RoOsh
FGM
Former BatMod
[on:Wanna see a magic trick?][of:See You, Space Cowboy....]
Posts: 284
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by RoOsh on Mar 23, 2008 23:02:32 GMT -5
Day Two:
The inmates wake up just before Dawn with a start. Apparently, there's the sound of a fight breaking out in one of the bathrooms. The inmates all rush to try and get a peek inside of the crowded room, but they just see two figures struggling, locked in mortal combat. "Hey! Wait! That's the one that they call sinjin!" cries out a small voice. They can clearly see now sinjin is struggling inside the bathroom with her assailant. Her hands are at her throat, and you can see the shadowy figure has apparently a cord of piano wire strung out, and is attempting to choke the life out of sinjin! Sinjin looks towards the huddled masses watching the struggle take forth. She peers into their eyes- some watching like scared sheep, others steadfast and waiting, and yet others have a bloodthirsty look, and a quiet grin on their faces. Her vision blurs, her strength is leaving... it's now or never! She hurls herself backwards into the wall, cracking it, and feels the figure loosen itself as it grunts in pain. She grabs him and with a roar of pain flings him into the wall, which shatters into pieces! The crowd cheers, and rush into the bathroom to help out sinjin, who is clearly weakened by the fight. They pull her out of the ruined wreckage, and then peer into the other room. But that room is filled with dirt and broken plaster, with no traces of a body. The assailant has vanished away, and suddenly the crowd looks into itself. "Quick, to the main hall!" and the mass of figures all rush into the main room.
After sorting themselves, and taking attendance, one of them gives a yell- a corpse is in the corner! But the rest of the inmates walk over, and mutter- it's merely the unfresh-smelling corpse of Bane from the Day before. The great host of "The Town" arrays itself for another Day as the sun begins to pour its light through the bars of the Asylum. Suddenly, a gruff voice cries out: "Look, it's the Bat!" Everyone turns their heads, and out by the window you can see a figure throw something into the room, and quickly swing off to hide. The inmates all scatter as the object bounces and clangs into the room, rolling to a stop before the feet of NAF. He bends over and examines the canister, reading aloud, "Warning: Bat Shark Repellent." "Bat Shark Repellent? What the hell does that do? Hey, wait guys, where are you all going? Don't run away!" ~FSSSSSHHH!!!~ The canister sprays its contents all over NAF, who begins to cough and gag from the nasty odor.
It is promising to be another strange day in Arkham Aslyum. It is now Day 2. There were No Deaths during the Night. NAF1138 is now resistant to sharks! sinjin survived a Night Kill.
Day 2 will end on Friday, March 28th at 9PM. Good Luck! Dio is once again the Day Mod.
|
|
|
Post by tdpatriots12 on Mar 23, 2008 23:04:25 GMT -5
NAF1138 is now resistant to sharks! WTF? RoOsh is crazy, I swear.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Mar 23, 2008 23:04:41 GMT -5
Please feel free to begin killing yourselves again. You have until 9pm, March 28 to do so.
|
|
Santo Rugger
Mome Rath
The Obviously Innocent Townie
The Rugger formerly known as Pygmy[on:BYAHH!][of:BYAHH?]
Posts: 3
[ Exalt | Smite ]
Karma:
|
Post by Santo Rugger on Mar 23, 2008 23:06:11 GMT -5
Sweet, looks like we've started this game out on the right foot.
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:07:12 GMT -5
Hey, nothing happened last Night? No deaths? I'll take that.
Bat Shark Repellent? I thought that we wanted to stay as far away as we can from the campy 70s version.
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Mar 23, 2008 23:08:43 GMT -5
Hooray for no Night deaths. And uh....just as forewarning, if the Jaws theme starts playing I call dibs on standing next to NAF.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Mar 23, 2008 23:12:36 GMT -5
Bat Shark Repellent? I thought that we wanted to stay as far away as we can from the campy 70s version. Campy 60's version, thank you very much. We used the entire corpus of the Batman world to design this game.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Mar 23, 2008 23:12:45 GMT -5
No deaths is very surprising. Maybe the game won't be as bloody as we thought.
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:13:12 GMT -5
Bat Shark Repellent? I thought that we wanted to stay as far away as we can from the campy 70s version. Campy 60's version, thank you very much. We used the entire corpus of the Batman world to design this game. Sorry, that was a Simpsons quote.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Mar 23, 2008 23:15:17 GMT -5
NAF1138 is now resistant to sharks! WTF? RoOsh is crazy, I swear. yeah :coughs: So I :coughs: had a rough :coughs: night I guess. :coughs: ToDay :coughs: should be :coughs: better :coughs: I hope :coughs:
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Mar 23, 2008 23:15:57 GMT -5
Kat had no abilities mentioned, so presumably she was vanilla scum. If we have vanilla scum then that suggests that the number of scum is higher than normal, around 7 or so (8 scum, a full third of the players, seems too many).
Kat's cover name was Azrael, which wasn't a particularly good Baddie name. We know that the masons are identifiable from their names, so names seem to mean a lot more that I first thought. A general name claim looks like it could be very useful. But are the masons happy to be outed?
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Mar 23, 2008 23:19:43 GMT -5
Kat had no abilities mentioned, so presumably she was vanilla scum. If we have vanilla scum then that suggests that the number of scum is higher than normal, around 7 or so (8 scum, a full third of the players, seems too many). Kat's cover name was Azrael, which wasn't a particularly good Baddie name. We know that the masons are identifiable from their names, so names seem to mean a lot more that I first thought. A general name claim looks like it could be very useful. But are the masons happy to be outed? The :coughs: one big :coughs: thing :coughs::coughs:that I seem :coughs: to have learned :coughs::coughs::coughs: from Kat's death :coughs: is that the Do Gooders :coughs: seem to have ready made :coughs::coughs: disguises available to them. :coughs: :hack::weeze::sigh:
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:21:01 GMT -5
I must admit that I'm unsure about name claims now. The masons would be outed. story apparently has something that he needs to do, and I'd bet a lot that Koldanar died because he had something to contribute(either that, or he was a "take-the-bullet" type of bodyguard). Of course, story can tell us better than I can whether a name claim would hurt or help him.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Klutz on Mar 23, 2008 23:22:07 GMT -5
Koldanar's demise could be due to a number of things:
(1) We have a Day killer (2) Something about his role/abilities backfired (3) The mods choose a random kill each dusk (4) A random player who voted for the lynchee gets killed (5) If we lynch scum then a random townie dies (6) Any other ideas?
(1) is the simplest explanation. Possibly too simple for this game.
(2) looks unlikely. We have been told that Koldanar was a more or less standard bodyguard type. An ability that could kill himself should surely qualify as something that would be sufficiently non-standard to mention.
(3) adds a fairly large chance element to the game.
(4) would make the game almost unplayable. Although we may be able to get around it by making sure we finish with a tie, so that there is no lynch.
(5) is interesting, but again a bit rough on town. Again, maybe we could get around this by always engineering a tie.
I would tend to go for the Day killer explanation, followed by the random kill each dusk. As far as engineering a tie goes, my feeling is that the mods wouldn't allow an easy way to get around a major mechanic, so the "mod kill if tied" would only have a relatively small effect.
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:22:18 GMT -5
Having a spot of trouble with :coughs: Gastard modding there, NAF?
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:24:35 GMT -5
Now, maybe I'm being stupid to assume things here, but it's pretty obvious to me that it's the Joker(and probably others) who's playing for keeps, only instead of Night killing he Day kills, because it fits the flavour better.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Mar 23, 2008 23:24:56 GMT -5
Having a spot of trouble with :coughs: Gastard modding there, NAF? :coughs:Don't know :coughs:what you are :coughs::coughs:talking :coughs:about. :coughs::splutter::hack::hack::curse loudly:
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Mar 23, 2008 23:33:15 GMT -5
Now, maybe I'm being stupid to assume things here, but it's pretty obvious to me that it's the Joker(and probably others) who's playing for keeps, only instead of Night killing he Day kills, because it fits the flavour better. That was my first thought when I saw Koldanar's Death description. But we don't know for certain if the Joker is playing for keeps or if he's just a pro-town, day vigilante. Kat's cover name was Azrael, which wasn't a particularly good Baddie name. We know that the masons are identifiable from their names, so names seem to mean a lot more that I first thought. A general name claim looks like it could be very useful. But are the masons happy to be outed? Well to be fair, we already managed to out a few of the masons already. Unless there's 8 masons or something insane like that, there probably aren't that many left and considering our luck we'll probably out them within the next Day anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Holy Moley! on Mar 23, 2008 23:43:45 GMT -5
Now, maybe I'm being stupid to assume things here, but it's pretty obvious to me that it's the Joker(and probably others) who's playing for keeps, only instead of Night killing he Day kills, because it fits the flavour better. That was my first thought when I saw Koldanar's Death description. But we don't know for certain if the Joker is playing for keeps or if he's just a pro-town, day vigilante. Kat's cover name was Azrael, which wasn't a particularly good Baddie name. We know that the masons are identifiable from their names, so names seem to mean a lot more that I first thought. A general name claim looks like it could be very useful. But are the masons happy to be outed? Well to be fair, we already managed to out a few of the masons already. Unless there's 8 masons or something insane like that, there probably aren't that many left and considering our luck we'll probably out them within the next Day anyway. Well if you guys wouldn't keep trying to lynch us...
|
|
|
Post by Rysto on Mar 23, 2008 23:48:15 GMT -5
A pro-Town Vig would have to be an idiot to have killed Koldenar after he claimed to basically be in some kind of "mason" group with story at the end of the Day.
sinjin's attacker was strangling her with piano wire. That's not the Bat's style -- he abhors killing. So I don't think that her attacker was a Do-Gooder. And I don't think that the Playing For Keeps group gets two kills per Day, either. Now, I suppose that a serial killer is possible, but the wording of the win condition really does say that there are only two scum groups. So I'm thinking that sinjin was targeted by a Vig.
It seems really unfair to the Do-Gooders to not give them a night-kill, though. So I can see a few possibilities here: 1) The Do-Gooders group is much larger than normal to make up for it. 2) NAF is now "disabled" and doesn't count in the Do-Gooder's win condition, and possibly not in the Playing For Keeps win condition either. 3) Hi Opal!
Even if it is #2, this still isn't as a good as a night-kill: NAF can still participate to a degree. It's possible that the Bat's attacks make the target go vanilla, but a Mason doesn't usually have any extra powers so that would seem to be ruled out. This could be to compensate for some other Do Gooders having special powers.
Finally, welcome to our new sub, MHaye. I tried to review everybody else's posts last Night to get a feel for everyone, but obviously I don't know anything about you yet. So please, participate. We've left Kat's corpse in the Great Hall. Pour encourager les autres and all that.
|
|
|
Post by Boozahol Squid, P.I. on Mar 23, 2008 23:50:04 GMT -5
We've left Kat's corpse in the Great Hall. Pour encourager les autres and all that. Please do not consume the corpses until ordered to do so.
|
|
|
Post by NAF1138 on Mar 23, 2008 23:53:23 GMT -5
Now, maybe I'm being stupid to assume things here, but it's pretty obvious to me that it's the Joker(and probably others) who's playing for keeps, only instead of Night killing he Day kills, because it fits the flavour better. That was my first thought when I saw Koldanar's Death description. But we don't know for certain if the Joker is playing for keeps or if he's just a pro-town, day vigilante. :coughs:Why would you think he was a pro town vigilante? Maybe I am alone in this, but I was dead certain that Koldanar was pro town by the end of the Day. :coughs: Why would a pro town Day killer have targeted him? :coughs:Kat's cover name was Azrael, which wasn't a particularly good Baddie name. We know that the masons are identifiable from their names, so names seem to mean a lot more that I first thought. A general name claim looks like it could be very useful. But are the masons happy to be outed? Well to be fair, we already managed to out a few of the masons already. Unless there's 8 masons or something insane like that, there probably aren't that many left and considering our luck we'll probably out them within the next Day anyway. Sounds like gloating to anyone else? For further explination on what I mean by gloating, see page fiveof the forbiden thread about the SDMB game. Or, if you aren't allowed to read that thread, I will quote myself paraphrasing from mafiascum.net (It loses something from lack of context, but you will get the general idea, I am unspoiled for that game, no spoilers of any sort are being posted) :coughs: Big ol nasty FOS on Atarus.:coughs:
|
|
|
Post by Pollux Oil on Mar 24, 2008 0:20:56 GMT -5
:coughs:Why would you think he was a pro town vigilante? Maybe I am alone in this, but I was dead certain that Koldanar was pro town by the end of the Day. :coughs: Why would a pro town Day killer have targeted him? :coughs: Well, for starters Koldanar and storyteller's "peekaboo, I see you!" back-and-forth didn't start until there was only like 5 or 6 hours left in the Day. It's entirely possible a pro-town Vig could have thought Koldanar was suspicious before then and submitted Koldanar as a target, and not have checked back until after the day was over. Furthermore, we know Koldanar was a bodyguard but we don't know if he was a day or a night bodyguard. For all we know, the pro-town Vig could have targetted somebody else, who Koldanar was protecting during the Day. If there's a Daykiller out there, wouldn't it make sense to have somebody able to protect during the Day too? Is this explanation complicated? Sure. Is it plausible? I think so. I know, I know. Occam's razor, simplest explanation, etc. etc. But I've noticed in Mafia games that it's not usually the simplest explanation. Especially in a game where everyone has a power role. Sounds like gloating to anyone else? I can see why you'd think it looks like gloating, but I wasn't. I was trying to make a joke. Similar in vein to this post by Santo Rugger? I even added a nice little emoticon for effect!
|
|
|
Post by CatInASuit on Mar 24, 2008 2:25:04 GMT -5
Good Grief, It's Day 2, I'm still here.
I'm Alive
:: Does Happy dance, considering the last two games ::
As for deaths: The good news is there were none, the bad news is who knows what else was going on last night.
storyteller: You were wondering why my game was not up to speed much.
Simple, the last two games I was in I was Night Killed on Night 1. If I had played in the YSI game, it would have been Night 0. I was waiting for it to happen again, and so I was not too fussed about giving it my all.
Another point. I don't really get started until Day 2, when there is more info around. And Kat's death provides plenty.
Cry Havoc and let slip the Cats of War.
|
|
|
Post by Høøpy Frøød on Mar 24, 2008 6:35:17 GMT -5
I know some of this has been brought up, but this was a post I crafted on Saturday and have been waiting until Day again to post it:
You know what disturbs me the most about the past Day's events?
Kat's claim. She was scum, but she claimed a full town profile, including a vig role. This means one of the following scenarios occurred (if you think of something in this list I haven't, feel free to add):
1) She got lucky. She guessed at a fairly obscure (I think, I'm not overly familiar with Bat-Canon and I've never heard of the guy) villian, hoping that no one else had it and couldn't counter claim her. The villian's description also fit nicely with the power of vig. She had plenty of time to research a fake claim.
2) She got not-quite-as-lucky. She guessed at a faily obscure villain, yadda, yadda, and even though that person does exist, he wasn't around to counter-claim at the time. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town.
3) The scum know a few names/roles of town. There are day powers out there, possibly scum investigators, and she knew the real Azrael was out for the rest of the day. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town.
4 & 5) Similar to 1 & 2, but with the investigative knowledge of 3. She chose a role that wasn't among the ones she knew existed, and hoped to get lucky.
6) The scum already know all the names of the town. We are playing a bastard mod game here, so it's not unlikely that this is true. (I doubt they know the roles, though. That just seems way overpowering for scum to me.) She concocted her own cover story, as no doubt all scum did, based on villians that weren't assigned already.
7) The scum don't know the names of the town, but have been given false identities, including roles, to claim with.
The best scenario for town is 2. Followed closely by 3 and 5. In each of these, the real Azrael exists and at some point could counter-claim. (Note: I'm not saying he should; at this point I don't know if the benefit outweighs the risks.)
1 is a wash. There's nothing bad about it in of itself, but it's something town is unlikely to be able to confirm, so we can't count it among the possibilities.
4 is like 1, but with the scum having investigative power.
6 and 7 suck, plain and simple.
So this means that name claims are essentially useless, unless we can confirm that the real Azrael exists. Yes, this means that both Zuma's and my claims from yesterday amount to a complete shipment of bupkis.
Furthermore, we can't even count on full role-claims to be trustworthy, since we don't know the distribution of power in this closed setup. There could be multiple doctors, multiple vigs, multiple what-have-yous. So we can't rely on counterclaims to necessarily invalidate another claim.
The only benefit claims have at this point is the ability to prove that there is only one of a given name. If two people claim the same name, one of them is lying. Of course, this means that someone claims an already taken role, and given the scenarios above, this is unlikely to happen.
Ugh! *Shakes head*
|
|
|
Post by Drain Bead on Mar 24, 2008 6:37:39 GMT -5
Having a spot of trouble with :coughs: Gastard modding there, NAF? :coughs:Don't know :coughs:what you are :coughs::coughs:talking :coughs:about. :coughs::splutter::hack::hack::curse loudly:Isn't this the gest game ever? *grumgle*
|
|
|
Post by Holy Moley! on Mar 24, 2008 6:39:32 GMT -5
I know some of this has been brought up, but this was a post I crafted on Saturday and have been waiting until Day again to post it: You know what disturbs me the most about the past Day's events? Kat's claim. She was scum, but she claimed a full town profile, including a vig role. This means one of the following scenarios occurred (if you think of something in this list I haven't, feel free to add): 1) She got lucky. She guessed at a fairly obscure (I think, I'm not overly familiar with Bat-Canon and I've never heard of the guy) villian, hoping that no one else had it and couldn't counter claim her. The villian's description also fit nicely with the power of vig. She had plenty of time to research a fake claim. 2) She got not-quite-as-lucky. She guessed at a faily obscure villain, yadda, yadda, and even though that person does exist, he wasn't around to counter-claim at the time. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town. 3) The scum know a few names/roles of town. There are day powers out there, possibly scum investigators, and she knew the real Azrael was out for the rest of the day. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town. 4 & 5) Similar to 1 & 2, but with the investigative knowledge of 3. She chose a role that wasn't among the ones she knew existed, and hoped to get lucky. 6) The scum already know all the names of the town. We are playing a bastard mod game here, so it's not unlikely that this is true. (I doubt they know the roles, though. That just seems way overpowering for scum to me.) She concocted her own cover story, as no doubt all scum did, based on villians that weren't assigned already. 7) The scum don't know the names of the town, but have been given false identities, including roles, to claim with. The best scenario for town is 2. Followed closely by 3 and 5. In each of these, the real Azrael exists and at some point could counter-claim. (Note: I'm not saying he should; at this point I don't know if the benefit outweighs the risks.) 1 is a wash. There's nothing bad about it in of itself, but it's something town is unlikely to be able to confirm, so we can't count it among the possibilities. 4 is like 1, but with the scum having investigative power. 6 and 7 suck, plain and simple. So this means that name claims are essentially useless, unless we can confirm that the real Azrael exists. Yes, this means that both Zuma's and my claims from yesterday amount to a complete shipment of bupkis. Furthermore, we can't even count on full role-claims to be trustworthy, since we don't know the distribution of power in this closed setup. There could be multiple doctors, multiple vigs, multiple what-have-yous. So we can't rely on counterclaims to necessarily invalidate another claim. The only benefit claims have at this point is the ability to prove that there is only one of a given name. If two people claim the same name, one of them is lying. Of course, this means that someone claims an already taken role, and given the scenarios above, this is unlikely to happen. Ugh! *Shakes head* I've been assuming 7 since the possibility was first brought up. I couldn't believe that the mods would allow their scum to be outed (and come on, "Batgirl"? Who'd think that wasn't a scummy name?) that easily. Kat's claim is at least negative confirmation of that for me.
|
|
|
Post by Holy Moley! on Mar 24, 2008 6:40:56 GMT -5
And one other thing - in a no vanilla game, I can't see the scum having NOBODY with an investigative power of some sort. The only question in my mind is how much is revealed. Does it reveal just the name and role, or details of how the role works?
|
|
|
Post by Hawkmod on Mar 24, 2008 7:41:29 GMT -5
I know some of this has been brought up, but this was a post I crafted on Saturday and have been waiting until Day again to post it: You know what disturbs me the most about the past Day's events? Kat's claim. She was scum, but she claimed a full town profile, including a vig role. This means one of the following scenarios occurred (if you think of something in this list I haven't, feel free to add): 1) She got lucky. She guessed at a fairly obscure (I think, I'm not overly familiar with Bat-Canon and I've never heard of the guy) villian, hoping that no one else had it and couldn't counter claim her. The villian's description also fit nicely with the power of vig. She had plenty of time to research a fake claim. 2) She got not-quite-as-lucky. She guessed at a faily obscure villain, yadda, yadda, and even though that person does exist, he wasn't around to counter-claim at the time. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town. 3) The scum know a few names/roles of town. There are day powers out there, possibly scum investigators, and she knew the real Azrael was out for the rest of the day. Though this still probably means she dies eventually, it buys her time and gives the town opportunity to lynch someone else, likely town. 4 & 5) Similar to 1 & 2, but with the investigative knowledge of 3. She chose a role that wasn't among the ones she knew existed, and hoped to get lucky. 6) The scum already know all the names of the town. We are playing a bastard mod game here, so it's not unlikely that this is true. (I doubt they know the roles, though. That just seems way overpowering for scum to me.) She concocted her own cover story, as no doubt all scum did, based on villians that weren't assigned already. 7) The scum don't know the names of the town, but have been given false identities, including roles, to claim with. The best scenario for town is 2. Followed closely by 3 and 5. In each of these, the real Azrael exists and at some point could counter-claim. (Note: I'm not saying he should; at this point I don't know if the benefit outweighs the risks.) 1 is a wash. There's nothing bad about it in of itself, but it's something town is unlikely to be able to confirm, so we can't count it among the possibilities. 4 is like 1, but with the scum having investigative power. 6 and 7 suck, plain and simple. So this means that name claims are essentially useless, unless we can confirm that the real Azrael exists. Yes, this means that both Zuma's and my claims from yesterday amount to a complete shipment of bupkis. Furthermore, we can't even count on full role-claims to be trustworthy, since we don't know the distribution of power in this closed setup. There could be multiple doctors, multiple vigs, multiple what-have-yous. So we can't rely on counterclaims to necessarily invalidate another claim. The only benefit claims have at this point is the ability to prove that there is only one of a given name. If two people claim the same name, one of them is lying. Of course, this means that someone claims an already taken role, and given the scenarios above, this is unlikely to happen. Ugh! *Shakes head* I vote for choice one and think you are being overly paranoid. Well, atleast paranoid about the wrong things. Kat clearly delayed her role claim, in retrospect, she probably used that time to create a believable alibi.
|
|
|
Post by storyteller0910 on Mar 24, 2008 8:04:24 GMT -5
OK, lessee here.
1. Because the question will be asked, and because if the scum thought about it at all last Night, I'm pretty sure they've worked this out already, I will name claim right now:
I am the best kisser in the Batman universe, if by "best" one means "most likely to kill to you:" I am Poison Ivy. I am pro-Town. I will not reveal my powers at this time.
2. Given the color relationship between our characters and the nature of our exchange yesterDay, I believe that the late, lamented Bane had the ability to take a bullet (or faceful of laughing gas) on my behalf. I do not know, and have no way of knowing, if that's what happened yesterDay, or if Koldanar was targeted on his own.
3. My analysis of the death of Bane, for what it's worth. Here's what we can intuit: The Joker is either a Vigilante or a Serial Killer, with a Day Kill ability. I believe that by targeting Koldanar (or me), he has tipped his hand and is the latter. With atarus' analysis in mind, I suppose I'll keep my mind open. However, I believe that at the present time, it is in our collective best interest to treat the Joker as a likely enemy of the Town. If I, any of the claimed Masons, or anyone we confirm as Town toDay turns up dead at the time of the lynch, we can be sure of this. It is also in the interest of the Do-Gooders, if this is the case, to help us sniff out the Joker as quickly as possible; a Day kill makes him an enormous danger with a good chance of winning the game.
4. The above aside, I'd rather not get too bogged down in hashing out who killed whom last Night. We have 37 pages of evidence from Day One with which to work, and we should get right to work on identifying scum. So I'd like to start with CatinaSuit:
Cat, as I said yesterDay, your relative quiet reads like an attempt to stay under the radar. Ordinarily, I'd interpret that as the behavior of either scum, or a strong pro-Town power role. But yesterDay, at the time of your last post, you were the vote leader. If you were a strong pro-Town power role, I'd have expected you to claim at that time if you didn't expect to be back, or certainly to have given us some indication that you were a strong pro-Town power role. That leaves me with only one interpretation - you are scum who disappeared in the hopes we'd spare you because you weren't around to claim (which, honestly, it exactly what we did). Why shouldn't I vote for you?
|
|