no results from her power that can be used to cast any doubt on the case against her. Vote Dizzy[/color] And I think I get why Peeker keeps harping on the dissonance in the idea that Meeko would 'see' Dizzy the Tracker in his room. He seems to be assuming that Tracking is done from a distance, and that is not an unreasonable assumption. I don't know that I've ever experienced a Watcher observing a Tracker in any past games I've played, but if anyone is aware of that happening in another game, it might be useful to see how those actions were reconciled.
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Oct 20, 2012 2:16:19 GMT -5
Meh. If I recall it was N1-Peeker-never left his room N2-ATPG-never left his room N3-Parzival-visited BillMC N4-blocked. None of this is verifiable which sucks if you're town but can't be helped. 1. Peeker admitted he never left his room. 2. I was roleblocked by the mafia. 3. Parzival was mafia. 4. "I was blocked" is the standard response for N4. Not one piece of NEW INFORMATION WAS GIVEN FROM DIZZYS CLAIM AND ALL OF THAT INFORMATION IS ZERO RISK TO CLAIM IF YOU ARE MAFIA. Apologies for the shouting. But it's convenient that, in FOUR NIGHTS of tracking data, she knows NOTHING that any scumbag wouldn't already know from being scum, and reading the thread. Meeko, on the other hand, provided new data no one knew. In case it matters to folks- I have 13 votes on me. If you want me alive at the end of today, I need a wagon of some 16 or so votes on Dizzy. For margin of error. There are plenty of folks still alive who can make my dreams of remaining alive come true. If not Dizzy, then Pizza, until you find another suspect 14 people can vote for, with zero votes on me.
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Oct 20, 2012 2:23:46 GMT -5
Pizza: you have posted a lot of "stuff" Can you please differentiate between what you "know" and what you "think". What I know: 1. CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies Nonhostile2. gnarlycharlie 3. colby11 Claimed Town recruiter 5. Meeko Claimed third-party nonhostile watcher 7. crys Claimed third-party /nonhostile/ mad bomber 9. dizzymrslizzy Claimed town tracker 11. Lightfoot 12. storyteller nonhostile13. Merestil Haye 14. Sister Coyote nonhostile16. LaurieRN 17. patricia 18. Suburban Plankton 19. peekercpa, aka Deadpool (Third-Party Serial Annoyer)20. Inner Stickler Claimed Town Vig 22. richbeckman 23. Red Skeezix - Nonhostile lean 27. sinjin non-hostile28. JustBeingGinger Claimed Town Scotsman/executioner, claimed to pee blue Day Four 29. Askthepizzaguy Town per ModAll of the above was true at the time of their scan. What I strongly believe: 1. CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies Nonhostile2. gnarlycharlie 3. colby11 Claimed Town recruiter5. Meeko Claimed third-party nonhostile watcher7. crys Claimed third-party /nonhostile/ mad bomber 9. dizzymrslizzy Claimed town tracker 11. Lightfoot 12. storyteller nonhostile13. Merestil Haye 14. Sister Coyote nonhostile16. LaurieRN 17. patricia 18. Suburban Plankton 19. peekercpa, aka Deadpool (Third-Party Serial Annoyer)20. Inner Stickler Claimed Town Vig22. richbeckman 23. Red Skeezix - Nonhostile27. sinjin non-hostile28. JustBeingGinger Claimed Town Scotsman/executioner, claimed to pee blue Day Four29. Askthepizzaguy Town per ModEverything else, I've posted my leans on. In terms of who is most scummy to least.
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Oct 20, 2012 2:25:17 GMT -5
Also post 196 wasn't directed at Inner, but at folks who believe Dizzy's town tracker claim.
What are the odds that in 4 nights, all of her information is not new?
|
|
|
Post by Red Skeezix on Oct 20, 2012 2:57:39 GMT -5
sinjin: I'm not assuming that dizzy is scum. I assume she's a hostile third party. Also, how she "knew" that peeker did nothing. I don't assume that she knew it, either it was said or hinted at previously, or she straight up guessed. @pizza: The other night I revealed that there were 5 recruitable third parties. I believe I am one of them, but not directly. Since my wincondition which is nothing now is bound to change to something, that would constitute recruitment. That aside, I know of one other player who is or was definitely recruitable, should I reveal that information, or do you consider that potentially damaging information? I'm tempted to reveal it, just on the odds that it will give colby a better line of sight onto target.
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Oct 20, 2012 3:08:59 GMT -5
Why not allow yourself to be recruited (or attempted to be recruited) tonight.
Then, just before dawn, reveal the other, so even if you die, we'll know.
|
|
|
Post by Askthepizzaguy on Oct 20, 2012 3:09:34 GMT -5
Timing is obviously very important for such a maneuver.
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Oct 20, 2012 5:34:07 GMT -5
sinjin: I'm not assuming that dizzy is scum. I assume she's a hostile third party. Also, how she "knew" that peeker did nothing. I don't assume that she knew it, either it was said or hinted at previously, or she straight up guessed. @pizza: The other night I revealed that there were 5 recruitable third parties. I believe I am one of them, but not directly. Since my wincondition which is nothing now is bound to change to something, that would constitute recruitment. That aside, I know of one other player who is or was definitely recruitable, should I reveal that information, or do you consider that potentially damaging information? I'm tempted to reveal it, just on the odds that it will give colby a better line of sight onto target. It would be an easy assumption that peeker went no where since he woke up dead? reading your earlier post it sounds like you have to 'find someone or they need to find you to complete your role description? I used a mechanic like that in HandBasket it was a blast for the mod
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 20, 2012 6:24:19 GMT -5
I don't see how you wouldn't be seen tracking, since Meeko watched your target. In other words, it's like me watching a plate of apples, and I see my dad grab one. While he got the apple, I would see him. Same instance applies to this case. Okay, and AGAIN, I AGREE WITH YOU. I've NEVER disagreed with what you said above here. I don't have a shread of doubt that I wouldn't be seen tracking Peekers. How do I track if I'm not there? Why wouldn't I be seen if I'm not there? PEEKERS is the one flipping out on me that "a tracker shouldn't be "IN" his room for a watcher to see" To his statement that he's said several times, I've said that I personally don't know how or what actions a player has to perform to be seen or not seen by a watcher. All I know is that I was there tracking, and I have no clue why Peekers is flipping out about.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 20, 2012 8:12:22 GMT -5
i don't think i am "flipping out". i think cookies may have stated it better than i have. typically trackers are just that. they kind of hunker around and surreptitiously go about their business. normally they are not so overt. now certainly this is gasterd and it is no doubt that pollux has taken some liberties with more traditional roles. but frankly, it is the strongest case out there. and to some extent your lynch will either add additonal credence to meeko or detract from it. and it also provides an additional data point about the merc being a role that floats or a player that is controlled. because i think we have all come to some sort of agreement that i was killed three different ways (even that could be a red herring, however). the fact that i died three different ways and the fact that three folks were seen seems to have a nice kind of balance. but if in fact you are innocent and if in fact i was killed three different ways then that indicates that the merc would be a power that is kind of blasted out as opposed to an individual who is robotically operating. unless the merc, as a player, is invisible.
and i keep waiting for gnarly to show up and vote colby for daring to suggest that dizzy was doing anything to me N1.
|
|
|
Post by peekercpa on Oct 20, 2012 8:18:13 GMT -5
Also post 196 wasn't directed at Inner, but at folks who believe Dizzy's town tracker claim. What are the odds that in 4 nights, all of her information is not new? gambler's fallacy?
|
|
|
Post by dizzymrslizzy on Oct 20, 2012 8:31:10 GMT -5
Pizza the same odds that Colby's first two targets showed up dead.
As far as I'm concerned Colby's claim hasn't been anywhere close to verified either.
Do my targets not make sense looking at each days play?
If Inner hadn't have killed parzival I would have a data point today. If I wasn't blocked last night then again I would have had a data point to go on today.
If you give me tonight to prove it you can even cherry pick the person I track tomorrow and I will post my result at dawn as soon as I get it.
|
|
|
Post by JustBeingGinger on Oct 20, 2012 9:42:25 GMT -5
Meh. If I recall it was N1-Peeker-never left his room N2-ATPG-never left his room N3-Parzival-visited BillMC N4-blocked. None of this is verifiable which sucks if you're town but can't be helped. 1. Peeker admitted he never left his room. 2. I was roleblocked by the mafia. 3. Parzival was mafia. 4. "I was blocked" is the standard response for N4. Not one piece of NEW INFORMATION WAS GIVEN FROM DIZZYS CLAIM AND ALL OF THAT INFORMATION IS ZERO RISK TO CLAIM IF YOU ARE MAFIA. Apologies for the shouting. But it's convenient that, in FOUR NIGHTS of tracking data, she knows NOTHING that any scumbag wouldn't already know from being scum, and reading the thread. Meeko, on the other hand, provided new data no one knew. In case it matters to folks- I have 13 votes on me. If you want me alive at the end of today, I need a wagon of some 16 or so votes on Dizzy. For margin of error. There are plenty of folks still alive who can make my dreams of remaining alive come true. If not Dizzy, then Pizza, until you find another suspect 14 people can vote for, with zero votes on me. Pizza, I am not sure if you are town/scum/3rd party, but you have been most vocal and useful to town. I will not let you be lynched. I have my one shot power to save you, at least for a Day and Night and then I can decide what town wants to do. I will wait to see how the voting goes before I put in my order.
|
|
Colby11
Administrator
Creator of Hell's Kitchen Mafia
Posts: 1,193
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Colby11 on Oct 20, 2012 12:03:25 GMT -5
sinjin: I'm not assuming that dizzy is scum. I assume she's a hostile third party. Also, how she "knew" that peeker did nothing. I don't assume that she knew it, either it was said or hinted at previously, or she straight up guessed. @pizza: The other night I revealed that there were 5 recruitable third parties. I believe I am one of them, but not directly. Since my wincondition which is nothing now is bound to change to something, that would constitute recruitment. That aside, I know of one other player who is or was definitely recruitable, should I reveal that information, or do you consider that potentially damaging information? I'm tempted to reveal it, just on the odds that it will give colby a better line of sight onto target. I am going to ask a weird question, just answer truthfully. I will then go from there Does your recruitment have anything to do with your mental state?
|
|
|
Post by LightFoot on Oct 20, 2012 12:24:12 GMT -5
I see Pizza has set himself up to need us to do his bidding to save his butt I DON'T LIKE IT
Town Scum or just butthead it's not a play tactic I appreciate- taking into consideration the magic bagging and telling us how we should be playing ( sorryATPG the person) and how we don’t do things right by his standards- there is a part of the avatar that is mine that thinks “ You poured your soup you eat it”
JBG your one shot – are you sure it will work for invisible votes? Can it be used AFTER the final vote count?
Maybe I’m just grumpy this morning
I’m not against dizzy’s lynch – but ATPG has created a hostage situation of sorts- and didn’t he earlier state
He’s reviewed and handed out party favours to some of the players he’s quoted= like we are at his house- I REPEAT I DON’T LIKE IT.
|
|