|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:13:14 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 22:13:14 GMT -5
I can't be the only person getting zuma vibes here.
Where's your vote for Top Dog, seriously.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:13:28 GMT -5
Post by roxis on Feb 3, 2009 22:13:28 GMT -5
Happy now roxis? Very much so, yes. Seeeeeee, I knew you'd vote if I prompted you! ;D 'course, I'm not going to unvote you just yet, because a) it would make my votes incomplete, and b) I don't know who else to vote for at the moment. Side note: Can I punch Ed?
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:15:06 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 3, 2009 22:15:06 GMT -5
Happy now roxis? Very much so, yes. Seeeeeee, I knew you'd vote if I prompted you! ;D 'course, I'm not going to unvote you just yet, because a) it would make my votes incomplete, and b) I don't know who else to vote for at the moment. Side note: Can I punch Ed? There is nothing in the rules against posting an unusually large number of times. There is also nothing in the rules about punching. Roxis, be my guest.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:16:27 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 22:16:27 GMT -5
There is also nothing in the rules about punching. Roxis, be my guest. Dude, a mod-approved beatdown! Sweet. I'll get the popcorn.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:17:51 GMT -5
Post by sinjin on Feb 3, 2009 22:17:51 GMT -5
Is there an ignore feature on this board? This is getting seriously obnoxious.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:18:31 GMT -5
Post by roxis on Feb 3, 2009 22:18:31 GMT -5
Good, because don't the Smash Bros. uh, punch? So I think a nice punch to Ed's face would fit rather nicely with the theme of this game. I can't be the only person getting zuma vibes here. Where's your vote for Top Dog, seriously. Elaborateeee.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:24:21 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 22:24:21 GMT -5
I can't be the only person getting zuma vibes here. Where's your vote for Top Dog, seriously. Elaborateeee. Long story short, in an early game on the Dope, there was a gambit where two scum (Idle Thoughts and zuma) pretended to be masons and counterclaimed the real masons. They lynched Idle and thought he was scum. So the next Day, zuma posted nothing put nonsense and voted for everybody in the game (and I think some people not in the game). He also voted for Top Dog. ...it's all in the wiki in FCOD's profile/signature/whatever I think.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 22:27:40 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 22:27:40 GMT -5
Long story short, in an early game on the Dope, there was a gambit where two scum (Idle Thoughts and zuma) pretended to be masons and counterclaimed the real masons. They lynched Idle and thought he was scum. So the next Day, zuma posted nothing put nonsense and voted for everybody in the game (and I think some people not in the game). He also voted for Top Dog. ...it's all in the wiki in FCOD's profile/signature/whatever I think. That should say "They lynched Idle and found out he was scum." And should also include the caveat that it was obvious zuma was also scum and dead meat the next Day. In addition, I'd just like to point out I tried to search the Conspiracy thread on the Dope for "Top Dog" to find the exact page and got this result: Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms. The following words are either very common, too long, or too short and were not included in your search : Top, Dog
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:11:49 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 3, 2009 23:11:49 GMT -5
If ed starts singing the ABC song, I quit.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:43:58 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 23:43:58 GMT -5
You just had to give him ideas.
This is a shameless fluff post so my next post will be at the top of the page and not drowned in Ed.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:46:29 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 3, 2009 23:46:29 GMT -5
Here's my readthrough. Bolded stuff is what I consider key. ------------------------ Okay, so at Post #327, zeriel throws out the mason grenade. Condemns miteymouse. Ed backs him up immediately in post #328. KidV votes MiteyMouse, Zeriel, Ed in #332. Notably, he gives no reasons, just "order of suspicion."Kat votes MiteyMouse in #333 based on the magic bagging she is accused of by the other two. Then votes aubby, molefan. Parzival votes for three non-masons in #339. Mentions there's something fishy about the masons but stays clear of voting them. Molefan votes MiteyMouse, Special Ed, Zeriel in #341. His reasons are (I assume, as his post is fairly randomish) MiteyMouse not wanting the info made public, Special Ed and his dubious logic in "bus"ing Roxis, and...zeriel being evil? Or something. Mitey votes for Zeriel, Ed, herself in #357. She says she initially thought Ed was scum, but is more convinced zeriel is because he seems to be sitting back and watching Ed and her duke it out on the mason boards. Mitey reveals her PM in #364. zeriel shows his in #367. Aubby comes in at #369 and votes Zeriel, Mitey, Koldanar. Notably, she is the first person to vote for Zeriel as #1 aside from Mitey. Her reasoning is that he came out without the support of his fellow masons. She also (as has been stated before) doesn't vote for Ed, but she says Ed concerns her because he doesn't confirm or deny anything except he's a Mason. Then says her concern is probably wrong because he is usually more likely to elaborate if he's scum. Also notably, does not give any particular reason for voting Mitey. Hal notes mason in Mitey's PM vs. Town mason in zeriel's in #377. In #379, he votes zeriel, Mitey, Ed, saying he thinks zeriel added "Town" and thinks zeriel was trying to gain townie cred by outing the mason's secret. Brokentree votes zeriel, miteymouse, Mr. Ed in #385. Gives no reason for her order whatsoever.KidV in #386 changes his order to Zeriel, Ed, Mitey because he likes that Mitey had no fear whatsoever in revealing her role PM. misterblockey in #398 votes zeriel, Ed, mitey. Says he thinks the unilateral decision by zeriel was a scum trying to maximize confusion. Metagames mitey wouldn't have an investigative role as scum. ---- At this point I'm stopping because the goal of my reread was to look at the early votes that started the zeriel bandwagon and I think after this point it gets to be...well, not early votes and the bandwagon is already started. ---- After this read-through, I'm very suspicious of aubby as not only is she the first to vote for zeriel besides Mitey, but she lists concerns of Ed then hand-waves them away. I'm also very suspicious of brokentree for voting for the three masons (zeriel first, Ed last) but not specifying any reason why for her particular order. I'm slightly suspicious of KidV for initially just jumping on the MiteyMouse train and putting Ed last without giving a concrete reason. Changing his vote and shuffling Mitey to last with a reason is good, but he still doesn't clarify why zeriel's ahead of Ed when he votes. Molefan's vote just confuses me. I think he was trying to give reasons in a roundabout way but I could be wrong. Anybody want to give me a little help here? Here's molefan's post: On a completely different subject: so Zeriel claims one of the masons is scum. Leaving us with a 1/3 chance of hitting scum by voting either the person who, according to Zeriel (although like Hoopy I'd like some more details here) didn't want that revalation made public, the person who's been accused of using some pretty dubious logic to try and "bus" Roxis, and the most overtly evil-seeming man on the face of the planet (TM). Well, a 1/3 shot is very likely to be statistically better than 5/24 or whatever the chances are of hitting scum / malicious PFKs in this game. That's not the whole post, but the rest is basically his vote, which I mentioned the order in the above summary. Kat, Hal, and blockey's posts don't strike me as particularly scummy. Kat's post is well thought out. Hal's is short, but it doesn't jump out to me as an opportunistic scum one. Misterblockey's post has a sense of logic to it as well. So with that settled, I'm going to go ahead and 3. Vote brokentreewhile I'm thinking about it.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 3, 2009 23:48:24 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 3, 2009 23:48:24 GMT -5
Ok. This has transcended absurd even based on my loose guidelines. I've cut the narcotics by half and have increased the cerveza by double and it is still all a blur.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 0:07:40 GMT -5
Post by Pollux Oil on Feb 4, 2009 0:07:40 GMT -5
Do you really expect anyone to read all that? You know, I don't think I would have even noticed how much you FUBAR'd my quoted post if you hadn't changed yourself to Lord Master Supreme. Nice work.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 0:14:58 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 4, 2009 0:14:58 GMT -5
Here's my readthrough. Bolded stuff is what I consider key. ------------------------ Okay, so at Post #327, mitey throws out the mason grenade. Condemns zeriel. Lord Master Supreme backs him up immediately in post #328. Roxis votes Zeriel, Mitey, Lord Master Supreme in #332. Notably, he gives no reasons, just "order of suspicion."Brokentree votes Zeriel in #333 based on the magic bagging she is accused of by the other two. Then votes natlaw, Hal. Parzival votes for three non-masons in #339. Mentions there's something fishy about the masons but stays clear of voting them. Hal votes Zeriel, Special Lord Master Supreme, Mitey in #341. His reasons are (I assume, as his post is fairly randomish) Zeriel not wanting the info made public, Special Lord Master Supreme and his dubious logic in "bus"ing KidV, and...mitey being evil? Or something. Zeriel votes for Mitey, Lord Master Supreme, herself in #357. She says she initially thought Lord Master Supreme was scum, but is more convinced mitey is because he seems to be sitting back and watching Lord Master Supreme and her duke it out on the mason boards. Zeriel reveals her PM in #364. mitey shows his in #367. Natlaw comes in at #369 and votes Mitey, Zeriel, Koldanar. Notably, she is the first person to vote for Mitey as #1 aside from Zeriel. Her reasoning is that he came out without the support of his fellow masons. She also (as has been stated before) doesn't vote for Lord Master Supreme, but she says Lord Master Supreme concerns her because he doesn't confirm or deny anything except he's a Mason. Then says her concern is probably wrong because he is usually more likely to elaborate if he's scum. Also notably, does not give any particular reason for voting Zeriel. KAT notes mason in Zeriel's PM vs. Town mason in mitey's in #377. In #379, he votes mitey, Zeriel, Lord Master Supreme, saying he thinks mitey added "Town" and thinks mitey was trying to gain townie cred by outing the mason's secret. Blockey votes mitey, zeriel, Mr. Lord Master Supreme in #385. Gives no reason for her order whatsoever.Roxis in #386 changes his order to Mitey, Lord Master Supreme, Zeriel because he likes that Zeriel had no fear whatsoever in revealing her role PM. captain sunshine in #398 votes mitey, Lord Master Supreme, zeriel. Says he thinks the unilateral decision by mitey was a scum trying to maximize confusion. Metagames zeriel wouldn't have an investigative role as scum. ---- At this point I'm stopping because the goal of my reread was to look at the early votes that started the mitey bandwagon and I think after this point it gets to be...well, not early votes and the bandwagon is already started. ---- After this read-through, I'm very suspicious of natlaw as not only is she the first to vote for mitey besides Zeriel, but she lists concerns of Lord Master Supreme then hand-waves them away. I'm also very suspicious of blockey for voting for the three masons (mitey first, Lord Master Supreme last) but not specifying any reason why for her particular order. I'm slightly suspicious of Roxis for initially just jumping on the Zeriel train and putting Lord Master Supreme last without giving a concrete reason. Changing his vote and shuffling Zeriel to last with a reason is good, but he still doesn't clarify why mitey's ahead of Lord Master Supreme when he votes. Hal's vote just confuses me. I think he was trying to give reasons in a roundabout way but I could be wrong. Anybody want to give me a little help here? Here's Hal's post: That's not the whole post, but the rest is basically his vote, which I mentioned the order in the above summary. Brokentree, KAT, and sunshine's posts don't strike me as particularly scummy. Brokentree's post is well thought out. KAT's is short, but it doesn't jump out to me as an opportunistic scum one. Captain sunshine's post has a sense of logic to it as well. So with that settled, I'm going to go ahead and 3. Vote blockeywhile I'm thinking about it. Do you really expect anyone to read all that? Alright, this one needs a warning. While it has occasionally skirted close, this is not a gastardly game. As such, quote tags are sacred (assuming the stuff inside is publicly accessible, obviously) and are NOT TO BE MESSED WITH. You can add tags or remove them for clarity, but that's it. Despite the humor easily derived from your post, it is still un-allowed, so don't do it again.
|
|
Parzival
Mome Rath
Let's all strive to do our best today![on:forgot to log out][of:forgot to log in]
Posts: 201
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 1:11:58 GMT -5
Post by Parzival on Feb 4, 2009 1:11:58 GMT -5
Actually, Señor P.'s post included one thing I had wanted to comment on but couldn't find. I found misterblockey's statement to the effect of "if scum have a mole, why would that mole be an investigator" to be odd. I see no reason to assume that the scum mason would have a power, and in fact expect them to, you know, lie. It's what they do. It has a faint whiff of outside information, but not enough for a vote.
(The way things have played out it wouldn't be a surprise if Mr. Special Dead has a power, though.)
vote 1. Mr. Special Ed
I know he wants us to cut the day short but I'm holding out hope for at least a little more discussion before it happens.
Aubby's behavior yesterday and today has been pinging me. She seems a little like she hasn't said much of real value but is posting enough to stay above lurker level.
2. Aubby
Let me preface my third vote by saying this is a #3 vote on a day when there's only one possible lynch candidate - about as little weight behind as there can be.
I looked back at the very start of the game to see if there were people who made early comments, on the guess that scum might be found there. My suspicion is that some scum would feel semi-confident about posting early, knowing that they have friends who can help them steer the conversation later in the day.
Mr. Special Ed was actually first to chime in, interestingly enough, but he didn't say much.
After the early purple votes were out of the way, I got the following impressions:
sachertorte had some comments early on and came in with advice for the town. This could have come from scum trying to establish trust. However, he was fairly consistent in the way he acted later in the day.
MHaye made some opening statements and discussed strategic voting some. Later in the day he didn't do much, other than votes on the Masons. There was, however, at least one post analyzing other players. Still, there's something that makes me want to keep an eye on him.
Kat had an early question about trophifying. This pings me a tiny bit (someone who knows more about it than we do would prefer to get mod-answers to avoid slips).
3. MHaye
More of a FOS vote than anything at this point.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 6:12:28 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 4, 2009 6:12:28 GMT -5
Ok. Here's my take on things as they currently stand.
LaLaLaLa, I can't hear you.
FCOL this is about as entertaining as a really long SCTV sketch.
Sheepdoodle (no offense Hal).
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 7:33:33 GMT -5
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Feb 4, 2009 7:33:33 GMT -5
Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms. The following words are either very common, too long, or too short and were not included in your search : Top, Dog Yeah, SD will not search for words shorter than 4 letters. I think it's a default setting in VBulletin.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 7:37:18 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 4, 2009 7:37:18 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | crazypunker | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | | Hal Briston | Mr. Special Ed | | | Hoopy Frood | | shaggy | Aubby | Kat | Mr. Special Ed | | | Natlaw | Mr. Special Ed | | | misterblocky | Mr. Special Ed | | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | Nanook | KidVermicious | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Aubby | Nanook | Parzival | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Merestil Haye | peekercpa | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Natlaw | Pollux Oil | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | | roxis | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Pollux Oil | Rysto | Mr. Special Ed | | | shaggy | Mr. Special Ed | sinjin | Hoopy Frood | sinjin | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Mr. Special Ed | 39 (15) | crazypunker, Hal Briston, Kat, Natlaw, misterblocky, molefan, Parzival, peekercpa, Pollux Oil, roxis, Rysto, shaggy, sinjin | | | shaggy | 11 (5) | Mr. Special Ed | crazypunker, Hoopy Frood, peekercpa, sinjin | | Aubby | 9 (6) | | Mr. Special Ed, Parzival, Pollux Oil, roxis | Hoopy Frood | Nanook | 3 (3) | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | brokentree | 3 (3) | | | | sinjin | 2 (2) | | shaggy | | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | shaggy | Pollux Oil | 1 (1) | | | roxis | KidVermicious | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Merestil Haye | 1 (1) | | | Parzival | Natlaw | 1 (1) | | | peekercpa |
Not Voting: brokentree, Aubby, KidVermicious, Merestil Haye, Nanook, TDPatriots
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 8:10:37 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 4, 2009 8:10:37 GMT -5
We're only halfway done with the day, though.
(na-na)
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 8:35:02 GMT -5
Post by peekercpa on Feb 4, 2009 8:35:02 GMT -5
Gd, pede no encouragement. Does anyone have a pair of tongs so that we can rip his tounge out.
Seriously, I have been skimming (null tell at this time). But if Regis gives me phone a friend Ed gets on the list for random shit.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 9:58:03 GMT -5
Post by Hal Briston on Feb 4, 2009 9:58:03 GMT -5
Geez 'n crackers...I come in and see five new pages. "Five new pages overnight!", I think, "There must've been a major development!" Yeah....that, or Ed apparently downed a full bottle of blatherjuice. I was going to reply to Hal but there was no appropriate sheep opening. Must have already been taken. Just one nightkill opportunity...that's all I ask for. Just one...whaddaya say, mods?
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 10:39:53 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Feb 4, 2009 10:39:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:29:50 GMT -5
Post by brokentree on Feb 4, 2009 12:29:50 GMT -5
Ed is trying soooo hard to end this DAY early...I hope it's ok for everyone to just skim through his posts!!!
On a scale from 1-10 ...would one be good or bad?
On my not giving reasons for my votes...At the time it was generally understood that we were going after the mason votes..I felt the fight to be mainly between Zeriel and Mighty Mouse Between the two of them..I felt as though Mighty was less likely to be scum. Not very good reasons. And obviously wrong reasons. That being said...I need to go back and see for myself what influenced my vote.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 12:40:55 GMT -5
Post by KidVermicious on Feb 4, 2009 12:40:55 GMT -5
Izzit getting to be about that time?
1. Mr Special Ed 2. Aubby 3.
My reasons for one and two should be obvious at this point. I'm tempted to place molefan number three (and OMGUS be damned), but ... he could be Town. Plus, I don't wanna complete my vote yet.
So he's on my shortlist. I'm still nervous about Hoopy and Peeker for their Day One votes of Nanook (it just seemed so opportunistic), and I'm not seeing a whole lot else to go on. I can't decide whether Shaggy is scummy or confused. The Sachertorte/Roxis exchange was interesting, but I don't think it led anywhere conclusive.
Somebody (besides Ed) do something really scummy, willya?
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 13:41:58 GMT -5
Post by aubby on Feb 4, 2009 13:41:58 GMT -5
Well christ in a handcart. That's how Ed acts when he's scum. He's just not usually so obvious about it.
I can't vote so...
FOS on Nanook. Where is he? He's posted once today to complain that people weren't talking enough. He also voted Ed #2 yesterday.
Parvizal, as to my would throw a FOS... I can't vote. FOS is all I've got right now, but I do appreciate the fact that you and molefan actually READ my thoughts when I feel I have some worth sharing.
If there were an unFOS, I would do so because after reading over the whole Sinjin - Parvizal interaction again, Sinjin just pings the heck out me. Thinking SCUM usually keep quiet is too much a stereotype for Sinjin to fit into from what I've head about other games with her.
Roxis states she's jumping on the bandwagon. Probably a null tell, but that's mostly what SCUM do. Look to see who else is being voted and go with it.
Yeah, I'm implicating myself from my behavior yesterday changing votes at the end to Mr Ed from Mitey. But honestly, I've given my reasons a number of times now and have been told that I can't expect people to believe that. So if you choose to believe it was SCUM rather than just someone being confused and trying to get into the game, then that's fine by me.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 14:44:38 GMT -5
Post by Nanook on Feb 4, 2009 14:44:38 GMT -5
Really? I make fairly decent sized post, with a bunch of different observations and comments and THAT'S what you take out of it? Especially since what you said is completely inaccurate. I didn't complain, I observed something that happens in just about every single game. But hey, let's go after Nanook! He's always fun to attack. Exactly what I would expect from scum, go after the easy target.
Regardless of what Ed's motive is, and I think it's obvious what he's attempting to do, he's certainly succeeded in drowning everyone else out. This thread is nearly unreadable at this point. I'm ready to just move on.
1 Vote Ed 2 Vote Aubby 3 Vote Shaggy[/color]
1 is obvious I would hope. Aubby has moved up a notch due to her ignoring my actual post in favor of a cheap, inaccurate smudge. Shaggy is 3 for the reasons I outlined earlier.
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 14:57:22 GMT -5
Post by The Real FCOD on Feb 4, 2009 14:57:22 GMT -5
Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | crazypunker | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | | Hal Briston | Mr. Special Ed | | | Hoopy Frood | | shaggy | Aubby | Kat | Mr. Special Ed | | | KidVermicious | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | | Natlaw | Mr. Special Ed | | | misterblocky | Mr. Special Ed | | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | Nanook | KidVermicious | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Aubby | Nanook | Nanook | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | shaggy | Parzival | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Merestil Haye | peekercpa | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Natlaw | Pollux Oil | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | | roxis | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Pollux Oil | Rysto | Mr. Special Ed | | | shaggy | Mr. Special Ed | sinjin | Hoopy Frood | sinjin | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Mr. Special Ed | 45 (18) | crazypunker, Hal Briston, Kat, KidVermicious, Natlaw, misterblocky, molefan, Nanook, Parzival, peekercpa, Pollux Oil, roxis, Rysto, shaggy, sinjin | | | Aubby | 13 (8) | | KidVermicious, Mr. Special Ed, Nanook, Parzival, Pollux Oil, roxis | Hoopy Frood | shaggy | 12 (6) | Mr. Special Ed | crazypunker, Hoopy Frood, peekercpa, sinjin | Nanook | brokentree | 3 (3) | | | | Nanook | 3 (3) | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | sinjin | 2 (2) | | shaggy | | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | shaggy | Pollux Oil | 1 (1) | | | roxis | KidVermicious | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Merestil Haye | 1 (1) | | | Parzival | Natlaw | 1 (1) | | | peekercpa |
Not Voting: brokentree, Aubby, Merestil Haye, TDPatriots --FCOD
|
|
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 15:07:58 GMT -5
Post by roxis on Feb 4, 2009 15:07:58 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure Pollux Oil voted brokentree third...not that you'd be able to find it in Ed's sea of shit.
|
|
Trepa Mayfield
FGM
Does Not Follow Directions
The only kind of panda worth preserving.
Posts: 989
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 15:23:23 GMT -5
Post by Trepa Mayfield on Feb 4, 2009 15:23:23 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure Pollux Oil voted brokentree third...not that you'd be able to find it in Ed's sea of shit. Whoops, missed that. Votes: Player | Vote 1 | Vote 2 | Vote 3 | crazypunker | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | | Hal Briston | Mr. Special Ed | | | Hoopy Frood | | shaggy | Aubby | Kat | Mr. Special Ed | | | KidVermicious | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | | Natlaw | Mr. Special Ed | | | misterblocky | Mr. Special Ed | | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | Nanook | KidVermicious | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Aubby | Nanook | Nanook | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | shaggy | Parzival | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Merestil Haye | peekercpa | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | Natlaw | Pollux Oil | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | brokentree | roxis | Mr. Special Ed | Aubby | Pollux Oil | Rysto | Mr. Special Ed | | | shaggy | Mr. Special Ed | sinjin | Hoopy Frood | sinjin | Mr. Special Ed | shaggy | |
Totals: Votee | Total | Voters (#1) | Voters (#2) | Voters (#3) | Mr. Special Ed | 45 (21) | crazypunker, Hal Briston, Kat, KidVermicious, Natlaw, misterblocky, molefan, Nanook, Parzival, peekercpa, Pollux Oil, roxis, Rysto, shaggy, sinjin | | | Aubby | 13 (10) | | KidVermicious, Mr. Special Ed, Nanook, Parzival, Pollux Oil, roxis | Hoopy Frood | shaggy | 12 (6) | Mr. Special Ed | crazypunker, Hoopy Frood, peekercpa, sinjin | Nanook | brokentree | 4 (4) | | | Pollux Oil | Nanook | 3 (3) | | molefan | Mr. Special Ed | sinjin | 2 (2) | | shaggy | | Hoopy Frood | 1 (1) | | | shaggy | Pollux Oil | 1 (1) | | | roxis | KidVermicious | 1 (1) | | | molefan | Merestil Haye | 1 (1) | | | Parzival | Natlaw | 1 (1) | | | peekercpa |
Not Voting: brokentree, Aubby, Merestil Haye, TDPatriots
|
|
Natlaw
Snark
Natlaw is a Modron short and stout.
Posts: 740
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Day 2
Feb 4, 2009 15:36:54 GMT -5
Post by Natlaw on Feb 4, 2009 15:36:54 GMT -5
3. Vote chucara (isn't that who replaced fria comida)shaggy for voting someone who did the same thing he did. chucara for being a replacement that has not posted. Little bit of a nudge, my friend. Others already pointed it out, but hi there peeker! Your posts don't seem half as cryptic as in Evil Dead, so maybe you need to step it up a notch . Mr. Special Ed is obviously trying to outdo you and failing, but shaggys attempts are much better. Where I reread your posts because I might miss some clue, with shaggy my eyes just follow the grammar when he throws it out of the window . Anyway, back to the game: I see Senor Pants did the same, but my reason to look at the early votes was specifically to those who voted without waiting for MiteyMouse to speak up. Well. Ok. Unvote 1. Mitey Mouse 2. Zeriel 3. Special EdIn order of suspicion. Question for all three of you, does your PM indicate whether or not your Scum-Mason is in communication with the other Scum? KidVermicious is the first to do it, basing his suspicion on I assume just what Zeriel and special ed posted. His previous votes were for Hoopy/peeker/Parzival, of the first two he is still suspicious Today: I'm still nervous about Hoopy and Peeker for their Day One votes of Nanook (it just seemed so opportunistic), and I'm not seeing a whole lot else to go on. If I remember correctly they basically put in a preemptive lynch the lurker vote for Nanook. I agree that is a safe vote Day One, but then a vote the LTL voters is as well (the solution is that the lurkers post more ). 1) MiteyMouse Based on Ed’s and zeriel’s posts (I had to redo my voting list thanks to the two of you ). I don’t want to vote for all 3 masons, so I’ll go with the one that the other two agree has done some suspicious-sounding magic bagging. I’d advise that Mitey give her opinion on which of the other two she thinks is more suspicious, for possible Vig/Detective players to consider when planning Night 1 Actions, and for everyone to consider for tomorrow, if Mitey gets lynched and isn’t the scum. Kat also votes before Mitey posts, but does want to hear more from her. The vigilante/detective suggestion I don't think a scum would have brought up, because it would (and did) free up a lynch dealing with the masons situation. On a completely different subject: so Zeriel claims one of the masons is scum. Leaving us with a 1/3 chance of hitting scum by voting either the person who, according to Zeriel (although like Hoopy I'd like some more details here) didn't want that revalation made public, the person who's been accused of using some pretty dubious logic to try and "bus" Roxis, and the most overtly evil-seeming man on the face of the planet (TM). Well, a 1/3 shot is very likely to be statistically better than 5/24 or whatever the chances are of hitting scum / malicious PFKs in this game. Now if only there was some game mechanic that allowed you to vote all three masons at once. OH WAIT - THERE IS! Unvote everything.Vote MiteyMouse (1 - three votes). Vote MrSpecialEd (2 - two votes). Vote Zeriel (3 - one vote). molefan is the last to vote before MM posts, he doesn't give a reason for his ordering, if I read this right. I haven't checked if this is correct, but I didn't see where Special Ed was accused of bussing roxis (as in roxis and ed are both scum). Of the other votes I looked at so far, aubbys was odd as well (suspicion of ed, but no vote while voting the other two), but others have pointed that out as well. I'll need to reread Day Two about that and at the remaining later voters Day one.
|
|