|
Post by Mister Blockey on Apr 3, 2009 20:16:32 GMT -5
As the sun rises the candidates are greeted by another grisly scene.
Seeker (formerly Storyteller) has been decapitated, his head pulverized, along with his candidate stone.
The old man looks satisfied, but not pleased.
It is now Day Five. Day Five will last until 11:59 pm EDT on Monday the 6th.
With 14 people alive 7 votes on one person will start a 12 hour countdown.
|
|
|
Post by Paulwhoisaghost on Apr 3, 2009 20:43:47 GMT -5
Where do the people who are watching post?
|
|
|
Post by The Real FCOD on Apr 3, 2009 20:44:13 GMT -5
Hm, ok.
I will Vote: Boozy for pure OMGUS reasons.
--FCOD
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 3, 2009 21:44:33 GMT -5
Where do the people who are watching post? not here. Don't make us kill you again
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 3, 2009 21:46:44 GMT -5
Hmmm.... So quiet.... Must be hunting wrabbit....
<== passes the green hookah to the right.....
<==passes the pink hookah to the left......
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 3, 2009 21:46:45 GMT -5
Hm, ok. I will Vote: Boozy [/color] for pure OMGUS reasons. --FCOD[/quote] Vote: FCOD Vote: flyingcowofdoom Vote: Dire Aviation Bovine For trying to confuse me with synonyms.
|
|
|
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 3, 2009 21:57:59 GMT -5
VOTE ED
For voting three times.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 3, 2009 22:12:25 GMT -5
We haven't killed any of the 3rd party yet, since they would be exposed on cardflip.
We were wrong about paul. He wasn't 3rd party.
Could sinjin be a Scotsman and not a Scholar protected by the Scholar PC lynch stopping power?
|
|
|
Post by reaperwithnoname on Apr 3, 2009 23:38:55 GMT -5
Vote FCOD
For being voted.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Apr 4, 2009 6:14:44 GMT -5
I was just about to respond to Ed's post in the Aliens game and then realised I was on the wrong board. But then I just realised I haven't done something here either Vote ED ;D Unvote ED We were wrong about paul. He wasn't 3rd party. Did "we" think he was? I guess you could be implying that your clan thought he was third party, or maybe you trying to make it appear that you are part of a clan, when in fact you are the third party? In addition your reply #10 on day 2 pinged me for being too blatant. Oh heck, why not, for that, and for voting three times, I think you are three time voting 3rd party scum mr ed! Vote ED
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Apr 4, 2009 8:04:33 GMT -5
Vote: FCOD
Because OMGUS is a scumtell. ANd there are very, very good chances he's scum.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2009 10:52:28 GMT -5
We were wrong about paul. He wasn't 3rd party. Did "we" think he was? I guess you could be implying that your clan thought he was third party, or maybe you trying to make it appear that you are part of a clan, when in fact you are the third party? That was the whole reason the first and second bandwagons started on paul. Were you not paying attention?
|
|
|
Post by The Real FCOD on Apr 4, 2009 10:53:13 GMT -5
Unvote: Boozy Vote: FCOD because everyone else is.... --FCOD
|
|
|
Post by DorianPhoenix on Apr 4, 2009 11:47:40 GMT -5
UNVOTE ED
Because the bandwagon never started
VOTE Captain Because he was here and didn't vote. Fluffer.
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Apr 4, 2009 12:01:03 GMT -5
That was the whole reason the first and second bandwagons started on paul. Were you not paying attention? There have been so many paul bandwagons on different games as of late, it's obviously his fault for not being more clear on why he is being bandwagon'd at any given time. ;D But yes, it was the reason FCOD used for the first vote on Paul on day 2, tho various folk chipped in other reasons (technically speaking Total cast the first vote on Paul) - and indeed you voted Cookies, and finished the day with your vote on NAF. On day 3, you started the ball rolling on Paul for a reason you couldn't remember - but at the end of the day you had your vote on bufftabbyOn day 4 by Reaper got the ball rolling again Paul being still alive, and you finish the day with your vote on Mitey. The point I was originally trying to make, and indeed, made it somewhat poorly, was that you doesn't appear to have ever expressly stated that you thought Paul was 3rd party, and you have never had your vote on him at the end of the day. Hence my umbridge with " We were wrong about paul. He wasn't 3rd party". Ok, I'll give that you may having been using the Royal "we". But the lack of voting conviction from you towards Paul kinda suggests you knew Paul wasn't 3rd party - maybe you are 3rd party, or maybe you knew the result of an investigation of Paul.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2009 12:43:14 GMT -5
That was the whole reason the first and second bandwagons started on paul. Were you not paying attention? There have been so many paul bandwagons on different games as of late, it's obviously his fault for not being more clear on why he is being bandwagon'd at any given time. ;D But yes, it was the reason FCOD used for the first vote on Paul on day 2, tho various folk chipped in other reasons (technically speaking Total cast the first vote on Paul) - and indeed you voted Cookies, and finished the day with your vote on NAF. But I was the one who suggested at first that we find and vote for 3rd party. Then it was pointed out that paul didn't have information that should have been shared in a thread, leading people to believe he was 3rd party (he may have been novice or guardian though) On day 3, you started the ball rolling on Paul for a reason you couldn't remember - but at the end of the day you had your vote on bufftabbyI may have said I didn't remember, but I remembered. On day 4 by Reaper got the ball rolling again Paul being still alive, and you finish the day with your vote on Mitey. This was a good vote by reaper. I don't like other people who are still alive except for a handful of them. The point I was originally trying to make, and indeed, made it somewhat poorly, was that you doesn't appear to have ever expressly stated that you thought Paul was 3rd party, and you have never had your vote on him at the end of the day. what's an umbridge? OK, I promise not to become spelling nazi, I did give a spelling test yesterday though. Hence my umbridge with " We were wrong about paul. He wasn't 3rd party". Ok, I'll give that you may having been using the Royal "we". But the lack of voting conviction from you towards Paul kinda suggests you knew Paul wasn't 3rd party - maybe you are 3rd party, or maybe you knew the result of an investigation of Paul. you're close here, but maybe I knew the alignment of paul because my spy told me so. Or maybe he's on my team. Can't see how you missed those more logical approaches. Oh, wait, yes, I can see how you'd miss the logical approaches ;D
|
|
|
Post by BillMc on Apr 4, 2009 13:23:13 GMT -5
what's an umbridge? OK, I promise not to become spelling nazi, I did give a spelling test yesterday though. It's how you get across dat there um river :-) Umm, the dictionary on this machine absolutely insists on correcting umbrage to umbridge - ms junk! you're close here, but maybe I knew the alignment of paul because my spy told me so. Or maybe he's on my team. Can't see how you missed those more logical approaches. That's what I said, you knew he wasn't ie your team, or may 3rd party or investigation by the spy.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 4, 2009 14:23:50 GMT -5
That's what I said, you knew he wasn't ie your team, or may 3rd party or investigation by the spy. but how would I know he was 3rd party if I was 3rd party? Do you think there's a 3rd party with investigation powers? I suppose that's possible. Or do you think the 3rd party players are working together?
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 4, 2009 18:37:34 GMT -5
Vote: bill for being a little too townish
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Apr 4, 2009 21:10:03 GMT -5
*bows to gathered clan-folk*
Fellow clanspeople, I bring you tidings that my clan wishes to share freely with you all. It has come to our attention that Mr Special Ed might be, how do I say this, well let's just say: Special. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) Our spy was rudely, yes I say again rudely** treated while trying to sneak an ever so quick peak at Mr Special Ed's clan tattoo. It's not like it's our fault that the clan tattoos are placed in such a, well, um, sensual region of the body. In fact most clanspeople, especially those of the male variety, are rather pleased to show off their clan tats to the curious. This leads us to believe that Mr Special Ed is without a clan tattoo. Do what you will with this information.
**Physically attacked and rendered unable to complete the sneak peak in case you're interested in the dreadful details. No permanent damage seems to have accrued, so bygones.
*bows to gathered clan-folk*
vote Special Ed
Or, we can just play it straight. Vote, Ed we think he's other!
|
|
|
Post by ComeToTheDarkSideWeHaveCookies on Apr 4, 2009 21:41:46 GMT -5
I shall vote for FCOD while we see what Ed has to say.
Vote: FCOD
|
|
|
Post by reaperwithnoname on Apr 5, 2009 0:38:10 GMT -5
My D20 has shown me the way once again!
Unvote Vote Boozy
Because it told me to. Plus, I don't drink, and his name is a threat to my sobriety.
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 5, 2009 0:44:22 GMT -5
*bows to gathered clan-folk* Fellow clanspeople, I bring you tidings that my clan wishes to share freely with you all. It has come to our attention that Mr Special Ed might be, how do I say this, well let's just say: Special. (Not that there's anything wrong with that.) Our spy was rudely, yes I say again rudely** treated while trying to sneak an ever so quick peak at Mr Special Ed's clan tattoo. It's not like it's our fault that the clan tattoos are placed in such a, well, um, sensual region of the body. In fact most clanspeople, especially those of the male variety, are rather pleased to show off their clan tats to the curious. This leads us to believe that Mr Special Ed is without a clan tattoo. Do what you will with this information. **Physically attacked and rendered unable to complete the sneak peak in case you're interested in the dreadful details. No permanent damage seems to have accrued, so bygones. *bows to gathered clan-folk* vote Special EdOr, we can just play it straight. Vote, Ed we think he's other! I've no idea what that means. Perhaps it's because I've received the protection of my guardian, and my guardian treated you so rudely. I do hope that's the case, because I know the identity of my guardian, and, from the rules, they should know if they are guarding their own clan. That, or sinjin is certain of my alignment and hasn't been able to NK me because of said protection. or, sinjinis herself a 3rd party. She DID survive a Day 1 lynching. One of our 3rd party players could b a Scotsman of sorts. It's either that or one faction burned their power the first Day (maybe she's their PC and knew it wouldn't last)
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Apr 5, 2009 1:07:44 GMT -5
Because it told me to. Plus, I don't drink, and his name is a threat to my sobriety. Your not drinking is a threat to my society. D20 Nerd.
|
|
|
Post by Mister Blockey on Apr 5, 2009 2:35:45 GMT -5
Current Vote Count:
FCOD (5): Mr Special Ed, Boozahol Squid, FCOD, Cookies Mr Special Ed (2): BillMC, Sinjin Captain Pinkies (1): Dorianphoenix BillMC (1): Captain Pinkies Boozahol Squid (1): reaperwithnoname
(You guys don't know how lucky you are you got this)
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 5, 2009 11:58:22 GMT -5
Hmmm.... I'm in the mood for a steak!!! Sorry Bill...
Unvote: BILL
Vote: VOTE FCOD Vote:
Smellin' the sweet BBQ...... MOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 5, 2009 12:00:21 GMT -5
Damn..... Someday I will get this..... Vote: FCOD
|
|
|
Post by Captain Pinkies on Apr 5, 2009 12:01:19 GMT -5
ARGGGGG.. Give me my hookah!!!!
Vote: FCOD
|
|
|
Post by special on Apr 5, 2009 13:22:27 GMT -5
Where is roxis?
She still hasn't changed her name back from zeriel. And rugger is still listed as roxis.
Who wants to start a bandwagon on an absent person?
|
|
|
Post by sinjin on Apr 5, 2009 14:50:19 GMT -5
I've no idea what that means. Perhaps it's because I've received the protection of my guardian, and my guardian treated you so rudely. I do hope that's the case, because I know the identity of my guardian, and, from the rules, they should know if they are guarding their own clan. That, or sinjin is certain of my alignment and hasn't been able to NK me because of said protection. or, sinjinis herself a 3rd party. She DID survive a Day 1 lynching. One of our 3rd party players could b a Scotsman of sorts. It's either that or one faction burned their power the first Day (maybe she's their PC and knew it wouldn't last) Grasping at straws Ed? The guardians don't rough up spys. They're docs, they protect you from being NK'd by your rival clan.
|
|