Death By Irony
FGM
The Former Mandate of Heaven/Current Gastard Night Mod
I'm my own mind-altering substance!
Posts: 109
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Death By Irony on Dec 12, 2007 11:05:55 GMT -5
Death by IronyThere is not much in the way of posts from you, although I nuderstand you are busy. Aside from drainbead - who else do you think is scummy and why? Captain Klutz's posts look a little funky from where I'm sitting, but at the moment I'm WIFOMing myself into another headache over whether or not his speculations mean brilliant insight or too much information.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 12, 2007 11:13:11 GMT -5
My biggest WIFOM at the moment is trying to remember that the Firefly scum are not necessarily scum in this game as well. Although when you start compiling a scum list starting drainbead, Captain Klutz, Cookiesyou do begin to wonder.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 12, 2007 11:44:54 GMT -5
Cookies:I've looked through your posts and so many of them are based around the Guv'nor role and challenging Santo Rugger. However, when it comes to analysis and reasoning for your votes for other players, there is not much there. What's your analysis on the rest of the players in this game That's an interesting spin on my past posts. My biggest WIFOM at the moment is trying to remember that the Firefly scum are not necessarily scum in this game as well. Although when you start compiling a scum list starting drainbead, Captain Klutz, Cookiesyou do begin to wonder. Yet in this Day Three post I'm in your "Pro-Colonist" column. Would you care to explain the about face? Day 4.186 CookiesNot being able to trust people applies to every topic, so I don't know why you are singling out this topic as particularly difficult in that respect. And bemoaning the fact that you can't ask the moderator because your role PM does not mention the Nexus-9 looks off. Why? If atarus is to be believed, he's the only one of us who has a basis for seeking clarification from story about the Nexus-9. How exactly do you propose that the rest of us question story about what may or may not have been stated in atarus' PM? You yourself have specifically asked atarus if he would clarify with story on this very subject. I took issue with some of the implications in this atarus statement: I take issue with it because Cat and Klutz are not the only ones who have been mulling over that particular facet of the game. Case in point.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 12, 2007 11:58:44 GMT -5
Sometimes I really....really....hate the behavior of these boards with respect to referring to locked threads.
I used the "Link to Post" urls for both of those those hyperlinks. Shouldn't they take you to that particular post?
"in this Day Three post" should take you to Post #55 on Day Three. "Case in point" should take you to Post #60 on Night Three.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Dec 12, 2007 12:49:06 GMT -5
I took issue with some of the implications in this atarus statement: I take issue with it because Cat and Klutz are not the only ones who have been mulling over that particular facet of the game. Case in point. (unworking link removed) 'Kay, 'kay, that's my bad. CatinaSuit and Klutz were the only ones that stood out in my mind because they were continuing discussion through Day Four and I just forgot about Night Three. I suppose that because Cat and Klutz were directly addressing me in a few of their posts is why I was remembering them more prominently. Kindly ignore the huge ego behind the curtain.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Dec 12, 2007 13:39:00 GMT -5
I don't mind doing a little speculation during the Night posts. I agree with Klutz that, in general, talking about possible scum roles is not as harmful to the town as talking about town power roles. For one thing, it can help us when/if scum try to make false claims that can actually be 'confirmed' by their powers.
That said, we've lost several, probably most of the town Power roles so there may not be a whole lot of role interaction to do. To be more specific, I think the reason we're not talking much about the Nexus-9 is that with both Kat (some sort of investigator) and Pleonast gone, the question of when or if the Nexus-9 activates may not mean much. It does sort of depend on what the tradeoffs are for the role. (From what we know, it seems logical it would wait the longest possible time before joining the scum boards, but there's probably a lot we don't know.)
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 12, 2007 14:56:32 GMT -5
You've probably noticed I haven't been posting a lot at night. I've decided for myself that I don't think it's a good idea. I'm not advocating that others don't stratagize at night, just noting that I'm not going to participate.
I also haven't gotten involved in the nexus-9 discussion because it's all WIFOM to me.
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 12, 2007 15:34:48 GMT -5
You've probably noticed I haven't been posting a lot at night. I've decided for myself that I don't think it's a good idea. I'm not advocating that others don't stratagize at night, just noting that I'm not going to participate. I also haven't gotten involved in the nexus-9 discussion because it's all WIFOM to me. I still fail to see a compelling reason not to talk at Night.
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Dec 12, 2007 15:48:24 GMT -5
I still fail to see a compelling reason not to talk at Night. I don't have a compelling reason. Mainly it's just a gut thing. I just keep remembering the mgtman thing, although he actually had nothing when he posted that night. YMOV.
|
|
|
Post by episodeofblonde on Dec 12, 2007 16:54:32 GMT -5
Klutz - I don't think any/all discussion of colour is bad, I'm sorry if that's how you read my post. I think focussing on speculating on the colour is not necessarily very productive and it pinged me because it read like a scum trying to find out who had what info, so 'fishing' in that sense. I could def. be wrong - I certainly was with my assessment of zeriel . I basically agree with CIAS2 - continuing to focus on things which may have limited relevance at this point doesn't seem very pro-town.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 13, 2007 1:22:44 GMT -5
Not sure when Night ends, I'll post this now in case I don't wake up.
Finding out zeriel was town forced a major rethink. I've not yet finished, but I have now come up with a brand new scum list (which is radically different to my old list):
roosh cookies parzival episodeofblonde tragic
Tomorrow we will probably be down to 5 scum and 10 townies, so I believe we can afford no more than one mislynch from here on in. We haven't killed scum yet, but there are not actually many places for the scum to hide. And I'm pretty sure that the 5 people on that list are all scum. (And yes, I am feeling confident, but I have to be careful: the last time I got this cocky I got killed.)
We can still win this.
Number of scum
As alluded to above, I believe that the opening colour is telling us that there are exactly 5 scum. I'm not ruling out 6, but I'm 90% sure that there are exactly 5 scum.
Idle speculation
Seeing as I asked episodeofblonde to speculate on scum roles, I thought I should have a go (although I notice that episodeofblonde didn't bother): I think the scum have (had) a once only ability to guarantee that their kill went through, and they used the ability to take out NAF.
See you in the Morning...
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 13, 2007 1:39:39 GMT -5
Cookies:I've looked through your posts and so many of them are based around the Guv'nor role and challenging Santo Rugger. However, when it comes to analysis and reasoning for your votes for other players, there is not much there. What's your analysis on the rest of the players in this game That's an interesting spin on my past posts. Yet in this Day Three post I'm in your "Pro-Colonist" column. Would you care to explain the about face? Cookies, how about responding to CIAS2's request? I am not saying that we should all try to get information from storyteller. I am saying that we should discuss it here, throw some ideas around, get people involved and come up with a number of reasonable hypotheses. As you said, atarus was asked to clarify the wording on his PM, he was not requested to ask storyteller for more Nexus-9 information. And I'm happy to note that you did participate briefly. But there is no reason to stop while there is potentially more useful information to gain.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 13, 2007 1:45:30 GMT -5
I don't mind doing a little speculation during the Night posts. I agree with Klutz that, in general, talking about possible scum roles is not as harmful to the town as talking about town power roles. For one thing, it can help us when/if scum try to make false claims that can actually be 'confirmed' by their powers. That said, we've lost several, probably most of the town Power roles so there may not be a whole lot of role interaction to do. To be more specific, I think the reason we're not talking much about the Nexus-9 is that with both Kat (some sort of investigator) and Pleonast gone, the question of when or if the Nexus-9 activates may not mean much. It does sort of depend on what the tradeoffs are for the role. (From what we know, it seems logical it would wait the longest possible time before joining the scum boards, but there's probably a lot we don't know.) Actually, we've lost a surprising number of vanillas, so it's likely that there are some power roles out there. "(From what we know, it seems logical it would wait the longest possible time before joining the scum boards, but there's probably a lot we don't know.)" "What we know" is ambiguous at best. I made that speculation as to the nature and tradeoff for "activation", but it's a long way from established. But you seem to be saying that it's true.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 13, 2007 1:57:08 GMT -5
Day 4.163 Tragic (underlining added)
Tragic, you used my "kassia's Night actions" idea as part of your vote justification for kassia. Everyone else has dismissed it as the words of a raving lunatic - why are you happy to accept it?
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 5:17:54 GMT -5
My biggest WIFOM at the moment is trying to remember that the Firefly scum are not necessarily scum in this game as well. Although when you start compiling a scum list starting drainbead, Captain Klutz, Cookiesyou do begin to wonder. This list came about because. drainbead is at the top because she is my #1 suspect Then working down the list of players. atarus = unconfirmed mason, so unlikey to be scum. The next two unconfirmed are Captain Klutz and Cookies, so my list at that point read drainbead Captain Klutz CookiesI looked at it and thought " storyteller wouldn't do that, would he? I mean give the Firefly scum another chance to prove how good they were? Surely the role handout was random?"
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 5:24:02 GMT -5
Not sure when Night ends, I'll post this now in case I don't wake up. Finding out zeriel was town forced a major rethink. I've not yet finished, but I have now come up with a brand new scum list (which is radically different to my old list): roosh cookies parzival episodeofblonde tragicTomorrow we will probably be down to 5 scum and 10 townies, so I believe we can afford no more than one mislynch from here on in. We haven't killed scum yet, but there are not actually many places for the scum to hide. And I'm pretty sure that the 5 people on that list are all scum. (And yes, I am feeling confident, but I have to be careful: the last time I got this cocky I got killed.) Some reasoning would be good behind your current scumlist. And if we have 5 scum and 10 townies, we have two more mis-lynches to go before we are stuffed. Day 5 Lynch: 5 scum 9 townies Night 5 Kill: 5 scum 8 townies Day 6 Lynch: 5 scum 7 townies Night 6 Kill: 5 scum 6 townies. But that doesn't include the effects of any power roles.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 5:45:12 GMT -5
Well, I was going to do a load more analysis on everyone, but time is lacking and as I am going to miss the start of Day due to an Xmas party tonight, (and probably my own demise), I am just going to throw out lots of questions for everyone to answer and try and kickstart discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Dec 13, 2007 8:07:29 GMT -5
Some reasoning would be good behind your current scumlist. And if we have 5 scum and 10 townies, we have two more mis-lynches to go before we are stuffed. Day 5 Lynch: 5 scum 9 townies Night 5 Kill: 5 scum 8 townies Day 6 Lynch: 5 scum 7 townies Night 6 Kill: 5 scum 6 townies. But that doesn't include the effects of any power roles. I'm trying to put the reasoning into a presentable state, but it mainly came from a reread and the Day 1 voting. And note that those 5 players never voted for each other (except for one final vote of the day, a throwaway vote on Day 3). No, it's not just the fact that they didn't vote for each other, in my reread those 5 stood out. And Cookies really was only interested in reigniting the Governor debate and gently smudging people (I'm glad we both noticed that). As for the number of mislynches, I am allowing for the possibility that the scum have an "extra" kill up their sleeve. It is certainly possible that we can afford 2 mislynches, but that will be sailing close to the wind. But (IMNSHO) I think we can finish this with no mislynches. Hope we're both around toMorrow... (PS Cat2 - keep asking questions! Lots of them!)
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 13, 2007 8:34:06 GMT -5
(Captain Klutz, N4.43)
Going through D4 after being gone the whole weekend was a process.. not one I ever hope to repeat at that.. and I ended up just keeping a little list of things that popped up in discussion that covered those who were at the top of my suspect list. That piece snuck it's way in likely because I read through D4 once and didn't go back to analyze a second time just due to time constraints. The first time I read the bit about the Night actions I blinked and thought it was a big thing against her. I recall reading things later where there was explination for the knowledge. I simply didn't remove the little bullet point from my analysis later because I'd forgotten about what was going on. I'm sorry if this caused anyone problems, lol, but yesterday was a headache! For me.. and for everyone else too, I imagine.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Dec 13, 2007 8:40:30 GMT -5
FYI - Night will end in about eight hours, at 5:00PM today, unless all Night actions are in before then. However, I may be leaving work early today - we're bracing for an ice storm - so if anyone waits until 5:00PM to send their action I won't be able to start the new Day until I get home, which won't be until fairly late tonight.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 10:00:19 GMT -5
Santo Rugger: If you consider your analysis of kassia's voting patterns to be accurate, what are you thoughts on my analysis of drainbead's voting pattern?
Santo Rugger: "Et Too, Roosh" Explain again please?
Roosh: What is your opinion of episodeofblonde?
Kat v 2.0: Your analysis of the other players is a bit non-existent. Aside from Captain Klutz, who else is pinging your scumdar and why?
episodeofblonde What was so uninspiring about CIAS v.1's defence on Day 1?
episodeofblonde: On Day 3 you voted for Roosh citing his behaviour and spat with sinjin. On Day 4, there is no mention of him and instead you vote Captain Klutz? WHY??
kassia: Considernig her late in the Day vote for you, what are your thoughts on Tragic? Scummy yes/no and why?
More questions for people to answer.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 10:18:42 GMT -5
tragic - What is your opinion of Death By Irony?
zuma v 2.0 - Aside from being really annoying to you yesterday - what other reasons can you fund for voting Roosh?
sinjin: Considering you found Santo Rugger suspicious for his ideas on people voting for Pleonast, do you consider him suspicious for his analysis of kassia's votes?
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 11:14:04 GMT -5
Well, I am all questioned out and I won't be back until Day start so I hope it has been enough to kick the Day off.
My two main suspects for tomorrow are
drainbead: Voting pattern, mysterious roleclaim (then lack of) and general scumminess episodeofblonde: Thread awareness and mysterious vote swapping from Day 3 to Day 4.
That's all folks.
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 13, 2007 11:14:56 GMT -5
tragic - What is your opinion of Death By Irony? How do I feel about DBI? She's not really at the top of my suspect list at present. Maybe because she's been a little inconspicuous lately but so have a lot of people (admittedly I was busy yesterDay too). For the most part I've gotten the impression of a number of fluff posts but nothing completely hurtful to the Town. Seems to be a bit of a bandwagon voter providing little new information to the Town. As such she could either be quite busy or hiding herself in fluff-land as scum. I'm more inclined to think that she's simply busy but I'd hate to write it off. Still there's nothing that just jumps at me for being absolute scumtell.
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Dec 13, 2007 11:23:11 GMT -5
tragic - What is your opinion of Death By Irony? How do I feel about DBI? She's not really at the top of my suspect list at present. Maybe because she's been a little inconspicuous lately but so have a lot of people (admittedly I was busy yesterDay too). For the most part I've gotten the impression of a number of fluff posts but nothing completely hurtful to the Town. Seems to be a bit of a bandwagon voter providing little new information to the Town. As such she could either be quite busy or hiding herself in fluff-land as scum. I'm more inclined to think that she's simply busy but I'd hate to write it off. Still there's nothing that just jumps at me for being absolute scumtell. tragic, it was a subtle hint to give us some analysis of Death By Irony's posts in slightly greater detail. Which ones are scummy, which ones aren't. The reasons for this are that it might alert other people to points they have missed and prompt them to think further. Same goes for everyone else I asked a question of.
|
|
|
Post by Tragic on Dec 13, 2007 11:26:26 GMT -5
Next time smack me over the head and let me know what you want. I'm no good at reading between the lines when it comes to requests I'll get to that once I finish a project for work (or maybe I'll tackle it during the day, depends on timing here, since it's gettin towards the end of work and I'm going out for drinks with my coworkers.. yeah... you get the point, sorry!)
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Dec 13, 2007 13:24:00 GMT -5
That's an interesting spin on my past posts. Yet in this Day Three post I'm in your "Pro-Colonist" column. Would you care to explain the about face? Cookies, how about responding to CIAS2's request? I am not saying that we should all try to get information from storyteller. I am saying that we should discuss it here, throw some ideas around, get people involved and come up with a number of reasonable hypotheses. As you said, atarus was asked to clarify the wording on his PM, he was not requested to ask storyteller for more Nexus-9 information. And I'm happy to note that you did participate briefly. But there is no reason to stop while there is potentially more useful information to gain. Clarification on the wording could potentially provide more Nexus-9 information, and by "more" I mean sufficient justification to rule out some of the many possible interpretations of what atarus' said that his PM said. "Did participate briefly?" Just because I sat down and thought about it and condensed all of my WIFOM into one post instead of sprinkling it around across multiple Days doesn't mean my participation in that conversation was any less significant. Nothing I have seen since making that post has eliminated any of the WIFOM. My viewpoint hasn't changed. If it had changed, I would've clarified it. The last time I repeatedly statedy my unchanging views people found it useful to use as justification to smear me in an anti-town manner. Oh yeah...you're one of those people. Some reasoning would be good behind your current scumlist. And if we have 5 scum and 10 townies, we have two more mis-lynches to go before we are stuffed. Day 5 Lynch: 5 scum 9 townies Night 5 Kill: 5 scum 8 townies Day 6 Lynch: 5 scum 7 townies Night 6 Kill: 5 scum 6 townies. But that doesn't include the effects of any power roles. I'm trying to put the reasoning into a presentable state, but it mainly came from a reread and the Day 1 voting. And note that those 5 players never voted for each other (except for one final vote of the day, a throwaway vote on Day 3). No, it's not just the fact that they didn't vote for each other, in my reread those 5 stood out. And Cookies really was only interested in reigniting the Governor debate and gently smudging people (I'm glad we both noticed that). As for the number of mislynches, I am allowing for the possibility that the scum have an "extra" kill up their sleeve. It is certainly possible that we can afford 2 mislynches, but that will be sailing close to the wind. But (IMNSHO) I think we can finish this with no mislynches. Hope we're both around toMorrow... (PS Cat2 - keep asking questions! Lots of them!) We're talking about my Day 1 activity, right? How can I reignite something that hadn't been lit yet? And what exactly besides "gentle smudging" is possible on Day 1? Regarding Cat's request for analysis on the other players (wrapped in a two-pronged smear accusing me of fixation and lack of analysis) doesn't actually merit much of a response, imho. Considering its smearing delivery and lack of an explanation as to why he trusted me earlier in the game (when I had a voting record that was comparatively more awash in innocent blood, when I was spending more time discussing the Gov role) yet finds me suspicious now (when I've managed to avoid jumping onto two Colonist-killing bandwagons, and have dropped the Gov role conversation)...his sudden focus on me (and Klutz's) strikes me as manipulative. Whether I smell tag-team manipulation or scum encouragement of a townie on the wrong path, I can't quite say yet. All that being said, I will be continuing to read and share my thoughts, just as I have been doing throughout the game.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Dec 13, 2007 15:03:29 GMT -5
Okay, I'm gonna do a bit of analysis before Dawn just in case I die an untimely death in a few hours.
As I stated in a post in Day Four, I've been specifically looking at the Day that Pleonast was lynched, and dividing people into two groups: Those who voted for Pleonast, and those who didn't. I think there's at least one scum in each group, as I don't believe every single scum would pile onto Pleonast. (You're free to disagree with me on this point.) The group who didn't vote for Pleonast is smaller, so I'm going with the analysis of them.
One of the main reasons I'm using this Day's voting for analysis is because it's the only Day so far where everybody voted.
NAF, Pleonast, and zeriel are all now dead and town. I know I'm town, so I'm Xing myself off as well, that leaves 5 people:
Cookies Death By Irony episodeofblonde Parzival Tragic
So I decided to put together all 5's voting patterns through the first four Days and do a bit of analysis on that...turns out, something really interesting turned up.
Cookies (zuma, Diomedes, Death By Irony, drainbead) Death By Irony (zuma, Diomedes, Roosh, drainbead) episodeofblonde (CatinaSuit, Diomedes, Roosh, Klutz) Parzival (Kat, Diomedes, Zeriel, Zeriel) Tragic (No Vote, Diomedes, Zeriel, kassia)
All 5 of them voted for Diomedes the previous Day to be lynched. And hell, if you include me that's 6 of the 8 voters for Diomedes NOT voting for Pleonast! Who were the 2 people that voted for both Diomedes and Pleonast? Drainbead and kassia. I'll be damned if there isn't something in this pattern that gives away who a scum or two might be, but right now it's giving me the Magic Eye treatment. I know there's a picture in there somewhere, but all I can see are fuzzy colors. That's why I'm posting this, in hopes somebody can put the pieces together.
Now, patterns within the five's voting. In addition to all voting for Diomedes....Cookies and Death By Irony both voted for zuma on Day 1, and both voted for drainbead on Day 4. Would two scum vote for the same people three out of four Days? Methinks not (YMMV) so I do not think both Cookies and DBI are scum. One might be, but not the other. Something weird to think about? The one Day Cookies and DBI didn't vote the same....Cookies was voting FOR DBI. Hmmmmmm. DBI, however, was still voting with somebody else, as she and episodeofblonde both voted for Roosh.
In my opinion, at least one of Cookies, DBI, and episodeofblonde are scum, but all three are not scum. If there are two scum in this group of three, episodeofblonde is definitely scum as I don't believe both Cookies and DBI are both scum. If there is only one scum, it could be any of those three. I'm not ruling out that DBI and Cookies could both be townies on the same scum-hunting wavelength.
The vote on drainbead is the most telling, though. For if drainbead IS scum, I would think DBI is the most scummy looking. Her vote for drainbead came near the end, when zeriel had a good amount of votes already. It could have been a random vote tossed to a scum buddy that she knew wouldn't matter, then later if drainbead turned up scum she could go "see? I voted her!" I was initially suspicious of Cookies voting for DBI, then going back to voting the same as her the next Day, until I remembered that DBI's vote came AFTER Cookies', and so I threw that suspicion out the window.
Now, Capt. Klutz...I think your scum list is full of utter crud. You listed:
You're telling me that 9 out of the 10 votes on Pleonast to lynch him were misguided townies? Fine, it's plausible, sure. But really? Really?
What I want to know is why, out of all the non-Pleonast voters on Day 3, DBI is the only one you don't think is scum? Furthermore, you voted for DBI both on Day 2 AND Day 3, before a late-in-the-day switch to Pleonast? What suddenly changed your mind about her?
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Dec 13, 2007 15:32:42 GMT -5
"(From what we know, it seems logical it would wait the longest possible time before joining the scum boards, but there's probably a lot we don't know.)" "What we know" is ambiguous at best. I made that speculation as to the nature and tradeoff for "activation", but it's a long way from established. But you seem to be saying that it's true. I don't know how you get me either seeming to or actually "saying it's true" out of 'It seems logical from what we know". But at this point I've realized the discussion of the Nexus-9 probably is fruitless. The focus heading into the Day should rightly be on suspicious people, and it looks to be where it's headed. I did realize one thing about Night strategy - the scum can (presumably) talk at Night, so some of the discussion at Night could be coordinated. Don't know if that's come into play yet, but it might.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Parzival on Dec 13, 2007 15:38:51 GMT -5
I made a summary of how each individual voter voted each Day. A * after the name means the person was lynched that Day. A # indicates the person died that Night.
If I have anyone's record wrong, let me know. I'll probably repost this in the Day thread assuming I'm alive.
confirmed by death zuma - Vanilla Colonist - kassia Diomedes - Vanilla Colonist - Pleo, self* CatinaSuit - Vanilla Colonist - zeriel hockey monkey - Vanilla Colonist - CatinaSuit(v.1)# mhaye - Vanilla Colonist - zeriel zeriel - Vanilla Colonist - zuma(v.1)*, DNV, sinjin, sinjin Kat- The Neuromancer - Pleo Pleonast - Rick Deckard, the Blade Runner - Kat(v.1)#, kassia, kassia NAF1138 - The Creator - CatinaSuit(v.1)#, kassia, sinjin
semi-confirmed Santo Rugger - Pleo, Pleo, Pleo*, zeriel* atarus - mhaye, Dio*, .BI, zeriel*
Voted at least once for the same person kassia - Pleo, Dio*, Pleo*, zeriel* diggitcamara - Pleo, Pleo, Pleo*, DNV Roosh - Pleo, Pleo, Pleo*, zeriel* Captain Klutz - zeriel, .BI, Pleo*, zeriel* sinjin - zuma*, Pleo, Pleo*, zeriel* Parzival - Kat(v.1)#, Dio*, zeriel, zeriel* zuma Version 2.0 (Blaster Master) - (DNV), Pleo, Pleo*, Roosh
Voted somebody different each Day CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies - zuma*, Dio*, .BI, drainb Death by Irony - zuma*, Dio*, Roosh, drainb drainbead - CIAS(v.1)#, Dio*, Pleo*, kassia episodeofblonde - CIAS(v.1)#, Dio*, Roosh, Capt. K CatinaSuit v. 2.0 (Hal Briston) - (NAF), (DNV), Pleo*, drainb Kat (Yattara) - (zuma)*, (DNV), Pleo*, Capt. K Tragic (hazelnutcoffee) - (DNV), Dio*, zeriel, kassia
People who have been voted for (end of Day votes only):
0 - zuma Version 2.0 (Blaster Master) diggitcamara Parzival atarus Santo Rugger
CatinaSuit v. 2.0 (Hal Briston)* CometotheDarkSideWeHaveCookies* episodeofblonde* Kat v. 2.0 (Yattara)* Tragic (hazelnutcoffee)*
People who have received votes, by Day : 0/0/0/2 - Captain Klutz 0/1/2/0 - Death by Irony 0/0/0/3 - drainbead 1/2/1/2 - kassia 0/0/2/1 - Roosh 0/0/2/1 - sinjin
|
|